Hi All,
Working on a project for a big client that want to switch from a monolithic
infrastructure to a microservice one we are getting stuck in a big doubt.
We are making an infrastructure where each microservice are deployed in a
different container on an ECS instance, than we have the first
else everything will be executed by the
> same dispatcher,
> which translates to having a single thread pool executor doing everything.
>
> http://doc.akka.io/docs/akka/2.4.10/java/dispatchers.html
> http://doc.akka.io/docs/akka/2.4.10/java/routing.html
>
> HTH,
>
> G
Just to be clear, my class: com.test.common.LoginRequest is formed of 4
strings and an actorRef
Thanks all
2016-09-09 16:34 GMT+02:00 silvio poma <silviopom...@gmail.com>:
> Right now one of the biggest and strange problem is that when arrive a
> message from the Actor A i
l-size-factor = 1
> pool-size-max = 8
> }
>
> client-socket-worker-pool {
> pool-size-min = 4
> pool-size-factor = 1
> pool-size-max = 8
> }
> }
>
> default-remote-dispatcher {
> type = Dispatcher
,
>
> Guido.
>
> On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 4:37:13 PM UTC+1, silvio poma wrote:
>>
>> Dear Guido,
>> Thanks a lot for you answer.
>> We have already improved our concurrency model, using multiple instances
>> for each actor, that now work in par
Hi Guido,
Following the release notes i create a config file like this:
"remote": {
"adapters": {
"gremlin": "akka.remote.transport.FailureInjectorProvider",
"trttl": "akka.remote.transport.ThrottlerProvider"
},
"artery": {
"bind-hostname": "127.0.1.1",
"enabled": "on",
"hostname":
the http response.
Il giorno martedì 13 settembre 2016 10:42:39 UTC+2, √ ha scritto:
>
> What is your bottleneck?
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:13 AM, silvio poma <silvio...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Thanks guy, I eventually fixed all the configuration as you sug
be careful there, I didn't mean "one dispatcher per
>> actor" but more like "one dispatcher per one or more types of actors"
>>
>> HTH,
>>
>> Guido.
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 4:37:13 PM UTC+1, silvio poma wrote:
&
be careful there, I didn't mean "one dispatcher per
>> actor" but more like "one dispatcher per one or more types of actors"
>>
>> HTH,
>>
>> Guido.
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 4:37:13 PM UTC+1, silvio poma wrote:
>>>
Thanks guy, I eventually fixed all the configuration as you suggested and
now everything is working.
I can see a big improvement in the average time of response of my service
but the throughput is still the same of before.
Any other suggestions, my target is to have throughput as high as
10 matches
Mail list logo
