https://github.com/arsenm closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107598
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
s only used by like, 4 visitors in the entire
codebase (e.g. overriding `WalkUpFromX`), but more details on that on the pr
for the DRAV impl.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105195
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
or` implementation
into a separate pr.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105195
_______
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/arsenm approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108853
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
/github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108853
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
#[[ATTR2]], !tbaa [[TBAA3]]
+//
+// CHECK-AARCH-LABEL: define dso_local i32 @test_ilogb(
+// CHECK-AARCH-SAME: fp128 noundef [[A:%.*]]) local_unnamed_addr #[[ATTR1]] {
+// CHECK-AARCH: [[CALL:%.*]] = tail call i32 @ilogbl(fp128 noundef [[A]])
#[[ATTR2]], !tbaa [[TBAA2]]
+//
+// CHECK-SPIR-LABEL: define dso_local spir_func i32 @test_ilogb(
+// CHECK-SPIR-SAME: double noundef [[A:%.*]]) local_unnamed_addr #[[ATTR1]] {
+// CHECK-SPIR:[[CALL:%.*]] = tail call spir_func i32 @ilogbl(double
noundef [[A]]) #[[ATTR3]], !tbaa [[TBAA2]]
+//
+// CHECK-MINGW32-LABEL: define dso_local i32 @test_ilogb(
+// CHECK-MINGW32-SAME: ptr nocapture noundef readonly [[TMP0:%.*]])
local_unnamed_addr #[[ATTR0]] {
+// CHECK-MINGW32:[[A:%.*]] = load x86_fp80, ptr [[TMP0]], align 16, !tbaa
[[TBAA3]]
+// CHECK-MINGW32:store x86_fp80 [[A]], ptr [[BYVAL_TEMP:%.*]], align 16,
!tbaa [[TBAA3]]
+// CHECK-MINGW32:[[CALL:%.*]] = call i32 @ilogbl(ptr noundef nonnull
[[BYVAL_TEMP]]) #[[ATTR3]]
+//
+int test_ilogb(long double a) {
+ return ilogbl(a);
+}
//.
// CHECK: [[TBAA2]] = !{[[META3:![0-9]+]], [[META3]], i64 0}
// CHECK: [[META3]] = !{!"int", [[META4:![0-9]+]], i64 0}
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ution(?) here would be to tweak LangRef to be binding in
that it spells out that iff a particular Target has a Flat AS, that will be
reflected in LLVM as AS0?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108786
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
notes](https://github.com/jenkinsci/plugin-pom/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/jenkinsci/plugin-pom/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md)
-
[Commits](https://github.com/jenkinsci/plugin-pom/compare/plugin-4.87...plugin-4.88)
---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: org.jenkins-ci.plugins:
https://github.com/DavidSpickett approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109764
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
tbaederr wrote:
Ok, I managed to reproduce on a s390x host
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108949
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tru milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109762
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
DavidSpickett wrote:
Landing this, post commit comments welcome as usual.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108365
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/DavidSpickett closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108365
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
sable gdb-remote
packets"))
+
+process = self.connect(target)
+lldbutil.expect_state_changes(
+self, self.dbg.GetListener(), process, [lldb.eStateStopped]
+)
+
+self.check_regs(4)
+
+# Now increase the SVE length and continue. The mock will respond with
a new
+# vg and lldb will reconfigure the register defs. This should not
break the
+# sub-registers.
+
+self.runCmd("register write vg 8")
+self.expect("continue", substrs=["stop reason = signal SIGINT"])
+
+self.check_regs(8)
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/dmpolukhin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109167
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
.
dmpolukhin wrote:
Done
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109167
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
m-project/pull/109167
_______
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
-project/pull/109167
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/dmpolukhin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109167
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/dmpolukhin commented:
All comments resolved, also I added TODO that we might want to use ondisk hash
table to allow lazy deserialization for the new record.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109167
___
cfe-commits mailing
nctionToLambdasMap.end()) {
for (auto LID : IT->second)
GetDecl(LID);
+ FunctionToLambdasMap.erase(IT);
}
}
}
diff --git a/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTWriter.cpp
b/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTWriter.cpp
index c2952df3a03702..c3514d6e6805fd 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTWriter.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTWriter.cpp
@@ -5708,6 +5708,8 @@ void ASTWriter::WriteDeclAndTypes(ASTContext &Context) {
DelayedNamespaceRecord);
if (!FunctionToLambdasMap.empty()) {
+// TODO: on disk hash table for function to lambda mapping might be more
+// efficent becuase it allows lazy deserialization.
RecordData FunctionToLambdasMapRecord;
for (const auto &Pair : FunctionToLambdasMap) {
FunctionToLambdasMapRecord.push_back(
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mstorsjo approved this pull request.
Aside for the option ergonomics, this looks reasonable to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109360
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi
s, I wouldn't offhand have any idea
about what indices to use here.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109360
_______
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
timate goal. We need to think harder about what the final
ABI looks like, instead of creating a new symbol for every individual field
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102913
_______
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lis
ch-label-scheme=unlabeled -E -dM %s \
+// RUN: -o - 2>&1 | FileCheck \
+// RUN: --check-prefixes=CHECK-NO-MACRO,CHECK-UNLABELED-SCHEME-UNUSED %s
-// RUN: %clang --target=riscv64 -mcf-branch-label-scheme=func-sig -c %s \
-// RUN: -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
-// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-FUNC-SIG-SCHEME-UNUSED %s
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv64 -mcf-branch-label-scheme=func-sig -E -dM %s \
+// RUN: -o - 2>&1 | FileCheck \
+// RUN: --check-prefixes=CHECK-NO-MACRO,CHECK-FUNC-SIG-SCHEME-UNUSED %s
+// CHECK-ZICFILP-UNLABELED: __riscv_landing_pad 1{{$}}
+// CHECK-ZICFILP-UNLABELED: __riscv_landing_pad_unlabeled 1{{$}}
+// CHECK-ZICFILP-FUNC-SIG: __riscv_landing_pad 1{{$}}
+// CHECK-ZICFILP-FUNC-SIG: __riscv_landing_pad_func_sig 1{{$}}
+// CHECK-NO-MACRO-NOT: __riscv_landing_pad
+// CHECK-NO-MACRO-NOT: __riscv_landing_pad_unlabeled
+// CHECK-NO-MACRO-NOT: __riscv_landing_pad_func_sig
// CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID: error: option 'cf-protection=branch' cannot be
// CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID-SAME: specified on this target
// CHECK-UNLABELED-SCHEME-UNUSED: warning: argument unused during compilation:
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
=riscv64 -mcf-branch-label-scheme=unlabeled -c %s \
+// RUN: -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-UNLABELED-SCHEME-UNUSED %s
+
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv64 -mcf-branch-label-scheme=func-sig -c %s \
+// RUN: -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-FUNC-SIG-SCHEME-UNUSED %s
+
+// CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID: error: option 'cf-protection=branch' cannot be
+// CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID-SAME: specified on this target
+// CHECK-UNLABELED-SCHEME-UNUSED: warning: argument unused during compilation:
+// CHECK-UNLABELED-SCHEME-UNUSED-SAME: '-mcf-branch-label-scheme=unlabeled'
+// CHECK-FUNC-SIG-SCHEME-UNUSED: warning: argument unused during compilation:
+// CHECK-FUNC-SIG-SCHEME-UNUSED-SAME: '-mcf-branch-label-scheme=func-sig'
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
08853
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
mylai-mtk wrote:
Update: Address comments
Update: Split the CLI flag introduction to #109784 as per the suggestion from
kito
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109600
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https
ote:
Fixed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109600
_______
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
validness of `-fcf-protection=branch` is performed in the codegen step, which
won't be triggered if clang is requested to only produce preprocessed sources.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109600
_______
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
hub.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109600
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ch-label-scheme=unlabeled -E -dM %s \
+// RUN: -o - 2>&1 | FileCheck \
+// RUN: --check-prefixes=CHECK-NO-MACRO,CHECK-UNLABELED-SCHEME-UNUSED %s
-// RUN: %clang --target=riscv64 -mcf-branch-label-scheme=func-sig -c %s \
-// RUN: -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
-// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-FUNC-SIG-SCHEME-UNUSED %s
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv64 -mcf-branch-label-scheme=func-sig -E -dM %s \
+// RUN: -o - 2>&1 | FileCheck \
+// RUN: --check-prefixes=CHECK-NO-MACRO,CHECK-FUNC-SIG-SCHEME-UNUSED %s
+// CHECK-ZICFILP-UNLABELED: __riscv_landing_pad 1{{$}}
+// CHECK-ZICFILP-UNLABELED: __riscv_landing_pad_unlabeled 1{{$}}
+// CHECK-ZICFILP-FUNC-SIG: __riscv_landing_pad 1{{$}}
+// CHECK-ZICFILP-FUNC-SIG: __riscv_landing_pad_func_sig 1{{$}}
+// CHECK-NO-MACRO-NOT: __riscv_landing_pad
+// CHECK-NO-MACRO-NOT: __riscv_landing_pad_unlabeled
+// CHECK-NO-MACRO-NOT: __riscv_landing_pad_func_sig
// CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID: error: option 'cf-protection=branch' cannot be
// CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID-SAME: specified on this target
// CHECK-UNLABELED-SCHEME-UNUSED: warning: argument unused during compilation:
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
thub.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109600
___________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Commits" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to jenkinsci-commits+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid
you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Commits" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to jenkinsci-commits+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkins
:
Fixed in #109784.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109600
_______
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ck --check-prefix=CHECK-UNLABELED-SCHEME-UNUSED %s
+
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv64 -mcf-branch-label-scheme=func-sig -c %s \
+// RUN: -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-FUNC-SIG-SCHEME-UNUSED %s
+
+// CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID: error: option 'cf-protection=branch' cannot be
+// CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID-SAME: specified on this target
+// CHECK-UNLABELED-SCHEME-UNUSED: warning: argument unused during compilation:
+// CHECK-UNLABELED-SCHEME-UNUSED-SAME: '-mcf-branch-label-scheme=unlabeled'
+// CHECK-FUNC-SIG-SCHEME-UNUSED: warning: argument unused during compilation:
+// CHECK-FUNC-SIG-SCHEME-UNUSED-SAME: '-mcf-branch-label-scheme=func-sig'
``
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109784
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID %s
+
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv64 -mcf-branch-label-scheme=unlabeled -c %s \
+// RUN: -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-UNLABELED-SCHEME-UNUSED %s
+
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv64
https://github.com/jryans edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107369
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
, fn_name, instr)
+di_loc_bug = DILocBug(origin, action, bb_name, fn_name,
instr)
jryans wrote:
Ah hmm, that is odd... Okay, seems like you've tried to follow the local
(somewhat strange) style. 😄
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107369
___
? It's what we basically assume
everywhere already, isn't it?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108786
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jryans edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107369
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
jryans wrote:
Hmm, how are environment variables ending up with up confused compiler
defines...? Anyway, it's fine to keep, even if highly unlikely to be hit.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107369
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-co
MacDue wrote:
I'll land this later today if there's no objections :slightly_smiling_face:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108853
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
o. But
really, this case is trying to capture cases where explicit choices were made,
so the name should reflect that somehow.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107279
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm
https://github.com/KanRobert closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106681
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
+# CHECK-NEXT: 0x0 R_X86_64_REX2_GOTPCRELX - 0x7
# CHECK-NEXT: 0x0 R_X86_64_NONE - 0x9
# CHECK-NEXT: 0x0 R_X86_64_8 - 0x9
# CHECK-NEXT: 0x0 R_X86_64_16 - 0x9
@@ -37,6 +39,7 @@
.reloc 0, R_X86_64_64, .data+2
.reloc 0, R_X86_64_GOTPCRELX, foo+3
.reloc 0, R_X86_64_REX_GOTPCRELX, 5
+ .reloc 0, R
KanRobert wrote:
Passed the validation of cpu2017 on intel sde w/ this patch + APX features.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106681
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe
e in ahead.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83237
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83237
>From f2e53e44eebab4720a1dbade24fcb14d698fb03f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuanqi Xu
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 11:41:53 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [Serialization] Code cleanups and polish 83233
---
clang/in
https://github.com/DavidSpickett closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109427
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
_______
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
yronglin wrote:
> @yronglin Could you try to investigate?
Ok, I'll take a look.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108949
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109427
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/vhscampos edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109412
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
.cpp
Line 416: expression evaluates to ''' (0x06, 6) == 12'
File
/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-00629752e622814649e67d6e5ecb02bf131b537d/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/constexpr-vectors.cpp
Line 419: expression evaluates to ''' (0x13, 19) == 9'
8 errors generated.
--
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108949
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/alexey-bataev approved this pull request.
LG
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109752
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
est to
deprecate standalone builds in the next release, then drop them afterwards? Do
we need an RFC? Do we need documentation for users on how to find the
"archived" standalone build support if they wanted it?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105969
____
-project/commit/c647b26ad534bb998063722f930ddd07162bfee7)
is too complex for a little win and I'm afraid future changes in this logic
will be even more complicated.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102835
_______
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@
t/pull/107343
_______
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/KanRobert approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109767
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
KanRobert wrote:
> @KanRobert @KanRobert What do you think about merging this PR to the release
> branch?
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109767
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/phoebewang edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109767
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
T(SmallSet, MoveAssignment) {
+ auto L = {1, 2, 3};
+ SmallSet S = L;
+ SmallSet T;
+ T = std::move(S);
+
+ EXPECT_TRUE(T.size() == L.size());
+ for (int Value : L) {
+EXPECT_TRUE(T.contains(Value));
+ }
+}
+
TEST(SmallSetTest, Insert) {
SmallSet s1;
__
Vector.end()));
Vector.clear();
-return std::make_pair(
-const_iterator(Set.insert(std::forward(V)).first), true);
+return {const_iterator(Set.insert(std::forward(V)).first), true};
}
};
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Small() const { return Set.empty(); }
-
- VIterator vfind(const T &V) const {
-for (VIterator I = Vector.begin(), E = Vector.end(); I != E; ++I)
- if (*I == V)
-return I;
-return Vector.end();
- }
};
/// If this set is of pointer values, transparently switch over to using
[2] PTR '(anon)' type_id=1
[3] INT 'int' size=4 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED
[4] VAR 'root' type_id=2, linkage=global
[5] DATASEC '.bss' size=0 vlen=1
type_id=4 offset=0 size=8 (VAR 'root')
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/
M-patch-version-specific handling in compiler-builtins.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109093
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
hes:
* Implement a single `TypeSystem` class that supports evaluation when given an
optional `Target`, implementing all the expression evaluation methods on the
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
o 4.88.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/jenkinsci/plugin-pom/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/jenkinsci/plugin-pom/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md)
-
[Commits](https://github.com/jenkinsci/plugin-pom/compare/plugin-4.87...plugin-4.88)
---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: org.j
o 4.88.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/jenkinsci/plugin-pom/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/jenkinsci/plugin-pom/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md)
-
[Commits](https://github.com/jenkinsci/plugin-pom/compare/plugin-4.87...plugin-4.88)
---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: org.j
m/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107343
_______
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ttings/notifications
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Commits" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to jenkinsci-commits+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the
possible that, at that point, thread-local access was not
implemented yet).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109477
_______________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
{evex} kmovq k0, qword ptr [rax - 0x10]
# CHECK-NOT: {evex}
``
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109767
___________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@KanRobert @KanRobert What do you think about merging this PR to the release
branch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109767
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi
ax - 16]
0x62,0xf1,0xfd,0x08,0x90,0x40,0xf0
-# ATT: {evex} kmovq -16(%rax), %k0
-# INTEL: {evex} kmovq k0, qword ptr [rax - 16]
+# ATT: kmovq -16(%rax), %k0
+# INTEL: kmovq k0, qword ptr [rax - 16]
0x62,0xf1,0xfc,0x08,0x90,0x40,0xf0
# ATT-NOT: {evex}
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109767
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
s://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107343
___________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/VyacheslavLevytskyy approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106429
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
abcdw pushed a commit to branch master
in repository guix.
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 75824be1ac gnu: librewolf: Add rdd paths allowlist patch.
75824be1ac is described below
com
https://github.com/eddyz87 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108071
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
int t;
#endif
+#ifdef __BPF_FEATURE_MAY_GOTO
+int u;
+#endif
// CHECK: int b;
// CHECK: int c;
@@ -98,6 +101,11 @@ int t;
// CPU_V3: int t;
// CPU_V4: int t;
+// CPU_V1: int u;
+// CPU_V2: int u;
+// CPU_V3: int u;
+// CPU_V4: int u;
+
// CPU_GENERIC: int g;
// CPU_PROBE: int f;
https://github.com/4ast approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108071
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vogelsgesang edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109485
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
d, and then merge
this pull request as soon as the test cases are green on Github
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109485
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/vogelsgesang approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109764
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
lure (it fails to fail to read memory). I looked into this (for
way longer than it should have been necessary), and I tracked it down to a
somewhat embarrassing bug. I've created #109764 to fix that.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109485
______
expr bool ctorFail() { //
+S2 *s = std::allocator().allocate(1);
+std::construct_at(s); // both-note {{in call to}}
+
+return true;
+ }
+ static_assert(ctorFail()); // both-error {{not an integral constant
expression}} \
+ // both-note {{in call to
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109753
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tbaederr edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109753
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
eddyz87 wrote:
@4ast, ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108071
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109760
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
(Class)&OBJC_CLASS_$_f;
+// CHECK: @c ={{.*}} global ptr @"OBJC_CLASS_$_f"
+// CHECK: @"OBJC_CLASS_$_f" ={{.*}} global %struct._class_t
_______
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
# stdio manipulation unsupported on Windows
@skipIfRemote # stdio manipulation unsupported on remote iOS
devices
@skipIf(oslist=["linux"], archs=["arm", "aarch64"])
``
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109764
________
y(sb_addr, 1, error))
+self.assertTrue(error.Fail())
+
@skipIfWindows # stdio manipulation unsupported on Windows
@skipIfRemote # stdio manipulation unsupported on remote iOS
devices
@skipIf(oslist=["linux"], archs=["arm", "aarch64"])
______
ALONE`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109306
___________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/KanRobert edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106681
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/KanRobert updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106681
>From 88cbdf9765e42dee7d2b050dcf8a20a08b4b148f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shengchen Kan
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:33:10 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [X86,lld] Add relocation R_X86_64_REX2_GOTPCRELX
For
1101 - 1200 of 542103 matches
Mail list logo
