Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Regkeepor] ACORN

I've seriously considered proposing the repeal of the regulations system, now that we've given them a chance. However, there are several tasks, such as tournaments, for which they seem the appropriate device. I'd favor simplifying them down and merging them into your responsibilities as Notary,

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Regkeepor] ACORN

Oh, my, this is getting interesting. We'll just have to see how the judge rules. -Aris On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:41 PM Ned Strange wrote: > So I do just want to respond to that. > [quote]The Promulgator of a regulation is an officer, not a person[/quote] > The term

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Regkeepor] ACORN

So I do just want to respond to that. [quote]The Promulgator of a regulation is an officer, not a person[/quote] The term "officer" is defined by rule 1006 as "the holder of an office". The holder of an office is a person who holds it at a particular time. Rule 1006 also states that "If the holder

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Regkeepor] ACORN

Arguments (partly quoted from above): The Promulgator of a regulation is an officer, not a person. In this case, the Promulgator is the Notary, not o. o only promulgated the regulation in eir persona as Notary, which has now passed to you. I therefore believe that V.J. Rada has the power to

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Regkeepor] ACORN

I disagree. The Promulgator of a regulation is an officer, not a person. In this case, the Promulgator is the Notary, not o. o only promulgated the regulation in eir persona as Notary, which has now passed to you. I therefore believe that you have the power to repeal the regulation. -Aris On

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Regkeepor] ACORN

Do other people believe my interpretation is correct? On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 5:07 PM, Ned Strange wrote: > The Regulations rule states that "Regulations may be repealed by their > promulgator". o. was the promulgator of the regulation you refer to, so I > believe I

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Regkeepor] ACORN

The Regulations rule states that "Regulations may be repealed by their promulgator". o. was the promulgator of the regulation you refer to, so I believe I cannot repeal or amend that Regulation. On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 5:59 PM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun,

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Regkeepor] ACORN

It remains a regulation until the Notary repeals it, which e hasn't done. -Aris On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 5:46 PM Ned Strange wrote: > " > The following contracts are exempt from paying sustenance payments, > until the date specified: > > * Order of the Occult Hand,

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Regkeepor] ACORN

I don't think e ever resolved the intent. -Aris On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 6:29 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > Didn't o promulgate a regulation setting the weekly contract limit at 3? > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Aris Merchant > wrote: >> The

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Regkeepor] ACORN

ah ok, ty On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > It's a report of all regulations. Regulations are intended as a way to > grant power under the rules to officers. They were enacted partly at > the request of a few players, who wished to use

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Regkeepor] ACORN

It's a report of all regulations. Regulations are intended as a way to grant power under the rules to officers. They were enacted partly at the request of a few players, who wished to use them for game systems they were working on. Those systems didn't go anywhere, so right now regulations don't