[CentOS] CPU Limit in Centos

2015-11-21 Thread Edward Ned Harvey (centos)
A few years ago, I vaguely recall some issue with RHEL needing a special license or something like that, if you had more than a certain amount of CPU's or a certain amount of RAM. Does Centos work fine for 2 CPU's, 16 cores, 32 threads, and 256 G of ram? Centos6 specifically.

Re: [CentOS] CPU Limit in Centos

2015-11-21 Thread Edward Ned Harvey (centos)
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Edward Ned Harvey (centos) > > According to these, centos 6 and rhel 6 are limited to 16G of ram. But I > currently have a rhel6 system with 128G, so ... Don't know what to think > about that..

Re: [CentOS] CPU Limit in Centos

2015-11-21 Thread Edward Ned Harvey (centos)
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Edward Ned Harvey (centos) > > A few years ago, I vaguely recall some issue with RHEL needing a special > license or something like that, if you had more than a certain amount of > CPU's or a cer

Re: [CentOS] Differences from upstream RHEL

2015-11-13 Thread Edward Ned Harvey (centos)
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Peter > > Anyways, the vendor is also free to support > whatever OS they want, and you're free to choose not to use their > software. Except when you're not. Because for whatever reason, the choice of software

Re: [CentOS] Differences from upstream RHEL

2015-11-11 Thread Edward Ned Harvey (centos)
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Johnny Hughes Thanks for the explanation. Of course what I want to do is evaluate centos fitness for our purposes, without the effort of evaluating all the changelogs, and I think this answer is the best

Re: [CentOS] Differences from upstream RHEL

2015-11-11 Thread Edward Ned Harvey (centos)
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Peter > > You can see better details of what has been changed by looking at the > changelog for a particular package. CentOS changes will be at the top > of the changelog, so again using httpd as an example: >

Re: [CentOS] Differences from upstream RHEL

2015-11-11 Thread Edward Ned Harvey (centos)
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Devin Reade > > The above answer is right-on. From a technical perspective, you can > probably expect the 3rd party software to work exactly the same on > RHEL and CentOS (barring some implausible edge cases),

[CentOS] Differences from upstream RHEL

2015-11-10 Thread Edward Ned Harvey (centos)
At work, we use some commercial software, that names RHEL6 as a supported OS, but not Centos6. I would like to know the difference between Centos and RHEL, in order to claim (or not) that we can support our users on Centos instead of RHEL. I see the release notes, that say "Packages modified