Yeah, I intended that to be part of it, but it really doesn't matter.
--
Trigon
currently on a phone
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020, 18:35 ATMunn via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 6/19/2020 7:42 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-business wrote:
> > I consent to the following
On 2020-06-19 17:57, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
So... is there anything stopping these contracts from just letting you
transfer all of our assets to yourself (besides, of course, our
limitless trust in your good nature)?
Nope! :)
--
Trigon
Treasuror of Agora; Former Speaker
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 23:55, Rebecca wrote:
> I retract that proposal and substitute this one.
>
> Title: No secret contracts
> AI: 2.5
> Text: Destroy each contract the full text of which has not been posted in
> public. If this destroyed Agora, put it back again the same as it was.
> Nobody
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:59 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On 7/24/2019 4:56 PM, Rebecca wrote:
> > Although actually, I think the "put it back exactly the same" clause means
> > that even the momentary destruction of Agora wouldn't fall afoul of the
> > higher power rules
>
> I wholly disagree,
On 7/24/2019 4:56 PM, Rebecca wrote:
Although actually, I think the "put it back exactly the same" clause means
that even the momentary destruction of Agora wouldn't fall afoul of the
higher power rules
I wholly disagree, and for historical reasons would vote against any
discontinuities
Although actually, I think the "put it back exactly the same" clause means
that even the momentary destruction of Agora wouldn't fall afoul of the
higher power rules
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 9:55 AM Rebecca wrote:
> I retract that proposal and substitute this one.
>
> Title: No secret contracts
If there's a proposal resolved immediately before this one, with a rule
change in it, the full text will not have been published at that moment.
(it may be inferred from public info, but it won't have actually have
been published).
On 7/24/2019 4:52 PM, Rebecca wrote:
I don't think so
Okay, you may be right, but it would be a lot safer to use "each", so
why don't you?
-Aris
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:52 PM Rebecca wrote:
>
> I don't think so because the full text of the Agoran ruleset has been
> posted in public, and it's the ruleset we all agree to.
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019
I don't think so because the full text of the Agoran ruleset has been
posted in public, and it's the ruleset we all agree to.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 9:43 AM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This doesn't work. It possibly tries to destroy Agora, which is
> impossible
9 matches
Mail list logo
