Bug#1069686: libsequoia-octopus-librnp: postinst script Syntax error: "fi" unexpected

2024-04-22 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 02:41:44PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: 12: Syntax error: "fi" unexpected (expecting > "then") > dpkg: error processing archive > /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-aFNmwO/1-libsequoia-octopus-librnp_1.8.1-3_amd64.deb > (--unpack): > new

Bug#1069686: libsequoia-octopus-librnp: postinst script Syntax error: "fi" unexpected

2024-04-22 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 02:41:44PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: 12: Syntax error: "fi" unexpected (expecting > "then") > dpkg: error processing archive > /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-aFNmwO/1-libsequoia-octopus-librnp_1.8.1-3_amd64.deb > (--unpack): > new

Bug#1069593: libsequoia-octopus-librnp: dpkg-divert in preinst doesn't happen on upgrade

2024-04-22 Thread Holger Levsen
hi dkg, thanks for these bugreports! I've commited fixes and am doing test builds now and will upload shortly. On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 04:29:10AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Why does the package exclude the diversion when preinst runs on upgrade? I guess because I used a bad example...

Bug#1069139: developers-reference: out-of-date section "Make transition packages deborphan compliant"

2024-04-21 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 08:30:52PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > While I fully support properly marking obsolete packages by putting > them in the (unfortunately misnamed :) oldlibs section (well excluding > library-like depended on packages that get dropped as a mater of course). > I wanted to

Bug#1069139: developers-reference: out-of-date section "Make transition packages deborphan compliant"

2024-04-21 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 08:30:52PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > While I fully support properly marking obsolete packages by putting > them in the (unfortunately misnamed :) oldlibs section (well excluding > library-like depended on packages that get dropped as a mater of course). > I wanted to

Bug#1069322: diffoscope crashes when trying to compare unreproducible src:dasel build artifacts

2024-04-19 Thread Holger Levsen
Package: diffoscope Version: 264 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: team+pkg...@tracker.debian.org Dear Maintainer, diffoscope crashes when comparing the build results of src:dasel. To make it more fun, src:dasel is only unreproducible on i386 (out of our four tested archs, amd64/i386/arm64/armhf)

Bug#1069322: diffoscope crashes when trying to compare unreproducible src:dasel build artifacts

2024-04-19 Thread Holger Levsen
Package: diffoscope Version: 264 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: team+pkg...@tracker.debian.org Dear Maintainer, diffoscope crashes when comparing the build results of src:dasel. To make it more fun, src:dasel is only unreproducible on i386 (out of our four tested archs, amd64/i386/arm64/armhf)

Bug#1069139: developers-reference: out-of-date section "Make transition packages deborphan compliant"

2024-04-17 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Vincent, On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 04:24:16AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Now that the deborphan package has been removed from unstable, > the section "Make transition packages deborphan compliant" in > "Best Packaging Practices" is out of date and should be updated. > > See

Bug#1069139: developers-reference: out-of-date section "Make transition packages deborphan compliant"

2024-04-17 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Vincent, On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 04:24:16AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Now that the deborphan package has been removed from unstable, > the section "Make transition packages deborphan compliant" in > "Best Packaging Practices" is out of date and should be updated. > > See

Bug#1068890: diffoscope: --hard-timeout option

2024-04-16 Thread Holger Levsen
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 04:51:09PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Just to say that I am totally on board with the idea of ensuring we > get _something_ out of diffoscope on tests.reproducible-builds.org. :) great! > Way better than 250 timeouts.

Bug#1068890: diffoscope: --hard-timeout option

2024-04-16 Thread Holger Levsen
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 04:51:09PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Just to say that I am totally on board with the idea of ensuring we > get _something_ out of diffoscope on tests.reproducible-builds.org. :) great! > Way better than 250 timeouts.

Re: debian-backports missing packages

2024-04-16 Thread Holger Levsen
hi, I was told by formorer that there will be announcement about this change later today, as well as an update to the documentation. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C

Re: debian-backports missing packages

2024-04-16 Thread Holger Levsen
hi, I was told by formorer that there will be announcement about this change later today, as well as an update to the documentation. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C

Bug#1069100: libscout.jar has duplicate ZIP entries in the central directory

2024-04-16 Thread Holger Levsen
Package: libscout Version: 2.3.2-3 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@alioth-lists.debian.net, Fay Stegerman Dear Maintainer, a few days ago I filed "#1068705: diffoscope crashes on libscout 2.3.2-3 build on unstable but not bullseye" which then led Fay Stegerman to discover

Bug#1069100: libscout.jar has duplicate ZIP entries in the central directory

2024-04-16 Thread Holger Levsen
Package: libscout Version: 2.3.2-3 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net, Fay Stegerman Dear Maintainer, a few days ago I filed "#1068705: diffoscope crashes on libscout 2.3.2-3 build on unstable but not bullseye" which then led Fay Stegerman to discover

Bug#1068705: diffoscope crashes on libscout 2.3.2-3 build on unstable but not bullseye

2024-04-16 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 03:00:42PM +0200, Fay Stegerman wrote: > > (thanks again!), am I correct to assume that thus there's no need > > to file a seperate bug against libscout? > It's generating a broken ZIP file with duplicate entries. It really shouldn't > be doing that, regardless of whether

Bug#1068705: diffoscope crashes on libscout 2.3.2-3 build on unstable but not bullseye

2024-04-16 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 03:00:42PM +0200, Fay Stegerman wrote: > > (thanks again!), am I correct to assume that thus there's no need > > to file a seperate bug against libscout? > It's generating a broken ZIP file with duplicate entries. It really shouldn't > be doing that, regardless of whether

Re: debina-backports missing packages

2024-04-16 Thread Holger Levsen
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 02:09:21AM -0400, Boyuan Yang wrote: > [...] Can I expect > the homepage and the Packages page to be updated soon? sooner if you provide patches. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP:

Bug#1068705: diffoscope crashes on libscout 2.3.2-3 build on unstable but not bullseye

2024-04-15 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi again, I've got two remaining questions about libscout (and diffoscope) On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 01:48:18AM +0200, Fay Stegerman wrote: > unzip does seem to extract all the files, though it errors out. Not sure what > diffoscope should do here. This is definitely a broken ZIP file. That bug

Bug#1068705: diffoscope crashes on libscout 2.3.2-3 build on unstable but not bullseye

2024-04-15 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi again, I've got two remaining questions about libscout (and diffoscope) On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 01:48:18AM +0200, Fay Stegerman wrote: > unzip does seem to extract all the files, though it errors out. Not sure what > diffoscope should do here. This is definitely a broken ZIP file. That bug

Bug#877337: single-page html of debian-policy to be revived?

2024-04-15 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 08:43:51PM +0800, Sean Whitton wrote: > ... but if dev-ref is already shipping both, maybe singlepage is indeed > usable these days ... I think it is. > > Could the Policy Editors team check, if everything is fine now, and if > > this should be published again? > > At

Bug#877337: single-page html of debian-policy to be revived?

2024-04-15 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 08:43:51PM +0800, Sean Whitton wrote: > ... but if dev-ref is already shipping both, maybe singlepage is indeed > usable these days ... I think it is. > > Could the Policy Editors team check, if everything is fine now, and if > > this should be published again? > > At

Re: single-page html of debian-policy to be revived?

2024-04-15 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 08:43:51PM +0800, Sean Whitton wrote: > ... but if dev-ref is already shipping both, maybe singlepage is indeed > usable these days ... I think it is. > > Could the Policy Editors team check, if everything is fine now, and if > > this should be published again? > > At

Bug#1068890: diffoscope: --hard-timeout option

2024-04-12 Thread Holger Levsen
Package: diffoscope Version: 264 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, currenlty diffoscope has a --timeout option --timeout SECONDS Best-effort attempt at a global timeout in seconds. If enabled, diffoscope will not recurse into any further sub-archives after

Bug#1068890: diffoscope: --hard-timeout option

2024-04-12 Thread Holger Levsen
Package: diffoscope Version: 264 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, currenlty diffoscope has a --timeout option --timeout SECONDS Best-effort attempt at a global timeout in seconds. If enabled, diffoscope will not recurse into any further sub-archives after

Bug#1068853: reprotest: SyntaxWarning: invalid escape sequence '\;'

2024-04-12 Thread Holger Levsen
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 10:29:07AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > How exactly did you get this error? upgrading my sid schroot. just confirmed the bug by removing it there and installing it again. then I mounted /proc but the bug is still there. /dev is also populated, though /usr/bin/mount

Bug#1068853: reprotest: SyntaxWarning: invalid escape sequence '\;'

2024-04-12 Thread Holger Levsen
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 10:29:07AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > How exactly did you get this error? upgrading my sid schroot. just confirmed the bug by removing it there and installing it again. then I mounted /proc but the bug is still there. /dev is also populated, though /usr/bin/mount

Re: finally end single-person maintainership

2024-04-12 Thread Holger Levsen
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 09:53:29AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Tue Apr 9, 2024 at 7:37 PM BST, Holger Levsen wrote: [...] > I agree with everything you say here! :) > Wrt git-buildpackage, I'd like to add that personally, I respect the gbp > authors and maintainers and it's a

Bug#1068853: reprotest: SyntaxWarning: invalid escape sequence '\;'

2024-04-12 Thread Holger Levsen
Package: reprotest Version: 0.7.27 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, when installing reprotest 0.7.27: SyntaxWarning: invalid escape sequence '\;' Setting up reprotest (0.7.27) ... /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/reprotest/__init__.py:360: SyntaxWarning: invalid escape sequence '\;'

Bug#1068853: reprotest: SyntaxWarning: invalid escape sequence '\;'

2024-04-12 Thread Holger Levsen
Package: reprotest Version: 0.7.27 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, when installing reprotest 0.7.27: SyntaxWarning: invalid escape sequence '\;' Setting up reprotest (0.7.27) ... /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/reprotest/__init__.py:360: SyntaxWarning: invalid escape sequence '\;'

Re: Please review the draft for March's report

2024-04-11 Thread Holger Levsen
Dear Chris et al, On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 07:52:39PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Please review the draft for March's Reproducible Builds report: > This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed. great, thank you and everyone involved indeed! I also like the final order of the

Bug#1066340: marked as done (t4kcommon: FTBFS: linebreak.c:163:19: error: implicit declaration of function ‘u8_mbtouc_unsafe’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

2024-04-11 Thread Holger Levsen
Dear Chris, On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 05:51:05PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 17:50:02 + > From: Debian FTP Masters > To: 1066340-cl...@bugs.debian.org > Subject: Bug#1066340: fixed in t4kcommon 0.1.1-11.2 > Reply-To: Chris Hofstaedtler thanks for that

Bug#1066340: marked as done (t4kcommon: FTBFS: linebreak.c:163:19: error: implicit declaration of function ‘u8_mbtouc_unsafe’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

2024-04-11 Thread Holger Levsen
Dear Chris, On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 05:51:05PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 17:50:02 + > From: Debian FTP Masters > To: 1066340-cl...@bugs.debian.org > Subject: Bug#1066340: fixed in t4kcommon 0.1.1-11.2 > Reply-To: Chris Hofstaedtler thanks for that

Bug#1002458: "version in VCS newer than in repository" might be a bit overzealous

2024-04-11 Thread Holger Levsen
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 03:02:05PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > > additionally you could also only classify d/changelog changing commits > > with "Gbp-Dch: ignore" in them as such, but I'd guess Marc's suggestion > > really is good enough. > I don't understand, if debian/changelog-only commits

Bug#1002458: "version in VCS newer than in repository" might be a bit overzealous

2024-04-11 Thread Holger Levsen
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 03:02:05PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > > additionally you could also only classify d/changelog changing commits > > with "Gbp-Dch: ignore" in them as such, but I'd guess Marc's suggestion > > really is good enough. > I don't understand, if debian/changelog-only commits

Bug#1068705: diffoscope crashes on libscout 2.3.2-3 build on unstable but not bullseye

2024-04-11 Thread Holger Levsen
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 11:28:19AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: [...] > Applied in Git with attribution taken from your email. [...] > Fixed as well. And it adds a nice comment displaying the issue. awesome, thank you both! -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁

Bug#1068705: diffoscope crashes on libscout 2.3.2-3 build on unstable but not bullseye

2024-04-11 Thread Holger Levsen
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 11:28:19AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: [...] > Applied in Git with attribution taken from your email. [...] > Fixed as well. And it adds a nice comment displaying the issue. awesome, thank you both! -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁

Bug#872944: #872944 www.debian.org: Remove JavaScript from Policy Manual published on web mirrors

2024-04-11 Thread Holger Levsen
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 09:18:06AM +0200, Thomas Lange wrote: > A single page html may be an additional option but there's already the > single page txt version and the PDF. That's sufficient and I see no > need in providing more formats of this manual. > > Therefore we can close this and I will

Bug#872944: #872944 www.debian.org: Remove JavaScript from Policy Manual published on web mirrors

2024-04-11 Thread Holger Levsen
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 09:18:06AM +0200, Thomas Lange wrote: > A single page html may be an additional option but there's already the > single page txt version and the PDF. That's sufficient and I see no > need in providing more formats of this manual. > > Therefore we can close this and I will

Re: Bug#872944: #872944 www.debian.org: Remove JavaScript from Policy Manual published on web mirrors

2024-04-11 Thread Holger Levsen
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 09:18:06AM +0200, Thomas Lange wrote: > A single page html may be an additional option but there's already the > single page txt version and the PDF. That's sufficient and I see no > need in providing more formats of this manual. > > Therefore we can close this and I will

Bug#1068705: diffoscope crashes on libscout 2.3.2-3 build on unstable but not bullseye

2024-04-10 Thread Holger Levsen
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 01:48:18AM +0200, Fay Stegerman wrote: > Salsa is probably better for figuring out what to do next, but I get these > mails > too :) :) > The libscout.jar has duplicate ZIP entries in the central directory, pointing > to > the same actual entry in the ZIP. So the

Bug#1068705: diffoscope crashes on libscout 2.3.2-3 build on unstable but not bullseye

2024-04-10 Thread Holger Levsen
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 01:48:18AM +0200, Fay Stegerman wrote: > Salsa is probably better for figuring out what to do next, but I get these > mails > too :) :) > The libscout.jar has duplicate ZIP entries in the central directory, pointing > to > the same actual entry in the ZIP. So the

Bug#1002458: "version in VCS newer than in repository" might be a bit overzealous

2024-04-10 Thread Holger Levsen
On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 01:36:35PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 01:15:08PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote: > > Re: Marc Haber > > > To fill my idea, vcswatch would need to classify commits into "real" > > > commits and "housekeeping" commits, so that the tracker can handle them

Bug#1002458: "version in VCS newer than in repository" might be a bit overzealous

2024-04-10 Thread Holger Levsen
On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 01:36:35PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 01:15:08PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote: > > Re: Marc Haber > > > To fill my idea, vcswatch would need to classify commits into "real" > > > commits and "housekeeping" commits, so that the tracker can handle them

Bug#1068705: diffoscope crashes on libscout 2.3.2-3 build on unstable but not bullseye

2024-04-10 Thread Holger Levsen
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 06:12:21PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Holger Levsen wrote: > > > when building libscout 2.3.2-3 on current unstable, the result is also > > unreproducible, but diffoscope crashes when analysing the diff. > I think this is somewhat related to: >

Bug#1068705: diffoscope crashes on libscout 2.3.2-3 build on unstable but not bullseye

2024-04-10 Thread Holger Levsen
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 06:12:21PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Holger Levsen wrote: > > > when building libscout 2.3.2-3 on current unstable, the result is also > > unreproducible, but diffoscope crashes when analysing the diff. > I think this is somewhat related to: >

Re: Please review the draft for March's report

2024-04-10 Thread Holger Levsen
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 10:02:56AM -0400, David A. Wheeler via rb-general wrote: > I agree, this one is HUGE news. There's been a lot of awesome work related to > reproducible builds, but "minimal container userland is a 100% reproducible > build in a real-world widely-used distro" is a big step

Bug#1068761: packaging-tutorial: mention hello and hello-traditional examples

2024-04-10 Thread Holger Levsen
Package: packaging-tutorial Version: 0.30 Severity: normal Dear Lucas, it would be great if the hello pkg would be mentioned, because its a clean example and because there's hello-traditional too. hello is a good example for using dh in d/rules: #!/usr/bin/make -f %: dh $@

Bug#1068760: packaging-tutorial: discourage cdbs and even pure debhelper more

2024-04-10 Thread Holger Levsen
Package: packaging-tutorial Version: 0.30 Severity: normal Dear Lucas, packaging-tutorial is great, but please discourage the use of cdbs and even pure debhelper more and emphasize to use dh which is great and simple. & many thanks for packaging-tutorial! -- cheers, Holger

Re: finally end single-person maintainership

2024-04-09 Thread Holger Levsen
hi, just adding some random data points to this thread: - I love git. - I very much dislike git-buildpackage, too much magic. I try to avoid it where I can. - I like salsa. (though I think for many new contributors this is rather a barrier "why not use github" directly. Also salsa is Debian

Bug#1068705: diffoscope crashes on libscout 2.3.2-3 build on unstable but not bullseye

2024-04-09 Thread Holger Levsen
package: diffoscope version: 263 hi, diffoscope 263 crashes on libscout 2.3.2-3 build on unstable but not bullseye: libscout 2.3.2-3 is part of bullseye (but neither bookworm nor trixie) and builds unreproducible there and diffoscope is able to show a diff. when building libscout 2.3.2-3 on

Bug#1068705: diffoscope crashes on libscout 2.3.2-3 build on unstable but not bullseye

2024-04-09 Thread Holger Levsen
package: diffoscope version: 263 hi, diffoscope 263 crashes on libscout 2.3.2-3 build on unstable but not bullseye: libscout 2.3.2-3 is part of bullseye (but neither bookworm nor trixie) and builds unreproducible there and diffoscope is able to show a diff. when building libscout 2.3.2-3 on

Re: Two questions about build-path reproducibility in Debian

2024-04-08 Thread Holger Levsen
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 08:45:03AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > >> Note: I confused myself when writing this; in fact Salsa-CI reprotest > >> _does_ > >> continue to test build-path variance, at least until we decide otherwise. > > this is in fact a bug and should be fixed with the next

Content and translation status for the debian-edu-bookworm manual

2024-04-06 Thread Holger Levsen
The (translated) debian-edu-bookworm manual in PDF, ePUB or HTML formats are available at https://jenkins.debian.net/userContent/debian-edu-doc// To understand this mail better, please read /usr/share/doc/debian-edu-doc/README. This mail is automatically send by a cronjob run by Holger Levsen

Bug#1068192: debian-policy: extended forbidden network access to contrib and non-freeo

2024-04-06 Thread Holger Levsen
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 09:49:58PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > If we go that route, here is a proposed alternative patch: > > --- a/policy/ch-source.rst > +++ b/policy/ch-source.rst > @@ -338,7 +338,8 @@ > For example, the build target should pass ``--disable-silent-rules`` > to any

Bug#1068192: debian-policy: extended forbidden network access to contrib and non-freeo

2024-04-06 Thread Holger Levsen
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 09:49:58PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > If we go that route, here is a proposed alternative patch: > > --- a/policy/ch-source.rst > +++ b/policy/ch-source.rst > @@ -338,7 +338,8 @@ > For example, the build target should pass ``--disable-silent-rules`` > to any

Bug#1068192: debian-policy: extended forbidden network access to contrib and non-free

2024-04-05 Thread Holger Levsen
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 10:58:37PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Thanks Philipp. Following that result, please find a patch proposal: > > --- a/policy/ch-source.rst > +++ b/policy/ch-source.rst > @@ -338,9 +338,9 @@ > For example, the build target should pass ``--disable-silent-rules`` > to

Bug#1068192: debian-policy: extended forbidden network access to contrib and non-free

2024-04-05 Thread Holger Levsen
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 10:58:37PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Thanks Philipp. Following that result, please find a patch proposal: > > --- a/policy/ch-source.rst > +++ b/policy/ch-source.rst > @@ -338,9 +338,9 @@ > For example, the build target should pass ``--disable-silent-rules`` > to

Re: Question to all voters: Is team upload in some example case OK? (Was: Question to all candidates: What are your technical goals)

2024-04-05 Thread Holger Levsen
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 12:26:03PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > also: (NMU-)uploads to DELAYED/15 are great. > Sorry, I do not feel my time well spent on just curing a symptom > (unfixed RC bug) via NMU instead of addressing the underlying cause > that the package is maintained by a single

Re: Question to all voters: Is team upload in some example case OK? (Was: Question to all candidates: What are your technical goals)

2024-04-05 Thread Holger Levsen
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 02:32:45PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > [...] I could follow the normal NMU procedure but I do not consider > this a sustainable solution. [...] > I did not uploaded my work but I would like to know what action is > considered acceptable by the voters. I repeat that

Re: Question to all voters: Is team upload in some example case OK? (Was: Question to all candidates: What are your technical goals)

2024-04-04 Thread Holger Levsen
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 02:59:34PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > I would like to learn what options I have to realise paragraph >Packaging standards > of my platform. I also think this feels a bit like abusing the election audience for a topic which should be discussed on -devel outside

ufw (was Re: Debian openssh option review: considering splitting out GSS-API key exchange)

2024-04-04 Thread Holger Levsen
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 01:32:11PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > So you have dedicated packet filters on every machine you run, even if > sshd is the only network-facing service? on most machines and it was as simple as doing: apt install ufw ufw allow ssh ufw enable voila, done. rules configured

Re: review of src:sequoia-chameleon-gnupg package descriptions

2024-03-27 Thread Holger Levsen
Dear Justin, On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 05:10:02PM +, Justin B Rye wrote: > Okay! Suggested version attached. <3 thank you very much for that lovely & caring review! I love all your changes and will upload shortly! 珞 > > Description: Sequoia's reimplementation of the GnuPG cli tools

review of src:sequoia-chameleon-gnupg package descriptions

2024-03-24 Thread Holger Levsen
not subscribed to this list.) Source: rust-sequoia-chameleon-gnupg Maintainer: Debian Rust Maintainers Uploaders: Alexander Kjäll , Holger Levsen Vcs-Git: https://salsa.debian.org/rust-team/debcargo-conf.git [src/sequoia-chameleon-gnupg] Vcs-Browser: https://salsa.debian.org/rust-team

Bug#1041832: #1041832: libsequoia-octopus-librnp: undeclared file conflict with thunderbird

2024-03-22 Thread Holger Levsen
hi, < h01ger> helmut: re: #1041832: i just could not reproduce this bug, see https://paste.debian.net/1311659/ - though we "didnt change anything" in sequoia-octopus, so what am i missing? :) that paste had basically this content: ± dpkg -L libsequoia-octopus-librnp |grep

Bug#1041832: #1041832: libsequoia-octopus-librnp: undeclared file conflict with thunderbird

2024-03-22 Thread Holger Levsen
hi, < h01ger> helmut: re: #1041832: i just could not reproduce this bug, see https://paste.debian.net/1311659/ - though we "didnt change anything" in sequoia-octopus, so what am i missing? :) that paste had basically this content: ± dpkg -L libsequoia-octopus-librnp |grep

Re: Package marked for autoremoval due to closed bug? [and 1 more messages]

2024-03-21 Thread Holger Levsen
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 10:47:21AM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Package marked for autoremoval due to closed bug? > [and 1 more messages]"): > > Steve, could you please do this for *all* the time_t transition RC > > bugs? > IMO things are currently ON FIRE. I'd rather

Bug#1062904: ping to prevent autoremoval

2024-03-21 Thread Holger Levsen
pong

Bug#1062904: ping to prevent autoremoval

2024-03-21 Thread Holger Levsen
pong

Bug#1067232: limit diffoscope recursions on packages where diffoscope runs into a timeout

2024-03-20 Thread Holger Levsen
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 04:31:22PM +, James Addison wrote: > > or maybe even simpler: first run diffoscope normally, then if that runs > > into a timeout, > > run with --max-container-depth=3 (or 5). It also occured to me that we then could diffoscope with a (way) lower timeout, eg 60min

Bug#1067232: limit diffoscope recursions on packages where diffoscope runs into a timeout

2024-03-20 Thread Holger Levsen
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 04:31:22PM +, James Addison wrote: > Package: jenkins.debian.org > X-Debbugs-Cc: hol...@layer-acht.org no need for that cc:, i'm subscribed to the package. > That seems like a straightforward way to get started, and without adding much > complexity. indeed. > In

Bug#1067232: limit diffoscope recursions on packages where diffoscope runs into a timeout

2024-03-20 Thread Holger Levsen
package: jenkins.debian.org severity: wishlist hi, in https://salsa.debian.org/qa/jenkins.debian.net/-/merge_requests/163 James Addison suggested to use --max-container-depth=3 (or 5) for when diffscope runs into a timeout on a package. (or rather not then, but always, which why this MR wasnt

Alexander Kjäll: Advocate

2024-03-20 Thread Holger Levsen (via nm.debian.org)
PGP SIGNATURE- Holger Levsen (via nm.debian.org) For details and to comment, visit https://nm.debian.org/process/1257/ -- https://nm.debian.org/process/1257/

Bug#1066991: easy way to crash diffoscope

2024-03-16 Thread Holger Levsen
package: diffoscope version: 240 hi, crashing diffoscope in under 2min (the package build takes 42sec here). $ apt source golang-github-stvp-tempredis $ sudo pbuilder build golang-github-stvp-tempredis_0.0~git20231107.8a695b6-1.dsc $ mkdir p1 ; mv /var/cache/pbuilder/unstable/result/* p1/ $

Bug#1066991: easy way to crash diffoscope

2024-03-16 Thread Holger Levsen
package: diffoscope version: 240 hi, crashing diffoscope in under 2min (the package build takes 42sec here). $ apt source golang-github-stvp-tempredis $ sudo pbuilder build golang-github-stvp-tempredis_0.0~git20231107.8a695b6-1.dsc $ mkdir p1 ; mv /var/cache/pbuilder/unstable/result/* p1/ $

Re: Reproducible Arch Linux in 2024/Q1 (irregular status update)

2024-03-13 Thread Holger Levsen
hi, from irc: kpcyrd: may i quote on rb-general what you wrote here? [11:56] < h01ger> kpcyrd: many thanks for your arch linux status update! i just wonder: does archlinux re-build in the same path as the original build or not? :) [11:59] < kpcyrd> | h01ger: yes, the build path always

Bug#1066121: ionos 5/6/15/16 loosing network

2024-03-13 Thread Holger Levsen
[22:39] * | h01ger filed a bug about 5/6/15/16 loosing network now [22:40] * | mapreri ponders the accuracy: the link was still up, so perhaps it only lost the IP somehow? [22:40] next time I will look up the dhcp lease if there is anything odd [22:40] mapreri: that pondering could be the

Bug#1066186: setup mastadon2irc bot

2024-03-13 Thread Holger Levsen
package: jenkins.debian.org not strictly a jenkins.d.o topic, but it would be nice to have mastadon mentions on #reproducible-builds again in that channel. https://github.com/hackspace-marburg/troet is a Mastodon plugin for Sopel IRC bots, sopel is available in Debian. -- cheers,

Bug#1066122: ionos3 configured twice

2024-03-12 Thread Holger Levsen
package: jenkins.debian.org some cleanup needs to be done here, we dont need two hosts. also twitter is dead, so maybe not even one. though maybe we wanted a mastadon bot? -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP:

Bug#1066121: ionos 5/6/15/16 loosing network

2024-03-12 Thread Holger Levsen
package: jenkins.debian.org (this has been ongoing for month already) < h01ger> mapreri: i think we need to put restarting network into some sort of 'cronjob' (probably only if network is down), ionos5 is been gone since several hours and thus half the amd64 builders are down now < h01ger> not

Bug#1059479: r-b CI tests very slow

2024-03-12 Thread Holger Levsen
On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 05:50:47PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > packages tested on average per day in the last week 596 3484482 > 348 > packages tested on average per day in the last 4 weeks774 4351 > 546 339 > packages tested on average per da

Re: Two questions about build-path reproducibility in Debian

2024-03-12 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 06:24:22PM +, James Addison via rb-general wrote: > Please find below a draft of the message I'll send to each affected bugreport. looks good to me, thank you for doing this! > Note: I confused myself when writing this; in fact Salsa-CI reprotest _does_ > continue to

Bug#1063376: How to ask efficiently for removal of 32 bit architectures of about 40 packages (Was: reverse dependenc)

2024-03-11 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 08:26:40PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > do mutt -s "RM: remove $package" -i tmpfile $package the 2nd $package in that line must be sub...@bugs.debian.org -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|la

Bug#1063376: How to ask efficiently for removal of 32 bit architectures of about 40 packages (Was: reverse dependenc)

2024-03-11 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 09:12:30PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > I hope there is some better solution than sending single bug reports > for those packages. If ftpmaster tooling really needs single bug > reports I wonder how I can automatically create such bug reports with > always the same text,

Re: How to ask efficiently for removal of 32 bit architectures of about 40 packages (Was: reverse dependenc)

2024-03-11 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 08:26:40PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > do mutt -s "RM: remove $package" -i tmpfile $package the 2nd $package in that line must be sub...@bugs.debian.org -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|la

Re: How to ask efficiently for removal of 32 bit architectures of about 40 packages (Was: reverse dependenc)

2024-03-11 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 09:12:30PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > I hope there is some better solution than sending single bug reports > for those packages. If ftpmaster tooling really needs single bug > reports I wonder how I can automatically create such bug reports with > always the same text,

Re: Two questions about build-path reproducibility in Debian

2024-03-06 Thread Holger Levsen
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 11:51:16PM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > FWIW Yocto Project is a strong believer in build reproducibiity > independent of build path and we've been quietly chipping away at those > issues. [...] > OpenEmbedded-Core (around 1000 pieces of software) is 100% reproducible >

Bug#1065463: debootstrap can deal with native dpkg file replacement feature

2024-03-05 Thread Holger Levsen
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 08:36:59AM +0800, Steven Shiau wrote: > debootstrap should be able to solve the libuuid1t64 dependency by installing > libuuid1 only. just in case you are not aware, bootstrapping using either mmdebstrap or cdebootstrap works atm. mmdebstrap is faster and mostly a drop-in

Bug#1065463: debootstrap can deal with native dpkg file replacement feature

2024-03-05 Thread Holger Levsen
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 08:36:59AM +0800, Steven Shiau wrote: > debootstrap should be able to solve the libuuid1t64 dependency by installing > libuuid1 only. just in case you are not aware, bootstrapping using either mmdebstrap or cdebootstrap works atm. mmdebstrap is faster and mostly a drop-in

Re: Two questions about build-path reproducibility in Debian

2024-03-04 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 11:52:07AM -0800, John Gilmore wrote: > Why would these become "wishlist" bugs as opposed to actual reproducibility > bugs > that deserve fixing, just because one server at Debian no longer invokes this > bug because it always uses the same build directory? because it's

Re: New requirements for APT repository signing

2024-03-04 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 07:47:08AM -, Sune Vuorela wrote: > In theory. I don't know if there are any statistics on 'popular' > 3rdparty repositories and their keys. I suspect src:extrepo-data is a good starting point for anyone interested in generating such statistics... -- cheers,

Content and translation status for the debian-edu-bookworm manual

2024-03-02 Thread Holger Levsen
The (translated) debian-edu-bookworm manual in PDF, ePUB or HTML formats are available at https://jenkins.debian.net/userContent/debian-edu-doc// To understand this mail better, please read /usr/share/doc/debian-edu-doc/README. This mail is automatically send by a cronjob run by Holger Levsen

Bug#1049716: some analysis

2024-03-02 Thread Holger Levsen
hi, after *one* build I see: $ git status On branch master Your branch is up to date with 'origin/master'. Changes not staged for commit: (use "git add ..." to update what will be committed) (use "git restore ..." to discard changes in working directory) modified:

Bug#1049716: some analysis

2024-03-02 Thread Holger Levsen
hi, after *one* build I see: $ git status On branch master Your branch is up to date with 'origin/master'. Changes not staged for commit: (use "git add ..." to update what will be committed) (use "git restore ..." to discard changes in working directory) modified:

Re: Unlocking Japanese and French translations of Debian Edu manuals on hosted-weblate

2024-02-26 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 06:32:39PM +0100, Wolfgang Schweer wrote: > Also, (ro) and (uk) translations seem to be complete: > debian-edu-bookworm-manual.ro.po: 1038 translated messages. > debian-edu-bookworm-manual.uk.po: 1038 translated messages. > New binary packages should be provided. I've just

Bug#1032752: please drop transitional package gnupg-agent from src:gnupg2

2024-02-17 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 01:29:54PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > Control: block -1 by 1064104 1064105 1064110 1064111 1064112 1064113 1064114 > 1064115 1064116 1064118 1064117 1064119 1064120 > I have submitted bugs against packages in sid with > Depends/Suggest/Recommends on gnupg-agent.

Bug#1062259: libcomps: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-15 Thread Holger Levsen
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 10:31:21AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Well, these packages will be garbage collected from experimental upon the > next upload of a package to unstable or experimental with a higher version; which might happen next month or next year or in 2027... > so this is a low

Bug#1062259: libcomps: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-15 Thread Holger Levsen
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 10:31:21AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Well, these packages will be garbage collected from experimental upon the > next upload of a package to unstable or experimental with a higher version; which might happen next month or next year or in 2027... > so this is a low

Re: Release State of DebianEdu

2024-02-15 Thread Holger Levsen
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 01:42:35PM +0100, Frank Weißer wrote: > booting this image tells Debian Edu 12.5, so maybe only the README.txt (as > README.html too) is the wrong one? I guess so. Do you get the Edu installer when booting it? -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁

Re: usrmerge breaks POSIX

2024-02-15 Thread Holger Levsen
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 10:08:11AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Not for mksh. so the subject should be "mksh is broken with usrmerge"? -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >