[Bug 2068738] Re: AMD GPUs fail with null pointer dereference when IOMMU enabled, leading to black screen

2024-06-18 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi everyone, I spoke with Stefan Bader of the Kernel Team again. They are planning to include the patch in a respin of the current 2024.06.10 SRU cycle. https://kernel.ubuntu.com/ I will let you know once the kernel has been built and placed into -proposed for verification. But at this stage,

[Bug 2067862] Re: Removing legacy virtio-pci devices causes kernel panic

2024-06-17 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi Dong, Thanks for trying the test kernel and letting me know it works. And for the help with the testcase. I have submitted the patch to the Ubuntu Kernel Team mailing list: Cover letter: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2024-June/151550.html Patch:

[Bug 2067862] Re: Removing legacy virtio-pci devices causes kernel panic

2024-06-17 Thread Matthew Ruffell
** Description changed: - In the Ubuntu 24's 6.8.0-31-generic kernel version, the capability - https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/fd27ef6b44bec26915c5b2b22c13856d9f0ba17a - (virtio-pci: Introduce admin virtqueue) was added. However, an issue was - overlooked by the upstream community,

[Bug 2067862] Re: Removing legacy virtio-pci devices causes kernel panic

2024-06-17 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthew Ruffell (mruffell) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067862 Title: Removing legacy virtio-pci devices causes kernel panic

[Bug 2069534] Re: linux 6.8 fails to boot on arm64 if any param is more than 140 chars

2024-06-17 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi Shantur, It is not fixed, I just marked it as fixed for "Ubuntu" a.k.a the development release oracular, since it will pick up a 6.10+ kernel when it eventually becomes available. I added a noble entry, since noble's kernel is the one that actually needs to be fixed. I did have a look at

[Bug 2069550] Re: DUTs displayed a black screen after installing the kernel in proposed on Focal

2024-06-17 Thread Matthew Ruffell
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2068738 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068738 Known regression. See bug 2068738 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2068738 AMD GPUs fail with null pointer dereference when IOMMU enabled, leading to black screen -- You received this

[Bug 2068791] Re: linux 6.8 fails to boot if any param is more than 140 chars

2024-06-17 Thread Matthew Ruffell
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2069534 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069534 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2069534 linux 6.8 fails to boot on arm64 if any param is more than 140 chars -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 2069534] Re: linux 6.8 fails to boot on arm64 if any param is more than 140 chars

2024-06-17 Thread Matthew Ruffell
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2069485] Re: won't boot on linux kernal 5.15.0-112

2024-06-17 Thread Matthew Ruffell
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2068738 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068738 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2068738 AMD GPUs fail with null pointer dereference when IOMMU enabled, leading to black screen -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 2069485] Re: won't boot on linux kernal 5.15.0-112

2024-06-16 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi Roger, Does your HP laptop have an AMD APU? AMD GPU? You are probably suffering from: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2068738 Thanks, Matthew -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2068840] Re: No drm.ko.zst in noble (ubuntu24.04) /linux-modules-6.8.0

2024-06-16 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi Pramod, I downloaded the driver version you listed, 550.90.07 from the NVIDIA website: https://www.nvidia.com/download/driverResults.aspx/226768/en-us/ This gave me NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-550.90.07.run. I managed to successfully install this to 6.8.0-31-generic, and 6.8.0-35-generic without

[Bug 1907932] Re: drop rb_safe_level() from ruby-curses to fix irqtop from missing symbols and deprecation warnings

2024-06-16 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Performing verification for Focal. I started a fresh focal VM, and installed irqtop 2.4-2ubuntu0.5 and ruby-curses 1.2.4-1build1 from -updates. I then started irqtop: $ sudo irqtop /usr/bin/irqtop:598: warning: rb_safe_level will be removed in Ruby 3.0

[Bug 1907932] Re: drop rb_safe_level() from ruby-curses to fix irqtop from missing symbols and deprecation warnings

2024-06-16 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Performing verification for Jammy. I started a fresh jammy VM, and installed irqtop 2.6-2ubuntu3 with ruby- curses 1.2.4-1build3, from -updates. I then ran: $ sudo irqtop :85:in `require': /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ruby/vendor_ruby/3.0.0/curses.so: undefined symbol: rb_safe_level -

[Bug 2067862] Re: remove virtio legacy device make kernel Oops

2024-06-13 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi Dong, I have been reading: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/CACGkMEs1t-ipP7TasHkKNKd=peVEES6Xdw1zSsJkb- bc9et...@mail.gmail.com/T/#m167335bf7ab09b12fec3bdc5d46a30bc2e26cac7 and I tried to reproduce the problem with 23.10's userspace, but I can't see the same crash. By virtio legacy devices, you

[Bug 2067862] Re: remove virtio legacy device make kernel Oops

2024-06-13 Thread Matthew Ruffell
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.

[Bug 2068738] Re: AMD GPUs fail with null pointer dereference when IOMMU enabled, leading to black screen

2024-06-13 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi everyone, An update: Greg KH has picked up the patch and added it to upstream stable now: https://lore.kernel.org/amd-gfx/2024061223-suitable-handler-b6f2@gregkh/ https://lore.kernel.org/amd-gfx/2024061239-rehydrate-flyable-343e@gregkh/ I suppose we can drop the UBUNTU: SAUCE tags. I

[Bug 2051299] Re: nvme-cli: fguid is printed as binary data and causes MAAS to fail erasing NVME disks

2024-06-12 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Attached is a V2 that corrects a minor omission in the changelog. ** Patch added: "Debdiff for nvme-cli on Jammy V2" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvme-cli/+bug/2051299/+attachment/5788982/+files/lp2051299_jammy_V2.debdiff ** Patch removed: "Debdiff for nvme-cli on Jammy"

[Bug 2051299] Re: nvme-cli: fguid is printed as binary data and causes MAAS to fail erasing NVME disks

2024-06-12 Thread Matthew Ruffell
) among numerous other functions, that is not appropriate to backport. Instead, just take the current implementation of nvme_uuid_to_string() and move it like the patch suggests, so json output works correctly. ** Also affects: nvme-cli (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status:

Re: [PATCH] Revert "drm/amdgpu: init iommu after amdkfd device init"

2024-06-12 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi Greg KH, Sasha, Please pick up this patch for 5.15 stable tree. I have built a test kernel and can confirm that it fixes affected users. Downstream bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2068738 Thanks, Matthew

Re: [PATCH] Revert "drm/amdgpu: init iommu after amdkfd device init"

2024-06-12 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi Greg KH, Sasha, Please pick up this patch for 5.15 stable tree. I have built a test kernel and can confirm that it fixes affected users. Downstream bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2068738 Thanks, Matthew

[Bug 2069025] Re: kernel BUG at mm/migrate.c:663 on 6.8.0-1009-aws #9-Ubuntu

2024-06-11 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi Ariel, Are you using zfs? I see you have the module listed. Your oops looks very similar to this discussion here: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/15140 It doesn't seem anyone has come to any conclusions yet. I'll do some more research. Thanks, Matthew ** Bug watch added:

[Bug 2068738] Re: AMD GPUs fail with null pointer dereference when IOMMU enabled, leading to black screen

2024-06-11 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi everyone, Patches are on the Ubuntu Kernel Team mailing list: Cover letter: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2024-June/151409.html Patch: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2024-June/151410.html I will go talk to the kernel team now, I can't promise anything, but will

[Bug 2068738] Re: AMD GPUs fail with null pointer dereference when IOMMU enabled, leading to black screen

2024-06-11 Thread Matthew Ruffell
** Summary changed: - Kernel update 5.15.0-112 might cause severe problems with specific AMD GPUs + AMD GPUs fail with null pointer dereference when IOMMU enabled, leading to black screen ** Description changed: - System is not booting while using AMD Picasso/Raven 2 graphics after - update to

[Bug 2069045] Re: 5.15.0-112 fails to initialize NVidia video card

2024-06-11 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hello Evgueni, Are you sure it is an Nvidia card? We have a known regression for 5.15.0-112-generic with AMD cards, over in bug 2068738. The symptom is a black screen on boot. Thanks, Matthew -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 2068738] Re: Kernel update 5.15.0-112 might cause severe problems with specific AMD GPUs

2024-06-11 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi Xie, Thanks for trying the test kernel, and its great news that we have identified the fix. I'll write up a SRU template, and get the patch sent off to the kernel team today. Thanks, Matthew -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 2068738] Re: Kernel update 5.15.0-112 might cause severe problems with specific AMD GPUs

2024-06-10 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi Tino, It says Fix Released for Ubuntu, aka, the latest Ubuntu release, which is 24.10 Oracular, as it isn't affected. Maybe I should have marked it invalid in the first place. Anyway, once someone tries the test kernel I built yesterday to see if it fixes the issue, I can go about getting the

[Bug 2068738] Re: Kernel update 5.15.0-112 might cause severe problems with specific AMD GPUs

2024-06-09 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthew Ruffell (mruffell) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068738 Title: Kerne

[Bug 2068738] Re: Kernel update 5.15.0-112 might cause severe problems with specific AMD GPUs

2024-06-09 Thread Matthew Ruffell
PS. Please remove the workaround "nomodeset" if you applied it before you try the test kernel. I really just want to know if the reverted patch fixes the issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2068735] Re: I updated my linux mint system today and after rebbot I received black screen

2024-06-09 Thread Matthew Ruffell
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2068738 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068738 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2068738 Kernel update 5.15.0-112 might cause severe problems with specific AMD GPUs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 2068738] Re: Kernel update 5.15.0-112 might cause severe problems with specific AMD GPUs

2024-06-09 Thread Matthew Ruffell
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2068793] Re: Black screen on restart after update: fix "nomodeset"

2024-06-09 Thread Matthew Ruffell
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2068738 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068738 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2068738 Kernel update 5.15.0-112 might cause severe problems with specific AMD GPUs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 2068840] Re: No drm.ko.zst in noble (ubuntu24.04) /linux-modules-6.8.0

2024-06-09 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi Pramod, Yes, this changed recently, in mantic and onward I believe. CONFIG_DRM is set to "y" for all architectures except s390x, which is why you still see drm.ko.zst for s390x only. In Ubuntu Noble kernel sources: debian.master/config/annotations: 177:CONFIG_DRM

[Bug 2068655] Re: net stable backport request for 24.04 lts

2024-06-06 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi Daniel, Thanks for your contributions! There's two ways we get patches into our Ubuntu kernels, the first is a LP bug per patchset that ideally fixes one specific issue, has a testcase etc and then we submit patches for review to the Ubuntu Kernel Mailing list. The process is:

[Bug 2066320] Re: gcp: set CONFIG_IDPF=y for Intel Infrastructure Data Path Function Driver

2024-05-21 Thread Matthew Ruffell
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2058052 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058052 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2058052 Enable Intel IDPF support on ARM64 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2066320] Re: gcp: set CONFIG_IDPF=y for Intel Infrastructure Data Path Function Driver

2024-05-21 Thread Matthew Ruffell
ged in: linux-gcp (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: linux-gcp (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthew Ruffell (mruffell) ** Changed in: linux-gcp (Ubuntu Oracular) Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthew Ruffell (mruffell) ** Changed in: linux

[Bug 2066320] [NEW] gcp: set CONFIG_IDPF=y for Intel Infrastructure Data Path Function Driver

2024-05-21 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Public bug reported: BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/ [Impact] GCE C3 Metal instance type requires the Intel IDPF driver for networking to function. On the Mantic kernel, this was built into the kernel: # grep IDPF /boot/config-6.5.0-1020-gcp CONFIG_IDPF=y On Noble, this is now been

[Bug 1907932] Re: drop rb_safe_level() from ruby-curses to fix irqtop from missing symbols and deprecation warnings

2024-05-17 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Attached is a debdiff which solves this issue for focal. ** Patch added: "Attached is a debdiff for ruby-curses on focal" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-curses/+bug/1907932/+attachment/5779433/+files/lp1907932_focal.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1907932] Re: drop rb_safe_level() from ruby-curses to fix irqtop from missing symbols and deprecation warnings

2024-05-17 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Attached is a debdiff for jammy which solves this issue. ** Summary changed: - ruby-curses: Emits warning: "rb_safe_level will be removed in Ruby 3.0", affects at least irqtop + drop rb_safe_level() from ruby-curses to fix irqtop from missing symbols and deprecation warnings ** Description

[Bug 1907932] Re: ruby-curses: Emits warning: "rb_safe_level will be removed in Ruby 3.0", affects at least irqtop

2024-05-17 Thread Matthew Ruffell
rses (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: ruby-curses (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: ruby-curses (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthew Ruffell (mruffell) ** Changed in: ruby-curses (Ubuntu Jammy)

[Bug 2065456] Re: segfault when importing *.tif as book cover

2024-05-13 Thread Matthew Ruffell
** Also affects: calibre (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: linux (Ubuntu) ** Also affects: calibre (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 2065265] Re: can not build linux-image-signed.deb

2024-05-09 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi Light_Kernel_Ops, The linux-signed package is signed with Canonical's Secure Boot Signing Key, making the kernel bootable on systems that have secure boot enabled. This key is not public for obvious reasons, and only particular Kernel team members have access to it. Where do you want to

[Bug 2036467] Re: Resizing cloud-images occasionally fails due to superblock checksum mismatch in resize2fs

2024-05-08 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi Theodore, Ubuntu carries a little delta ontop of debian, and requires a merge, so I think it is best to wait a week for the final e2fsprogs release before we perform the merge. https://merges.ubuntu.com/e/e2fsprogs/REPORT Thanks, Matthew -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 2065047] Re: df -h reports resource unavailable for CIFS mounts

2024-05-07 Thread Matthew Ruffell
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2060780 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060780 Hi JB2Cool, Yes, you are correct. You are seeing the exact same as bug 2060780, that was introduced between 5.15.0-101 and 5.15.0-102 and fixed in 5.15.0-105. For AWS, the fix is in: $ git log --grep

[Bug 2064291] Re: Ubuntu 24.04 crashed multiple times

2024-05-07 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi Bernard, These are userspace application crashes. Try and wait for a kernel crash to occur. Thanks, Matthew -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064291 Title: Ubuntu 24.04 crashed

[Bug 2064291] Re: Ubuntu 24.04 crashed multiple times

2024-05-06 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi Bernard, The crash seems to bring your system down before the logs are able to be written to disk, so there is no oops present in your dmesg. Its pretty common. Would you be able to capture a kernel crashdump (kdump). Follow the instructions in:

[Bug 2064999] [NEW] Prevent soft lockups during IOMMU streaming DMA mapping by limiting nvme max_hw_sectors_kb to cache optimised size

2024-05-06 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Importance: Undecided Status: Fix Released ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Medium Assignee: Matthew Ruffell (mruffell) Status: In Progress ** Tags: jammy sts ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux

[Bug 2064827] Re: [5.19.0-1030-lowlatency] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000006b1

2024-05-06 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi Sophi, The 5.19 HWE kernel for Jammy is no longer supported. Its support period was for the lifetime of the 22.10 Kinetic Kudu release, which is now end of life. Can you upgrade to a supported kernel, e.g. the latest 5.15 Jammy kernel or the current 6.5 HWE kernel, and retry? Is there any

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060919] Re: cifs: Copying file to same directory results in page fault

2024-04-30 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi everyone, Thank you for testing, and its great to hear that it fixes the issue. The Jammy HWE kernel is still queued up to be built, it should be built over the next few days. You can keep an eye on it at https://kernel.ubuntu.com/reports/kernel-stable-board/ Regardless, we should be on

[Bug 2060919] Re: cifs: Copying file to same directory results in page fault

2024-04-30 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi everyone, Thank you for testing, and its great to hear that it fixes the issue. The Jammy HWE kernel is still queued up to be built, it should be built over the next few days. You can keep an eye on it at https://kernel.ubuntu.com/reports/kernel-stable-board/ Regardless, we should be on

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2064291] Re: Ubuntu 24.04 crashed multiple times

2024-04-30 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi Bernard, Can you have a look at your /var/log/kern.log and /var/log/syslog files, and look for what is known as a kernel oops? It looks like some of the examples in this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2060919 Would you be able to copy and paste any you find into a

[Bug 2064291] Re: Ubuntu 24.04 crashed multiple times

2024-04-30 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi Bernard, Can you have a look at your /var/log/kern.log and /var/log/syslog files, and look for what is known as a kernel oops? It looks like some of the examples in this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2060919 Would you be able to copy and paste any you find into a

[Bug 2060919] Re: cifs: Copying file to same directory results in page fault

2024-04-29 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi everyone, The kernel team has built the patch into the s2024.04.1 SRU cycle, as 6.5.0-35-generic. An ETA for this is the week of 13th of May, as per https://kernel.ubuntu.com/ Would anyone be able to help test the kernel by installing 6.5.0-35-generic from -proposed and doing a cifs mount

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060919] Re: cifs: Copying file to same directory results in page fault

2024-04-29 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi everyone, The kernel team has built the patch into the s2024.04.1 SRU cycle, as 6.5.0-35-generic. An ETA for this is the week of 13th of May, as per https://kernel.ubuntu.com/ Would anyone be able to help test the kernel by installing 6.5.0-35-generic from -proposed and doing a cifs mount

[Bug 2036467] Re: Resizing cloud-images occasionally fails due to superblock checksum mismatch in resize2fs

2024-04-28 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi Krister, Thanks for the heads up about 1.47.1 upstream, it does indeed look like a release is coming soon. It seems Debian unstable already has 1.7.1-rc1: https://packages.debian.org/sid/e2fsprogs When the Ubuntu archive opens for OO, we will merge 1.47.1~rc1-1 from debian unstable, and then

[Bug 2036467] Re: Resizing cloud-images occasionally fails due to superblock checksum mismatch in resize2fs

2024-04-28 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Attached is a V2 patch for Noble for e2fsprogs. ** Patch added: "Debdiff for e2fsprogs on noble V2" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/2036467/+attachment/5772258/+files/lp2036467_noble_V2.debdiff ** Patch removed: "Debdiff for e2fsprogs on noble"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2036467] Re: Resizing cloud-images occasionally fails due to superblock checksum mismatch in resize2fs

2024-04-28 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Attached is a V2 patch for Noble for e2fsprogs. ** Patch added: "Debdiff for e2fsprogs on noble V2" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/2036467/+attachment/5772258/+files/lp2036467_noble_V2.debdiff ** Patch removed: "Debdiff for e2fsprogs on noble"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2036467] Re: Resizing cloud-images occasionally fails due to superblock checksum mismatch in resize2fs

2024-04-28 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi Krister, Thanks for the heads up about 1.47.1 upstream, it does indeed look like a release is coming soon. It seems Debian unstable already has 1.7.1-rc1: https://packages.debian.org/sid/e2fsprogs When the Ubuntu archive opens for OO, we will merge 1.47.1~rc1-1 from debian unstable, and then

[Bug 2060919] Re: cifs: Copying file to same directory results in page fault

2024-04-21 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi everyone, Thanks for helping to test the test kernel, and I am glad that it fixes the issue. I have written a SRU template and have set it as the description of the bug. I have submitted the revert to the Kernel team mailing list for SRU: Cover Letter:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060919] Re: cifs: Copying file to same directory results in page fault

2024-04-21 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi everyone, Thanks for helping to test the test kernel, and I am glad that it fixes the issue. I have written a SRU template and have set it as the description of the bug. I have submitted the revert to the Kernel team mailing list for SRU: Cover Letter:

[Bug 2060919] Re: cifs: Copying file to same directory results in page fault

2024-04-21 Thread Matthew Ruffell
** Summary changed: - Remote filesystems mounted as CIFS not working after update to Kernel "6.5.0-27-generic #28-Ubuntu" (amd64) or Kernel "6.5.0-1014-raspi #17-Ubuntu" (aarch64). + cifs: Copying file to same directory results in page fault ** Description changed: - Remote filesystems

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060919] Re: cifs: Copying file to same directory results in page fault

2024-04-21 Thread Matthew Ruffell
** Summary changed: - Remote filesystems mounted as CIFS not working after update to Kernel "6.5.0-27-generic #28-Ubuntu" (amd64) or Kernel "6.5.0-1014-raspi #17-Ubuntu" (aarch64). + cifs: Copying file to same directory results in page fault ** Description changed: - Remote filesystems

[Bug 2060780] Re: CIFS stopped working/is unstable with kernel update to 5.15.0-102.112

2024-04-21 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi Axel, Sorry about you getting spammed about all these verifications. The robot that posts these messages looks for the Launchpad bug number in the package changelogs, and just makes a post for every package it sees it in. You might not know, but Ubuntu has slightly over 100 kernels these

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060780] Re: CIFS stopped working/is unstable with kernel update to 5.15.0-102.112

2024-04-21 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi Axel, Sorry about you getting spammed about all these verifications. The robot that posts these messages looks for the Launchpad bug number in the package changelogs, and just makes a post for every package it sees it in. You might not know, but Ubuntu has slightly over 100 kernels these

[Bug 2060919] Re: Remote filesystems mounted as CIFS not working after update to Kernel "6.5.0-27-generic #28-Ubuntu" (amd64) or Kernel "6.5.0-1014-raspi #17-Ubuntu" (aarch64).

2024-04-21 Thread Matthew Ruffell
) => Matthew Ruffell (mruffell) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060919 Title: Remote filesystems mounted as CIFS not working after update to Kernel "6.5.0-27-generic #28-Ubunt

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060919] Re: Remote filesystems mounted as CIFS not working after update to Kernel "6.5.0-27-generic #28-Ubuntu" (amd64) or Kernel "6.5.0-1014-raspi #17-Ubuntu" (aarch64).

2024-04-21 Thread Matthew Ruffell
) => Matthew Ruffell (mruffell) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-azure in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060919 Title: Remote filesystems mounted as CIFS not working after update to Kernel "6.5.0-2

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2049634] Re: smb: wsize blocks of bytes followed with binary zeros on copy, destroying data

2024-04-19 Thread Matthew Ruffell
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049634 Title: smb: wsize blocks of bytes followed with

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060919] Re: Remote filesystems mounted as CIFS not working after update to Kernel "6.5.0-27-generic #28-Ubuntu" (amd64) or Kernel "6.5.0-1014-raspi #17-Ubuntu" (aarch64).

2024-04-19 Thread Matthew Ruffell
h: commit 9dc02a5b7540d18a69bcbaf8f4fa428e32075b4b (HEAD -> lp2060919-test) Author: Matthew Ruffell Date: Fri Apr 19 17:25:48 2024 +1200 Revert "cifs: fix flushing folio regression for 6.1 backport" This reverts commit 21bb2ba4f1ac1e3a57594be62dd74e7b1401b2b1. dif

[Bug 2049634] Re: smb: wsize blocks of bytes followed with binary zeros on copy, destroying data

2024-04-18 Thread Matthew Ruffell
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049634 Title: smb: wsize blocks of bytes followed with binary zeros

[Bug 2060919] Re: Remote filesystems mounted as CIFS not working after update to Kernel "6.5.0-27-generic #28-Ubuntu" (amd64) or Kernel "6.5.0-1014-raspi #17-Ubuntu" (aarch64).

2024-04-18 Thread Matthew Ruffell
h: commit 9dc02a5b7540d18a69bcbaf8f4fa428e32075b4b (HEAD -> lp2060919-test) Author: Matthew Ruffell Date: Fri Apr 19 17:25:48 2024 +1200 Revert "cifs: fix flushing folio regression for 6.1 backport" This reverts commit 21bb2ba4f1ac1e3a57594be62dd74e7b1401b2b1. dif

[Bug 2060919] Re: Remote filesystems mounted as CIFS not working after update to Kernel "6.5.0-27-generic #28-Ubuntu" (amd64) or Kernel "6.5.0-1014-raspi #17-Ubuntu" (aarch64).

2024-04-18 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hello, I can't actually reproduce the issue, I seem to be missing something. Server -- $ sudo apt update $ sudo apt upgrade $ sudo apt install samba $ sudo vim /etc/samba/smb.conf server min protocol = NT1 [sambashare] comment = Samba on Ubuntu path = /home/ubuntu/sambashare

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060919] Re: Remote filesystems mounted as CIFS not working after update to Kernel "6.5.0-27-generic #28-Ubuntu" (amd64) or Kernel "6.5.0-1014-raspi #17-Ubuntu" (aarch64).

2024-04-18 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hello, I can't actually reproduce the issue, I seem to be missing something. Server -- $ sudo apt update $ sudo apt upgrade $ sudo apt install samba $ sudo vim /etc/samba/smb.conf server min protocol = NT1 [sambashare] comment = Samba on Ubuntu path = /home/ubuntu/sambashare

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060780] Re: CIFS stopped working/is unstable with kernel update to 5.15.0-102.112

2024-04-18 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi everyone, 5.15.0-105-generic has been released to -updates now. It fixes the cifs issue. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/5.15.0-105.115 Please let us know if you find any more issues. Thanks, Matthew -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel

[Bug 2060780] Re: CIFS stopped working/is unstable with kernel update to 5.15.0-102.112

2024-04-18 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi everyone, 5.15.0-105-generic has been released to -updates now. It fixes the cifs issue. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/5.15.0-105.115 Please let us know if you find any more issues. Thanks, Matthew -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 2059197] Re: mount.nfs: Fix minor version parsing when '-t nfs4' and '-o vers=4.x' are used together

2024-04-18 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Performing verification for Focal. I started two VMs, one Jammy, which is the nfs server, and one Focal, which is the client. I used the instructions in the testcase sections of this bug, and also bug 2049262. The Focal VM has nfs-common 1:1.3.4-2.5ubuntu3.6 from -updates. Let's try the

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2062113] Re: CIFS SMB does not work on linux-image-5.15.0-102-generic

2024-04-18 Thread Matthew Ruffell
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2060780 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060780 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2060780 CIFS stopped working/is unstable with kernel update to 5.15.0-102.112 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel

[Bug 2062113] Re: CIFS SMB does not work on linux-image-5.15.0-102-generic

2024-04-18 Thread Matthew Ruffell
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2060780 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060780 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2060780 CIFS stopped working/is unstable with kernel update to 5.15.0-102.112 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060780] Re: CIFS stopped working/is unstable with kernel update to 5.15.0-102.112

2024-04-17 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Performing verification for Jammy. I started two Jammy VMs. One is a server and the other a client. Server -- $ sudo apt update $ sudo apt upgrade $ sudo apt install samba $ sudo vim /etc/samba/smb.conf [sambashare] comment = Samba on Ubuntu path = /home/ubuntu/sambashare read

[Bug 2060780] Re: CIFS stopped working/is unstable with kernel update to 5.15.0-102.112

2024-04-17 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Performing verification for Jammy. I started two Jammy VMs. One is a server and the other a client. Server -- $ sudo apt update $ sudo apt upgrade $ sudo apt install samba $ sudo vim /etc/samba/smb.conf [sambashare] comment = Samba on Ubuntu path = /home/ubuntu/sambashare read

[Bug 2060780] Re: CIFS stopped working/is unstable with kernel update to 5.15.0-102.112

2024-04-17 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi everyone, the fix will also be available for Focal, as part of it getting the Jammy HWE kernel. It will be released at the same time as Jammy's kernel is released. We got the notification above that the kernel should be in -proposed, but I have been refreshing -proposed all day and the kernel

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060780] Re: CIFS stopped working/is unstable with kernel update to 5.15.0-102.112

2024-04-17 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi everyone, the fix will also be available for Focal, as part of it getting the Jammy HWE kernel. It will be released at the same time as Jammy's kernel is released. We got the notification above that the kernel should be in -proposed, but I have been refreshing -proposed all day and the kernel

Re: pastebinit default target on Ubuntu

2024-04-16 Thread Matthew Ruffell
I think we should be pointing it back to paste.ubuntu.com, because our existing users expect it will go to a distro owned pastebin, and we should remain consistent. I am also all for keeping user data on IS controlled assets, we don't exactly know who controls dpaste, and if they parse dmesg or

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060780] Re: CIFS stopped working/is unstable with kernel update to 5.15.0-102.112

2024-04-15 Thread Matthew Ruffell
The new kernel is tagged as 5.15.0-105-generic, and it is a respin of 5.15.0-103-generic with the fix. https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu- kernel/ubuntu/+source/linux/+git/jammy/log/?h=Ubuntu-5.15.0-105.115 It should be available in -proposed soon, the Kernel Team are still rebuilding all the

[Bug 2060780] Re: CIFS stopped working/is unstable with kernel update to 5.15.0-102.112

2024-04-15 Thread Matthew Ruffell
The new kernel is tagged as 5.15.0-105-generic, and it is a respin of 5.15.0-103-generic with the fix. https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu- kernel/ubuntu/+source/linux/+git/jammy/log/?h=Ubuntu-5.15.0-105.115 It should be available in -proposed soon, the Kernel Team are still rebuilding all the

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2061248] Re: kernel 5.15.0-102 - CIFS mount problem (NAS)

2024-04-14 Thread Matthew Ruffell
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2060780 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060780 Come over to bug 2060780 and talk about it with us there. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2060780 CIFS stopped working/is unstable with kernel update to 5.15.0-102.112 -- You received

[Bug 2061248] Re: kernel 5.15.0-102 - CIFS mount problem (NAS)

2024-04-14 Thread Matthew Ruffell
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2060780 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060780 Come over to bug 2060780 and talk about it with us there. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2060780 CIFS stopped working/is unstable with kernel update to 5.15.0-102.112 -- You received

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060780] Re: CIFS stopped working/is unstable with kernel update to 5.15.0-102.112

2024-04-11 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi everyone, 5.15.0-104-generic just hit jammy-proposed a couple minutes ago. It isn't available for focal users yet. Can someone please test 5.15.0-104-generic on jammy and let me know if it fixes the issue? Thanks. Instructions to Install (On a mantic system): 1) cat << EOF | sudo tee

[Bug 2060780] Re: CIFS stopped working/is unstable with kernel update to 5.15.0-102.112

2024-04-11 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi everyone, 5.15.0-104-generic just hit jammy-proposed a couple minutes ago. It isn't available for focal users yet. Can someone please test 5.15.0-104-generic on jammy and let me know if it fixes the issue? Thanks. Instructions to Install (On a mantic system): 1) cat << EOF | sudo tee

[Bug 2059197] Re: mount.nfs: Fix minor version parsing when '-t nfs4' and '-o vers=4.x' are used together

2024-04-10 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Thanks for pointing out the missing patch Heitor. I was indeed missing it. Please review and sponsor the V2 debdiff. Thanks, Matthew -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059197 Title:

[Bug 2059197] Re: mount.nfs: Fix minor version parsing when '-t nfs4' and '-o vers=4.x' are used together

2024-04-10 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Sanity testing the test package: https://launchpad.net/~mruffell/+archive/ubuntu/lp2059197-test nfs-common 1:1.3.4-2.5ubuntu3.6+lp2059197v20240411b1 Testcase for this bug, i.e. the regression. $ sudo mount -t nfs4 -o vers=4.2 -vvv jammy-nfs-server:/ /mnt mount.nfs4: timeout set for Thu Apr 11

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060780] Re: CIFS stopped working/is unstable with kernel update to 5.15.0-102.112

2024-04-10 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi everyone, Reading: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2024020616.454699-1-kova...@altlinux.org/T/ It seems the issue was introduced in commit 33eae65c6f49770fec7a662935d4eb4a6406d24b Author: Paulo Alcantara Date: Wed Dec 13 12:25:57 2023 -0300 Subject: smb: client: fix OOB in

[Bug 2060780] Re: CIFS stopped working/is unstable with kernel update to 5.15.0-102.112

2024-04-10 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi everyone, Reading: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2024020616.454699-1-kova...@altlinux.org/T/ It seems the issue was introduced in commit 33eae65c6f49770fec7a662935d4eb4a6406d24b Author: Paulo Alcantara Date: Wed Dec 13 12:25:57 2023 -0300 Subject: smb: client: fix OOB in

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060780] Re: CIFS stopped working/is unstable with kernel update to 5.15.0-102.112

2024-04-10 Thread Matthew Ruffell
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided => High ** Tags added: seg -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 2060780] Re: CIFS stopped working/is unstable with kernel update to 5.15.0-102.112

2024-04-10 Thread Matthew Ruffell
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided => High ** Tags added: seg -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 2060797] Re: df says Resource temporarily unavailable after kernel upgrade to 5.15.0-102

2024-04-10 Thread Matthew Ruffell
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2060780 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060780 Hi everyone, I will provide updates on the other bug 2060780. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2060780 CIFS stopped working/is unstable with kernel update to 5.15.0-102.112 -- You

[Bug 2059197] Re: mount.nfs: Fix minor version parsing when '-t nfs4' and '-o vers=4.x' are used together

2024-04-10 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Attached is a new debdiff which includes the missing patch. I did another look upstream, but I think we are okay now. ** Patch added: "Debdiff for nfs-utils on Focal V2" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/2059197/+attachment/5763564/+files/lp2059197_focal_V2.debdiff **

[Bug 2059197] Re: mount.nfs: Fix minor version parsing when '-t nfs4' and '-o vers=4.x' are used together

2024-04-10 Thread Matthew Ruffell
** Patch removed: "Debdiff for nfs-utils on Focal" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/2059197/+attachment/5761398/+files/lp2059197_focal.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2049634] Re: smb: wsize blocks of bytes followed with binary zeros on copy, destroying data

2024-04-07 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi R. Diez, The 6.5.0-27-generic kernel just got released, so it should make its way to an archive mirror near you in the next couple of hours, and should solve your SMB 1 issue. The 6.8 kernel should be good to go when you get it in the next couple of months. Let us know if you encounter any

[Bug 2049634] Re: smb: wsize blocks of bytes followed with binary zeros on copy, destroying data

2024-04-07 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi R. Diez, The 6.5.0-27-generic kernel just got released, so it should make its way to an archive mirror near you in the next couple of hours, and should solve your SMB 1 issue. The 6.8 kernel should be good to go when you get it in the next couple of months. Let us know if you encounter any

[Bug 2059197] Re: mount.nfs: Fix minor version parsing when '-t nfs4' and '-o vers=4.x' are used together

2024-04-02 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi Jeff, Again, I apologise for introducing this regression, but we are on our way to getting this fixed. The fixes are: commit 1e3ca7fe199531a372bb8e1c1033d8973097be50 Author: NeilBrown Date: Wed Jul 26 13:47:42 2017 -0400 Subject: mount: move handling of "-t nfs4" into nfs_nfs_version()

[Bug 2059197] Re: Fix minor version parsing when '-t nfs4' and '-o vers=4.x' are used together

2024-04-02 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Attached is a debdiff for Focal which fixes this issue. ** Summary changed: - Issue with nfs4.0 mounts after upgrade to 3.6 + Fix minor version parsing when '-t nfs4' and '-o vers=4.x' are used together ** Summary changed: - Fix minor version parsing when '-t nfs4' and '-o vers=4.x' are used

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >