On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 12:57 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> Oops, forgot something... I withdraw my most recent CFJ.
>
>
> I CFJ on: In a message dated Mon, 22 May 2017 15:31:30 -0400,
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus initiated an Agoran
> Decision.
I think I missed this earlier?
On Wed, 2017-05-24 at 01:05 +, Quazie wrote:
> I CFJ on the statement: I paid Gaelan 1 Shiney via QPS.
This is CFJ 3512. I assign it to Sprocklem.
> Arguments:
> 1 - QPS isn't a valid agency, as it contains 4 non-conjunction words.
> (Will
> is a verb, not a conjunction)
> 2 - Agencies allow
On Tue, 2017-05-23 at 20:51 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> I CFJ on the following statement:
>
> Posting a message on a public forum is itself an action, for
> the purposes of rule 2467.
This is CFJ 3511. I assign it to Gaelan.
> Caller’s evidence:
>
> > Rule 2467/1 (Agencies)
> >
> > An
On Tue, 2017-05-23 at 20:09 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> I CFJ on the following statement, barring Publius Scribonius
> Scholasticus:
>
> In the last seven days, I conditionally paid Publius Scribonius
> Scholasticus 20 shinies on three separate occasions.
This is CFJ 3510. I assign it to
On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 19:20 -0700, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> I CFJ on these statements:
>
> “Any player may take the office of Rulekeepor with 2 support.” [i.e.
> I got a pink slip]
> “o committed a cardable offense in issuing a Pink Slip to Gaelan.”
>
> I bar o from both CFJs.
These are CFJ 3508
I claim that the most recent Secretary’s weekly report contains an error: it
omits a payment between Quazie and Gaelan. I accept this claim and retract the
report, and publish the following correction in its place.
Secretary's Weekly Report
Date of this report: Sun, 21 May 2017
Date of last
6 matches
Mail list logo
