On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Attila Lendvai attila.lend...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm not fond of the name strcat, but come to think of
it, I'm not fond of mkstr either -- they're more in a C naming
tradition. I don't have a good suggestion for a name though.
+1
--
attila
I like
Just to weigh on this quickly:
Given that we have PRINC-TO-STRING, PRIN1-TO-STRING, and
WRITE-TO-STRING, an N-argument version should probably exist in these
variants too, and be named along those lines.
Contracted names will not be added to Alexandria, though, unless
supported by existing
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:58 PM, John Fremlin j...@fremlin.org wrote:
Liam Healy l...@healy.washington.dc.us writes:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Daniel Herring dherr...@tentpost.com
wrote:
[...]
Isn't that the same as
(defun mkstr (rest args)
Make a string out of the printed
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Liam Healy wrote:
(defun mkstr (rest args)
Make a string out of the printed representations of the arguments.
(with-output-to-string (s)
(dolist (a args) (princ a s
Isn't that the same as
(defun mkstr (rest args)
Make a string out of the printed
Liam Healy l...@healy.washington.dc.us writes:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Daniel Herring dherr...@tentpost.com wrote:
[...]
Isn't that the same as
(defun mkstr (rest args)
Make a string out of the printed representations of the arguments.
(format nil ~{~A~} args))
?
Is this
