Hi,
Please take an example at:
https://sourceforge.net/p/tipc/tipcutils/ci/master/tree/demos/connection_demo/
Regards,
Hoang
> -Original Message-
> From: Røysland, Jonas Gjendem via tipc-discussion
>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2022 8:22 PM
> To: tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
>
Hi Jon, Ying,
Just remind in case you guys missed this email thread.
Thanks,
Hoang
> -Original Message-
> From: Hoang Le
> Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2022 2:35 PM
> To: jma...@redhat.com; ma...@donjonn.com; ying@windriver.com; Tung Quang
> Nguyen ;
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Xin Long
> Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2022 12:57 AM
> To: tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [tipc-discussion] [PATCH net-next] tipc: remove inputq from
> tipc_bc_base
>
> fix Jon's email address.
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 1:52 PM Xin Long
age-
> From: Niels Dossche
> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 11:12 PM
> To: tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; Jon Maloy ; Ying Xue
> ; David S. Miller
> ; Jakub Kicinski ; Paolo Abeni
> ; Hoang Huu Le
> ; Niels Dossche
> Subject:
From: Andy Stec
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 10:14 AM
To: Hoang Huu Le ;
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Setting Node Address
Which command is still supported, is it 'tipc node set address'? I'm getting
operation not permitted error when I use 'tipc node set address
Let's use 'tipc node set identity' instead.
However, that command is still support as legacy, this means you can continue
using it in your application.
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Stec via tipc-discussion
> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 8:16 AM
> To:
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Maloy
> Sent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 5:42 AM
> To: Hoang Huu Le ;
> tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net; Tung Quang Nguyen
> ; Xin Long ; Ying Xue
>
> Cc: Huy Xuan Nhat Hoang
> Subject: Re: Strange behavior i
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Maloy
> Sent: Wednesday, September 1, 2021 7:39 AM
> To: Hoang Huu Le ;
> tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net; Tung Quang Nguyen
> ; Xin Long ; Ying Xue
>
> Cc: Huy Xuan Nhat Hoang
> Subject: Re: Strange behavior in socket.c::
Hi Zheng,
The patch was being merged by accident. Will have you planning to revert it?
We need to do ASAP since calling path tipc_node_xmit() -> tipc_link_xmit()
broken as side effect.
Thanks,
hoang
> -Original Message-
> From: zhengyongjun
> Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 8:35 AM
> To:
Hi Jon,
Let's enjoy your vacation.
Our new team member (CCed) will take a look at it.
Regards,
Hoang
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Maloy
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2021 6:20 AM
> To: tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net; Tung Quang Nguyen
> ; Hoang Huu Le
> ; X
Hi Xin,
I think the issue caused by your patch:
f4919ff59c282 ("tipc: keep the skb in rcv queue until the whole data is read)
1976 if (!skb_cb->bytes_read)
1977 tsk_advance_rx_queue(sk); <-- skb free-ed here
1978
1979 if (likely(!connected) ||
Series
Tested-by: Hoang Le
> -Original Message-
> From: jma...@redhat.com
> Sent: Thursday, April 8, 2021 3:59 AM
> To: tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Tung Quang Nguyen ; Hoang Huu Le
> ; Tuong Tong Lien
> ; jma...@redhat.com; ma...@donjonn.com;
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: jma...@redhat.com
> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 10:56 PM
> To: tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Tung Quang Nguyen ; Hoang Huu Le
> ; Tuong Tong Lien
> ; jma...@redhat.com; ma...@donjonn.com;
> l...@redhat.com
> -Original Message-
> From: David Ahern
> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 10:08 AM
> To: Hoang Huu Le ; net...@vger.kernel.org;
> tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net;
> jma...@redhat.com; ma...@donjonn.com; ying@windriver.com; Tuan Anh Vo
> ; Tung Quang
&g
:expected struct tipc_aead [noderef] __rcu *__tmp
net/tipc/crypto.c:1201:9:got struct tipc_aead *
[...]
v2: switch to use the keyword "__always_inline" for inline function
Acked-by: Jon Maloy
Signed-off-by: Hoang Huu Le
---
net/tipc/crypto.c | 13 +-
net/tipc/moni
From: Hoang Le
(struct tipc_link_info)->dest is in network order (__be32), so we must
convert the value to network order before assigning. The problem detected
by sparse:
net/tipc/netlink_compat.c:699:24: warning: incorrect type in assignment
(different base types)
:expected struct tipc_aead [noderef] __rcu *__tmp
net/tipc/crypto.c:1201:9:got struct tipc_aead *
[...]
Acked-by: Jon Maloy
Signed-off-by: Hoang Huu Le
---
net/tipc/crypto.c | 12 -
net/tipc/monitor.c | 63 ++
net/tipc/node.c| 5
3
From: Hoang Le
(struct tipc_link_info)->dest is in network order (__be32), so we must
convert the value to network order before assigning. The problem detected
by sparse:
net/tipc/netlink_compat.c:699:24: warning: incorrect type in assignment
(different base types)
Remove a duplicate code checking for header size in tipc_msg_create() as
it's already being done in tipc_msg_init().
Signed-off-by: Hoang Huu Le
---
net/tipc/msg.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/tipc/msg.c b/net/tipc/msg.c
index 2aca86021df5..e9263280a2d4 100644
From: Hoang Le
(struct tipc_link_info)->dest is in network order (__be32), so we must
convert the value to network order before assigning. The problem detected
by sparse:
net/tipc/netlink_compat.c:699:24: warning: incorrect type in assignment
(different base types)
:expected struct tipc_aead [noderef] __rcu *__tmp
net/tipc/crypto.c:1201:9:got struct tipc_aead *
[...]
Signed-off-by: Hoang Huu Le
---
net/tipc/crypto.c | 12 -
net/tipc/monitor.c | 63 ++
net/tipc/node.c| 5
3 files changed, 58
: sparse: warning: cast to restricted __be32
[...]
---
Signed-off-by: Hoang Huu Le
---
net/tipc/crypto.c | 12 ++--
net/tipc/monitor.c| 32
net/tipc/netlink_compat.c | 2 +-
net/tipc/node.c | 5 +
4 files changed, 28 insertions
From: Hoang Le
The buffer list can have zero skb as following path:
tipc_named_node_up()->tipc_node_xmit()->tipc_link_xmit(), so
we need to check the list before casting an _buff.
Fault report:
[] tipc: Bulk publication failure
[] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical [#1]
From: Hoang Le
We initialize nlmsghdr without any payload in tipc_nl_compat_dumpit(),
then, result of calling parse attributes always fails and return with
'-EINVAL' error.
To fix error returning when parsing attributes of a netlink message,
we do a sanity check the length of message payload.
Hi Jon,
See my inline comment …
Regards,
Hoang
From: Jon Maloy
Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2020 5:22 PM
To: Hoang Huu Le
Cc: tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net; tipc-dek
Subject: Fwd: BUG: rwlock bad magic on CPU, kworker/0:LINE/NUM, ADDR
Hi Hoang,
This was the one I had in mind. To me
From: Hoang Le
We add the support to remove a specific node down with 128bit
node identifier, as an alternative to legacy 32-bit node address.
example:
$tipc peer remove identiy <1001002|1677>
Acked-by: Jon Maloy
Signed-off-by: Hoang Le
---
net/tipc/node.c | 21 ++---
1
From: Hoang Le
We add the support to remove a specific node down with 128bit
node identifier, as an alternative to legacy 32-bit node address.
example:
$tipc peer remove identiy <1001002|1677>
Signed-off-by: Hoang Le
---
net/tipc/node.c | 21 ++---
1 file changed, 18
From: Hoang Le
In commit 682cd3cf946b6
("tipc: confgiure and apply UDP bearer MTU on running links"), we
introduced a function to change UDP bearer MTU and applied this new value
across existing per-link. However, we did not apply this new MTU value at
node level. This lead to packet dropped at
,
Hoang
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Kicinski
> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 7:47 AM
> To: Hoang Huu Le
> Cc: tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net; jma...@redhat.com;
> ma...@donjonn.com; ying@windriver.com;
> net...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [net]
fix window 50)
However, when setting maximum window variable via command, the window
variable was re-initialized to unexpect value (i.e 32).
We fix this by updating the fix window for broadcast as we stated.
Fixes: 16ad3f4022bb ("tipc: introduce variable window congestion control")
Sign
the function to re-calculate queue limit of the
broadcast link.
Acked-by: Jon Maloy
Signed-off-by: Hoang Huu Le
---
net/tipc/bcast.c | 6 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/tipc/bcast.c b/net/tipc/bcast.c
index 940d176e0e87..c77fd13e2777 100644
--- a/net/tipc/bcast.c
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Maloy
> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 6:39 AM
> To: Hoang Huu Le ;
> tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net; ma...@donjonn.com;
> ying@windriver.com
> Subject: Re: [net] tipc: fix incorrect setting window for bcast link
>
&
dist_queue is no longer used since commit 37922ea4a310
("tipc: permit overlapping service ranges in name table")
Signed-off-by: Hoang Huu Le
---
net/tipc/core.c | 2 --
net/tipc/core.h | 3 ---
net/tipc/name_distr.c | 19 ---
3 files changed, 24 deletion
l_lock);
lock(>lock#2);
lock(>nametbl_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
Regards,
Hoang
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Maloy
> Sent: Friday, October 9, 2020 1:01 AM
> To: Jakub Kicinski ; Hoang Huu Le
> Cc: ma...@donjonn.com; ying@windriver.com;
> tipc-discuss
Hi Jon,
See my inline comment.
Thanks,
Hoang
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Maloy
> Sent: Friday, October 9, 2020 1:27 AM
> To: Hoang Huu Le ; ma...@donjonn.com;
> ying@windriver.com; tipc-
> discuss...@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [net-next] tipc: in
Hi Jon,
I've done at:
https://sourceforge.net/p/tipc/tipcutils/merge-requests/8/
Please take time to review it.
Regards,
Hoang
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Maloy
> Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 10:44 PM
> To: Hoang Huu Le ;
> tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net;
[] CR2:
[] ---[ end trace 65c276a8e2e2f310 ]---
To fix this, we need to grab the lock of the 'namedq' list on both
path calling.
Fixes: cad2929dc432 ("tipc: update a binding service via broadcast")
Acked-by: Jon Maloy
Signed-off-by: Hoang Huu Le
---
net/tipc/name_distr.c | 10
had reached.
We now introduce a smooth change to replicast if the broadcast link has
reach to the limit of queue.
Signed-off-by: Hoang Huu Le
---
net/tipc/link.c | 5 -
net/tipc/node.c | 12 ++--
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/tipc/link.c b/n
[] CR2:
[] ---[ end trace 65c276a8e2e2f310 ]---
To fix this, we need to grab the lock of the 'namedq' list on both
path calling.
Fixes: cad2929dc432 ("tipc: update a binding service via broadcast")
Signed-off-by: Hoang Huu Le
---
net/tipc/name_distr.c | 10 +-
Hi Jon,
I will make an effort on this. Do you think we need to keep these APIs
compatibility work with Python2 or completely remove out?
Regards,
Hoang
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Maloy
> Sent: Saturday, October 3, 2020 5:59 AM
> To: Hoang Huu Le ;
>
Hi Jon,
I've done this a long time ago:
5057f8bb4de0 tipcutils: introduce python api
Basically, it works with Python 2.
Regards,
Hoang
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Maloy
> Sent: Friday, October 2, 2020 4:56 AM
> To: tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net; tipc-dek
> ; Xin Long ;
Hi Jon,
See my inline comment.
Regards,
Hoang
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Maloy
> Sent: Friday, October 2, 2020 4:40 AM
> To: Hoang Huu Le ;
> tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net; ma...@donjonn.com;
> ying@windriver.com; Xin Long
> Subject: Re: [net
the function to re-calculate queue limit of the
broadcast link.
Signed-off-by: Hoang Huu Le
---
net/tipc/bcast.c | 6 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/tipc/bcast.c b/net/tipc/bcast.c
index abac9443b4d9..bc566b304571 100644
--- a/net/tipc/bcast.c
+++ b/net/tipc/bcast.c
This lead to the window for broadcast link had effect as unexpect value
(i.e the window size is constantly 32).
We fix this by updating the window for broadcast as its configuration.
Signed-off-by: Hoang Huu Le
---
net/tipc/bcast.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ti
5aa7e0385f6a5d0f...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: fdeba99b1e58 ("tipc: fix use-after-free in tipc_bcast_get_mode")
Signed-off-by: Hoang Huu Le
---
net/tipc/core.c | 8
net/tipc/core.h | 1 +
net/tipc/net.c | 10 +-
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/tip
b126c1...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Hoang Huu Le
---
net/tipc/core.c | 6 ++
net/tipc/core.h | 10 ++
net/tipc/net.c | 21 +
3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/tipc/core.c b/net/tipc/core.c
index 4f6dc74adf45..f81b80e7 100644
---
lock((wq_completion)events);
*** DEADLOCK ***
[...]
We need to find out another solution to fix the original issue.
Reported-by: syzbot+d5aa7e0385f6a5d0f...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: fdeba99b1e58 ("tipc: fix use-after-free in tipc_bcast_get_mode")
Signed-off-by: Hoang Huu L
Hi Jon,
Below solution does not fully resolve the issue. I'm finding out another
solution.
Regards,
Hoang
-Original Message-
From: Jon Maloy
Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2020 8:53 PM
To: Hoang Huu Le ; ma...@donjonn.com;
ying@windriver.com; tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc
lock((wq_completion)events);
*** DEADLOCK ***
[...]
We need to find out another solution to fix the original issue.
Reported-by: syzbot+d5aa7e0385f6a5d0f...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: fdeba99b1e58 ("tipc: fix use-after-free in tipc_bcast_get_mode")
Signed-off-by: Hoang Huu L
Thanks for pointing that out. I will revert the patch and submit another
solution.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Dumazet
Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2020 12:08 AM
To: Hoang Huu Le ; jma...@redhat.com;
ma...@donjonn.com; net...@vger.kernel.org; tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc
b126c1...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Acked-by: Jon Maloy
Signed-off-by: Hoang Huu Le
---
net/tipc/core.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/tipc/core.c b/net/tipc/core.c
index 4f6dc74adf45..37d8695548cf 100644
--- a/net/tipc/core.c
+++ b/net/tipc/core.c
@@ -109,6 +109,11 @@ stati
b126c1...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Acked-by: Jon Maloy
Signed-off-by: Hoang Huu Le
---
net/tipc/core.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/tipc/core.c b/net/tipc/core.c
index 4f6dc74adf45..37d8695548cf 100644
--- a/net/tipc/core.c
+++ b/net/tipc/core.c
@@ -109,6 +109,11 @@ stati
.
Acked-by: Jon Maloy
Signed-off-by: Hoang Huu Le
---
tipc/peer.c | 53 -
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tipc/peer.c b/tipc/peer.c
index f6380777033d..f14ec35e6f71 100644
--- a/tipc/peer.c
+++ b/tipc/peer.c
y been freed)
Reported-by: syzbot+6ea1f7a8df64596ef...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+e9cc557752ab126c1...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Hoang Huu Le
---
net/tipc/core.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/tipc/core.c b/net/tipc/core.c
y been freed)
Reported-by: syzbot+6ea1f7a8df64596ef...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+e9cc557752ab126c1...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Hoang Huu Le
---
net/tipc/bcast.c | 1 +
net/tipc/core.c | 1 +
net/tipc/core.h | 1 +
net/tipc/net.c | 3 +++
4 files chan
.
Signed-off-by: Hoang Le
Signed-off-by: Hoang Huu Le
---
tipc/peer.c | 53 -
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tipc/peer.c b/tipc/peer.c
index f6380777033d..f14ec35e6f71 100644
--- a/tipc/peer.c
+++ b/tipc/peer.c
1cbcd7ca down
invalid network address, syntax: Z.C.N
error: No such device or address
Solution:
We add the support to remove a specific node down with 128bit
node identifier, as an alternative to legacy 32-bit node address.
Signed-off-by: Hoang Le
Signed-off-by: Hoang Huu Le
Fixes: 5027f233e35b ("tipc: add link broadcast get")
Signed-off-by: Hoang Huu Le
---
tipc/link.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tipc/link.c b/tipc/link.c
index ba77a20152ea..192736eaa154 100644
--- a/tipc/link.c
+++ b/tipc/link.c
@@ -217,7 +217,7
-Original Message-
From: Jon Maloy
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2020 8:33 PM
To: Hoang Huu Le ; ma...@donjonn.com;
ying@windriver.com; tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [next-net v6] tipc: update a binding service via broadcast
On 6/6/20 11:10 PM, Hoang Huu Le wrote
Thanks Jon!
Hoang
-Original Message-
From: Jon Maloy
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2020 8:57 AM
To: Hoang Huu Le ;
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net; tipc-dek
Subject: Re: [tipc-discussion] [net-next] tipc: update a binding service via
broadcast
In case you are not aware of this, check
-Original Message-
From: Jon Maloy
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2020 2:14 AM
To: tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [tipc-discussion] [net-next] tipc: update a binding service via
broadcast
On 6/7/20 3:03 PM, Jon Maloy wrote:
>
>
> On 6/7/20 12:24 AM, Hoang Huu
-Original Message-
From: Jon Maloy
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2020 2:12 AM
To: Hoang Huu Le ; ma...@donjonn.com;
ying@windriver.com; tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [next-net v6] tipc: update a binding service via broadcast
On 6/6/20 11:10 PM, Hoang Huu Le wrote
ial synchronization and sequence number check, and
delivered unconditionally. Therefore, we add another 'is_not_legacy' bit
to all new messages so that those can be distinguished from legacy
messages and the latter delivered directly.
Signed-off-by: Hoang Huu Le
Acked-by: Jon Maloy
---
net/tipc/bcas
-Original Message-
From: Jon Maloy
Sent: Friday, June 5, 2020 8:03 PM
To: Hoang Huu Le ; ma...@donjonn.com;
ying@windriver.com; tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [next-net v6] tipc: update a binding service via broadcast
On 6/5/20 3:52 AM, Hoang Huu Le wrote
ast
v5: - never use broadcast if there is a single node not understanding it
- always use broadcast otherwise
- add sequence numbering to non-bulk messages
v6: update Jon's comment
Signed-off-by: Hoang Huu Le
Acked-by: Jon Maloy
---
net/tipc/bcast.c | 6 +--
net/tipc/bcas
Hi Jon,
See my inline comment.
Regards,
Hoang
-Original Message-
From: Jon Maloy
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 8:42 PM
To: Hoang Huu Le ; ma...@donjonn.com;
ying@windriver.com; tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [net-next] tipc: update a binding service via
From: Jon Maloy
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 8:59 PM
To: Hoang Huu Le ;
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net; tipc-dek ;
Tuong Tong Lien ; Xin Long ;
Tung Quang Nguyen ; Ying Xue
Subject: Re: FW: [PATCH 2/2] tipc: update a binding service via broadcast
On 6/4/20 5:14 AM, Hoang Huu Le
ode not understanding it
- always use broadcast otherwise
- add sequence numbering to non-bulk messages
Signed-off-by: Hoang Huu Le
---
net/tipc/bcast.c | 6 +--
net/tipc/bcast.h | 4 +-
net/tipc/link.c | 2 +-
net/tipc/msg.h| 40 +++
net/t
broadcast
Added more recipients.
Forwarded Message
Subject:
Re: FW: [PATCH 2/2] tipc: update a binding service via broadcast
Date:
Fri, 29 May 2020 12:08:02 -0400
From:
Jon Maloy <mailto:jma...@redhat.com>
To:
Hoang Huu Le <mailto:hoang.h...@dektech.com.au>,
ma...
-Original Message-
From: Jon Maloy
Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 8:37 PM
To: Hoang Huu Le ;
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Tung Quang Nguyen ; Tuong Tong Lien
; ma...@donjonn.com; x...@redhat.com;
ying@windriver.com; parthasarathy.bhuvara...@gmail.com
Subject: Re
Hi Jon,
See my comment inline.
Hoang
-Original Message-
From: Jon Maloy
Sent: Monday, June 1, 2020 7:40 PM
To: Hoang Huu Le ;
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Tung Quang Nguyen ; Tuong Tong Lien
; ma...@donjonn.com; x...@redhat.com;
ying@windriver.com
Hi Jon,
There is a concern in function tipc_node_broadcast.
See my comment inline.
Regards,
Hoang
-Original Message-
From: jma...@redhat.com
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2020 10:34 PM
To: tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Tung Quang Nguyen ; Hoang Huu Le
; Tuong Tong Lien ;
jma
Hi Tuong,
The 'node_cleanup' is not clear in meaning. I'd prefer using
'node_cleanup_time_secs'.
I think we should use 'milliseconds' for more popular than 'seconds' in
proc/sysctl.
Regards,
Hoang
-Original Message-
From: Tuong Tong Lien
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 2:30 PM
To:
Yes, I got the same results.
Hoang
-Original Message-
From: Jon Maloy
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 8:43 PM
To: Tuong Tong Lien ; ma...@donjonn.com;
ying@windriver.com; tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: tipc-...@dektech.com.au
Subject: Re: [tipc-discussion] [PATCH RFC 2/4]
74 matches
Mail list logo
