Sorry. I did see your original comment but completely forgot to get around to
writing a revised proposal.
-twg
Original Message
On 4 Mar 2019, 02:18, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> This is broken. As I pointed out in a previous comment on this proposal,
> rule [2591](tel:2591) no longer contains this text.
>
> Greetings,
> Ørjan.
>
> On Sun, 3 Mar [2019](tel:2019), Aris Merchant wrote:
>
>> //
>> ID: [8169](tel:8169)
>> Title: Spaceship Armour Defaults
>> Adoption index: 1.0
>> Author: twg
>> Co-authors: D Margaux, Telnaior
>>
>>
>> Amend Rule [2591](tel:2591), "Spaceships", by replacing the following:
>>
>> * Armour (an integer switch limited to values from 0 to 10
>> inclusive).
>>
>> with:
>>
>> * Armour (an integer switch limited to values from 0 to 10
>> inclusive, defaulting to 10).
>>
>> Flip to 10 the Armour of each Spaceship that, at the time of the
>> submission of this proposal, was:
>>
>> * in Sector 04 and owned by Baron von Vaderham, or;
>> * in Sector 05 and owned by twg [previously Lost & Found], or;
>> * in Sector 08 and owned by Falsifian, or;
>> * in Sector 09 and owned by Telnaior, or;
>> * in Sector 16 and owned by Telnaior [previously Lost & Found].
