tag 568292 patch
thanks
On Wednesday 03 February 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
The package should be reworked so that it works together with netcfg if
it is included in the initrd, but should also work correctly when netcfg
gets installed later by anna.
The dependency on netcfg should
On Wednesday 03 February 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
Or if the dependency is required for menu ordering, then there should be
an alternative udeb whose only function is to queue auto-install for
images that don't have netcfg.
Hmmm. I think it could even pull in both auto-install and ai-choosers
On Wednesday 03 February 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 03 February 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
Or if the dependency is required for menu ordering, then there should
be an alternative udeb whose only function is to queue auto-install
for images that don't have netcfg.
Hmmm. I think
On Wednesday 03 February 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 03 February 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 03 February 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
Or if the dependency is required for menu ordering, then there
should be an alternative udeb whose only function is to queue
auto-install
Hello Fred,
It took a bit of time, but I think you'll see why.
I do really like the new functionality. I think we'll need to discuss the
details of the user interface a bit more, but the concept definitely
works. My compliments for your work.
Attached a patch series, mostly on top of your
reassign 562051 partman-md
tag 562051 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
I've tried to reproduce this with both a daily image and a Lenny image.
I've not used the identical disk layout, but I did create 3 RAID devices
over 2 disks.
On Tuesday 22 December 2009, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
This is the
On Tuesday 02 February 2010, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
It would be awesome if you could update the bug with short instructions
on what to look for if someone can reproduce it. Just a couple of
sentences or so.
Simplest thing is to add a line 'set -x' in /lib/partman/lib/base.sh.
That will give a
On Tuesday 08 December 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
D-I now always installs Recommends by default, except when
base-installer/install-recommends is preseeded to false.
However, there are a few specific cases where we want to force
installing or not installing Recommends with specific packages
reassign 562051 partman-md
tag 562051 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
I've tried to reproduce this with both a daily image and a Lenny image.
I've not used the identical disk layout, but I did create 3 RAID devices
over 2 disks.
On Tuesday 22 December 2009, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
This is the
On Tuesday 02 February 2010, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
It would be awesome if you could update the bug with short instructions
on what to look for if someone can reproduce it. Just a couple of
sentences or so.
Simplest thing is to add a line 'set -x' in /lib/partman/lib/base.sh.
That will give a
Joerg,
On Sunday 20 December 2009, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
If you are one of the majority of people that have no access to Debians
ftp-master host, but still do want to know in which state our main
archive update, the dinstall run, is:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/dinstall.status to the rescue.
On Monday 01 February 2010, Manuel Navarrete Hidalgo wrote:
I am looking for Debian download format floppy disk, but i can not find.
Installation from floppy is no longer supported because current Debian
kernel images no longer fit on on a single floppy.
You'll have to use some other
On Monday 01 February 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
So, well, I answered Joss that, yes, ext4 will be available in D-I as
an option so that might answer his concerns. But, still, I felt the
duty to mention his concerns.
And reiserfs will not be dropped. It's still available for selection for
On Monday 01 February 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 01 February 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I.e, multiple IP addresses should be comma-separated. This also goes
for ntp-servers, which probably should not have quotes as it's
similar to dns.
Fixed both issues; I can't test it now
On Sunday 31 January 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
Having all leases in the file would mostly be an aid for
troubleshooting. It's not a huge issue for me though.
To it to concatenate them is a simgle line change
On Monday 01 February 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Your suggestion makes the code much nicer to read, indeed, however I
did test it inside of busybox' shell and it worked. Has it failed for
you?
I tried the commands I showed in an earlier mail in D-I debug shell. Maybe
the configs are
On Monday 01 February 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Current issues:
- sparc images are broken
It's not the images that are broken, but the installation of the silo
bootloader to the target system. So the reboot fails.
Should be fixed when D-I switches to .32. Details in #565639.
--
To
...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Frans Pop f...@debian.org
Description:
partman-partitioning - Partitioning operations for partman (udeb)
Changes:
partman-partitioning (64lenny1) stable; urgency=low
.
* Fix display of 'BIOS boot area' option for gpt partitions.
Checksums-Sha1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 14:21:46 +0100
Source: debmirror
Binary: debmirror
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:2.4.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Frans Pop f...@debian.org
Changed-By: Frans Pop f...@debian.org
Description
reassign 567590 partman-partitioning 64
fixed 567590 71
tag 567590 pending
thanks
On Saturday 30 January 2010, Zachary Palmer wrote:
I witnessed the same confusion myself; in retrospect, I should've
mentioned it. I simply assumed that it was a graphical glitch of some
kind. I was unable to
Source: reiser4progs
Version: 1.0.7-5
Severity: minor
Tags: d-i
Please drop the udebs from reiser4progs. There seems to be no chance that
reiser4 will ever be included in Debian kernels and supported in Debian
Installer.
Cheers,
FJP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: ftp.debian.org
Tags: d-i
The current override says standard, but that's not needed as the udeb will
get pulled in by partman-reiserfs if it's needed.
TIA,
FJP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Source: reiserfsprogs
Version: 1:3.6.21-1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch d-i
Please consider the following patch for reiserfsprogs-udeb.
The added dependency ensures that mkreiserfs will always be available if
the other tools get installed.
The added menu item number allows users to manually
On Sunday 31 January 2010, Luk Claes wrote:
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Also, if I run netcfg multiple times with dhcp3, I get multiple
leases in the leases file. You seem to overwrite the existing file.
Not sure if that needs fixing or not.
I think it is not worth. syslog now has the gotten
reassign 567590 partman-partitioning 64
fixed 567590 71
tag 567590 pending
thanks
On Saturday 30 January 2010, Zachary Palmer wrote:
I witnessed the same confusion myself; in retrospect, I should've
mentioned it. I simply assumed that it was a graphical glitch of some
kind. I was unable to
(Please reply to the d-boot list.)
Hello Felix,
On Saturday 30 January 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
What do people think of degrading reiserfs support to optional, i.e.
only usable by specifically selecting partman-reiserfs in anna?
The rationale would be that its popularity has decreased (AFAIK
On Saturday 30 January 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
What do people think of degrading reiserfs support to optional, i.e.
only usable by specifically selecting partman-reiserfs in anna?
I've also filed a BR (#567858) to request dropping the reiser4 udebs. I
don't see support for that happening
Another issue.
The Depends: for netcfg in debian/control now has:
dhcp3-client-udeb (= 3.1.0-2) [kfreebsd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64]
According to policy this is only allowed for build dependencies, not for
regular ones. Or am I missing something?
If I'm right the dependency should be added
On Sunday 31 January 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Probably worth adding/fixing for udhcpc is:
- missing option host-name
I've added it but I can't test it right now. Please see if it works for
you.
- missing option domain-name-servers
- missing option dhcp-server-identifier
- strange
On Monday 01 February 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I.e, multiple IP addresses should be comma-separated. This also goes
for ntp-servers, which probably should not have quotes as it's similar
to dns.
Fixed both issues; I can't test it now so if you have time do a last
check.
This is not
I've just uploaded a new version of partman-partitioning (64lenny1) with a
minor fix for a display issue for gpt disk labels in D-I.
Please accept.
TIA,
FJP
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Sunday 31 January 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
I've just uploaded a new version of partman-partitioning (64lenny1) with
a minor fix for a display issue for gpt disk labels in D-I.
Oops. Forgot the bug closure. It's for #567590.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
also, just so you know: i'll be buying at least one of these to give
to anyone willing to port debian onto it (they're that cheap, duh).
it already has some sort of random linux distro on it but it would be
nice to have it done as a proper debian HOWTO etc.
reassign 567590 partman-base 128lenny1
retitle 567590 Strange bootable flag behavior with gpt disk label; RAID fails
thanks
On Saturday 30 January 2010, Zachary Palmer wrote:
Here's the interesting bit. I sped through the menus and discovered
that the RAID system was quite happy to create a
On Saturday 30 January 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
│ Bootable flag: off │
│ off │
Note the extra line with 'off' below the 'Bootable flag' line. That
could be caused by bootable flag
On Saturday 30 January 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 30 January 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
Toggling Bootable flag does not work (it remains 'off'), but toggling
the line below changes it from 'off' to 'on'.
Toggling the bootable flag still does not have any effect. It should be
supported
On Thursday 28 January 2010, Fred wrote:
I've updated my patch to follow suggestions from F. Pop, and tested
it at my level. Perhaps some enhancements could be added for a better
usability.
Thanks Fred. I've taken a first look at the patch and will review it more
thoroughly over the next
Yesterday I've committed a fairly large update to the D-I Internals
document. It now reflects the current development version for Squeeze
instead of lagging at Etch.
I've also started its transformation towards a more general developers
reference by integrating the menu-item-numbers and
reassign 567590 partman-base 128lenny1
retitle 567590 Strange bootable flag behavior with gpt disk label; RAID fails
thanks
On Saturday 30 January 2010, Zachary Palmer wrote:
Here's the interesting bit. I sped through the menus and discovered
that the RAID system was quite happy to create a
On Saturday 30 January 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
│ Bootable flag: off │
│ off │
Note the extra line with 'off' below the 'Bootable flag' line. That
could be caused by bootable flag
On Saturday 30 January 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 30 January 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
Toggling Bootable flag does not work (it remains 'off'), but toggling
the line below changes it from 'off' to 'on'.
Toggling the bootable flag still does not have any effect. It should be
supported
On Thursday 28 January 2010, Fred wrote:
I've updated my patch to follow suggestions from F. Pop, and tested
it at my level. Perhaps some enhancements could be added for a better
usability.
Thanks Fred. I've taken a first look at the patch and will review it more
thoroughly over the next
I've checked only by grepping, nothing fancy.
On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Joey Hess wrote:
AFAICS, the following templates are all not used anywhere:
partman-jfs/check_failed
partman-reiserfs/check_failed
partman-ext3/check_failed
partman-ext2r0/check_failed
partman-xfs/check_failed
What do people think of degrading reiserfs support to optional, i.e. only
usable by specifically selecting partman-reiserfs in anna?
The rationale would be that its popularity has decreased (AFAIK), upstream
development is not very active and that more (and better?) alternatives
are available
On Friday 29 January 2010, Rainer Koenig wrote:
Frans Pop schrieb:
- install build dependencies
- build a netboot image using:
make reallyclean; fakeroot make build_netboot
At this point I fail. The build process wants to install packages like
acpi-modules-2.6.26-2-686-di
On Saturday 30 January 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote:
It was a long time since I last looked at it; I've looked again and I
found that the script was not being set as executable. I've fixed it
for next busybox' upload.
Thanks for the fixes. I'll give it a go.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Saturday 30 January 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I built a netboot image without dhcp3-udeb to test udhcpc, but it
failed miserably as it did not manage to get a lease during netcfg.
How well was this tested?
Works OK now. Nice.
Now it has one. /var/lib/udhcp/udhcpc.leases.
udhcpc
FYI
I've taken over the daily builds of Debian Installer for s390 as lophos has
been down for well over a month now.
If the service on lophos is ever reinstated, or if someone wants to set up
(and manage) the builds on a regular buildd I'll be happy to stop them
again.
The link on the D-I
...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Frans Pop f...@debian.org
Description:
choose-mirror - Choose mirror to install from (menu item) (udeb)
choose-mirror-bin - Choose mirror to install from (program) (udeb)
Closes: 502245
Changes:
choose-mirror (2.32) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Improve generation
-By: Frans Pop f...@debian.org
Description:
localechooser - choose language/country/locale (udeb)
Changes:
localechooser (2.24) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Use Norwegian Bokmaal country names if no iso-codes translation is
available for Northern Sami.
* Correct display of translation
reassign 567431 kernel-wedge 2.62
tags 567431 pending
thanks
On Friday 29 January 2010, boice...@msu.edu wrote:
Comments/Problems:
Using the text installer, USB Keyboard did not work even with BIOS
legacy emulation enabled once I passed the Install menu choice and
was on the language screen.
On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
Please consider the attached patch which adds a udeb for libgcc1
containing only libgcc_s.so.1.
In case we do decide on inclusion in gcc, here is an updated patch for 4.4
and the additional patch for 4.5.
Changes:
- added libgcc[246] udebs
On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
Please consider the attached patch which adds a udeb for libgcc1
containing only libgcc_s.so.1.
In case we do decide on inclusion in gcc, here is an updated patch for 4.4
and the additional patch for 4.5.
Changes:
- added libgcc[246] udebs
reassign 567431 kernel-wedge 2.62
tags 567431 pending
thanks
On Friday 29 January 2010, boice...@msu.edu wrote:
Comments/Problems:
Using the text installer, USB Keyboard did not work even with BIOS
legacy emulation enabled once I passed the Install menu choice and
was on the language screen.
On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
Please consider the attached patch which adds a udeb for libgcc1
containing only libgcc_s.so.1.
In case we do decide on inclusion in gcc, here is an updated patch for 4.4
and the additional patch for 4.5.
Changes:
- added libgcc[246] udebs
On Friday 29 January 2010, Josef Wolf wrote:
Since the interface name can be used to decide whether to activate vlan
support, no new debconf questions (like netcfg/enable_vlan or something)
are needed, IMHO.
Doesn't that already answer your question about the user interface? :-)
One request:
On Friday 29 January 2010, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 09:35:47PM +0100, Josef Wolf wrote:
2. Install vlan package into installer environment. Only the vconfig
binary (9kb) is really needed. But it needs libc6. Is this an
issue?
Not needed:
| config VCONFIG
|
On Friday 29 January 2010, Josef Wolf wrote:
But at that time the interface chosen interface is not known. So
deducing from chosen interface name (as outlined above) is not possible
and this method would only work with preseeding or if additional
questions are asked.
No. The sequence should
FYI
I've taken over the daily builds of Debian Installer for s390 as lophos has
been down for well over a month now.
If the service on lophos is ever reinstated, or if someone wants to set up
(and manage) the builds on a regular buildd I'll be happy to stop them
again.
The link on the D-I
On Friday 29 January 2010, Holger Wansing wrote:
- So, the first line is localized (german translation, correct)
- The second chapter is NOT LOCALIZED (is in english !)
- The third chapter is localized (german translation, correct)
- The last line is NOT LOCALIZED (is in english !)
You're
On Saturday 30 January 2010, Josef Wolf wrote:
This is why my original proposal was to decide from the value of
netcfg/chosen_interface whether to load/configure all the vlan stuff.
So you would *always* show vlan interfaces, even for regular users on
normal systems? I don't think I like that
Just happened to be looking at the BTS...
Thorsten Glaser wrote:
You might want to have a look at all these gcc warnings about
array accesses being below/above array bounds, though. There
may be more security issues hiding.
These warnings have been fixed in the upcoming upstream release.
reassign 565639 linux-2.6 2.6.30-8
severity 565639 serious
affects 565639 debian-installer
On Sunday 24 January 2010, Jurij Smakov wrote:
Adding kernel team for comment: it looks like the value returned by
uname -m has changed from 'sparc64' in kernel 2.6.26 to 'sparc' in
2.6.30 (and,
On Thursday 28 January 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 27.01.2010 23:26, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
- did you consider building the udeb from a separate source
package, build-depending on gcc-4.4-source?
No, I had not considered
Package: dosfstools
Version: 3.0.8-1
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
Justification: Breaks Debian Installer
With the new version we're getting the following errors during builds
of images for D-I.
On i386:
mcopy -i./tmp/hd-media/boot.img ./tmp/hd-media/vmlinuz ::linux
Cannot initialize '::'
On
On Thursday 28 January 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 27.01.2010 23:26, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
- did you consider building the udeb from a separate source
package, build-depending on gcc-4.4-source?
No, I had not considered
On Thursday 28 January 2010, Geek87 wrote:
Thanks! So it's impossible to have it work with tasksel. And for the
base system? Does someone have an idea?
That's a question that's probably better asked on the debian-user list.
Cheers,
FJP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
reassign 565639 linux-2.6 2.6.30-8
severity 565639 serious
affects 565639 debian-installer
On Sunday 24 January 2010, Jurij Smakov wrote:
Adding kernel team for comment: it looks like the value returned by
uname -m has changed from 'sparc64' in kernel 2.6.26 to 'sparc' in
2.6.30 (and,
On Thursday 28 January 2010, Rainer Koenig wrote:
Would be nice to figure out the why behind this problem. My guess at
the moment is that it is related to
a) the CPU which is a new AMD dual core athlon
b) the 2.6.26-2-486 kernel that is used during the installation
So I think there is a sort
On Thursday 28 January 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 27.01.2010 23:26, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
- did you consider building the udeb from a separate source
package, build-depending on gcc-4.4-source?
No, I had not considered
On Thursday 28 January 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Since 2 or 3 days, I'm having build failures on my local daily build
for i386.
The IA64 buildd has a similar error:
mkfs.msdos -i deb1 -n Debian Inst -C ./tmp/cdrom/boot.img 32768
mkfs.msdos 3.0.8 (23 Jan 2010)
mmd -i./tmp/cdrom/boot.img
On Thursday 28 January 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 28 January 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Since 2 or 3 days, I'm having build failures on my local daily build
for i386.
The IA64 buildd has a similar error:
mkfs.msdos -i deb1 -n Debian Inst -C ./tmp/cdrom/boot.img 32768
On Thursday 28 January 2010, Josef Wolf wrote:
This can not be replaced by the generic netcfg with netcfg/use_dhcp set
to false or netcfg/disable_dhcp set to true?
In theory that could maybe be done (but see below). Also note that setting
an arch-dependent default while still fully supporting
On Thursday 28 January 2010, Joey Hess wrote:
From 7:51 am timestamp, I assume Christian needed to get to work and
didn't have time.
It also said for the last few days.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Thursday 28 January 2010, you wrote:
a) can I build a 32bit install image on a Debian amd64 system?
Only if you create an i386 chroot (using debootstrap).
b) is there a bit of documentation for those things? Websites, books
or whatever. Wouldn't mind reading some stuff to get deeper into
reassign 565639 linux-2.6 2.6.30-8
severity 565639 serious
affects 565639 debian-installer
On Sunday 24 January 2010, Jurij Smakov wrote:
Adding kernel team for comment: it looks like the value returned by
uname -m has changed from 'sparc64' in kernel 2.6.26 to 'sparc' in
2.6.30 (and,
Just happened to be looking at the BTS...
Thorsten Glaser wrote:
You might want to have a look at all these gcc warnings about
array accesses being below/above array bounds, though. There
may be more security issues hiding.
These warnings have been fixed in the upcoming upstream release.
Package: dosfstools
Version: 3.0.8-1
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
Justification: Breaks Debian Installer
With the new version we're getting the following errors during builds
of images for D-I.
On i386:
mcopy -i./tmp/hd-media/boot.img ./tmp/hd-media/vmlinuz ::linux
Cannot initialize '::'
On
On Thursday 28 January 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 27.01.2010 23:26, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
- did you consider building the udeb from a separate source
package, build-depending on gcc-4.4-source?
No, I had not considered
Frans Pop wrote:
I've packaged the new upstream version. Most debian/patches could be
refreshed or updated without too many problems. I've also updated the
packaging and fixed some BRs.
I found I'd missed updating the files to be installed. I've now updated
that too and made some other
Frans Pop wrote:
I've packaged the new upstream version. Most debian/patches could be
refreshed or updated without too many problems. I've also updated the
packaging and fixed some BRs.
I found I'd missed updating the files to be installed. I've now updated
that too and made some other
Source: gcc-4.4
Version: 1:4.4.3-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i patch
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-b...@lists.debian.org
Please consider the attached patch which adds a udeb for libgcc1 containing
only libgcc_s.so.1. That file is needed for the (directfb based) graphical
installer because of
Thanks a lot for the quick reply.
On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
The patch itself looks ok, some other questions:
- did you consider building the udeb from a separate source package,
build-depending on gcc-4.4-source?
No, I had not considered that. It's an option
xavier grave wrote:
I'm trying to help on the packaging of polyorb (I'm not a Debian
Developer) and I would like to work on bug 562192. The test suite driver
fail on hppa with a nasty Segmentation fault.
It's very likely that this is an hppa issue and not an issue in your
package. However, it
Source: gcc-4.4
Version: 1:4.4.3-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i patch
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-b...@lists.debian.org
Please consider the attached patch which adds a udeb for libgcc1 containing
only libgcc_s.so.1. That file is needed for the (directfb based) graphical
installer because of
Thanks a lot for the quick reply.
On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
The patch itself looks ok, some other questions:
- did you consider building the udeb from a separate source package,
build-depending on gcc-4.4-source?
No, I had not considered that. It's an option
On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Geek87 wrote:
I also would like to have it working similarly for the tasks: for
example if I have a task Mail server installed depending on Sendmail
and that the new version of this task now depends on Postfix, I would
like Sendmail to be automatically removed and
On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Josef Wolf wrote:
I am wondering what netcfg-static is good for. Looks like it is an
(outdated) subset of the more generic netcfg.
No. It's used for s390:
installer/build/pkg-lists/netboot/s390.cfg:1:netcfg-static
On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Bastian Blank wrote:
In the meantime this is correct. DHCP can be used on s390 with some
constraints, but it needs to be disabled by default.
Is it useful in practice though? I rather doubt anyone would want to set up
an s390 box using DHCP.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Source: gcc-4.4
Version: 1:4.4.3-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i patch
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Please consider the attached patch which adds a udeb for libgcc1 containing
only libgcc_s.so.1. That file is needed for the (directfb based) graphical
installer because of
-- Forwarded Message --
From: Matthias Klose d...@debian.org
On 27.01.2010 21:03, Frans Pop wrote:
Please consider the attached patch which adds a udeb for libgcc1
containing only libgcc_s.so.1. That file is needed for the (directfb
based) graphical installer because
Thanks a lot for the quick reply.
On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
The patch itself looks ok, some other questions:
- did you consider building the udeb from a separate source package,
build-depending on gcc-4.4-source?
No, I had not considered that. It's an option
Christian Perrier wrote:
The remaining months, that should be targeted by anybody but
me, Frans Pop, Holger Wansing and Lee Winter, are:
* March 1999 to May 2000
* October 2000 to July 2002
* May and June 2004
I just see that as of yesterday the whole archive has now been scanned
xavier grave wrote:
I'm trying to help on the packaging of polyorb (I'm not a Debian
Developer) and I would like to work on bug 562192. The test suite driver
fail on hppa with a nasty Segmentation fault.
It's very likely that this is an hppa issue and not an issue in your
package. However, it
I've just tried running the SVN version of netcfg which includes the
following change:
[ Otavio Salvador ]
* Add support for udhcpc. This was based on Luk Claes but changed to
avoid dropping support for dhclient, dhclient3 and pump for now.
I built a netboot image without dhcp3-udeb
Given that, what are the guidelines for when to file the initial bug
report directly with upstream vs. when to file a bug report with Debian?
It's mostly a question of what's most effective.
The kernel team is already drowned in bug reports and has very little
manpower to deal with relatively
Given that, what are the guidelines for when to file the initial bug
report directly with upstream vs. when to file a bug report with Debian?
It's mostly a question of what's most effective.
The kernel team is already drowned in bug reports and has very little
manpower to deal with relatively
Christian Perrier wrote:
If you're interested in statistics, you can look [2] to learn that
our list is by far the one that got most cleaning.
Here's a little overview of the lists with the most removed posts,
including the ratio of deleted spam over reviewed posts.
As you can see we have a
Package: s390-tools
Version: 1.6.2-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
The 'optional' option is currently undocumented. Please find attached a
proposed patch.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: s390
Kernel: Linux
Package: s390-tools
Version: 1.6.2-1
Severity: important
$ sudo lstape
/sbin/lstape: 30: Syntax error: ( unexpected
Line 30 contains:
function RequireArgument() {
And 'function' is a bashism. Changing the shebang to /bin/bash fixed the
problem.
Other scripts in the package may well have the
901 - 1000 of 18898 matches
Mail list logo
