[Bug 1562402] Re: segv in apt 1.2.7 with dist-upgrade

2016-03-26 Thread LaMont Jones
And here is the trace from 1.2.8: Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". Need to get 798 kB/35.8 MB of archives. After this operation, 3,549 kB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] Get:1 http://ubuntu-mirror.wfg-office/ubuntu xenial/main

[Bug 1379567] Re: maas-proxy is an open proxy with no ACLs; it should add networks automatically

2016-03-23 Thread LaMont Jones
** Changed in: maas Assignee: (unassigned) => LaMont Jones (lamont) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1379567 Title: maas-proxy is an open proxy with no A

[Bug 1379567] Re: maas-proxy is an open proxy with no ACLs; it should add networks automatically

2016-03-23 Thread LaMont Jones
** Changed in: maas Assignee: (unassigned) => LaMont Jones (lamont) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1379567 Title: maas-proxy is an open proxy with no ACLs; it should

Accepted bind9 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-5 (all amd64 source) into experimental, experimental

2016-03-22 Thread LaMont Jones
: medium Maintainer: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Changed-By: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Description: bind9-doc - Documentation for BIND bind9-host - Version of 'host' bundled with BIND 9.X bind9 - Internet Domain Name Server bind9utils - Utilities for BIND dnsutils

Accepted bind9 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P2-7 (all amd64 source) into experimental, experimental

2016-03-22 Thread LaMont Jones
: medium Maintainer: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Changed-By: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Description: bind9 - Internet Domain Name Server bind9-doc - Documentation for BIND bind9-host - Version of 'host' bundled with BIND 9.X bind9utils - Utilities for BIND dnsutils

Accepted bind9 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P2-7 (all amd64 source) into experimental, experimental

2016-03-22 Thread LaMont Jones
: medium Maintainer: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Changed-By: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Description: bind9 - Internet Domain Name Server bind9-doc - Documentation for BIND bind9-host - Version of 'host' bundled with BIND 9.X bind9utils - Utilities for BIND dnsutils

Accepted bind9 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-1 (all amd64 source) into experimental, experimental

2016-03-22 Thread LaMont Jones
: medium Maintainer: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Changed-By: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Description: bind9 - Internet Domain Name Server bind9-doc - Documentation for BIND bind9-host - Version of 'host' bundled with BIND 9.X bind9utils - Utilities for BIND dnsutils

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1543683] Re: Fails to detect (second) display

2016-03-21 Thread LaMont Jones
The kernel in #45: 1) exhibits the window shuffling issue. 2) if I lock the screen, and sit back for a few seconds, the display blanks, and then (almost immediately) unblanks. I would expect it to remain blanked until there was mouse or keyboard activity. I suspect that the next step is to

[Bug 1543683] Re: Fails to detect (second) display

2016-03-21 Thread LaMont Jones
The kernel in #45: 1) exhibits the window shuffling issue. 2) if I lock the screen, and sit back for a few seconds, the display blanks, and then (almost immediately) unblanks. I would expect it to remain blanked until there was mouse or keyboard activity. I suspect that the next step is to

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1543683] Re: Fails to detect (second) display

2016-03-21 Thread LaMont Jones
The kernel in comment #40 exhibits neither the original bug, nor the window-shuffling bug. On a lark, I'd like tip 4.4.0-9 with the "original" fix added (and 237ed86c NOT reverted). All of which assumes that 237ed86c was not reverted as part of landing the fix. Something about this feels like

[Bug 1543683] Re: Fails to detect (second) display

2016-03-21 Thread LaMont Jones
The kernel in comment #40 exhibits neither the original bug, nor the window-shuffling bug. On a lark, I'd like tip 4.4.0-9 with the "original" fix added (and 237ed86c NOT reverted). All of which assumes that 237ed86c was not reverted as part of landing the fix. Something about this feels like

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1543683] Re: Fails to detect (second) display

2016-03-20 Thread LaMont Jones
And I completely misstated myself. :( What I think I want is: 237ed86c with the current patch for this bug applied. Here is what I'm seeing, and trying to isolate it to these two patches, or if it's something yet newer that we'll need to bisect all over again: With current xenial (4.4.0-13 and

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1543683] Re: Fails to detect (second) display

2016-03-20 Thread LaMont Jones
Rereading #40, what exactly was that kernel? On rereading, it sounds like it was top-of-tree (ish), with 237ed86c reverted and the fix added -- or was it bonafide 237ed86c~1 + the fix? (on which hinges what the kernel to try next is, but the last 2 paragraphs in #41 are still valid) -- You

[Bug 1543683] Re: Fails to detect (second) display

2016-03-20 Thread LaMont Jones
And I completely misstated myself. :( What I think I want is: 237ed86c with the current patch for this bug applied. Here is what I'm seeing, and trying to isolate it to these two patches, or if it's something yet newer that we'll need to bisect all over again: With current xenial (4.4.0-13 and

[Bug 1543683] Re: Fails to detect (second) display

2016-03-20 Thread LaMont Jones
Rereading #40, what exactly was that kernel? On rereading, it sounds like it was top-of-tree (ish), with 237ed86c reverted and the fix added -- or was it bonafide 237ed86c~1 + the fix? (on which hinges what the kernel to try next is, but the last 2 paragraphs in #41 are still valid) -- You

[ubuntu/xenial-proposed] isc-dhcp 4.3.3-5ubuntu11 (Accepted)

2016-03-20 Thread LaMont Jones
isc-dhcp (4.3.3-5ubuntu11) xenial; urgency=medium * No change upload for rebuild Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:36:57 -0600 Changed-By: LaMont Jones <lam...@canonical.com> Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/is

[ubuntu/xenial-proposed] bind9 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-1 (Accepted)

2016-03-20 Thread LaMont Jones
assertion failure due to improper DNAME handling when parsing fetch reply messages. (CVE-2016-1286) [RT #41753] - Duplicate EDNS COOKIE options in a response could trigger an assertion failure. (CVE-2016-2088) [RT #41809] [LaMont Jones] * Do not build -export libs for libbind90

[Bug 1556175] Re: networking.service hangs on shutdown -- killing dhclient has no effect any more

2016-03-19 Thread LaMont Jones
** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1556175 Title: networking.service hangs on shutdown -- killing dhclient has no

[ubuntu/xenial-proposed] bind9 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-5 (Accepted)

2016-03-19 Thread LaMont Jones
bind9 (1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-5) experimental; urgency=medium * Drop dead code in bind9.preinst. * move from /var/run to /run for policy. Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 19:52:04 -0600 Changed-By: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-5 -BEG

[Bug 1556175] Re: networking.service hangs on shutdown -- killing dhclient has no effect any more

2016-03-19 Thread LaMont Jones
** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1556175 Title: networking.service hangs on shutdown -- killing

[ubuntu/xenial-proposed] bind9 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-3 (Accepted)

2016-03-19 Thread LaMont Jones
bind9 (1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-3) experimental; urgency=medium * Fix vcs links * build in debian/tmp, use bind9.install Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:46:30 -0600 Changed-By: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-3 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED M

[ubuntu/xenial-proposed] bind9 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-2 (Accepted)

2016-03-19 Thread LaMont Jones
-By: LaMont Jones <lam...@canonical.com> Maintainer: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-2 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:58:07 -0600 Source: bind9 Binary: bind9 bind9utils bi

Bug#781739: bind9: please package new upstream version 9.10.2

2016-03-18 Thread LaMont Jones
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 12:30:45PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > bind9 9.10.2 is available on https://www.isc.org/downloads/ - it would be nice > if you could package this. (eg because latest freeipa versions need it.) 9.10.3-P4 is in NEW on its way to experimental. I'm expecting to land it in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1556175] Re: networking.service hangs on shutdown -- killing dhclient has no effect any more

2016-03-18 Thread LaMont Jones
** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1556175 Title: networking.service hangs on shutdown

[ubuntu/xenial-proposed] bind9 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-4 (Accepted)

2016-03-18 Thread LaMont Jones
bind9 (1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-4) experimental; urgency=medium * use multiarch path in udebs * Updated root cache file. Closes: #806954 Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:50:49 -0600 Changed-By: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-4 -BEG

[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2016-03-15 Thread LaMont Jones
Fixed in alpha2 ** Changed in: maas Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: maas Milestone: None => 2.0.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553176 Title: BIND ignores

[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2016-03-15 Thread LaMont Jones
Fixed in alpha2 ** Changed in: maas Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: maas Milestone: None => 2.0.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553176 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1551351] Re: dhclient does not renew leases

2016-03-09 Thread LaMont Jones
The plan here is to restore the -export libraries for the time being, until upstream finishes the dhcp changes that are needed to have the common libs work. This is in-progress. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed

[Bug 1551351] Re: dhclient does not renew leases

2016-03-09 Thread LaMont Jones
The plan here is to restore the -export libraries for the time being, until upstream finishes the dhcp changes that are needed to have the common libs work. This is in-progress. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1551351] Re: dhclient does not renew leases

2016-03-09 Thread LaMont Jones
The plan here is to restore the -export libraries for the time being, until upstream finishes the dhcp changes that are needed to have the common libs work. This is in-progress. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug

[Bug 1543683] Re: Fails to detect (second) display

2016-03-08 Thread LaMont Jones
On the other hand, for the "completely unacceptable" part of the diff: locking the screen results in the display going away or something, such that X randomly moves windows from the right hand to the left and vice versa. Just... No. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1543683] Re: Fails to detect (second) display

2016-03-08 Thread LaMont Jones
On the other hand, for the "completely unacceptable" part of the diff: locking the screen results in the display going away or something, such that X randomly moves windows from the right hand to the left and vice versa. Just... No. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1528710] Re: overly agressive URLField validation causes failures

2016-03-08 Thread LaMont Jones
Any progress on getting this into xenial, or shall I just do an upload so that I quit hitting it and wait for the eventual merge? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to python-django in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1528710] Re: overly agressive URLField validation causes failures

2016-03-08 Thread LaMont Jones
Any progress on getting this into xenial, or shall I just do an upload so that I quit hitting it and wait for the eventual merge? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528710 Title: overly

[Bug 1543683] Re: Fails to detect (second) display

2016-03-08 Thread LaMont Jones
4.4.0-9.24~lp1543683Commit8d409cb is a good kernel. (with the now expected lag of ~1/2 second between the two displays refreshing during boot at driver cutover.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1543683] Re: Fails to detect (second) display

2016-03-08 Thread LaMont Jones
4.4.0-9.24~lp1543683Commit8d409cb is a good kernel. (with the now expected lag of ~1/2 second between the two displays refreshing during boot at driver cutover.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2016-03-04 Thread LaMont Jones
Fixed in 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P2-5 ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2016-03-04 Thread LaMont Jones
This also affects 9.9.5 in trusty and later. ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => trusty-updates ** Branch linked: lp:~lamont/maas/packaging-bug-1553176 -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2016-03-04 Thread LaMont Jones
Fixed in 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P2-5 ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2016-03-04 Thread LaMont Jones
This also affects 9.9.5 in trusty and later. ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => trusty-updates ** Branch linked: lp:~lamont/maas/packaging-bug-1553176 -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1553176] [NEW] BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2016-03-04 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: Since 2.6, linux has supported nanosecond granular time in stat(2) returns. BIND has a comment in the code that it might use it, but continues to ignore it. As of 9.9.3b2, named checks the time of (at least) zone files on disk (expanding to include include files in

[Bug 1553176] [NEW] BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2016-03-04 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: Since 2.6, linux has supported nanosecond granular time in stat(2) returns. BIND has a comment in the code that it might use it, but continues to ignore it. As of 9.9.3b2, named checks the time of (at least) zone files on disk (expanding to include include files in

Accepted bind9 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P2-5 (all amd64 source) into experimental

2016-03-03 Thread LaMont Jones
-udeb libisccfg140-udeb libirs141-udeb Architecture: all amd64 source Version: 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P2-5 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Changed-By: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Description: bind9 - Internet Domain Name Serve

Accepted bind9 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P2-5 (all amd64 source) into experimental

2016-03-03 Thread LaMont Jones
-udeb libisccfg140-udeb libirs141-udeb Architecture: all amd64 source Version: 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P2-5 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Changed-By: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Description: bind9 - Internet Domain Name Serve

[ubuntu/xenial-proposed] bind9 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P2-5 (Accepted)

2016-03-03 Thread LaMont Jones
on sys.net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range. LP: #1552441 [LaMont Jones] * Return nanosecond-precise time for files, so that we more-correctly know when we can skip loading a zonefile. (Bug introduced 9.9.3b2) Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 18:17:06 -0700 Changed-By: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org>

[Bug 1552441] Re: [xenial] @{PROC}/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range denial

2016-03-02 Thread LaMont Jones
Fixed in 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P2-5 ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1552441 Title: [xenial]

[Bug 1552441] Re: [xenial] @{PROC}/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range denial

2016-03-02 Thread LaMont Jones
Fixed in 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P2-5 ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1552441 Title: [xenial]

Accepted postfix 3.0.4-5 (all amd64 source) into unstable

2016-02-26 Thread LaMont Jones
Urgency: medium Maintainer: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Changed-By: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Closes: 816052 Description: postfix-cdb - CDB map support for Postfix postfix-dev - Loadable modules development environment for Postfix postfix-doc - Documentation for Postfix postf

[ubuntu/xenial-proposed] postfix 3.0.4-5 (Accepted)

2016-02-26 Thread LaMont Jones
postfix (3.0.4-5) unstable; urgency=medium [LaMont Jones] * Cleanup logic in postinst [localization folks] * l10n: Updated Slovak debconf translations. Closes: #816052 (helix84) * l10n: Updated Indonesian debconf translations. (Surya Fajri) Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 01:33:17 +

Accepted postfix 3.0.4-4 (all amd64 source) into unstable

2016-02-26 Thread LaMont Jones
Urgency: medium Maintainer: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Changed-By: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Closes: 815047 815985 816018 Description: postfix- High-performance mail transport agent postfix-cdb - CDB map support for Postfix postfix-dev - Loadable modules development

[ubuntu/xenial-proposed] postfix 3.0.4-4 (Accepted)

2016-02-26 Thread LaMont Jones
postfix (3.0.4-4) unstable; urgency=medium [LaMont Jones] * If main.cf has daemon_directory = /usr/lib/postfix, then fix it or abort the install. Closes: #815047 [localization folks] * l10n: New Brazilian Portuguese debconf translations. Closes: #815985 (Marcelo Santana

postfix 3.0.4-3: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-02-26 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed (yes, again... sorry), and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the

postfix 3.0.4-3: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-02-26 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed (yes, again... sorry), and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the

postfix 3.0.4-3: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-02-26 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed (yes, again... sorry), and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the

postfix 3.0.4-3: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-02-26 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed (yes, again... sorry), and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the

postfix 3.0.4-3: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-02-26 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed (yes, again... sorry), and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the

postfix 3.0.4-3: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-02-26 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed (yes, again... sorry), and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the

postfix 3.0.4-3: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-02-26 Thread LaMont Jones
ranslation is Mon, 07 Mar 2016 09:03:34 -0700. Thanks in advance, lamont # # Catalan translation for postfix package. # Copyright (C) 2012 LaMont Jones. # This file is distributed under the same license as the postfix package. # # Jordà Polo <jo...@ettin.org>, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2012. #

postfix 3.0.4-3: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-02-26 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed (yes, again... sorry), and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the

postfix 3.0.4-3: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-02-26 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed (yes, again... sorry), and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the

postfix 3.0.4-3: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-02-26 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed (yes, again... sorry), and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the

postfix 3.0.4-3: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-02-26 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed (yes, again... sorry), and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the

postfix 3.0.4-3: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-02-26 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed (yes, again... sorry), and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1543683] Re: Fails to detect (second) display

2016-02-25 Thread LaMont Jones
Interestingly, while two displays show up in the lspci output, only the one was detected and used. lamont -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1543683 Title: Fails to detect

[Bug 1543683] Re: Fails to detect (second) display

2016-02-25 Thread LaMont Jones
Interestingly, while two displays show up in the lspci output, only the one was detected and used. lamont -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1543683 Title: Fails to detect (second)

[Bug 1543683] Re: Fails to detect (second) display

2016-02-24 Thread LaMont Jones
Here is the boot... Interestingly, it shows 2 displays in lspci. I'm not in front of the computer, so I can't exactly say if it found it or not, but ISTR that it didn't show the device at all (in lspci) in the bad kernels. ** Attachment added: "zz"

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1543683] Re: Fails to detect (second) display

2016-02-24 Thread LaMont Jones
Here is the boot... Interestingly, it shows 2 displays in lspci. I'm not in front of the computer, so I can't exactly say if it found it or not, but ISTR that it didn't show the device at all (in lspci) in the bad kernels. ** Attachment added: "zz"

Accepted postfix 3.0.4-3 (all amd64 source) into unstable

2016-02-24 Thread LaMont Jones
Urgency: medium Maintainer: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Changed-By: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Closes: 815047 Description: postfix- High-performance mail transport agent postfix-cdb - CDB map support for Postfix postfix-dev - Loadable modules development environment

[Bug 1543683] Re: Fails to detect (second) display

2016-02-24 Thread LaMont Jones
Works. Note that during boot, when it flashes (presumably over to the kernel's i915 driver?) there is a noticible delay between the first (00:02.0) display and the second (failing, 00:02.1) display coming up - on the order of "under a second or two". I'm attaching the kernel log from the boot,

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1543683] Re: Fails to detect (second) display

2016-02-24 Thread LaMont Jones
Works. Note that during boot, when it flashes (presumably over to the kernel's i915 driver?) there is a noticible delay between the first (00:02.0) display and the second (failing, 00:02.1) display coming up - on the order of "under a second or two". I'm attaching the kernel log from the boot,

Accepted postfix 3.0.4-2 (all amd64 source) into unstable

2016-02-23 Thread LaMont Jones
Urgency: medium Maintainer: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Changed-By: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Closes: 815583 815591 815698 815707 Description: postfix- High-performance mail transport agent postfix-cdb - CDB map support for Postfix postfix-dev - Loadable modules

[ubuntu/xenial-proposed] postfix 3.0.4-2 (Accepted)

2016-02-23 Thread LaMont Jones
postfix (3.0.4-2) unstable; urgency=medium [LaMont Jones] * For now, use python2.7 for the test suite. See also launchpad bug 1548594. * Better handling for smtp_tls_CAfile. Closes: #815707 [localization folks] * l10n: Updated German debconf translations. Closes: #815698 (Helge

[Bug 1546788] Re: Fresh install of Postfix 3.0.3-1~build1 will not start with instance conflict error

2016-02-23 Thread LaMont Jones
Fixed in 3.0.3-2, which eventually became 3.0.4-1 ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1546788 Title: Fresh

[Bug 1546788] Re: Fresh install of Postfix 3.0.3-1~build1 will not start with instance conflict error

2016-02-23 Thread LaMont Jones
Fixed in 3.0.3-2, which eventually became 3.0.4-1 ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1546788

Bug#815707: postfix: fails to start after upgrade: fails to copy CA certificates

2016-02-23 Thread LaMont Jones
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 09:27:51PM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > This is presumably because my Postfix configuration has > smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt > but the init script seems to assume that the smtp_tls_CAfile will be a > directory? It looks to be a "almost

[Bug 1543683] Re: Fails to detect (second) display

2016-02-23 Thread LaMont Jones
d2e0 is good 74fc bad 237e bad. We have a winner: 237ed86c is the first failing commit. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1543683 Title: Fails to detect (second) display To manage

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1543683] Re: Fails to detect (second) display

2016-02-23 Thread LaMont Jones
d2e0 is good 74fc bad 237e bad. We have a winner: 237ed86c is the first failing commit. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1543683 Title: Fails to detect (second) display

[Bug 1548594] [NEW] Convert test suite to python 3.0

2016-02-22 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: 3.0.4-1ubuntu1 uses python 2.7 instead of 3.0 for the test suite. This should be corrected: migrate the test suite to python 3.0. ** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1548594] [NEW] Convert test suite to python 3.0

2016-02-22 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: 3.0.4-1ubuntu1 uses python 2.7 instead of 3.0 for the test suite. This should be corrected: migrate the test suite to python 3.0. ** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[ubuntu/xenial-proposed] postfix 3.0.4-1ubuntu1 (Accepted)

2016-02-22 Thread LaMont Jones
postfix (3.0.4-1ubuntu1) xenial; urgency=medium [LaMont Jones] * For now, use python2.7 for the test suite. See also launchpad bug 1548594. [localization folks] * l10n: Update Russian debconf translations. Closes: #815591 (Sergey Alyoshin) * l10n: Updated Czech debconf

Accepted postfix 3.0.4-1 (all amd64 source) into unstable

2016-02-22 Thread LaMont Jones
Urgency: medium Maintainer: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Changed-By: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Description: postfix- High-performance mail transport agent postfix-cdb - CDB map support for Postfix postfix-dev - Loadable modules development environment for Postfix

[ubuntu/xenial-proposed] postfix 3.0.4-1 (Accepted)

2016-02-22 Thread LaMont Jones
postfix (3.0.4-1) unstable; urgency=medium [Wietse Venema] * New Upstream release: 3.0.4 - Don't throttle a destination after opportunistic TLS failure. Viktor Dukhovni. - Wrong paramester name in lmtp_address_verify_target description. [LaMont Jones] * Finish migrating

Accepted postfix 3.0.3-3 (all amd64 source) into unstable

2016-02-22 Thread LaMont Jones
Urgency: medium Maintainer: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Changed-By: LaMont Jones <lam...@debian.org> Closes: 683056 704016 763637 771769 815384 815460 815498 Description: postfix- High-performance mail transport agent postfix-cdb - CDB map support for Postfix postfix-dev - Load

[ubuntu/xenial-proposed] postfix 3.0.3-3 (Accepted)

2016-02-22 Thread LaMont Jones
postfix (3.0.3-3) unstable; urgency=medium [LaMont Jones] * Update templates * typo fix [localization folks] * l10n: Updated Indonesian debconf translations. (T. Surya Fajri) * l10n: Updated Slovak debconf translations. Closes: #815498 (helix84) * l10n: Updated French debconf

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1543683] Re: Fails to detect (second) display

2016-02-22 Thread LaMont Jones
23eafea6a9d1faac0588a5275d0c755cb261346e is good (with complaints from the monitor about refreshrate out of range) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1543683 Title: Fails to

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1543683] Re: Fails to detect (second) display

2016-02-22 Thread LaMont Jones
That is, if it's convenient to just loop through and build all 7, then throw them into ~jsalisubury/lp1543683/$REF, then I can smash through the reboots in minimal time. (Getting tired of rebuilding my workspace...) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1543683] Re: Fails to detect (second) display

2016-02-22 Thread LaMont Jones
9eca6832f7254d49d25494da7d47c0f8a24f7862 is bad. In the interest of letting me do the rest in one interruption of my primary worksurface, would it be possible for you to build all 7 remaining versions (or throw me a script..), and then I can just reboot a few times for completion. I'm of the

Bug#666950: postfix-sqlite is missing, and main postfix package now links with libpq5

2016-02-20 Thread LaMont Jones
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 08:22:17PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: > On 12.04.2012 18:51, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > [LaMont Jones] > >* Link with and use sqlite when building dict_sqlite. add sqlite > > dictionary to dynamicmaps.cf. Closes: #666950 >

Bug#815094: postfix-mysql: fails to link dict_mysql.so

2016-02-20 Thread LaMont Jones
fixed 3.0.3-2 -- 3.0.3-2 has the migration code to properly rewrite dynamicmaps.cf to reflect upstream changes when incorporating shared libraries and dynamicmaps. lamont

[Bug 1543683] Re: Fails to detect (second) display

2016-02-20 Thread LaMont Jones
9eca6832f7254d49d25494da7d47c0f8a24f7862 is bad. In the interest of letting me do the rest in one interruption of my primary worksurface, would it be possible for you to build all 7 remaining versions (or throw me a script..), and then I can just reboot a few times for completion. I'm of the

[Bug 1543683] Re: Fails to detect (second) display

2016-02-20 Thread LaMont Jones
That is, if it's convenient to just loop through and build all 7, then throw them into ~jsalisubury/lp1543683/$REF, then I can smash through the reboots in minimal time. (Getting tired of rebuilding my workspace...) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

postfix 3.0.3-2: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-02-20 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the updated file to me, or

postfix 3.0.3-2: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-02-20 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the updated file to me, or

postfix 3.0.3-2: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-02-20 Thread LaMont Jones
ed debconf question. Thanks in advance, lamont # # Catalan translation for postfix package. # Copyright (C) 2012 LaMont Jones. # This file is distributed under the same license as the postfix package. # # Jordà Polo <jo...@ettin.org>, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2012. # msgid "" msgstr "

postfix 3.0.3-2: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-02-20 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the updated file to me, or

postfix 3.0.3-2: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-02-20 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the updated file to me, or

postfix 3.0.3-2: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-02-20 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the updated file to me, or

postfix 3.0.3-2: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-02-20 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the updated file to me, or

postfix 3.0.3-2: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-02-20 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the updated file to me, or

postfix 3.0.3-2: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2016-02-20 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the updated file to me, or

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >