NttPF.
I'm not _trying_ to catch you out, I promise...
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On August 4, 2018 5:24 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
> Oh come on. That's cruel.
>
> I withdraw my proposal entitled "Revamping movement v3.1" if possible.
>
> I submit and pend the following proposal.
>
Oh come on. That's cruel.
I withdraw my proposal entitled "Revamping movement v3.1" if possible.
I submit and pend the following proposal.
-
Title: Revamping movement v3.2
AI: 1
Author: Trigon
Co-authors: twg, Aris, G., Corona
Amend rule 2003 "Actions in Arcadia" by replacing its text
Sorry, only just noticed this - you changed "force-feed" to "feed" in one place
but missed the other occurrence.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On August 4, 2018 5:16 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
> I feel I've given ample time to submit notes on this version.
>
> I withdraw my proposal
> G.
I believe this is implied by R2509, but I have added a provision in the
case that it's not.
> Aris
That is a valid concern. The reason it is the way it is now is simply
that I thought it was funny to include excessively ridiculous words.
Nevertheless, I have changed it in the below
With G.'s suggestion, this looks pretty great content-wise. I would request
that you change "force-feed" to "feed", though, because the real world
contexts where the former occurs are somewhat upsetting.
-Aris
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 10:10 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> This reads really clearly
This reads really clearly and I like it this way around. Minor edit:
capitalize the CAN and add to that sentence "if it would not reduce eir
EP below 0"? (Not sure if it's implied anyway, better safe than sorry?)
On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
> I believe this institutes a clear
I believe this institutes a clear cause-and-effect. Please notify me if
it doesn't, G..
Title: Revamping movement v3
AI: 1
Author: Trigon
Co-authors:
Amend rule 2003 "Actions in Arcadia" by replacing its text with:
Energy Points (abbreviated EP) is an untracked natural player
I'd prefer the shorter version ("I move to (x, y)), as that decreases the
potential for mistakes by automatically using the correct amount of
resources.
On Wednesday, August 1, 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> In adding the switch layer you need to put in a "by announcement" somewhere
> as it's
In adding the switch layer you need to put in a "by announcement" somewhere
as it's no longer implied as it is with payments/fees.
It's also a but unclear on cause and effect - do people decrease their EP to
cause
movement, or move and as a result have their EP decrease - This affects
I added some more shorthand and made the changes suggested. Somehow I
know I've messed up something, though, so I'm not pending it just yet.
Title: Revamping movement v2
AI: 1
Author: Trigon
Co-authors:
Amend rule 2003 "Actions in Arcadia" by replacing its text with:
Energy Points
I'm sorry for my lack of clarity. The proposal currently says "Players
can destroy one apple to increase eir...". Players is plural, whereas
eir is singular, so they do not agree in number. You could change eir
to their, but I was suggesting that it might be clearer to make the
subject singular.
Can you explain this? I don't understand what you're saying I should to.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018, 18:00 Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A playercan destroy... Eir is singular, and you're really talking about one
> player at a time anyway.
>
> -Aris
>
> On Tue, Jul 31,
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018, 17:20 Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> Doesn't include G.'s land grants (proposal 8064).
>
Darn. I kept reminding myself I had to include that in the proposal while
writing it up but I just didn't do it. Aaaah, this is why I can't trust
myself to immediately pend stuff.
Also,
13 matches
Mail list logo
