Hello All,
Please forward this notice to potential candidates.
SOUTH CAROLINA, COLUMBIA 29208. University of South Carolina. The
Department of Geography invites applications for a tenure track position
in GIScience/Geocomputation at the rank of Assistant Professor to begin
August 15, 2004 or
you could modify the suggested approach by using a generalization of the
Poisson, the neg binomial assumption you mention. most stat software
allows negative binomial regression. in this case, the variance component
of the Chi-squared resids may be better approximated (than under the
Poisson ass
Ruben Roa Ureta wrote:
Yes, that is a nice comment. However, you cannot shake natural population
to destroy the mechanisms that determine their functioning and make them
random. I gotta go now, or else I miss the soccer game!
R.
You can shake the (imaginary) bottle with all sample locations, fr
Marcelo Alexandre Bruno wrote:
Whats wrong? Someone could help me?
I don't know if something is wrong. Maybe your data don't exhibit
much spatial correlation, maybe they are so skew that without
transformation you just don't see any in sample variograms.
The family of distribution of M. stehmanni
Title: RE: AI-GEOSTATS: Moran scatterplot
-Original Message-
From: Pat Bellamy
Sent: 28 November 2003 13:57
To: 'Monica Palaseanu-Lovejoy'
Subject: RE: AI-GEOSTATS: Moran scatterplot
Dear Monica
I think it would be worth looking at the following papers as it should give a
Monica
The simplest solution to your problem is to use
probability paper. If you do not have easy access to
this, you can download a free graph paper plotter from
http://perso.easynet.fr/~philimar
There are also simple algorithms to produce your own.
Two populations show up on a probability plo
(I added gstat-info to the addressees, as I believe this message and
possibly further discussion better belong there)
--
Edzer
Marta Rufino wrote:
Dear Collegues,
I have some particular doubts about gstat for R (most probabily very
basic for what I apoligise):
1. Does it compute indicator krigi
Hello list,
I need your help to interpret this. I am working with contamination
data in soil. I think the dataset has two populations, one
representing a diffusive process (the majority of the data) and a
point source process which generates outliers - or it seems part of
them. I used the M
Hi everybody,
I want to ask your opinion on some results from Moran scatterplot.
I am working with soil contamination data, and in my opinion the
dataset is formed by 2 different distributions, one more diffusive
which is the majority of the data, and one generated by a point
source process re
Dear list members,
I would like to know if anyone has information or bibliography on
backtransformation of the variogram or the variogram model.
I have 2 ref. only (Armstrong and Guiblin et al. 1995).
Is this supose to give similar results to the log-normal kriging?
Could anyone point me bibliogr
10 matches
Mail list logo
