Re: DIS: [FRC] Draft Judgements

2019-08-08 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 7:00 AM Kerim Aydin wrote: > On 8/8/2019 6:39 AM, Jason Cobb wrote: > > On 8/8/19 1:40 AM, Aris Merchant wrote: > >> Rule 9, by nch: > > > > > > Your Supreme Eminence, I humbly suggest that Rule 9 is INVALID due to its > > failure to contain the word "please" in the

Re: DIS: [FRC] Draft Judgements

2019-08-08 Thread Kerim Aydin
On 8/8/2019 6:39 AM, Jason Cobb wrote: > On 8/8/19 1:40 AM, Aris Merchant wrote: >> Rule 9, by nch: > > > Your Supreme Eminence, I humbly suggest that Rule 9 is INVALID due to its > failure to contain the word "please" in the first paragraph following the > opening brace, as required by Rule 6.

Re: DIS: [FRC] Draft Judgements

2019-08-08 Thread Jason Cobb
On 8/8/19 1:40 AM, Aris Merchant wrote: Rule 9, by nch: Your Supreme Eminence, I humbly suggest that Rule 9 is INVALID due to its failure to contain the word "please" in the first paragraph following the opening brace, as required by Rule 6. Worshiper of the AGORAN GODS, Jason Cobb

Re: DIS: [FRC] Draft Judgements

2019-08-08 Thread Reuben Staley
I find all these judgements very fitting, O Aris, Supreme Eminence, Pontifex Maximus! On 8/7/19 11:40 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: Anyone see any obvious errors or omissions in this? Aris Pontefix Maximus --- [Apologies for how long this took and for any errors. I've been busy for the last few