Thank you, that was just what I needed.
On Monday, October 3, 2016 at 9:55:28 AM UTC-4, loe...@posteo.de wrote:
>
> The following might help:
> https://github.com/hseeberger/reactive-flows/blob/master/src/main/scala/de/heikoseeberger/reactiveflows/FlowFacade.scala#L72
>
>
> On 3 Oct 2016, at
Hi Bert,
There is no public access to the current behaviour of the actor in the API
so this you would have to implement yourself.
--
Johan
Akka Team
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Bert Robben wrote:
>
> I'm puzzled by the meaning of Actor.receive() and
I looked for that but CompletionStage doesn't have a map method. At least
not in the Java8 version of java.util.concurrent.CompletionStage.
On Monday, October 3, 2016 at 10:41:23 AM UTC-7, Josep Prat wrote:
>
> It's not very stylish, but you can call map on the CompletionStage doing a
> cast to
Hi Tal,
The settings you reference are only about the maximum sizes before the
client fails rather than returning the response, it cannot affect how large
chunks the server returns. Additionally the the OS on the sending side,
network devices between the client and server and the receiving client
Hi Jose,
There are to few details in the provided code sample to say for sure, it
depends on what your Routing actor does when handleMessage returns and also
how your SpringExtension integration works.
--
Johan
Akka Team
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 4:58 PM, José Diaz wrote:
I am creating a directive for Akka HTTP using the javadsl that performs an
ask on an actor and then returns the resulting object in a type-friendly
way that other directives and route handlers can process easily.
For example:
public CompletionStage askActor(String actorPath, Object
message,
Also, I believe that it should be consistent, I think Java fixed thread
pool factories will give you a thread pool that expire the threads after 1
minute being idle,
should be the same *-consistency-* for Akka?
On Monday, October 3, 2016 at 4:20:01 PM UTC+1, Guido Medina wrote:
>
> Look and
You should also think about what happens if you don't get any replies. In
the end the actor should probably be stopped to avoid resource "leak".
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Roland Kuhn wrote:
> Yes, almost: it should be context.actorOf, not system.actorOf.
>
> Regards,
Yes, sorry, state is good but per actor, so that I should create one actor
instance each time I would like to combine the two CSV.
So, given that actor should/can have states and that *tell* is the
preferred approach. I should have something like that :
class Combiner(subject:Subject,
> 3 okt. 2016 kl. 14:30 skrev gervais.b :
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm fairly new with Akka (and maybe the whole question below is polluted by
> my synchronous background). In my app, I have to parse 2 CSV available as
> HTTP, I plan to access them from one actor that accept two
Hello,
I'm fairly new with Akka (and maybe the whole question below is polluted by
my synchronous background). In my app, I have to parse 2 CSV available as
HTTP, I plan to access them from one actor that accept two messages (one
per csv). But I should add another HTTP resources next week. So
11 matches
Mail list logo