FWIW this is likely to be a libpth issue, which in turn may be a
makecontext/setcontext issue in the glibc. You have to contact porters
about that.
I know for sure, that the makecontext/setcontext have not yet been
implemented on hppa.
Are they required for dirmngr ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
FWIW this is likely to be a libpth issue, which in turn may be a
makecontext/setcontext issue in the glibc. You have to contact porters
about that.
I know for sure, that the makecontext/setcontext have not yet been
implemented on hppa.
Are they required for dirmngr ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Not sure if this gdb-backtrace helps:
Program received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1.
0x409efe78 in sigsuspend () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0 0x409efe78 in sigsuspend () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x40648d44 in __pth_mctx_set () from /usr/lib/libpth.so.20
#2 0x4064c5bc in pth_spawn ()
Starting program: /usr/bin/dirmngr
(no debugging symbols found)
Program received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1.
0x40defe78 in sigsuspend () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0 0x40defe78 in sigsuspend () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x40a48d44 in __pth_mctx_set () from /usr/lib/libpth.so.20
#2
Not sure if this gdb-backtrace helps:
Program received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1.
0x409efe78 in sigsuspend () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0 0x409efe78 in sigsuspend () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x40648d44 in __pth_mctx_set () from /usr/lib/libpth.so.20
#2 0x4064c5bc in pth_spawn ()
Starting program: /usr/bin/dirmngr
(no debugging symbols found)
Program received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1.
0x40defe78 in sigsuspend () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0 0x40defe78 in sigsuspend () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x40a48d44 in __pth_mctx_set () from /usr/lib/libpth.so.20
#2
This is probably the same problem as in ecj Bug#459563
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Michael wrote:
In both cases gij is called (indirectly). Can you please try to make a
simple testcase running gij on hppa?
Ok, but then a testcase isn't needed, as it's easily reproducable.
Just call gij without any parameters and it will crash (as already
reported in Bug #459563).
This is probably the same problem as in ecj Bug#459563
Michael wrote:
In both cases gij is called (indirectly). Can you please try to make a
simple testcase running gij on hppa?
Ok, but then a testcase isn't needed, as it's easily reproducable.
Just call gij without any parameters and it will crash (as already
reported in Bug #459563).
This is probably the same problem as in ecj Bug#459563
Michael wrote:
In both cases gij is called (indirectly). Can you please try to make a
simple testcase running gij on hppa?
Ok, but then a testcase isn't needed, as it's easily reproducable.
Just call gij without any parameters and it will crash (as already
reported in Bug #459563).
12 matches
Mail list logo