Juniper wrote:
Query: This report lists my lateness as !!! - but Simplifior was only
enacted in the past 24 hrs, right? Am I misinterpreting something in
this report?
Yeah, the 'offices' table in the database doesn't track how recently an
office was created (it's available in the event history
ais523 via agora-discussion [2024-06-24 03:08]:
> On Mon, 2024-06-24 at 11:50 +1000, Matt Smyth via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > Query: This report lists my lateness as !!! - but Simplifior was only
> > enacted in the past 24 hrs, right? Am I misinterpreting something in
> > this report?
>
> My g
On Mon, 2024-06-24 at 11:50 +1000, Matt Smyth via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Query: This report lists my lateness as !!! - but Simplifior was only
> enacted in the past 24 hrs, right? Am I misinterpreting something in
> this report?
My guess is that the report is automatically generated, and the
au
Trigon wrote:
On 10/31/20 11:45 AM, Edward Murphy via agora-official wrote:
Office Report Last Published Late
Coopor Barrels, Bargains 2020-10-01
Herald Pa
ATMunn wrote:
On 7/12/2020 12:21 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-official wrote:
OFFICES
Office Holder[1] Since Last Election
Notary ATMunn 2020-06-07 2020-06-15
Not a CoE because
yet another unintuitive way this switch works (but yes e gets 2 extra votes
on econ proposals)
Btw Notice of Honour
+1 Trigon for a really tough report in a crazy week
-1 Murphy, I actually am upset that you stole ADoP from me on a
technicality despite the fact that I won two elections for it.
O
On 2020-07-06 18:34, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
On 7/2/2020 8:38 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-official wrote:
INTERESTS
-
Office Interest
[snip]
Treasuror Economy, Economy
I get that
On 7/6/2020 8:36 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
On 7/6/20 8:34 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
On 7/2/2020 8:38 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-official wrote:
INTERESTS
-
Office Interest
---
On 7/6/20 8:34 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 7/2/2020 8:38 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-official wrote:
>> INTERESTS
>> -
>>
>> Office Interest
>>
> [snip]
>> Treasuror Economy, Econom
On 11/3/19 10:51 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
Only a comment, since this isn't self-ratifying: ais523 is only a
player if CFJ 3776 is judged TRUE.
Sorry, ais523 is only a /candidate/ if CFJ 3776 is judged TRUE.
--
Jason Cobb
Not to the public forum
Jason Cobb
On 6/17/19 8:09 AM, Rebecca wrote:
CoE: there is no astronomor or clork post te sidegame suspension act
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 7:18 PM Edward Murphy wrote:
=Metareport=
You can find an up-to-date version of this report at
http://zenith.homelinux.n
On Sun, 27 Jan 2019, Edward Murphy wrote:
I transfer a kudo from myself (for overlooking this) to twg (for
pointing it out).
That takes me back. But it's all about karma nowadays. Which is probably
a bit more flexible.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Sun, 4 Nov 2018, ATMunn wrote:
For some reason, this showed up as a separate email for me. For a second I
missed the "DIS: Re:" and thought you were trying to publish an ADoP report.
Hm, I don't recall doing anything out of the ordinary for that message.
I deleted the copy I got back from
For some reason, this showed up as a separate email for me. For a second
I missed the "DIS: Re:" and thought you were trying to publish an ADoP
report.
On 11/4/2018 8:39 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
On Sun, 4 Nov 2018, Edward Murphy wrote:
[twg intended to deputise for Referee on Nov 1, though
On Fri, 23 Mar 2018, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 1:20 PM, Aris Merchant <
> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > We really need a Rulekeepor. It's probably the most important office on
> > that list. Gaelan, are you interested in taking that on again?
> >
> >
>
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 1:20 PM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We really need a Rulekeepor. It's probably the most important office on
> that list. Gaelan, are you interested in taking that on again?
>
>
Once (or n-ce) upon a time, the Speaker was the backup for all
I’m a bit swamped with schoolwork at the moment, but I’ll deputize if I get a
chance.
Gaelan
> On Mar 19, 2018, at 10:20 AM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>
> We really need a Rulekeepor. It's probably the most important office on
> that list. Gaelan, are you interested in taking that on again?
>
We really need a Rulekeepor. It's probably the most important office on
that list. Gaelan, are you interested in taking that on again?
-Aris
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 8:51 AM Edward Murphy wrote:
> G. wrote:
>
> >> Prime Minister*(vacant) 2018-02-28[2] (ongoing)
>
> Notice of Honour: +1 G.
G. wrote:
On Sun, 11 Feb 2018, Edward Murphy wrote:
ArbitorMurphy 2018-01-28(ongoing) 2
Did someone re-start this election after winning it? This is one
that was confusing me earlier.
No, that's incorrect data, will fix shortly.
ATMunn wrote:
You do realize, by the way, that the all the tildes (~) are supposed to
be dashes (-), right?
The tildes were a joke for the Christmas report.
I mean, if you like this way better, that's fine, but reports usually
use dashes instead. :P
I hadn't, no, I was just maintaining (wha
sshhh both reports are now late but i wanted to report on last week
and not trickle over to this one.
my reporting is so bad *facepalm*.
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
> Yes, but the report is based on the effective date.
>
> Publius Scribonius Scho
Yes, but the report is based on the effective date.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Oct 1, 2017, at 8:49 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
>
> Except it *is* late now because it's October.
>
> On Sun, 1 Oct 2017 at 20:42 VJ Rada wrote:
> Notably this makes
Now that I'm also not on my phone, arguments: VJ's message does not explain
the scope and nature of the perceived error, as required by rule 2201 to
make a claim of error.
On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 at 17:02 VJ Rada wrote:
> Of course you did. Yep. I'm on phone now, I'll see about it later.
>
> On Sund
Of course you did. Yep. I'm on phone now, I'll see about it later.
On Sunday, October 1, 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> I CFJ (with AP): in the below-quoted message, V.J. Rada issued a claim of
> error.
>
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2017, 08:41 VJ Rada, > wrote:
>
>> CoE this is bugging me.
>>
>>
>> On Sat,
Rule 2143, penultimate paragraph.
With tongue firmly in cheek,
-o
> On Sep 23, 2017, at 9:46 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
>
> Quazie's tables were worse, so I assumed it didn't matter. I can make
> more of an effort next week.
>
> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
>> On Sat, 23 S
Quazie's tables were worse, so I assumed it didn't matter. I can make
more of an effort next week.
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
>
>> ===Metareport===
>
>
> Your tables are horribly misaligned. I suggest using a programming editor
>
I meant in the technical sense - should I make a claim of error, and if so,
what is the nature of the error?
I can’t see any reason simple duplication wouldn’t be formally acceptable, even
if it is messy, but the ratification parts of the rules aren’t my forté.
-o
> On Jun 26, 2017, at 11:33 P
Gah - i'll republish the single correct body shortly
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 20:31 Owen Jacobson wrote:
> Is the duplicated report body an error?
>
> -o
>
> On Jun 26, 2017, at 9:05 PM, Quazie wrote:
>
> See https://agoranomic.github.io/ADoP/ for past, current, and future
> reports.
>
> <---
NttPF
-Aris
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
> Well, I will CoE. CoE: The speaker is not electable.
>
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Nic Evans wro
Well, I will CoE. CoE: The speaker is not electable.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Nic Evans wrote:
> > Minor mistake here: The speaker is not 'Electable' due to
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Nic Evans wrote:
> Minor mistake here: The speaker is not 'Electable' due to its nature.
> Since that's not a required field, I don't think I need to resubmit but
> feel free to CoE if I do.
>
CFJ 1420 applies here (it says that even informal sections of reports
s
31 matches
Mail list logo
