https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444138
--- Comment #9 from Ben Cooksley ---
Sorry i'm still a little confused here as to how mirroring fixes your issue.
If there are no changes required, then a fork shouldn't need to be created and
you can just use the original upstream repository
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444138
--- Comment #3 from Ben Cooksley ---
Assuming these are personal forks of other projects on invent.kde.org, then you
should simply be able to fetch those into your local clone, rebase your branch
as needed and then push it back up to your private fork
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444138
Ben Cooksley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bcooks...@kde.org
--- Comment #1 from Ben
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 5:52 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El dilluns, 18 d’octubre de 2021, a les 13:59:24 (CEST), Vlad Zahorodnii
> va escriure:
> > On 10/18/21 14:25, Aleix Pol wrote:
> > > Does anyone know why we are having this problem all of a sudden? I
> > > cannot reproduce on my system.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440809
Ben Cooksley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Patricia Schaefer |[ Subject removed due
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440809
Ben Cooksley changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://differentcasinogame |
|s.blogspot.com
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 9:27 AM Luca Beltrame wrote:
> In data mercoledì 13 ottobre 2021 19:24:48 CEST, Ben Cooksley ha scritto:
>
> > It would appear that the necessary dependencies between targets aren't
> set
> > up properly?
>
> They aren't - one of the reasons
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 9:27 AM Luca Beltrame wrote:
> In data mercoledì 13 ottobre 2021 19:24:48 CEST, Ben Cooksley ha scritto:
>
> > It would appear that the necessary dependencies between targets aren't
> set
> > up properly?
>
> They aren't - one of the reasons
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 8:46 PM Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 9:28 PM Antonio Rojas wrote:
>
>> El lunes, 4 de octubre de 2021 10:10:02 (CEST), Ben Cooksley escribió:
>>
>> > If someone could confirm the SIP version we need that would be awesome.
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 8:46 PM Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 9:28 PM Antonio Rojas wrote:
>
>> El lunes, 4 de octubre de 2021 10:10:02 (CEST), Ben Cooksley escribió:
>>
>> > If someone could confirm the SIP version we need that would be awesome.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=443627
Ben Cooksley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bcooks...@kde.org
Summary|Will Cash
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426313
Ben Cooksley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit|https://invent.kde.org/plas |https://invent.kde.org/plas
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410606
Ben Cooksley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit|https://invent.kde.org/plas |https://invent.kde.org/plas
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422467
Ben Cooksley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit|https://invent.kde.org/plas |https://invent.kde.org/plas
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338599
Ben Cooksley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit|https://invent.kde.org/plas |https://invent.kde.org/plas
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389529
Ben Cooksley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit|https://invent.kde.org/plas |https://invent.kde.org/plas
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279658
Ben Cooksley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit|https://invent.kde.org/plas |https://invent.kde.org/plas
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362865
Ben Cooksley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit|https://invent.kde.org/plas |https://invent.kde.org/plas
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 9:28 PM Antonio Rojas wrote:
> El lunes, 4 de octubre de 2021 10:10:02 (CEST), Ben Cooksley escribió:
>
> > If someone could confirm the SIP version we need that would be awesome.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Ben
> >
>
> Yes, KF5 doesn't su
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 4:44 AM Luca Beltrame wrote:
> In data domenica 3 ottobre 2021 10:44:29 CEST, Ben Cooksley ha scritto:
>
> Hello Ben,
>
> > Does anyone know which SUSE packages are required for the bindings to be
> > built?
>
> I think python38-qt5-sip, py
On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 9:35 PM David Faure wrote:
> On samedi 2 octobre 2021 21:08:06 CEST Antonio Rojas wrote:
> > El sábado, 2 de octubre de 2021 20:10:54 (CEST), David Faure escribió:
> > > Dear packagers,
> > >
> > > KDE Frameworks 5.87.0 has been uploaded to the usual place.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:27 PM Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As those of you who watch and work on Frameworks repositories will be
> aware, we've just rolled out the first set of native Gitlab CI builds.
>
> These builds are at this time Linux only, but do includ
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:27 PM Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As those of you who watch and work on Frameworks repositories will be
> aware, we've just rolled out the first set of native Gitlab CI builds.
>
> These builds are at this time Linux only, but do includ
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:27 PM Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As those of you who watch and work on Frameworks repositories will be
> aware, we've just rolled out the first set of native Gitlab CI builds.
>
> These builds are at this time Linux only, but do includ
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:27 PM Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As those of you who watch and work on Frameworks repositories will be
> aware, we've just rolled out the first set of native Gitlab CI builds.
>
> These builds are at this time Linux only, but do includ
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 10:40 AM David Hurka wrote:
> On Thursday, September 30, 2021 10:12:35 PM CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Does this means we can no longer have interesting CI like
> > "install this special distro that has openssl3 so that the QCA code
> > doesn't regress" or
> >
On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 7:28 AM Amber Schenck wrote:
> On 9/30/21 5:05 PM, Nate Graham wrote:
> > On 9/30/21 17:00, Amber Schenck wrote:
> >> Would it be possible for a project outside of KDE infra
> >> (https://sourceforge.net/projects/kuroo/) to use KDE CI? Unit tests
> have
> >> been on the
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:03 PM Tobias Leupold wrote:
> Hi list :-)
>
Hi Tobias,
> Please be merciful, I'm completely new to CI and never used GItLab CI
> before ;-)
>
> I tried to setup CI for KGeoTag. I added a .kde-ci.yml and a
> .gitlab-ci.yml
> file, but the resulting build fails:
>
>
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 8:04 PM Laurent Montel wrote:
> On jeudi 30 septembre 2021 08:40:04 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 7:10 PM Laurent Montel wrote:
> > > Hi,
> >
> > Hi Laurent,
> >
> > I added in .kde-ci.yml
> >
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 8:04 PM Laurent Montel wrote:
> On jeudi 30 septembre 2021 08:40:04 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 7:10 PM Laurent Montel wrote:
> > > Hi,
> >
> > Hi Laurent,
> >
> > I added in .kde-ci.yml
> >
orks.
> Regards
>
Cheers,
Ben
> On mercredi 29 septembre 2021 11:27:08 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > Hi all,
>
> --
> Laurent Montel | laurent.mon...@kdab.com | KDE/Qt Senior Software
> Engineer
> KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
> Tel: France
orks.
> Regards
>
Cheers,
Ben
> On mercredi 29 septembre 2021 11:27:08 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > Hi all,
>
> --
> Laurent Montel | laurent.mon...@kdab.com | KDE/Qt Senior Software
> Engineer
> KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
> Tel: France
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 3:41 AM Johnny Jazeix wrote:
>
>
> Le mer. 29 sept. 2021 à 11:27, Ben Cooksley a écrit :
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As those of you who watch and work on Frameworks repositories will be
>> aware, we've just rolled out the first set of native
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 3:41 AM Johnny Jazeix wrote:
>
>
> Le mer. 29 sept. 2021 à 11:27, Ben Cooksley a écrit :
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As those of you who watch and work on Frameworks repositories will be
>> aware, we've just rolled out the first set of native
Hi all,
As those of you who watch and work on Frameworks repositories will be
aware, we've just rolled out the first set of native Gitlab CI builds.
These builds are at this time Linux only, but do include support for both
regular branch builds as well as for Merge Requests. It is anticipated
Hi all,
As those of you who watch and work on Frameworks repositories will be
aware, we've just rolled out the first set of native Gitlab CI builds.
These builds are at this time Linux only, but do include support for both
regular branch builds as well as for Merge Requests. It is anticipated
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 7:04 AM Aleix Pol wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 8:26 PM Ben Cooksley wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 12:34 AM Aleix Pol wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 1:32 AM Nicolás Alvarez
> >> wrote:
> >> >
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 7:04 AM Aleix Pol wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 8:26 PM Ben Cooksley wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 12:34 AM Aleix Pol wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 1:32 AM Nicolás Alvarez
> >> wrote:
> >> >
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 7:04 AM Aleix Pol wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 8:26 PM Ben Cooksley wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 12:34 AM Aleix Pol wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 1:32 AM Nicolás Alvarez
> >> wrote:
> >> >
lvarez
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > El jue, 23 de sep. de 2021 a la(s) 08:55, Aleix Pol (
> aleix...@kde.org) escribió:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 11:52 AM Ben Cooksley
> wrote:
> > > > > >
lvarez
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > El jue, 23 de sep. de 2021 a la(s) 08:55, Aleix Pol (
> aleix...@kde.org) escribió:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 11:52 AM Ben Cooksley
> wrote:
> > > > > >
lvarez
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > El jue, 23 de sep. de 2021 a la(s) 08:55, Aleix Pol (
> aleix...@kde.org) escribió:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 11:52 AM Ben Cooksley
> wrote:
> > > > > >
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442905
Ben Cooksley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bhus...@gmail.com
ehaviour/bugs)
> Shantanu
>
Cheers,
Ben
> On Thu, 23 Sept 2021 at 22:13, Nicolás Alvarez
> wrote:
>
>> El jue, 23 de sep. de 2021 a la(s) 08:55, Aleix Pol (aleix...@kde.org)
>> escribió:
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 11:52 AM Ben Cooksley
>> wr
ehaviour/bugs)
> Shantanu
>
Cheers,
Ben
> On Thu, 23 Sept 2021 at 22:13, Nicolás Alvarez
> wrote:
>
>> El jue, 23 de sep. de 2021 a la(s) 08:55, Aleix Pol (aleix...@kde.org)
>> escribió:
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 11:52 AM Ben Cooksley
>> wr
ehaviour/bugs)
> Shantanu
>
Cheers,
Ben
> On Thu, 23 Sept 2021 at 22:13, Nicolás Alvarez
> wrote:
>
>> El jue, 23 de sep. de 2021 a la(s) 08:55, Aleix Pol (aleix...@kde.org)
>> escribió:
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 11:52 AM Ben Cooksley
>> wr
Hi all,
It has recently come to our attention that the number of queries being
handled for the endpoint https://autoconfig.kde.org/ocs/providers.xml on a
day to day basis has gotten to the point where it is causing issues with
server responsiveness to other traffic. This is perhaps best
Hi all,
It has recently come to our attention that the number of queries being
handled for the endpoint https://autoconfig.kde.org/ocs/providers.xml on a
day to day basis has gotten to the point where it is causing issues with
server responsiveness to other traffic. This is perhaps best
Hi all,
It has recently come to our attention that the number of queries being
handled for the endpoint https://autoconfig.kde.org/ocs/providers.xml on a
day to day basis has gotten to the point where it is causing issues with
server responsiveness to other traffic. This is perhaps best
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 8:34 PM David Redondo wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 21. September 2021, 10:23:57 CEST schrieb Ben Cooksley:
> > [...]
> > [2021-09-20T19:24:50.371Z] * KSysGuard
>
> Afaik that's libksysguard and not ksysguard as in the repo, that's fine
>
That descript
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 7:27 PM David Redondo wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 19. September 2021, 23:09:04 CEST schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
> > Plasma devs if there will be no new ksysguard 5.22.x release please tell
> > us and we'll clean it up from stable i18n
>
> Hi Albert,
>
Hi Plasma Developers,
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442473
Ben Cooksley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 7:06 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El dimarts, 14 de setembre de 2021, a les 20:35:40 (CEST), Ben Cooksley va
> escriure:
> > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 5:35 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> >
> > > El dimarts, 14 de setembre de 2021, a les 17:23
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 5:35 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El dimarts, 14 de setembre de 2021, a les 17:23:01 (CEST), Harald Sitter
> va escriure:
> > It is practically free software as far as we are concerned
>
> I guess this means it's not actually Free Software?
>
Please see
On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 7:07 AM Frederik Schwarzer
wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi all,
> On 9/10/21 21:17, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 5:40 AM Carl Schwan wrote:
>
> >> We also are losing the krita/kmymoney/other app private api generation,
> >
On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 5:24 AM Frederik Schwarzer
wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi all,
> we have been working on getting KApiDox to run on Jenkins. This work has
> been taken way longer than I expected but has now reached a state close
> to finished. :)
>
> So I would like to invite you to check
On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 7:43 AM Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
wrote:
> Am Freitag, 10. September 2021, 19:23:47 CEST schrieb Frederik Schwarzer:
> > Hi,
> >
> > we have been working on getting KApiDox to run on Jenkins. This work has
> > been taken way longer than I expected but has now reached a
On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 5:40 AM Carl Schwan wrote:
> Le vendredi 10 septembre 2021 à 7:23 PM, Frederik Schwarzer <
> schwar...@kde.org> a écrit :
>
> > Hi,
>
> Hi :D
>
Hey Carl,
> > we have been working on getting KApiDox to run on Jenkins. This work has
> > been taken way longer than I
On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 5:24 AM Frederik Schwarzer
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have been working on getting KApiDox to run on Jenkins. This work has
> been taken way longer than I expected but has now reached a state close
> to finished. :)
>
> So I would like to invite you to check
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 10:22 AM Heiko Becker wrote:
> On Thursday, 9 September 2021 10:10:29 CEST, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 9:54 AM Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> > - is there a polite tap-on-the-shoulder kind of message to send to
> distro's
>
On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 9:54 AM Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> Frameworks 5.86 haven't been released yet; from the calendar it looks like
> that will happen next week. However, there's a couple of Linux distro's
> that
> have packages up already. This makes the repology.org feed for frameworks
> a
>
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 10:28 PM Vlad Zahorodnii
wrote:
> On 9/7/21 1:21 PM, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 10:14 PM Vlad Zahorodnii > <mailto:vlad.zahorod...@kde.org>> wrote:
> >
> > On 9/7/21 12:22 PM, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> >
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 10:14 PM Vlad Zahorodnii
wrote:
> On 9/7/21 12:22 PM, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 8:48 PM Vlad Zahorodnii > <mailto:vlad.zahorod...@kde.org>> wrote:
> >
> > On 9/5/21 3:18 PM, David Faure wrote:
> > >
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 8:48 PM Vlad Zahorodnii
wrote:
> On 9/5/21 3:18 PM, David Faure wrote:
> > On dimanche 5 septembre 2021 12:26:50 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote:
> >> On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 10:22 PM David Faure wrote:
> >>> For frameworks, I think we should be a
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 9:09 PM David Edmundson
wrote:
> Excellent news!! Thanks very much
>
> > Once the scripts have been proven successfully for Frameworks, we will
> look at extending them to projects that depend only on Frameworks and
> repositories
>
> Does this mean we would like Plasma to
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 9:09 PM David Edmundson
wrote:
> Excellent news!! Thanks very much
>
> > Once the scripts have been proven successfully for Frameworks, we will
> look at extending them to projects that depend only on Frameworks and
> repositories
>
> Does this mean we would like Plasma to
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 9:09 PM David Edmundson
wrote:
> Excellent news!! Thanks very much
>
> > Once the scripts have been proven successfully for Frameworks, we will
> look at extending them to projects that depend only on Frameworks and
> repositories
>
> Does this mean we would like Plasma to
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 9:09 PM David Edmundson
wrote:
> Excellent news!! Thanks very much
>
> > Once the scripts have been proven successfully for Frameworks, we will
> look at extending them to projects that depend only on Frameworks and
> repositories
>
> Does this mean we would like Plasma to
p on more tests.
>
Thanks for getting that landed Johnny.
Please note that you've specified no dependencies, so your builds won't
even have ECM available so you may wish to fix that.
> Cheers,
>
> Johnny
>
Cheers,
Ben
> Le dim. 5 sept. 2021 à 12:11, Ben Cooksley a écrit :
>
&
p on more tests.
>
Thanks for getting that landed Johnny.
Please note that you've specified no dependencies, so your builds won't
even have ECM available so you may wish to fix that.
> Cheers,
>
> Johnny
>
Cheers,
Ben
> Le dim. 5 sept. 2021 à 12:11, Ben Cooksley a écrit :
>
&
p on more tests.
>
Thanks for getting that landed Johnny.
Please note that you've specified no dependencies, so your builds won't
even have ECM available so you may wish to fix that.
> Cheers,
>
> Johnny
>
Cheers,
Ben
> Le dim. 5 sept. 2021 à 12:11, Ben Cooksley a écrit :
>
&
p on more tests.
>
Thanks for getting that landed Johnny.
Please note that you've specified no dependencies, so your builds won't
even have ECM available so you may wish to fix that.
> Cheers,
>
> Johnny
>
Cheers,
Ben
> Le dim. 5 sept. 2021 à 12:11, Ben Cooksley a écrit :
>
&
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 1:04 AM Tom Zander wrote:
> On maandag 6 september 2021 11:48:39 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > > Pushing everything into required is likely not scalable,
> > > causing projects too wait too long for compile.
> > > Avoiding the optiona
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 1:04 AM Tom Zander wrote:
> On maandag 6 september 2021 11:48:39 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > > Pushing everything into required is likely not scalable,
> > > causing projects too wait too long for compile.
> > > Avoiding the optiona
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 1:04 AM Tom Zander wrote:
> On maandag 6 september 2021 11:48:39 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > > Pushing everything into required is likely not scalable,
> > > causing projects too wait too long for compile.
> > > Avoiding the optiona
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 1:04 AM Tom Zander wrote:
> On maandag 6 september 2021 11:48:39 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > > Pushing everything into required is likely not scalable,
> > > causing projects too wait too long for compile.
> > > Avoiding the optiona
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 1:04 AM Tom Zander wrote:
> On maandag 6 september 2021 11:48:39 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > > Pushing everything into required is likely not scalable,
> > > causing projects too wait too long for compile.
> > > Avoiding the optiona
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442039
Ben Cooksley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 9:00 PM Tom Zander wrote:
> On zondag 5 september 2021 08:13:09 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > In terms of the format of the 'Dependencies' section,
>
> Playing with kde-build script and noticing the fast growing
> dependency trees we have today, I think it
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 9:00 PM Tom Zander wrote:
> On zondag 5 september 2021 08:13:09 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > In terms of the format of the 'Dependencies' section,
>
> Playing with kde-build script and noticing the fast growing
> dependency trees we have today, I think it
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 9:00 PM Tom Zander wrote:
> On zondag 5 september 2021 08:13:09 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > In terms of the format of the 'Dependencies' section,
>
> Playing with kde-build script and noticing the fast growing
> dependency trees we have today, I think it
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 9:00 PM Tom Zander wrote:
> On zondag 5 september 2021 08:13:09 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > In terms of the format of the 'Dependencies' section,
>
> Playing with kde-build script and noticing the fast growing
> dependency trees we have today, I think it
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 9:00 PM Tom Zander wrote:
> On zondag 5 september 2021 08:13:09 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > In terms of the format of the 'Dependencies' section,
>
> Playing with kde-build script and noticing the fast growing
> dependency trees we have today, I think it
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 12:18 AM David Faure wrote:
> On dimanche 5 septembre 2021 12:26:50 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 10:22 PM David Faure wrote:
> > > For frameworks, I think we should be able to write a one-time script
> that
> > > gen
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 12:18 AM David Faure wrote:
> On dimanche 5 septembre 2021 12:26:50 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 10:22 PM David Faure wrote:
> > > For frameworks, I think we should be able to write a one-time script
> that
> > > gen
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 12:46 AM Nicolas Fella wrote:
> On 05.09.21 08:13, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This morning after much work i'm happy to announce that the new
> > generation CI scripts intended for use with Gitlab CI successfully
> > co
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 12:46 AM Nicolas Fella wrote:
> On 05.09.21 08:13, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This morning after much work i'm happy to announce that the new
> > generation CI scripts intended for use with Gitlab CI successfully
> > co
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 12:46 AM Nicolas Fella wrote:
> On 05.09.21 08:13, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This morning after much work i'm happy to announce that the new
> > generation CI scripts intended for use with Gitlab CI successfully
> > co
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 12:46 AM Nicolas Fella wrote:
> On 05.09.21 08:13, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This morning after much work i'm happy to announce that the new
> > generation CI scripts intended for use with Gitlab CI successfully
> > co
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 12:46 AM Nicolas Fella wrote:
> On 05.09.21 08:13, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This morning after much work i'm happy to announce that the new
> > generation CI scripts intended for use with Gitlab CI successfully
> > co
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 11:03 AM Michael Reeves wrote:
> How do we get a visual on exactly which lines are covered by auto testing
> and which aren't?
>
Please see
https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/merge_requests/test_coverage_visualization.html
for more details on how this works on Merge
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 11:03 AM Michael Reeves wrote:
> How do we get a visual on exactly which lines are covered by auto testing
> and which aren't?
>
Please see
https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/merge_requests/test_coverage_visualization.html
for more details on how this works on Merge
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 11:03 AM Michael Reeves wrote:
> How do we get a visual on exactly which lines are covered by auto testing
> and which aren't?
>
Please see
https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/merge_requests/test_coverage_visualization.html
for more details on how this works on Merge
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 11:03 AM Michael Reeves wrote:
> How do we get a visual on exactly which lines are covered by auto testing
> and which aren't?
>
Please see
https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/merge_requests/test_coverage_visualization.html
for more details on how this works on Merge
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 11:03 AM Michael Reeves wrote:
> How do we get a visual on exactly which lines are covered by auto testing
> and which aren't?
>
Please see
https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/merge_requests/test_coverage_visualization.html
for more details on how this works on Merge
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442039
Ben Cooksley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bcooks...@kde.org
--- Comment #1 from Ben
On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 10:22 PM David Faure wrote:
> On dimanche 5 septembre 2021 12:11:05 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > It would be appreciated if people could please work on getting these
> files
> > populated in Frameworks (as everyone needs those) as well as in their ow
On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 10:22 PM David Faure wrote:
> On dimanche 5 septembre 2021 12:11:05 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > It would be appreciated if people could please work on getting these
> files
> > populated in Frameworks (as everyone needs those) as well as in their ow
On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 6:13 PM Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
Hi all,
> This morning after much work i'm happy to announce that the new generation
> CI scripts intended for use with Gitlab CI successfully completed their
> first build (of ECM, and then subsequently
On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 6:13 PM Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
Hi all,
> This morning after much work i'm happy to announce that the new generation
> CI scripts intended for use with Gitlab CI successfully completed their
> first build (of ECM, and then subsequently
901 - 1000 of 5181 matches
Mail list logo
