15 г., 23:21:34 UTC+3 пользователь Jakub Kahovec
> написал:
>>
>> That’s a good news, looking forward to see more ;-)
>>
>> Thank you Roland
>>
>> Jakub
>>
>> From: <akka...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Roland Kuhn
>> Reply-To: &
четверг, 8 октября 2015 г., 23:21:34 UTC+3 пользователь Jakub Kahovec
> написал:
>>
>> That’s a good news, looking forward to see more ;-)
>>
>> Thank you Roland
>>
>> Jakub
>>
>> From: <akka...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Roland Kuhn
>> Re
uests in 10.10s, 70.63MB read
> Requests/sec: 49220.11
> Transfer/sec: 6.99MB
>
> четверг, 8 октября 2015 г., 23:21:34 UTC+3 пользователь Jakub Kahovec написал:
> That’s a good news, looking forward to see more ;-)
>
> Thank you Roland
>
> Jakub
>
> Fr
-To: <akka...@googlegroups.com >
> Date: Thursday 8 October 2015 at 22:11
> To: akka-user
> Subject: Re: [akka-user] Akka http vs Spray performance
>
> Hi Jakub,
>
> we are currently working on the performance improvements, but there is
> nothing to see yet since
Hi Jakub,
we are currently working on the performance improvements, but there is nothing
to see yet since the first (and biggest) step requires the internal framework
that is necessary for internal optimizations (operation fusion). We are about
to finish the preparations and will hopefully
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Giovanni Alberto Caporaletti
paradi...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm already using http/streams in a minor component, but since you're
talking about this: do you have a rough idea of when the performance
improvement work will start? Of course I'm not talking about the
Nice, thank you Endre.
I guess knowing that the project will stay under active development after
1.0.0 is enough to choose it over spray, once the api is (roughly) stable
with 1.0.0.
I think that for most people it's important to know that the project will
be supported and the current
Hi,
At the current point the aim of streams 1.0 was to reach a desired
functionality level. Basically there is zero performance work done at this
point. We will improve performance in later versions though.
We basically refactored streams API in roughly every second release, so we
are currently
I've done little benchmarks to compare spray and akka-http performance. I
use default jvm and akka settings. So you can see that there is
an significant performance difference between it.
code:
spray https://gist.github.com/zergood/18bae0adc2e774c31233.
akka-http
Ok. I understand. Thank you for your work, good luck.
среда, 27 мая 2015 г., 14:49:10 UTC+3 пользователь drewhk написал:
Hi,
At the current point the aim of streams 1.0 was to reach a desired
functionality level. Basically there is zero performance work done at this
point. We will improve
I'm already using http/streams in a minor component, but since you're
talking about this: do you have a rough idea of when the performance
improvement work will start? Of course I'm not talking about the exact day
but it would be very useful to know if we can expect something by the end
of the
11 matches
Mail list logo
