This time to the official forum:
On 2/24/20 1:39 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote: > RESOLUTION OF PROPOSALS 8322-8341 > ================================= > > I hereby resolve the Agoran decisions to adopt the below proposals. > > The quorum for all below decisions was 6. > > Voting Strengths > ================ > Strength is 3 unless otherwise noted. > $: player has voting strength 4 > %: player has voting strength 5 > ^: player has voting strength 6 > &: player has voting strength 7 > *: player has voting strength 8 > +: player has voting strength 9 > > PROPOSALS > ========= > PROPOSAL 8322 (Unrepetition v1.1) > CLASS: DEMOCRATIC > FOR (7): Aris, Bernie, Falsifian, Jason$, Murphy, Rance, twg > AGAINST (0): > PRESENT (3): Alexis, Warrigal, sukil > BALLOTS: 10 > AI (F/A): 22/0 (AI=3.0) > OUTCOME: ADOPTED > [ > Bernie: Endorsement of twg > Rance: Endorsement of Jason > twg: Endorsement of Falsifian > ] > > PROPOSAL 8323 (Secure Ribbons) > CLASS: DEMOCRATIC > FOR (9): Alexis, Aris, Cuddle Beam, Falsifian, G., Jason$, Murphy, Rance, o > AGAINST (0): > PRESENT (4): Bernie, Warrigal, sukil, twg > BALLOTS: 13 > AI (F/A): 28/0 (AI=3.0) > OUTCOME: ADOPTED > [ > Bernie: Endorsement of twg > Falsifian: Endorsement of Jason > Rance: Endorsement of Jason > twg: Conditional resolved: Jason did not vote AGAINST > ] > > PROPOSAL 8324 (Democratic unassignment) > CLASS: ORDINARY > CHAMBER: LEGISLATION > FOR (8): Aris%, Bernie, Falsifian, Jason*, Murphy, Rance, Warrigal, twg% > AGAINST (0): > PRESENT (2): Alexis, sukil > BALLOTS: 10 > AI (F/A): 33/0 (AI=2.0) > OUTCOME: ADOPTED > [ > Bernie: Endorsement of twg > Rance: Endorsement of Jason > twg: Endorsement of Falsifian > ] > > PROPOSAL 8325 (Inflation Vote) > CLASS: ORDINARY > CHAMBER: ECONOMY > FOR (4): Aris, Cuddle Beam, Falsifian, Murphy > AGAINST (5): Alexis, G., Jason$, Rance, o > PRESENT (4): Bernie, Warrigal, sukil, twg+ > BALLOTS: 13 > AI (F/A): 12/16 (AI=2.0) > OUTCOME: REJECTED > [ > Bernie: Endorsement of twg > Rance: Endorsement of Jason > twg: Conditional resolved: Falsifian did not vote AGAINST > ] > > PROPOSAL 8326 (Attempted cleanup) > CLASS: DEMOCRATIC > FOR (11): Alexis, Aris, Bernie, Cuddle Beam, Falsifian, Jason$, Murphy, > Rance, Warrigal, sukil, twg > AGAINST (2): G., o > PRESENT (0): > BALLOTS: 13 > AI (F/A): 34/6 (AI=3.0) > OUTCOME: ADOPTED > [ > Bernie: Endorsement of twg > Rance: Endorsement of Jason > twg: Endorsement of Falsifian > ] > > PROPOSAL 8327 (Blink test v1.2) > CLASS: ORDINARY > CHAMBER: LEGISLATION > FOR (8): Alexis, Aris%, Bernie, Cuddle Beam, Falsifian, Murphy, Warrigal, twg% > AGAINST (3): G., o, sukil > PRESENT (2): Jason*, Rance > BALLOTS: 13 > AI (F/A): 28/9 (AI=1.0) > OUTCOME: ADOPTED > [ > Bernie: Endorsement of twg > Falsifian: Conditional resolved: no Notice of Veto was published > Rance: Endorsement of Jason > twg: Endorsement of Falsifian > ] > > PROPOSAL 8328 (The Eternal Sprit) > CLASS: DEMOCRATIC > FOR (7): Aris, Bernie, Cuddle Beam, Falsifian, Murphy, Warrigal, twg > AGAINST (4): Alexis, G., o, sukil > PRESENT (2): Jason$, Rance > BALLOTS: 13 > AI (F/A): 21/12 (AI=3.0) > OUTCOME: REJECTED > [ > Bernie: Endorsement of twg > Rance: Endorsement of Jason > twg: Endorsement of Falsifian > ] > > PROPOSAL 8329 (RtRW Reschedule) > CLASS: ORDINARY > CHAMBER: PARTICIPATION > FOR (7): Alexis%, Bernie, Cuddle Beam, Jason^, Rance, sukil, twg& > AGAINST (4): Aris, G., Warrigal, o > PRESENT (2): Falsifian, Murphy > BALLOTS: 13 > AI (F/A): 30/12 (AI=1.0) > OUTCOME: ADOPTED > [ > Bernie: Endorsement of twg > Falsifian: Conditional resolved: no Notice of Veto was published > Rance: Endorsement of Jason > twg: Endorsement of Alexis > ] > > PROPOSAL 8330 (No looting white ribbons) > CLASS: DEMOCRATIC > FOR (7): Alexis, Aris, Falsifian, Jason$, Murphy, Rance, Warrigal > AGAINST (0): > PRESENT (3): Bernie, sukil, twg > BALLOTS: 10 > AI (F/A): 22/0 (AI=3.0) > OUTCOME: ADOPTED > [ > Bernie: Inextricable: Endorsement of twg > Rance: Endorsement of Jason > twg: Inextricable: Endorsement of non-voter G. > ] > > PROPOSAL 8331 (Promissory cleanliness) > CLASS: ORDINARY > CHAMBER: JUSTICE > FOR (7): Alexis, Aris, Falsifian, Jason$, Murphy, Rance, Warrigal > AGAINST (0): > PRESENT (3): Bernie, sukil, twg& > BALLOTS: 10 > AI (F/A): 22/0 (AI=1.7) > OUTCOME: ADOPTED > [ > Bernie: Endorsement of twg > Rance: Endorsement of Jason > twg: Conditional resolved: Warrigal did not vote AGAINST > ] > > PROPOSAL 8332 (Switch Responsibility Responsibility) > CLASS: ORDINARY > CHAMBER: EFFICIENCY > FOR (3): Alexis, Warrigal, sukil > AGAINST (5): Aris, Bernie, Jason^, Rance, twg% > PRESENT (2): Falsifian%, Murphy% > BALLOTS: 10 > AI (F/A): 9/20 (AI=1.0) > OUTCOME: REJECTED > [ > Bernie: Endorsement of twg > Falsifian: Conditional resolved: no Notice of Veto was published > Rance: Endorsement of Jason > ] > > PROPOSAL 8333 (Meaningful extra votes) > CLASS: ORDINARY > CHAMBER: LEGISLATION > FOR (3): Alexis, Murphy, Warrigal > AGAINST (6): Aris%, Bernie, Falsifian, Jason*, Rance, twg% > PRESENT (1): sukil > BALLOTS: 10 > AI (F/A): 9/27 (AI=2.0) > OUTCOME: REJECTED > [ > Bernie: Endorsement of twg > Falsifian: Endorsement of twg: Conditional resolved: no Notice of Veto was > published > Rance: Endorsement of Jason > ] > > PROPOSAL 8334 (Meaningless extra coins) > CLASS: ORDINARY > CHAMBER: ECONOMY > FOR (5): Alexis, Cuddle Beam, Murphy, Warrigal, sukil > AGAINST (8): Aris, Bernie, Falsifian, G., Jason$, Rance, o, twg+ > PRESENT (0): > BALLOTS: 13 > AI (F/A): 15/31 (AI=2.0) > OUTCOME: REJECTED > [ > Bernie: Endorsement of twg > Rance: Endorsement of Jason > ] > > PROPOSAL 8335 (Consistent ADoP duties) > CLASS: ORDINARY > CHAMBER: EFFICIENCY > FOR (2): Warrigal, sukil > AGAINST (6): Alexis, Aris, Bernie, Jason^, Rance, twg% > PRESENT (2): Falsifian%, Murphy% > BALLOTS: 10 > AI (F/A): 6/23 (AI=2.0) > OUTCOME: REJECTED > [ > Bernie: Endorsement of twg > Rance: Endorsement of Jason > ] > > PROPOSAL 8336 (Define "publicly") > CLASS: DEMOCRATIC > FOR (10): Alexis, Aris, Bernie, Falsifian, Jason$, Murphy, Rance, Warrigal, > sukil, twg > AGAINST (0): > PRESENT (0): > BALLOTS: 10 > AI (F/A): 31/0 (AI=3.0) > OUTCOME: ADOPTED > [ > Bernie: Endorsement of twg > Falsifian: Endorsement of Jason > Rance: Endorsement of Jason > twg: Endorsement of Jason > ] > > PROPOSAL 8337 (Fix Auctions) > CLASS: ORDINARY > CHAMBER: ECONOMY > FOR (3): Aris, Murphy, Warrigal > AGAINST (4): Alexis, Bernie, Falsifian, twg+ > PRESENT (3): Jason$, Rance, sukil > BALLOTS: 10 > AI (F/A): 9/18 (AI=1.0) > OUTCOME: REJECTED > [ > Bernie: Endorsement of twg > Rance: Endorsement of Jason > ] > > PROPOSAL 8338 (Clarify quorum (option 1)) > CLASS: ORDINARY > CHAMBER: LEGISLATION > FOR (9): Alexis, Aris%, Bernie, Falsifian, Jason*, Murphy, Rance, Warrigal, > twg% > AGAINST (1): sukil > PRESENT (0): > BALLOTS: 10 > AI (F/A): 36/3 (AI=2.0) > OUTCOME: ADOPTED > [ > Bernie: Endorsement of twg > Rance: Endorsement of Jason > twg: Endorsement of Murphy > ] > > PROPOSAL 8339 (Clarify quorum (option 2)) > CLASS: ORDINARY > CHAMBER: LEGISLATION > FOR (0): > AGAINST (7): Alexis, Aris%, Falsifian, Jason*, Rance, Warrigal, sukil > PRESENT (3): Bernie, Murphy, twg% > BALLOTS: 10 > AI (F/A): 0/28 (AI=2.0) > OUTCOME: REJECTED > [ > Bernie: Endorsement of twg > Rance: Endorsement of Jason > Warrigal: Proposal 8338 has sufficient votes to be adopted > twg: Conditional resolved: Murphy did not vote AGAINST > ] > > PROPOSAL 8340 (The Paradox of Self-Appointment) > CLASS: ORDINARY > CHAMBER: PARTICIPATION > FOR (8): Alexis%, Aris, Bernie, Cuddle Beam, Falsifian, Murphy, Warrigal, twg& > AGAINST (2): G., o > PRESENT (3): Jason^, Rance, sukil > BALLOTS: 13 > AI (F/A): 30/6 (AI=1.0) > OUTCOME: ADOPTED > [ > Bernie: Endorsement of twg > Falsifian: Endorsement of Alexis: Conditional resolved: no Notice of Veto was > published > Rance: Endorsement of Jason > twg: Endorsement of Alexis > ] > > PROPOSAL 8341 (Support of the Person) > CLASS: DEMOCRATIC > FOR (2): Alexis, Falsifian > AGAINST (4): Aris, Bernie, sukil, twg > PRESENT (4): Jason$, Murphy, Rance, Warrigal > BALLOTS: 10 > AI (F/A): 6/12 (AI=3.0) > OUTCOME: REJECTED > [ > Bernie: Endorsement of twg > Falsifian: Endorsement of Alexis > Rance: Endorsement of Jason > ] > > The full text of each ADOPTED proposal is included below: > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8322 > Title: Unrepetition v1.1 > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Falsifian > Co-authors: Alexis, twg > > > For each of Proposals 8287-8307, if the proposal took effect more than > once, then any changes to rule text caused by the second and later > times the proposal took effect are considered "extra" for the purposes > of this proposal. > > Reverse all such "extra" changes, in the reverse of the order in which > they occurred. > > [Comment: See > https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-discussion/2020-February/056587.html > for context. I think the changes this undoes are relatively benign, > but it's nice to have certainty about the state of the ruleset.] > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8323 > Title: Secure Ribbons > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Jason > Co-authors: > > > Amend Rule 2438 (Ribbons) by replacing the text "Ribbon Ownership is a > person switch" with the text "Ribbon Ownership is a secured person switch". > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8324 > Title: Democratic unassignment > Adoption index: 2.0 > Author: Falsifian > Co-authors: > > > If Proposal 8320 (Promotorial Assignment) has been adopted, then amend > the rule entitled "Proposal Chambers" by replacing "If a proposal in > the Proposal Pool has its chamber unset" with "If the chamber of an > ordinary proposal in the Proposal Pool is unset". > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8326 > Title: Attempted cleanup > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Falsifian > Co-authors: > > > Repeal Rule 2604 ("Nothing to see here, Rule 1030,") and Rule 2600 ("Boo!!"). > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8327 > Title: Blink test v1.2 > Adoption index: 1.0 > Author: Falsifian > Co-authors: > > > Amend Rule 2601 to read in full: > > If this is the only paragraph in this rule, and it has been at > least one week since this rule was last amended, then any player > CAN Close the Eye by announcement. When that happens, this rule > repeals itself. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8329 > Title: RtRW Reschedule > Adoption index: 1.0 > Author: Alexis > Co-authors: > > > Amend Rule 2327 (Read the Ruleset Week) by adding the following paragraph: > { > The above notwithstanding, due to serious uncertainty surrounding the > state of the rules during the scheduled Read the Ruleset Week, in the > year 2020, Read the Ruleset Week is, instead, the week of February 24 > - March 1 > } > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8330 > Title: No looting white ribbons > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: G. > Co-authors: > > > Amend Rule 2438 (Ribbons) by replacing: > A player who has been registered for at least 30 days > and has never caused another person to gain a White Ribbon > (including under a previous ruleset) CAN award a White Ribbon to > another person by announcement. > with: > A player who has been registered for at least 30 days > and has never acted on eir own behalf to cause another person to > gain a White Ribbon (including under a previous ruleset) CAN act > on eir own behalf to award a White Ribbon to another person by > announcement. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8331 > Title: Promissory cleanliness > Adoption index: 1.7 > Author: Warrigal > Co-authors: > > > Append the following paragraph to Rule 2450 "Pledges": > > The Notary CAN destroy a pledge Without Objection, and SHOULD do so if and > only if the pledge no longer serves any significant purpose. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8336 > Title: Define "publicly" > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Jason > Co-authors: > > > Amend Rule 478 by appending to the paragraph beginning "A public message > is" the following sentence: > > To do something "publicly" is to do that thing within a public message. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8338 > Title: Clarify quorum (option 1) > Adoption index: 2.0 > Author: Murphy > Co-authors: > > > If the author's proposal "Clarify quorum (option 2)" has been or > would be adopted with a greater proportion of support, then this > proposal has no effect. Otherwise: > > Amend Rule 879 (Quorum) by replacing "Agoran decision to adopt a > proposal" with "Agoran decision on whether to adopt a proposal". > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8340 > Title: The Paradox of Self-Appointment > Adoption index: 1.0 > Author: Alexis > Co-authors: > > > Amend Rule 103 (The Speaker) by inserting > { > If the Prime Minister is emself Laureled, eir power to appoint a > Speaker continues for the entirety of a message in which e resigns as > Prime Minister, and if e is the only Laureled player, e CAN void that > power, and thereby discharge the obligation to use it, by announcing > that e declines to take the office. > } > > at the end of the second paragraph, and by moving the first two > sentences of the second paragraph to the first paragraph. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >
