On Sat, 2013-12-14 at 23:03 -0500, omd wrote:
> Well, it would make scams easier if the scamster waits for a
> (historically fairly rare, but not unheard of) period of mass apathy,
> such as the current one. Not the end of the world.
Especially as apathetic periods are the ones most likely to ben
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> It shouldn't make scams easier unless there's widespread disinterest in
> a distribution. In fact, the rule would provide an incentive to vote (so
> as to prevent the following distribution being used for a voting scam).
Well, it would make sc
On Sun, 15 Dec 2013, Alex Smith wrote:
It shouldn't make scams easier unless there's widespread disinterest in
a distribution. In fact, the rule would provide an incentive to vote (so
as to prevent the following distribution being used for a voting scam).
I imagine it could scammably amplify b
On Sat, 2013-12-14 at 22:20 -0500, omd wrote:
> This can potentially make quorum negative; I guess this is not
> inherently wrong, but it seems odd. Also likely to make scams easier
> in some cases, which, it being you, I'm sure is purposeful...
I made a conscious decision not to think too much a
4 matches
Mail list logo
