On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 4:36 PM, ehird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are these valid?
It's impossible to cast a negative number of votes. Other than that,
the ones that aren't in excess of your voting limit would appear to be
valid.
-root
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 5:44 PM, ehird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FOR*2 + FOR*-1 = FOR*1
It's not algebra. You wrote FOR*2, FOR*-1, which is shorthand for
I cast 2 votes FOR, then I cast -1 vote FOR. The first half of that
is sensible, the second is not.
-root
On 30 Sep 2008, at 19:55, ais523 wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 14:53 -0400, comex wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Geoffrey Spear
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I challenge this message's claim that it was not published by tusho.
I challenge this message's claim that it was not pubilshed
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 20:05 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 30 Sep 2008, at 19:55, ais523 wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 14:53 -0400, comex wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Geoffrey Spear
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I challenge this message's claim that it was not published by tusho.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 2:55 PM, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 14:53 -0400, comex wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I challenge this message's claim that it was not published by tusho.
I challenge this message's claim that
On 30 Sep 2008, at 20:47, ais523 wrote:
Actually I posted that to a-d deliberately, it was a bit too frivolous
for the Public Forum IMO. (It was partly an illusion to the
spoon-discussion memes that blow up out of nowhere in B every now and
then, such as players signing messages in s-d as from
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 15:37 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 2:55 PM, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 14:53 -0400, comex wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I challenge this message's claim that it was
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 10:53:00 pm Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Ben Caplan wrote:
5731 D 0 3.0 Goethe Loss of Privileges
AGAINST. Still feels rough around the edges.
How can something be rough that was part of Agora for at least 10
years? -G.
If the fitted
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Ben Caplan wrote:
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 10:53:00 pm Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Ben Caplan wrote:
5731 D 0 3.0 Goethe Loss of Privileges
AGAINST. Still feels rough around the edges.
How can something be rough that was part of Agora for
9 matches
Mail list logo
