What if you want to use a d10? That's not a platonic solid.
On 5/31/2018 10:05 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jun 2018, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
Because it would be easy to change the result probabilities in this way, I
don't think this satisfies "SHOULD use a method for which the final
On June 1, 2018 1:06 AM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> - The message would be forwarded by you, but then there would need to be
>
> a way to verify not just that server message but also that you
>
> hadn't made any other similar requests.
Thinking idly: A way
On Fri, 1 Jun 2018, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> Because it would be easy to change the result probabilities in this way, I
> don't think this satisfies "SHOULD use a method for which the final
> probability distribution can be readily confirmed".
I personally consider this a very weak SHOULD. We
On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 03:06 +0200, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> I'm not sure there's a way to do it perfectly with fewer than three
> messages to the lists (although I think a-d might suffice for two of
> them) without significant added features in the dice server:
>
> * To avoid an initial message,
On Thu, 31 May 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
1. I forget to put the prefix one time and someone complains about it. Nice.
Well sorry, you're not the first one. Straws, camels, and another quibble
to bundle it with.
2. The best idea I have is sending the message directly to a-o. If you have
1. I forget to put the prefix one time and someone complains about it. Nice.
2. The best idea I have is sending the message directly to a-o. If you have
any better ideas, let me know. If it's convenient for me, I'll do it.
On Thu, May 31, 2018, 18:37 Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> (1) This seems
6 matches
Mail list logo
