On May 30, 2009, at 1:48 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I intend to deputise for the Herald to announce that OscarMeyr became
Speaker on 20 May 2009.
Oscar, or anyone deputizing if Oscar fails to do so: I believe the
Respectfully, my nickname is OscarMeyr, not Oscar. Take a
Benjamin Schultz wrote:
On May 30, 2009, at 1:48 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I intend to deputise for the Herald to announce that OscarMeyr became
Speaker on 20 May 2009.
Oscar, or anyone deputizing if Oscar fails to do so: I believe the
Respectfully, my nickname is
Sean Hunt wrote:
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I intend to deputise for the Herald to announce that OscarMeyr became
Speaker on 20 May 2009.
Oscar, or anyone deputizing if Oscar fails to do so: I believe the
current MWoPs are myself, ais523, root, yourself, and Wooble. Note that
Canada being awarded
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
at OscarMeyr became
Speaker on 20 May 2009.
Canada is a player, and an active one at that.
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
at OscarMeyr became
Speaker on 20 May 2009.
Canada is a player, and an active one at that.
It is a person; I'm not aware of it ever becoming
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I accept this nomination. I also predict that Taral will decline (or
at least not accept) eirs, as IIRC e ran away screaming the last time
e was so nominated.
Eh, if Murphy wants it, e can have it. Murphy?
--
Taral [EMAIL
Taral wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I accept this nomination. I also predict that Taral will decline (or
at least not accept) eirs, as IIRC e ran away screaming the last time
e was so nominated.
Eh, if Murphy wants it, e can have it. Murphy?
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 10:47 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I intend to deputise for the CotC to:
* Recuse the appeals panel on CFJ 2213a
* Recuse the appeals panel on CFJ 2203a
* Recuse the appeals panel on CFJ
On Sunday 25 November 2007 13:32:11 comex wrote:
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
I intend to deputise for the CotC in the assignment of criminal case
1804. The time limit for assignment runs out in nearly 24 hours, so 48
hours after my declaration of intent, I will be
On Sunday 25 November 2007 15:14:53 Ed Murphy wrote:
pikhq wrote:
On Sunday 25 November 2007 13:32:11 comex wrote:
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
I intend to deputise for the CotC in the assignment of criminal case
1804. The time limit for assignment runs out in
On Sunday 25 November 2007 15:26:28 comex wrote:
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
Finally, if my above deputisation goes through, I intend to nominate
Murphy as CotC.
You don't need to do that dependently.
I don't want the nomination to occur until I deputise for
On 10/31/07, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
comex wrote:
Actually, I'm not even sure if either of the deputisations will work. The
CotC isn't obligated to assign cases to me (just to someone), and
deputisation isn't clear on whether I can deputise with an argument (if
not then I'd
comex wrote:
I CFJ on the following:
A worthwhile CFJ from comex. With cogent arguments, even. Will wonders
never cease?
While it seems that the CotC is indirectly required to perform that action
(else he can't assign any judges, which he is required to do),
This is slightly wrong. The
On Wednesday 31 October 2007, Taral wrote:
Well, I guess this works as well as the original attempt. However,
it's likely to hit you with 10,000 violations of Rule 1871.
I'm not sure about that. R1871 only says that the *CotC* SHALL NOT do
this. However, I think it's more likely that it
comex wrote:
On Wednesday 31 October 2007, Taral wrote:
Well, I guess this works as well as the original attempt. However,
it's likely to hit you with 10,000 violations of Rule 1871.
I'm not sure about that. R1871 only says that the *CotC* SHALL NOT do
this. However, I think it's more
15 matches
Mail list logo
