Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Re-renumbered Index: Proposals 8322-8341

2020-02-17 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion
Alexis wrote:
> I think I missed something. Why does broken zombie auctions mean that
> you own the zombies?

Jason already replied about eirs, but as for me, my zombie's master
switch self-ratified a while back.

-twg


Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Re-renumbered Index: Proposals 8322-8341

2020-02-17 Thread Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
On 2/17/20 6:47 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> I think I missed something. Why does broken zombie auctions mean that
> you own the zombies?


I only reset Rance's master if there was an ongoing zombie auction [0].

[0]:
https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2020-February/042184.html

-- 
Jason Cobb



Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Re-renumbered Index: Proposals 8322-8341

2020-02-17 Thread Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
On 2/17/20 6:58 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
> I only reset Rance's master if there was an ongoing zombie auction [0].


Whoops, looks like that sent twice. Sorry.

-- 
Jason Cobb



Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Re-renumbered Index: Proposals 8322-8341

2020-02-17 Thread Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
On 2/17/20 6:47 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> I think I missed something. Why does broken zombie auctions mean that
> you own the zombies?


I only reset Rance's master if there was an ongoing zombie auctino [0].

[0]:
https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2020-February/042184.html

-- 
Jason Cobb



Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Re-renumbered Index: Proposals 8322-8341

2020-02-17 Thread Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 at 12:26, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business
 wrote:
> Jason wrote:
> > Depending on how evil I was feeling as Assessor, I could probably
> > construe that has having your zombie endorse me.
>
> *sigh*
>
> I cause Bernie to retract all eir votes in Agoran decisions on whether
> to adopt a proposal that are currently in their voting periods.
>
> I cause Bernie to vote to endorse me in each Agoran decision on whether
> to adopt a proposal that is currently in its voting period.
>
> -twg

I think I missed something. Why does broken zombie auctions mean that
you own the zombies?


Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Re-renumbered Index: Proposals 8322-8341

2020-02-15 Thread Tanner Swett via agora-discussion
On Sat, Feb 15, 2020, 10:43 Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:

> Did we ever get the results from the blackjack game? I think at least
> one person won their hand.
>

Yowch, it looks like I botched sending the final result message. I've sent
that now.

—Warrigal

>


Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Re-renumbered Index: Proposals 8322-8341

2020-02-15 Thread Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 14:28, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
 wrote:
>
> On 2/14/20 2:12 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business wrote:
> >> 8323*  Jason3.0   Secure Ribbons
> > Conditional: AGAINST if Jason votes AGAINST; otherwise PRESENT.
> > Undeniably a good idea, but I can't quite bring myself to give up on
> > such a juicy scam target.
> >
>
> [Apologies if this has already been sent, but I got failure notices.]
>
> One option would be to add some special language for black ribbons,
> which would also make it clear that those are specifically for scam targets.

I agree, it would also make quite clear that black ribbons are
intended as a reward for a dictatorship at any power.


Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Re-renumbered Index: Proposals 8322-8341

2020-02-15 Thread Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
On 2/15/20 9:39 AM, Tanner Swett via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020, 14:12 Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>>> 8331j  Warrigal 1.7   Promissory cleanliness
>> Conditional: AGAINST if Warrigal votes AGAINST; otherwise PRESENT. I
>> don't object in principle, but, I mean, you didn't _have_ to set your
>> pledge's expiry date a full year in the future...
>>
> I'm more than happy to be bound by the pledge for an entire year. :D
> However, it might be convenient for the other players for the pledge to go
> away sooner than that.
>
> —Warrigal


Did we ever get the results from the blackjack game? I think at least
one person won their hand.

-- 
Jason Cobb



Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Re-renumbered Index: Proposals 8322-8341

2020-02-14 Thread sukil via agora-discussion
Woops, that should be interpreted as present, yes. Fixing by sending 
that to public forum, thanks.




El 14/02/2020 a las 16:30, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion escribió:

On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 07:31, sukil via agora-business
 wrote:

8323*  Jason3.0   Secure Ribbons

Did you intend to leave this one without a vote?