[exim] Re: SRS example in spec

2024-04-28 Thread Andreas Metzler via Exim-users
On 2024-04-28 Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote: > On 28/04/2024 06:05, Andreas Metzler via Exim-users wrote: >> The router fails all bounces where >> inbound_srs{} fails, not only the ones that "look SRS'd". > It assumes that you really are SRS'ing all outbounds, th

[exim] SRS example in spec

2024-04-27 Thread Andreas Metzler via Exim-users
Good morning, the SRS example in the spec features three routers: 8X--- outbound: [dnslookup router, choose srs-encoding transport when necessary] inbound_srs: [try to SRS-decode incoming bounce and redirect to new adddress on

[exim] Re: Setting a specific email address to receive panic log notifications from exim

2024-04-27 Thread Andreas Metzler via Exim-users
On 2024-04-25 Third World Developer via Exim-users wrote: > I have a mail server for the domain 'example.net' and the hostname of that > mail server is 'mail.example.net'. > When the exim MTA panics, then emails are automatically queued to ' > r...@mail.example.net' but I would prefer to send

Bug#1069415: libsoup2.4: FTBFS on arm64: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-aarch64-linux-gnu && DEB_PYTHON_INSTALL_LAYOUT=deb LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 MESON_TESTTHREADS=4 meson test returned exit code 29

2024-04-24 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-04-20 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: libsoup2.4 > Version: 2.74.3-7 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS [...] > > (hsts-test:547071): GLib-Net-WARNING **: 04:03:06.247: Failed to load TLS > > database: System trust contains zero trusted certificates; please > > investigate your

Bug#1069415: libsoup2.4: FTBFS on arm64: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-aarch64-linux-gnu && DEB_PYTHON_INSTALL_LAYOUT=deb LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 MESON_TESTTHREADS=4 meson test returned exit code 29

2024-04-24 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-04-20 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: libsoup2.4 > Version: 2.74.3-7 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS [...] > > (hsts-test:547071): GLib-Net-WARNING **: 04:03:06.247: Failed to load TLS > > database: System trust contains zero trusted certificates; please > > investigate your

[exim] Re: Equivalent of Envelope-to as variables in pipe transport

2024-04-24 Thread Andreas Metzler via Exim-users
On 2024-04-24 Odhiambo Washington wrote: [...] > LMTP error after RCPT TO: virtual_domains: [...] > data = ${extract{smtp}{$address_data}} Afaict you need to modify this to return john...@domain.name instead of /var/spool/virtual/domain.name/johndoe/Maildir. cu Andreas --

[exim] Re: Equivalent of Envelope-to as variables in pipe transport

2024-04-23 Thread Andreas Metzler via Exim-users
On 2024-04-23 Mark Hills via Exim-users wrote: > How do I access the equivalent of "Envelope-to" header in transport > variables? > I'm trying to call dovecot-lda in a manner that enables its "envelope" > rule. [...] Hello, Iirc think the easiest way to combine dovecot and exim is nowadays

Bug#1067915: veusz: diff for NMU version 3.6.2-1.1

2024-04-21 Thread Andreas Metzler
-20 07:10:18.0 +0100 +++ veusz-3.6.2/debian/changelog 2024-04-21 14:19:21.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +veusz (3.6.2-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Drop runtime library packages (not -dev) from b-d. Closes: #1067915 + + -- Andreas Metzler Sun, 21 Apr

Bug#1067915: veusz: diff for NMU version 3.6.2-1.1

2024-04-21 Thread Andreas Metzler
-20 07:10:18.0 +0100 +++ veusz-3.6.2/debian/changelog 2024-04-21 14:19:21.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +veusz (3.6.2-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Drop runtime library packages (not -dev) from b-d. Closes: #1067915 + + -- Andreas Metzler Sun, 21 Apr

Bug#1067915: veusz: diff for NMU version 3.6.2-1.1

2024-04-21 Thread Andreas Metzler
-20 07:10:18.0 +0100 +++ veusz-3.6.2/debian/changelog 2024-04-21 14:19:21.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +veusz (3.6.2-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Drop runtime library packages (not -dev) from b-d. Closes: #1067915 + + -- Andreas Metzler Sun, 21 Apr

Bug#1068224: deepin-movie-reborn: diff for NMU version 5.10.8-2.1

2024-04-21 Thread Andreas Metzler
:59.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +deepin-movie-reborn (5.10.8-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Change hardcoded dependency to libqt5concurrent5t64 instead of +libqt5concurrent5. Closes: #1068224 + + -- Andreas Metzler Sun, 21 Apr 2024 13:23:59 +0200 + deepin

Bug#1068224: deepin-movie-reborn: diff for NMU version 5.10.8-2.1

2024-04-21 Thread Andreas Metzler
:59.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +deepin-movie-reborn (5.10.8-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Change hardcoded dependency to libqt5concurrent5t64 instead of +libqt5concurrent5. Closes: #1068224 + + -- Andreas Metzler Sun, 21 Apr 2024 13:23:59 +0200 + deepin

Bug#1068226: trantor: diff for NMU version 1.5.12+ds-1.1

2024-04-21 Thread Andreas Metzler
(1.5.12+ds-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Pull fix from Ubuntu by Michael Hudson-Doyle: ++ Drop spurious Depends on libssl3 as package is currently built with no + TLS provider. Closes: #1068226 + + -- Andreas Metzler Sun, 21 Apr 2024 12:04:17 +0200 + trantor

Bug#1068226: trantor: diff for NMU version 1.5.12+ds-1.1

2024-04-21 Thread Andreas Metzler
(1.5.12+ds-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Pull fix from Ubuntu by Michael Hudson-Doyle: ++ Drop spurious Depends on libssl3 as package is currently built with no + TLS provider. Closes: #1068226 + + -- Andreas Metzler Sun, 21 Apr 2024 12:04:17 +0200 + trantor

Bug#1068608: tfortune dependencies unsatisfiable on 32-bit non-i386 architectures.

2024-04-21 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-04-08 Andre Noll wrote: > On Sun, Apr 07, 22:02, Peter Michael Green wrote: > > After being rebuilt for the time64 transition, tfortune > > depends on both liblopsub1 and liblopsub1t64. As a > > result it is uninstallable on architectures that are undergoing > > the time64 transition

Bug#1068608: tfortune dependencies unsatisfiable on 32-bit non-i386 architectures.

2024-04-21 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-04-08 Andre Noll wrote: > On Sun, Apr 07, 22:02, Peter Michael Green wrote: > > After being rebuilt for the time64 transition, tfortune > > depends on both liblopsub1 and liblopsub1t64. As a > > result it is uninstallable on architectures that are undergoing > > the time64 transition

Bug#1068689: urfkill: diff for NMU version 0.5.0-7.2

2024-04-21 Thread Andreas Metzler
-09-06 15:48:31.0 +0200 +++ urfkill-0.5.0/debian/changelog 2024-04-21 11:43:27.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +urfkill (0.5.0-7.2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Drop hardcoded dependency on libglib2.0-0. Closes: #1068689 + + -- Andreas Metzler Sun, 21 Apr

Bug#1068689: urfkill: diff for NMU version 0.5.0-7.2

2024-04-21 Thread Andreas Metzler
-09-06 15:48:31.0 +0200 +++ urfkill-0.5.0/debian/changelog 2024-04-21 11:43:27.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +urfkill (0.5.0-7.2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Drop hardcoded dependency on libglib2.0-0. Closes: #1068689 + + -- Andreas Metzler Sun, 21 Apr

[Lynx-dev] [patch] Fix out-of-tree builds

2024-04-21 Thread Andreas Metzler
Hello, find attached a trivial patch to fix out of tree builds (mkdir blah ; cd blah ; ../configure ...) TIA, cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' --- lynx-2.9.1.orig/po/makefile.inn

Bug#1069307: FTBFS: configure: error: must specify --with-locking-method option

2024-04-20 Thread Andreas Metzler
to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' Description: Fixx FTBFS due to implicit declarations in autoconf tests. Author: Andreas Metzler Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/1069307 Origin: vendor Last-Update: 2024-04-20 --- a/libs/ldapaddressbook/configure.ac +++ b/libs/ldapaddressboo

Bug#1069307: FTBFS: configure: error: must specify --with-locking-method option

2024-04-20 Thread Andreas Metzler
to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' Description: Fixx FTBFS due to implicit declarations in autoconf tests. Author: Andreas Metzler Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/1069307 Origin: vendor Last-Update: 2024-04-20 --- a/libs/ldapaddressbook/configure.ac +++ b/libs/ldapaddressboo

Bug#1066396: lftp: diff for NMU version 4.9.2-2.1

2024-04-20 Thread Andreas Metzler
: #1066396 + + -- Andreas Metzler Sat, 20 Apr 2024 14:28:35 +0200 + lftp (4.9.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium * lftp.tech domain doesn't work anymore; switch back to lftp.yar.ru diff -Nru lftp-4.9.2/debian/patches/ftbfs_implicit.diff lftp-4.9.2/debian/patches/ftbfs_implicit.diff --- lftp-4.9.2

Bug#1066396: lftp: diff for NMU version 4.9.2-2.1

2024-04-20 Thread Andreas Metzler
: #1066396 + + -- Andreas Metzler Sat, 20 Apr 2024 14:28:35 +0200 + lftp (4.9.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium * lftp.tech domain doesn't work anymore; switch back to lftp.yar.ru diff -Nru lftp-4.9.2/debian/patches/ftbfs_implicit.diff lftp-4.9.2/debian/patches/ftbfs_implicit.diff --- lftp-4.9.2

Bug#1064486: rnp: FTBFS: Errors while running CTest

2024-04-20 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-02-23 Bo YU wrote: > Source: rnp > Version: 0.17.0-3 > Severity: serious > Dear Maintainer, > The package has a ftbfs issue on my local amd64 build: > ``` > 260/260 Test #255: cli_tests-Encryption > .. Passed 60.86 > sec >

Bug#1064486: rnp: FTBFS: Errors while running CTest

2024-04-20 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-02-23 Bo YU wrote: > Source: rnp > Version: 0.17.0-3 > Severity: serious > Dear Maintainer, > The package has a ftbfs issue on my local amd64 build: > ``` > 260/260 Test #255: cli_tests-Encryption > .. Passed 60.86 > sec >

Re: Status of the t64 transition

2024-04-18 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-04-18 Sebastian Ramacher wrote: [...] > Let's start with the first category. Those are packages that could be > binNMUed, but there are issues that make those rebuilds not have the > desired effect. This list include packages that > * are BD-Uninstallabe, > * FTBFS but with out

Re: Status of the t64 transition

2024-04-18 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-04-18 Sebastian Ramacher wrote: [...] > Let's start with the first category. Those are packages that could be > binNMUed, but there are issues that make those rebuilds not have the > desired effect. This list include packages that > * are BD-Uninstallabe, > * FTBFS but with out

Re: Status of the t64 transition

2024-04-18 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-04-18 Sebastian Ramacher wrote: [...] > Let's start with the first category. Those are packages that could be > binNMUed, but there are issues that make those rebuilds not have the > desired effect. This list include packages that > * are BD-Uninstallabe, > * FTBFS but with out

Bug#1010965: db5.3: New upstream (comdb2's embedded copy)

2024-04-13 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2022-05-14 Bastian Germann wrote: > Source: db5.3 > Severity: wishlist > X-Debbugs-Cc: 987...@bugs.debian.org > There is a Sleepycat-licensed fork of BerkeleyDB at > https://github.com/bloomberg/comdb2/tree/master/berkdb. Maybe this is > a way forward as long as #987013 (removal) is not

Bug#1010965: db5.3: New upstream (comdb2's embedded copy)

2024-04-13 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2022-05-14 Bastian Germann wrote: > Source: db5.3 > Severity: wishlist > X-Debbugs-Cc: 987...@bugs.debian.org > There is a Sleepycat-licensed fork of BerkeleyDB at > https://github.com/bloomberg/comdb2/tree/master/berkdb. Maybe this is > a way forward as long as #987013 (removal) is not

Bug#1065538: bind9-libs hard-codes a dependency on libuv1

2024-04-13 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-06 Ondřej Surý wrote: >> On 6. 3. 2024, at 12:45, Matthias Klose wrote: >> Package: bind9-libs >> Version: 1:9.19.21-1 >> Severity: serious >> Tags: sid trixie >> bind9-libs hard-codes a dependency on libuv1, that should be >> libuv1t64 now. But better derive it form the libuv1-dev

Bug#1065538: bind9-libs hard-codes a dependency on libuv1

2024-04-13 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-06 Ondřej Surý wrote: >> On 6. 3. 2024, at 12:45, Matthias Klose wrote: >> Package: bind9-libs >> Version: 1:9.19.21-1 >> Severity: serious >> Tags: sid trixie >> bind9-libs hard-codes a dependency on libuv1, that should be >> libuv1t64 now. But better derive it form the libuv1-dev

Bug#1066398: xwayland: FTBFS: ./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/meson-private/tmpz22kr2qg/./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/meson-private/tmpz22kr2qg/testfile.c:17:(.text+0x9): undefined reference to `SHA1Init'

2024-04-13 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-23 Diederik de Haas wrote: [...] > 2) near the end of your build log is the following message: > "../os/meson.build:63:8: ERROR: Problem encountered: secure-rpc requested, > but > neither libtirpc or libc RPC support were found" > And that matches the build issue mentioned in

Bug#1066398: xwayland: FTBFS: ./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/meson-private/tmpz22kr2qg/./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/meson-private/tmpz22kr2qg/testfile.c:17:(.text+0x9): undefined reference to `SHA1Init'

2024-04-13 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-23 Diederik de Haas wrote: [...] > 2) near the end of your build log is the following message: > "../os/meson.build:63:8: ERROR: Problem encountered: secure-rpc requested, > but > neither libtirpc or libc RPC support were found" > And that matches the build issue mentioned in

Bug#1066398: xwayland: FTBFS: ./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/meson-private/tmpz22kr2qg/./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/meson-private/tmpz22kr2qg/testfile.c:17:(.text+0x9): undefined reference to `SHA1Init'

2024-04-13 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-23 Diederik de Haas wrote: [...] > 2) near the end of your build log is the following message: > "../os/meson.build:63:8: ERROR: Problem encountered: secure-rpc requested, > but > neither libtirpc or libc RPC support were found" > And that matches the build issue mentioned in

Bug#1017361: ITA: postsrsd -- Sender Rewriting Scheme (SRS) lookup table for Postfix

2024-04-13 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-04-12 Abhijith PA wrote: > On 12/04/24 03:34 PM, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] >>> On Sun, 11 Jun 2023 23:09:11 +0530 Abhijith PA wrote: >>>> I would like to adopt this package. I maintain a mailing list server >>>> where I am already using postsrsd.

Bug#1017361: ITA: postsrsd -- Sender Rewriting Scheme (SRS) lookup table for Postfix

2024-04-13 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-04-12 Abhijith PA wrote: > On 12/04/24 03:34 PM, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] >>> On Sun, 11 Jun 2023 23:09:11 +0530 Abhijith PA wrote: >>>> I would like to adopt this package. I maintain a mailing list server >>>> where I am already using postsrsd.

Bug#1017361: ITA: postsrsd -- Sender Rewriting Scheme (SRS) lookup table for Postfix

2024-04-12 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2023-07-17 Oxan van Leeuwen wrote: > On 16-07-2023 22:35, Timo Röhling wrote: > > I think this was not forwarded to Oxan, so I'm resending it to > You're right, thanks for the forward. > On Sun, 11 Jun 2023 23:09:11 +0530 Abhijith PA wrote: > > I would like to adopt this package. I maintain

Bug#1017361: ITA: postsrsd -- Sender Rewriting Scheme (SRS) lookup table for Postfix

2024-04-12 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2023-07-17 Oxan van Leeuwen wrote: > On 16-07-2023 22:35, Timo Röhling wrote: > > I think this was not forwarded to Oxan, so I'm resending it to > You're right, thanks for the forward. > On Sun, 11 Jun 2023 23:09:11 +0530 Abhijith PA wrote: > > I would like to adopt this package. I maintain

Bug#1068644: gnutls-bin: "Fatal error: The encryption algorithm is not supported" appeared with 3.8.5 upgrade

2024-04-08 Thread Andreas Metzler
Control: severity -1 serious Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/issues/1540 On 2024-04-08 Sanjoy Mahajan wrote: > Package: gnutls-bin > Version: 3.8.5-1 > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: none, Sanjoy Mahajan > File: /usr/bin/gnutls-cli > After dist-upgrading today, exim4

Bug#1066010: dvdisaster: diff for NMU version 0.79.10-3.1

2024-04-07 Thread Andreas Metzler
@@ +dvdisaster (0.79.10-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fix FTBFS with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration Closes: #1066010 + + -- Andreas Metzler Sun, 07 Apr 2024 18:38:18 +0200 + dvdisaster (0.79.10-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Team upload diff -Nru dvdisaster

Bug#1066010: dvdisaster: diff for NMU version 0.79.10-3.1

2024-04-07 Thread Andreas Metzler
@@ +dvdisaster (0.79.10-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fix FTBFS with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration Closes: #1066010 + + -- Andreas Metzler Sun, 07 Apr 2024 18:38:18 +0200 + dvdisaster (0.79.10-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Team upload diff -Nru dvdisaster

Bug#1068219: chatty, dependencies unsatisfiable on 32-bit non-i386 architectures.

2024-04-07 Thread Andreas Metzler
Control: tags -1 patch On 2024-04-02 Peter Michael Green wrote: > Package: chatty > Version: 0.8.2-1 > Severity: serious > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertag: time-t > After being rebuilt for the time64 transition, chatty depends > on both libpurple0 and libpurple0t64. As a > result it

Bug#1068219: chatty, dependencies unsatisfiable on 32-bit non-i386 architectures.

2024-04-07 Thread Andreas Metzler
Control: tags -1 patch On 2024-04-02 Peter Michael Green wrote: > Package: chatty > Version: 0.8.2-1 > Severity: serious > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertag: time-t > After being rebuilt for the time64 transition, chatty depends > on both libpurple0 and libpurple0t64. As a > result it

Bug#1066005: epic4: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: gailib.c:95:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strlcpy’; did you mean ‘strncpy’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

2024-04-07 Thread Andreas Metzler
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream On 2024-03-10 Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Source: epic4 > Version: 1:2.10.10-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) > X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org >

Bug#1066005: epic4: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: gailib.c:95:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strlcpy’; did you mean ‘strncpy’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

2024-04-07 Thread Andreas Metzler
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream On 2024-03-10 Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Source: epic4 > Version: 1:2.10.10-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) > X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org >

Bug#1060457: /usr/sbin/exim4: SIGSEGV when remote smtp reject the message

2024-04-07 Thread Andreas Metzler
Control: found 1060457 4.96-15+deb12u2 On 2024-04-02 Didier Raboud via Pkg-exim4-maintainers wrote: > wrote: >> Il giorno ven, 12/01/2024 alle 18.15 +0100, Andreas Metzler ha scritto: >>> Is this a regression in 4.96-15+deb12u4? i.e. can you still reprroduce >>>

Bug#1068503: mlterm: Please consider dropping Canna (and perhaps freewnn)

2024-04-06 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-04-06 Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > I had a look at the bug and it is non-trivial to fix. (I spent some > effort, but gave up.) So I am wondering whether it would not make sense > to stop building the mlterm canna input method plugin: [...] Hello, trivial patch attached.

Bug#1068503: mlterm: Please consider dropping Canna (and perhaps freewnn)

2024-04-06 Thread Andreas Metzler
Package: mlterm Version: 3.9.3-1 Severity: normal Hello, mlterm currently build-depends on canna to build "Canna input method plugin". Canna is rc-buggy, it breaks on -Werror=implicit-function-declaration (see #1066375 ). I had a look at the bug and it is non-trivial to fix. (I spent some

Re: Some t64 libraries already in testing; I'm confused

2024-03-31 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-31 Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > Afaict these are broken, though: [...] > tnat64 0.06-1 false positive, grep error.

Re: Some t64 libraries already in testing; I'm confused

2024-03-31 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-31 Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2024-03-31 Sven Joachim wrote: [...] >> Unfortunately the other four are not similar, but rather lacked a build >> dependency on dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) which would have prevented their >> migration to testing. Testing users on arme

Re: Some t64 libraries already in testing; I'm confused

2024-03-31 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-31 Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2024-03-31 06:54 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > On 2024-03-30 Julian Gilbey wrote: [...] > >> Looking through testing, I see the following t64 libraries present: > >> libaio1t64 > >> libfyba0t64 > >

Re: Some t64 libraries already in testing; I'm confused

2024-03-30 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-30 Julian Gilbey wrote: > My very limited understanding of this major transition was that the > t64 libraries are being held in unstable until (almost) everything is > ready, at which point there will be a coordinated migration into > testing. But I've now been asked to upgrade

Re: xz backdoor

2024-03-30 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-31 Wookey wrote: [...] > e.g. I remember it took me years to realise that I used _my_ public > key for signing, [...] Good morning, s/public/private/ - $recipient can then use your public key to verify the sig. cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His

Bug#1065221: O: py7zr -- pure Python 7-zip library

2024-03-30 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-30 yokota wrote: > I'm interested in py7zr because it is required by Calibre. > New py7zr requires some other modules that not packaged by Debian yet. > I make those modules into Debian packages. > https://salsa.debian.org/yokota/python-multivolumefile >

Bug#1065221: O: py7zr -- pure Python 7-zip library

2024-03-30 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-30 yokota wrote: > I'm interested in py7zr because it is required by Calibre. > New py7zr requires some other modules that not packaged by Debian yet. > I make those modules into Debian packages. > https://salsa.debian.org/yokota/python-multivolumefile >

Re: Packaging multivolumefile?

2024-03-30 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-30 Andreas Metzler wrote: > Hello, > I originally intended to file an ITP, but it probably makes more sense > to ask here: > py7zr >= 0.16.0 requires multivolumefile by the same author. How about > packaging it under the debian-python umbrella? Nevermind, YOKOTA H

Bug#1067905: mpg321: Does not work on modern system (pipewire)

2024-03-30 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-30 Peter B wrote: > "mpg321 simply produces no sound output here on a system running pipewire." > How strange! > Just wondering; have you got pipewire-alsa installed? Hello Peter, yes, I have got the recommended meta-package (pipewire-audio) installed. cu Andreas -- `What a good

Packaging multivolumefile?

2024-03-30 Thread Andreas Metzler
Hello, I originally intended to file an ITP, but it probably makes more sense to ask here: py7zr >= 0.16.0 requires multivolumefile by the same author. How about packaging it under the debian-python umbrella? * Source package name: python-multivolumefile * Binary Package

Re: Updated package list with packages open for adoption (Was: morph's abandoned packages (list))

2024-03-29 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-28 Andreas Tille wrote: [...] > ? #1065221 O: py7zr -- pure Python 7-zip library >rdepends: recoll (Kartik Mistry ) > calibre (YOKOTA Hiroshi , > Martin Pitt , > Nicholas D Steeves ) > Hint: This package is lagging quite

Bug#1065221: O: py7zr -- pure Python 7-zip library

2024-03-29 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-02 Sandro Tosi wrote: [...] > I intend to orphan the py7zr package. > The package description is: > py7zr is a library and command-line utility to support 7zip archive > compression, decompression, encryption and decryption. I will take a look, since I use calibre. (Just a

Bug#1065221: O: py7zr -- pure Python 7-zip library

2024-03-29 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-02 Sandro Tosi wrote: [...] > I intend to orphan the py7zr package. > The package description is: > py7zr is a library and command-line utility to support 7zip archive > compression, decompression, encryption and decryption. I will take a look, since I use calibre. (Just a

Bug#1067844: c-evo-dh: Depends on dead-upstream mpg321 instead of mpg123

2024-03-28 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-28 Peter B wrote: > On 27/03/2024 14:57, Andreas Metzler wrote: >> mpg321 is dead upstream > I don't see that as a show stopper. >> Please consider moving to another player, e.g. mpg123. > I moved away from ffmpeg after c-evo-dh showed a puiparts fail > stemmin

Bug#1067883: terminatorx: Depends on dead-upstream mpg321 instead of mpg123

2024-03-28 Thread Andreas Metzler
Source: terminatorx Version: 4.2.0-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: ametz...@bebt.de User: ametz...@debian.org Usertags: mpg321-removal Hello, this package depends on mpg321. mpg321 is dead upstream (last change 2012, about 12 years ago), it was initially created because of license issues with

Bug#1067883: terminatorx: Depends on dead-upstream mpg321 instead of mpg123

2024-03-28 Thread Andreas Metzler
Source: terminatorx Version: 4.2.0-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: ametz...@bebt.de User: ametz...@debian.org Usertags: mpg321-removal Hello, this package depends on mpg321. mpg321 is dead upstream (last change 2012, about 12 years ago), it was initially created because of license issues with

Bug#1067882: snd-common: recommends dead-upstream mpg321 instead of mpg123

2024-03-28 Thread Andreas Metzler
Source: snd-common Version: 24.2-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: ametz...@bebt.de User: ametz...@debian.org Usertags: mpg321-removal Hello, this package recommends mpg321. mpg321 is dead upstream (last change 2012, about 12 years ago), it was initially created because of license issues with

Bug#1067881: ripperx: suggests dead-upstream mpg321 instead of mpg123

2024-03-28 Thread Andreas Metzler
Source: ripperx Version: 2.8.0-3 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: ametz...@bebt.de User: ametz...@debian.org Usertags: mpg321-removal Hello, this package suggests mpg321. mpg321 is dead upstream (last change 2012, about 12 years ago), it was initially created because of license issues with mpg123,

Bug#1067880: normalize-audio: suggests dead-upstream mpg321 instead of mpg123

2024-03-28 Thread Andreas Metzler
Source: normalize-audio Version: 0.7.7-17 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: ametz...@bebt.de User: ametz...@debian.org Usertags: mpg321-removal Hello, this package suggests mpg321. mpg321 is dead upstream (last change 2012, about 12 years ago), it was initially created because of license issues

Bug#1067879: mp3check: suggests dead-upstream mpg321 instead of mpg123

2024-03-28 Thread Andreas Metzler
Source: mp3check Version: 0.8.7-4 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: ametz...@bebt.de User: ametz...@debian.org Usertags: mpg321-removal Hello, this package suggests mpg321. mpg321 is dead upstream (last change 2012, about 12 years ago), it was initially created because of license issues with

Bug#1067878: music123: recommends dead-upstream mpg321 over mpg123

2024-03-28 Thread Andreas Metzler
Source: music123 Version: 16.6-6 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: ametz...@bebt.de User: ametz...@debian.org Usertags: mpg321-removal Hello, this package recommends 'mpg321 | mpg123'. mpg321 is dead upstream (last change 2012, about 12 years ago), it was initially created because of license

Bug#1067877: emms: recommends dead-upstream mpg321 instead of mpg123

2024-03-28 Thread Andreas Metzler
Source: emms Version: 5.1-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: ametz...@bebt.de User: ametz...@debian.org Usertags: mpg321-removal Hello, this package recommends mpg321. mpg321 is dead upstream (last change 2012, about 12 years ago), it was initially created because of license issues with mpg123,

Bug#1066115: mpg321: diff for NMU version 0.3.2-3.2

2024-03-27 Thread Andreas Metzler
+0100 +++ mpg321-0.3.2/debian/patches/ftbfs_implicit.diff 2024-03-27 15:39:14.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ +Description: Fix build error with -Wno-error=implicit-function-declaration +Author: Andreas Metzler +Origin: vendor +Forwarded: no +Last-Update: 2024-03-27 +Bug-Debian: https

Bug#1066115: mpg321: diff for NMU version 0.3.2-3.2

2024-03-27 Thread Andreas Metzler
+0100 +++ mpg321-0.3.2/debian/patches/ftbfs_implicit.diff 2024-03-27 15:39:14.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ +Description: Fix build error with -Wno-error=implicit-function-declaration +Author: Andreas Metzler +Origin: vendor +Forwarded: no +Last-Update: 2024-03-27 +Bug-Debian: https

Bug#1067844: c-evo-dh: Depends on dead-upstream mpg321 instead of mpg123

2024-03-27 Thread Andreas Metzler
Source: c-evo-dh Version: 1.11-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: ametz...@bebt.de User: ametz...@debian.org Usertags: mpg321-removal Hello, this package depends on mpg321. mpg321 is dead upstream (last change 2012, about 12 years ago), it was initially created because of license issues with

Bug#1066115: mpg123: FTBFS: error: implicit declaration of function ‘mpg321_alsa_get_volume’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

2024-03-26 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-26 Joachim Reichel wrote: > Hi Andreas, > usually I would have implemented your suggestion (and I don't mind anyone > implementing it), but I'm not really keen on investing in a dependency that > hasn't seen a single upstream release in 12 years and where the last upload > was an NMU

Bug#1066115: mpg123: FTBFS: error: implicit declaration of function ‘mpg321_alsa_get_volume’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

2024-03-26 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-26 Joachim Reichel wrote: > Hi Andreas, > usually I would have implemented your suggestion (and I don't mind anyone > implementing it), but I'm not really keen on investing in a dependency that > hasn't seen a single upstream release in 12 years and where the last upload > was an NMU

Bug#1067729: nmu: exim4_4.97-5

2024-03-26 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-26 Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > nmu exim4_4.97-5 . armel armhf hppa m68k . unstable . -m "Rebuild against > libspf2-dev >= 1.2.10-8.1 (64-bit time_t transition)" > The first t64-changed libspf2 was uninstallable on the 32bit archs, > which is wh

Bug#1067729: nmu: exim4_4.97-5

2024-03-26 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-26 Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > nmu exim4_4.97-5 . armel armhf hppa m68k . unstable . -m "Rebuild against > libspf2-dev >= 1.2.10-8.1 (64-bit time_t transition)" > The first t64-changed libspf2 was uninstallable on the 32bit archs, > which is wh

Bug#1066115: mpg123: FTBFS: error: implicit declaration of function ‘mpg321_alsa_get_volume’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

2024-03-26 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-22 Joachim Reichel wrote: > tag 1066115 + patch > thanks > Hi, > attached is the debdiff for the NMU, uploaded to delayed/10. Similar to the > previous NMU it adds -Wno-error=implicit-function-declaration to downgrade > these errors back into warnings again. [...] That seems to be

Bug#1066115: mpg123: FTBFS: error: implicit declaration of function ‘mpg321_alsa_get_volume’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

2024-03-26 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-22 Joachim Reichel wrote: > tag 1066115 + patch > thanks > Hi, > attached is the debdiff for the NMU, uploaded to delayed/10. Similar to the > previous NMU it adds -Wno-error=implicit-function-declaration to downgrade > these errors back into warnings again. [...] That seems to be

Re: Debian testing/unstable users: beware of Firefox critical CVEs

2024-03-26 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-24 Samuel Henrique wrote: > Hello everyone, > Given our current time_t transition happening, which means packages > are blocked from migrating to testing for weeks, and that unstable > updates have become harder to apply, two critical CVE fixes for > Firefox became impossible to get

Bug#1067729: nmu: exim4_4.97-5

2024-03-26 Thread Andreas Metzler
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Control: affects -1 + src:exim4 User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hello, nmu exim4_4.97-5 . armel armhf hppa m68k . unstable . -m "Rebuild against libspf2-dev >= 1.2.10-8.1 (64-bit time_t transition)" The first

Bug#1067729: nmu: exim4_4.97-5

2024-03-26 Thread Andreas Metzler
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Control: affects -1 + src:exim4 User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hello, nmu exim4_4.97-5 . armel armhf hppa m68k . unstable . -m "Rebuild against libspf2-dev >= 1.2.10-8.1 (64-bit time_t transition)" The first

Bug#1067664: FTBFS: dh_installdocs: error: Requested unknown package libspf2-2 via --link-doc

2024-03-25 Thread Andreas Metzler
Source: libspf2 Version: 1.2.10-8.1 Severity: serious Tags: patch ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Even with fixing the -Werror=implicit-function-declaration build error libspf2 also fails to build (dpkg-buildpackage -b) at dh_installdocs with:

Bug#1067664: FTBFS: dh_installdocs: error: Requested unknown package libspf2-2 via --link-doc

2024-03-25 Thread Andreas Metzler
Source: libspf2 Version: 1.2.10-8.1 Severity: serious Tags: patch ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Even with fixing the -Werror=implicit-function-declaration build error libspf2 also fails to build (dpkg-buildpackage -b) at dh_installdocs with:

Bug#1066396: lftp: FTBFS: ./config.h:2540:11: fatal error: trio.h: No such file or directory

2024-03-24 Thread Andreas Metzler
Control: tags -1 patch On 2024-03-24 Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 01:03:20PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > ./config.h:2540:11: fatal error: trio.h: No such file or directory > > > 2540 | # include "trio.h" > > > | ^~~~ > (this suggests that using

Bug#1066396: lftp: FTBFS: ./config.h:2540:11: fatal error: trio.h: No such file or directory

2024-03-24 Thread Andreas Metzler
Control: tags -1 patch On 2024-03-24 Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 01:03:20PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > ./config.h:2540:11: fatal error: trio.h: No such file or directory > > > 2540 | # include "trio.h" > > > | ^~~~ > (this suggests that using

Bug#1066375: canna: FTBFS: context.c:105:13: error: implicit declaration of function ‘mkdir’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

2024-03-24 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-13 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: canna > Version: 3.7p3-20 > Severity: serious [...] > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build > on amd64. > This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg 1.22.6, that enabled > -Werror=implicit-function-declaration. For

Bug#1066375: canna: FTBFS: context.c:105:13: error: implicit declaration of function ‘mkdir’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

2024-03-24 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-13 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: canna > Version: 3.7p3-20 > Severity: serious [...] > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build > on amd64. > This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg 1.22.6, that enabled > -Werror=implicit-function-declaration. For

Bug#1066375: canna: FTBFS: context.c:105:13: error: implicit declaration of function ‘mkdir’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

2024-03-24 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-13 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: canna > Version: 3.7p3-20 > Severity: serious [...] > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build > on amd64. > This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg 1.22.6, that enabled > -Werror=implicit-function-declaration. For

Bug#1066433: uim: FTBFS: bsd-snprintf.c:104:38: error: assignment to expression with array type

2024-03-24 Thread Andreas Metzler
Control: tags -1 patch On 2024-03-13 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: uim > Version: 1:1.8.8-9.2 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > Tags: trixie sid ftbfs > User: lu...@debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie > Hi, > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package

Bug#1066433: uim: FTBFS: bsd-snprintf.c:104:38: error: assignment to expression with array type

2024-03-24 Thread Andreas Metzler
Control: tags -1 patch On 2024-03-13 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: uim > Version: 1:1.8.8-9.2 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > Tags: trixie sid ftbfs > User: lu...@debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie > Hi, > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package

Re: Fwd: speedo.mk errors out

2024-03-23 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-22 Christian Sommer via Gnupg-users wrote: > hi. > building GnuPG by speedo.mk on current master branch fails. The log > attached for building the dependencies looks fine. [...] Good morning, Does not look "fine" to me: configure:9456: Use gpgrt-config as libassuan-config

Bug#980768: gnupg2: fails to build gpgkeys_ldap, probably due to -Werror=implicit-function-declaration

2024-03-17 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-17 Thorsten Glaser wrote: >> Afaict ghostscript/fig2dev have stopped being blockers so I do not plan >> on doing another upload (with more work for the other autobuilders) just >> to temporarily disable these b-ds. > unfortunately, imagemagick/graphicsmagick is still a problem, > and

Bug#1066963: xmorph: FTBFS with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration

2024-03-16 Thread Andreas Metzler
Source: xmorph Version: 1:20150712-5 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Hello, there are multiple implicit function errors when trying to build xmorph, some trivial, but also an API issue: 8X-- In file included from RgbaImage.c:935: RgbaImage.c: In function 'rgbaImageWarp': warp.h:19:20:

Bug#1066963: xmorph: FTBFS with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration

2024-03-16 Thread Andreas Metzler
Source: xmorph Version: 1:20150712-5 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Hello, there are multiple implicit function errors when trying to build xmorph, some trivial, but also an API issue: 8X-- In file included from RgbaImage.c:935: RgbaImage.c: In function 'rgbaImageWarp': warp.h:19:20:

Bug#1066963: xmorph: FTBFS with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration

2024-03-16 Thread Andreas Metzler
Source: xmorph Version: 1:20150712-5 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Hello, there are multiple implicit function errors when trying to build xmorph, some trivial, but also an API issue: 8X-- In file included from RgbaImage.c:935: RgbaImage.c: In function 'rgbaImageWarp': warp.h:19:20:

Bug#1066137: gnupg1: fails to build gpgkeys_ldap, probably due to -Werror=implicit-function-declaration

2024-03-16 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-13 Thorsten Glaser wrote: [...] > >It is fixed in 2.4 and I am very reluctant to backport major packaging > >updates to 2.2 > For some values of major; Helmut already verified that the resulting > binary packages are identical, and… > >since I think we will need to ship some kind of

Bug#1066137: gnupg1: fails to build gpgkeys_ldap, probably due to -Werror=implicit-function-declaration

2024-03-16 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-03-13 Thorsten Glaser wrote: [...] > >It is fixed in 2.4 and I am very reluctant to backport major packaging > >updates to 2.2 > For some values of major; Helmut already verified that the resulting > binary packages are identical, and… > >since I think we will need to ship some kind of

Bug#1066137: gnupg1: fails to build gpgkeys_ldap, probably due to -Werror=implicit-function-declaration

2024-03-16 Thread Andreas Metzler
Control: notfound 1066137 2.4.3-2 Control: close 1066137 2.4.3-2 On 2024-03-14 Sune Stolborg Vuorela wrote: > On Wednesday, March 13, 2024 7:10:13 PM CET Andreas Metzler wrote: >> I have upload a fix for 2.2, probably will not be able to spend any time >> on 1.x or 2.4 bef

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >