Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3773 assigned to Murphy
On 9/11/19 5:12 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: Gratuitous: Since spaaace was repealed before the date on the Evil Astronomor report, this is definitely not PARADOXICAL as I originally intended it to be (whether or not it would even been otherwise). Whether that makes TRUE or FALSE is something I don't feel qualified to answer, though... -twg Gratuitous: it's possible that simply publishing information that claims to be about the future could be construed as a violation of R2471 or R2143, regardless of whether the information ends up being accurate. -- Jason Cobb
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3773 assigned to Murphy
On 9/11/2019 5:12 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > Gratuitous: Since spaaace was repealed before the date on the Evil > Astronomor report, this is definitely not PARADOXICAL as I originally > intended it to be (whether or not it would even been otherwise). Whether > that makes TRUE or FALSE is something I don't feel qualified to answer, > though... I would guess that something claiming to be a report of future conditions just isn't a report, because it's impossible to report on the future (there are some precedents that combine to lead to this, but I'll leave that fun, or whatever other approach, to Judge Murphy...) -G.
