Re: [akka-user] Akka remote small/many messages throughput discussion?

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Guido Medina wrote: > Thanks for the quick response: > > Nodes pair or actors pair? > Sorry I meant actors pair. But honestly, in the case of UDP there will be no performance increase by having these subchannels at all, at least in terms of

Re: [akka-user] Akka remote small/many messages throughput discussion?

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Guido Medina wrote: > Given the following scenario, which design would fit best: > > Assume I have 2 receivers@node-1, for simplicity lets call them (I know > I'm using the wrong convention): > >- receiver-1@node-1 >- receiver-2@node-1

[akka-user] Akka remote small/many messages throughput discussion?

Given the following scenario, which design would fit best: Assume I have 2 receivers@node-1, for simplicity lets call them (I know I'm using the wrong convention): - receiver-1@node-1 - receiver-2@node-1 Assume I have 4 processors@node-2, for simplicity again lets call them: -

Re: [akka-user] Akka remote small/many messages throughput discussion?

Thanks for the quick response: Nodes pair or actors pair? I used the wrong convention when describing the scenario, in both designs I'm sending from node-1 to node-2. The only difference between the 2 is that design 1 is sending to the same actor@node-2 and design 2 is cycling the actors@node-2