Re: [akka-user] akka-persistence vs durable mailbox

2014-07-14 Thread Konrad Malawski
Hello Jeff, Basically I want to pile a bunch of messages into this mailbox and have the actor process them when it can with a producer timeout restriction. I know this is related to the Reactive Stream stuff, but I'm interested in something near term and deciding if I should implement a

Re: [akka-user] akka-persistence vs durable mailbox

2014-07-08 Thread Jeff Simpson
The main difference I see with the change from a DurableMailbox to using a PersistentChannel/AtLeastOnceDelivery is the former seems pull based while the latter is push. Is this the case? I'm curious if there's a way I can essentially implement a durable mailbox based on the Persistence

[akka-user] akka-persistence vs durable mailbox

2014-03-24 Thread Logan Aube
Hello, I was looking to use durable mailboxes in a new akka project. Looking through the documentation, it appears these have been dropped in favour of akka-persistence. I took a look into the akka-persistence documentation and from what I can gather the goal of the project is to store

Re: [akka-user] akka-persistence vs durable mailbox

2014-03-24 Thread Patrik Nordwall
The big difference is that when using akka-persistence the messages are not stored immediately when placed in the mailbox. When you receive the Persistent message in the Processor you know that it has been stored. The sender can let go of the responsibility when it has received an explicit

Re: [akka-user] akka-persistence vs durable mailbox

2014-03-24 Thread Logan Aube
Great, thanks guys for pointing me in the right direction! On Monday, March 24, 2014 10:53:23 AM UTC-4, Patrik Nordwall wrote: The big difference is that when using akka-persistence the messages are not stored immediately when placed in the mailbox. When you receive the Persistent message