Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

+1: macOS 14.4.1/Xcode 15.3, CentOS8, Ubuntu 18.04LTS, 20.04LTS, 22.04LTS > On Apr 3, 2024, at 8:26 AM, Eric Covener wrote: > > Hi all, > > (After only minor embarrassment of patching tags/2.4.55 instead of 2.4.x...) > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > >

Re: mod_systemd: refactor to get rid of libsystemd dependency?

+1 > On Apr 4, 2024, at 5:43 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > > > On 4/3/24 4:32 PM, Joe Orton wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 12:25:40PM +0200, Rainer Jung wrote: >>> Hi there, >>> >>> in the light of the recent xz attack I was wondering, whether we should also >>> reduce our library

Re: MacOS testing for bug 112829 (SVG clipboard format)

has that patch I sent, because I am not sure it > works yet. > > On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 8:07 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> I mean, is there a branch with this already folded in? >> >>> On Feb 22, 2024, at 2:27 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >>> >>&

Re: MacOS testing for bug 112829 (SVG clipboard format)

I mean, is there a branch with this already folded in? > On Feb 22, 2024, at 2:27 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > Either trunk or AOO42X. > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 7:11 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> Which branch? >> >>> On Feb 22, 2024, at 10:54 AM,

Re: MacOS testing for bug 112829 (SVG clipboard format)

Which branch? > On Feb 22, 2024, at 10:54 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > Hi > > For bug 112829, I got graphics and charts to copy out of AOO in SVG format > on FreeBSD and Windows (and probably Linux), but I wasn't able to test > macOS. A quick look at the code shows we might need another

Re: [License-discuss] documentation on un-enforceability of ethical licenses? (was Re: License Review Request - Anu Initiative

> On Feb 6, 2024, at 10:39 AM, Stefano Maffulli wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 4:18 PM Daniel Mihai > wrote: >> We are happy to remove the restriction of use for positive ecological >> conservation and sustainability, yet we are not happy to allow usage of

AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 Community Builds Available for Testing and Fun

We have community builds of AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 available for download and testing at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev5/ We encourage people to try these builds out and to provide feedback and PRs against them; These are NOT production ready! Heck, they aren't even

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

> On Jan 30, 2024, at 7:53 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > >> On Jan 30, 2024, at 5:23 AM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Hi Jim, >> >> Am 30.01.24 um 11:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> macOS and Linux64 have also been upload

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

> On Jan 30, 2024, at 5:23 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 30.01.24 um 11:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> macOS and Linux64 have also been uploaded. > Great! I'll start on Linux32 bit builds today. >> >> Since these are develope

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev5/ >> >> Regards, >> >>Matthias >> >> Am 24.01.24 um 18:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>> Am 24.01.24 um 13:05 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>>> Are we ready for a Dev5 in any c

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

Current on AOO42X is c51e9806. Should we start there? > On Jan 24, 2024, at 12:32 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 24.01.24 um 13:05 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Are we ready for a Dev5 in any case? > I am ready as soon as we decide on a Git hash to build. >> >&

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

Are we ready for a Dev5 in any case? > On Jan 15, 2024, at 10:02 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 10.01.24 um 19:14 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Am 10.01.24 um 15:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> Lets fold this in and build -Dev5 after it's committed > > Co

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

s a Linux fix only? What does boost do? Improve calculation speed? > > I already did a build for Windows, boost is part of our build system. > > We need to check for macOS/Linux now. > >> >> In any case, +1 to updating libraries > > That is the intention. >

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

I'm up for doing the dev tarballs for Linux and macOS > On Jan 7, 2024, at 5:55 PM, Keith N. McKenna > wrote: > > Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hi All, >> and a happy new year! >> After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work >> towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for

Re: age in proxy_balancer_method

nt to give the past a smaller > influence on the balancing decision than the more recent activity. > > I hope that's understandable and maybe Jim remembers something similar to > that. > > Best regards, > > Rainer > > Am 21.12.23 um 08:23 schrieb jean-frederic cl

Re: age in proxy_balancer_method

I'll have to go back through my notes... I do recall adding fields that although were not being used at the time, were _going to be used_ as some point, and I didn't want to have to worry about ABI compatibility. > On Dec 14, 2023, at 8:27 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > > Hi, > > Any

Re: AOO 4.1.15 Release Schedule

Perfect, thanks! I'll start the xfer to SF tomorrow am > On Dec 18, 2023, at 1:40 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi All, > > I have now signed and re-uploaded all Windows binaries. > > The Release Schedule was updated as far as I was involved: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.15-RC2 as GA

I call this vote CLOSED. Based on the responses, AOO 4.1.15-RC2 has been approved as GA. Thanks to all who tested and voted. > On Nov 28, 2023, at 10:45 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community > builds of Apache OpenO

Re: Open letter to TDF

Maybe new leadership at TDF will encourage cooperation between LO and AOO instead of still harboring ill-will between the 2 efforts. > On Dec 11, 2023, at 2:28 AM, Bidouille wrote: > > > For some months now, the libreoffice community has been in turmoil. > A new committee is set to oust the

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.15-RC2 as GA

> On Nov 28, 2023, at 10:45 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community > builds of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.15-RC2 as GA. > > These artifacts can be found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/d

Re: svn commit: r1912245 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy: balancers/mod_lbmethod_bybusyness.c mod_proxy_balancer.c proxy_util.c proxy_util.h

> On Nov 28, 2023, at 4:29 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 3:28 PM Ruediger Pluem > wrote: >> >> On 11/24/23 10:59 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 5:47 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 11/23/23 5:05 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:

[VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.15-RC2 as GA

I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community builds of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.15-RC2 as GA. These artifacts can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.15-RC2/ Please cast your vote: The Release Candidate is good for production/GA: [

RECALLED (Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.15-RC1 as GA)

I am recalling and closing this VOTE as we work on getting a RC2 release out. Thanks to all who tested and voted!! > On Nov 1, 2023, at 10:54 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community > builds of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.15-RC1 as GA

Good idea! > On Nov 19, 2023, at 4:16 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > > Hello Jim, All, > > On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 08:59:46AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> Are there any patches or additions anyone thinks would be >> appropriate to add in for a RC2 or is RC1 &q

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.15-RC1 as GA

Are there any patches or additions anyone thinks would be appropriate to add in for a RC2 or is RC1 "good enough"? > On Nov 13, 2023, at 2:32 PM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 11.11.23 um 22:59 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: >> On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 09:51:42AM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> [...] >>>

Re: VP Conferences changes

> On Nov 9, 2023, at 5:46 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > > rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote on 11/8/23 9:45 AM: > ...snip... >> I'm honestly torn as to whether this troll-y message merits a response. > > No, it didn't merit a response, but here we are anyway! 8-) > > The response feels like it's from

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.15-RC1 as GA

> On Nov 1, 2023, at 10:54 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community > builds of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.15-RC1 as GA. > > These artifacts can be found at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/d

[VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.15-RC1 as GA

I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community builds of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.15-RC1 as GA. These artifacts can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.15-RC1/ Please cast your vote: The Release Candidate is good for production/GA:

Re: [License-discuss] Query on "delayed open source" licensing

> On Oct 27, 2023, at 2:06 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote: > > FWIW, I can confirm Larry Rosen's suggestion that indeed L. Peter Deutsch and > Aladdin Ghostscript likely invented the manipulative marketing approach of > pre-announcing that proprietary software might someday be FOSS and/or making >

Re: "Roadmap"

Yep. macOS and Linux 32 and 64 bit builds (as source) are uploaded to dist/dev > On Oct 24, 2023, at 5:52 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 23.10.23 um 14:34 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> I'll start some dev builds for 0a12a2c1 > > So thi

Re: "Roadmap"

I'll start some dev builds for 0a12a2c1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: "Roadmap"

I'm back from the All Things Open event, so I signed up for some tasks as well. > On Oct 18, 2023, at 5:52 PM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 17.10.23 um 16:52 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Am 05.10.23 um 16:50 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >>> Matthias Seidel wrote: I would like to collect ideas

Re: 4.2.0 release blockers

> On Oct 5, 2023, at 3:20 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > >> On Oct 4, 2023, at 2:12 PM, Damjan Jovanovic > <mailto:dam...@apache.org>> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 4:52 PM Jim Jagielski > <mailto:j...@jagunet.com> <mailto:j...@

Re: 4.2.0 release blockers

> On Oct 4, 2023, at 2:12 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 4:52 PM Jim Jagielski <mailto:j...@jagunet.com>> wrote: > >> >> >>> On Oct 1, 2023, at 7:44 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >>> >>> 127154 and 12796

Re: 4.2.0 release blockers

> On Oct 2, 2023, at 12:11 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > Is there a step by step how to build AOO on these? Knowing the steps would > allow someone who is interested to try on their own Mac. > > Remind what version of macOS should be the minimum? My 11 year old iMac can > only be on

Re: 4.2.0 release blockers

> On Oct 1, 2023, at 7:44 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > 127154 and 127966 need to be looked at by a Mac developer. > Those look pretty old. I should create a quick macOS 4.2.0 dev build for testing - To unsubscribe,

Re: balancers bybusyness, bytraffic and byrequest thread/process safe issues

IIRC, the goal of having an "aging" function was to handle this exact kind of thing, where values could be normalized over a long period of time so that old entries that may skew results are not weighted as heavily as new ones. > On Aug 30, 2023, at 11:19 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > >

Re: balancers bybusyness, bytraffic and byrequest thread/process safe issues

Isn't the call to find the best balancer mutex protected? > On Aug 31, 2023, at 7:44 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > > On 8/30/23 17:33, Rainer Jung wrote: >> Hi JFC, >> I have not checked ur current code, but the topic reminds me of our history >> in mod_jk land. There we switched the

Re: Booth opportunity at All Things Open 2023 conference

I'll be there and could spend some time at the ASF booth. > On Jun 14, 2023, at 3:36 PM, Sharan Foga wrote: > > Hi Swapnil > > I'm planning to be there - and could help out. I wont be able to do it full > time as I might have a talk and other commitments at the event. Apart from > that I'd

Re: [VOTE] Switch read/write repository from Subversion to Git

> On May 4, 2023, at 4:34 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > This is a formal vote on whether we should move our read/write repository > from Subversion to Git. > This means that our latest read/write repository will be no longer available > via svn.apache.org. It > will be available via Git at

Re: Back to basics: What we do @comdev

Maybe part of ComDev could be in the matchmaker aspect of connecting external people to internal groups. For example, Petri is a sort of mentoring program... Just 2c from a peanut > On Mar 16, 2023, at 11:40 AM, rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: > > Hi, folks, > > I have tried to write this email

Re: [RESULT] PASSED Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.14-RC1 as GA

Fantastic! Thank you. > On Feb 23, 2023, at 4:23 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi All, > > Am 23.02.23 um 15:18 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> With 8 binding +1 votes, this PASSES. >> >> Thanks to all who tested and voted. >> >> We will c

[RESULT] PASSED Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.14-RC1 as GA

With 8 binding +1 votes, this PASSES. Thanks to all who tested and voted. We will continue with the release process. > On Feb 13, 2023, at 7:38 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community > builds of > Apache OpenOf

Re: [DISCUSS] Release AOO 4.1.14-RC1 as GA

FWIW, I'm fine keeping the vote open a few days longer. > On Feb 20, 2023, at 2:46 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > > Am 20.02.23 um 00:15 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Hi Peter, >> >> Am 19.02.23 um 23:59 schrieb Peter Kovacs: >>> Am 19.02.23 um 23:44 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi Peter,

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.14-RC1 as GA

+1 > On Feb 13, 2023, at 7:38 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community > builds of > Apache OpenOffice 4.1.14-RC1 as GA. > > These artifacts can be found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dis

[VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.14-RC1 as GA

I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community builds of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.14-RC1 as GA. These artifacts can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.14-RC1/ Please cast your vote: The Release Candidate is good for production/GA: [

Re: AOO 4.1.14

++1! > On Feb 7, 2023, at 4:47 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: > > I hope you get better soon! > > On 2/7/23 9:09 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hi Carl, >> >> Am 07.02.23 um 14:52 schrieb Carl Marcum: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> On 2/7/23 4:48 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi all, I think it is

Re: Nightly Builds

+1 > On Jan 26, 2023, at 10:09 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I think we can all agree on a 4 week (30 days) period for archiving the > binaries? > > Looking at: > > https://nightlies.apache.org/openoffice/install/linux64/?C=M;O=D > > we should also think about shortening

Re: [VOTE] release apr-util-1.6.2-rc2 as apr-util 1.6.2

> On Jan 23, 2023, at 1:57 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > > 1.6.2-rc2 is here: > > https://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > For the release of apr-util-1.6.2 > [X] +1 looks great! > [ ] -1 something is broken > > I will let the vote run through mid-week and then try to finalize APR > and APU

Re: VOTE: Release apr-1.7.1-rc2 as 1.7.1

> On Jan 19, 2023, at 7:44 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > > 1.7.1-rc1 is here: > > https://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > For the release of apr-1.7.1 > [ X] +1 looks great! > [ ] -1 something is broken > > I will let the vote run through mid-week. > macOS 12.6.2 / Xcode 14.2

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.55-rc1 as httpd-2.4.55

> On Jan 10, 2023, at 8:40 AM, Eric Covener wrote: > > Hi all, > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.55-rc1 as

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

ag "AOO420-Dev4-m4"? I will update the version in AOO42X >> then. >> >> Regards, >> >>Matthias >> >> Am 23.12.22 um 13:59 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> Yep! Just finished building and uploading! >>> >>>> On Dec 23, 20

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

ards, > >Matthias > > Am 22.12.22 um 18:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> My guess is that 18ec844f on AOO42X will be the hash for Dev4... the changes >> are in configure.ac and affect only the macOS/Darwin path. >> >>> On Dec 22, 2022, at 9:45 AM, Matthias

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

nges are needed? > > Am 22.12.22 um 15:36 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Just a FYI that I do expect some delay, and likely changes, required to get >> AOO42X building on macOS. As such, let's delay on Dev4 unt

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Just a FYI that I do expect some delay, and likely changes, required to get AOO42X building on macOS. As such, let's delay on Dev4 until I can resolve these issues. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: build breaks with: osl/unx/mutex.c:69: undefined reference to `pthread_mutexattr_setkind_np'

Is this trunk, AOO42X or AOO41X ? > On Dec 21, 2022, at 1:01 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > Hello All, > > I try to build OpenOffice on Ubuntu 22.04.1 > > It seems that the macro flag "Linux" has not set. Anyone had this issue? > > > All the best > > Peter > > >

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

My macOS Catalina build server VM is very unreliable... working on getting it back in shape. > On Dec 21, 2022, at 8:11 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 21.12.22 um 13:50 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> OK. I'll rebuild all from a46cde238 > > Thanks, my Windows buil

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

OK. I'll rebuild all from a46cde238 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

0-Dev4 to #9b873c1694 ? > > Regards, > >Matthias > > Am 20.12.22 um 14:19 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> The Linux build for 4.2.0-Dev4 (test) are available: >> >>https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/4.2.0-Dev4/ >> <https://home.apache

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

The Linux build for 4.2.0-Dev4 (test) are available: https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/4.2.0-Dev4/ macOS builds are on-going

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Had to reboot the VM... > On Dec 19, 2022, at 7:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > failed to download > https://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-extensions/files/1429/11/da_dk-2.7.001.oxt/download > at /home/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solenv/bin/modules/ExtensionsLst.pm line &

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

failed to download https://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-extensions/files/1429/11/da_dk-2.7.001.oxt/download at /home/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solenv/bin/modules/ExtensionsLst.pm line 519. Hmmm > On Dec 19, 2022, at 7:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Perfect. I'll start some d

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Perfect. I'll start some dev builds this week > On Dec 17, 2022, at 6:37 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 18.12.22 um 00:35 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Hi Jim, >> >> Am 08.11.22 um 14:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> Let me know when we are ready for a

Re: Support for maven

The later versions of beanshell, starting w/ 3.x will be maven only, I think > On Dec 2, 2022, at 5:05 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > On 12/2/22 13:24, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> There are some java apps that no longer support ant and >> instead rely on mav

Support for maven

There are some java apps that no longer support ant and instead rely on maven. Last I checked, I don't think we support that, do we? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: malloc, calloc and APR pools

8k -> 512k > On Nov 14, 2022, at 3:57 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > > > On 11/13/22 4:23 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> This article (https://vorpus.org/blog/why-does-calloc-exist/) >> looks like it's very applicable to APR, where we do the exact >> malloc

malloc, calloc and APR pools

This article (https://vorpus.org/blog/why-does-calloc-exist/) looks like it's very applicable to APR, where we do the exact malloc-memset trick. Prelim testing on my macOS and Linux machines do show appreciable improvements. At the very least, maybe a compile-time flag??

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

Let me know when we are ready for a Dev4 then and I'll kick off the builds. > On Nov 8, 2022, at 5:32 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, all, > > Am 07.11.22 um 13:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> That works for me. I can do the same w/ the macOS and Linux builds. &

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

That works for me. I can do the same w/ the macOS and Linux builds. Is HEAD of AOO42X in a suitable state, or are there additional fixes to be added before we build? > On Nov 6, 2022, at 4:37 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi all, > > We released our last Developer version some time ago.

Re: friends of mod_proxy

+1 > On Oct 11, 2022, at 3:47 AM, Stefan Eissing via dev > wrote: > > > >> Am 10.10.2022 um 20:39 schrieb Ruediger Pluem : >> >> >> >> On 10/10/22 6:35 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 11:55 AM Yann Ylavic wrote: On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 9:14 PM Ruediger Pluem

Re: friends of mod_proxy

Yeah... The logic in not re-using a worker is that the pattern matching aspect made it both difficult and somewhat inconsistent due to the dynamic nature of the situation, hence the use of the "default" worker for these. We now have the functionality to handle this, but it is still a

Re: Monteray MacOS build and Python

Just because Apple doesn't ship it, doesn't mean it's not available. You can still download it via MacPorts or Homebrew. > On Sep 5, 2022, at 9:07 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 10:36 AM Bidouille > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Since MacOS 12.3,

Re: [users@httpd] mod_proxy_hcheck module uses HTTP 1.0 protocol

This was just added to trunk; I will propose a back port to 2.4.x soon! > On Aug 24, 2022, at 3:14 PM, Mike Scinto wrote: > > We have a client using the mod proxy health check module which is failing > because the healthcheck end point we are hitting does not accept HTTP 1.0 > requests or

Re: source release with MacOSx build.log

+1 (patches welcome) > On Aug 28, 2022, at 5:31 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Andrea, > > Am 28.08.22 um 23:20 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: >> On 27/08/22 Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Am 23.08.22 um 23:53 schrieb Peter Kovacs: I found a note that we package the build log (which is 20

Git(Hub) workflow

Do we have an approved and official Git(Hub) based workflow defined?

[jira] [Commented] (WHIMSY-389) unsubscribe feature does not work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17576854#comment-17576854 ] Jim Jagielski commented on WHIMSY-389: -- Actually, hostnames are, and should be, case insensitive

[jira] [Commented] (WHIMSY-389) unsubscribe feature does not work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17576723#comment-17576723 ] Jim Jagielski commented on WHIMSY-389: -- I am assuming that this is some sort of email case issue

[jira] [Updated] (WHIMSY-389) unsubscribe feature does not work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jim Jagielski updated WHIMSY-389: - Attachment: Screen Shot 2022-08-08 at 7.39.04 AM.png > unsubscribe feature does not w

[jira] [Commented] (WHIMSY-389) unsubscribe feature does not work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17576721#comment-17576721 ] Jim Jagielski commented on WHIMSY-389: -- For example, if I try to unsubscribe from !Screen Shot 2022

Re: Locating the Items Needed for ASF Booth - New Orleans

I think your assumption may be incorrect. > On Aug 7, 2022, at 7:34 PM, Walter Cameron > wrote: > > I thought we were moving away from the “Apache Feather”? M has been > using a featherless ASF logo on Twitter for weeks now and I assumed > everyone was in agreement that it was a symbol of

[jira] [Created] (WHIMSY-389) unsubscribe feature does not work

Jim Jagielski created WHIMSY-389: Summary: unsubscribe feature does not work Key: WHIMSY-389 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-389 Project: Whimsy Issue Type: Bug

Re: [CLOSED] Vote Passed: (Was: Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.13-RC1 as GA)

idel: >> Hi all, >> >> The Windows binaries were signed and re-uploaded. >> >> I created the staged dir on SourceForge and rsynced all binaries. >> >> Regards, >> >>Matthias >> >> Am 16.07.22 um 15:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski: &g

[CLOSED] Vote Passed: (Was: Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.13-RC1 as GA)

The polls are closed; the VOTE PASSES. Thx to all who voted and tested. > On Jul 5, 2022, at 7:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community > builds of > Apache OpenOffice 4.1.13-RC1 as GA. > > These a

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.13-RC1 as GA

> On Jul 5, 2022, at 7:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community > builds of > Apache OpenOffice 4.1.13-RC1 as GA. > > These artifacts can be found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dis

Re: [Discuss] Vote on Release AOO 4.1.13-RC1 as GA

This has been the case for years. Recall that the binary builds are community convenience packages. > On Jul 10, 2022, at 4:51 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: > > Hi All, > > Checking the signature on the windows binaries I get Matthias's signature and > not Jim's (the Release Manager). > The policy

[VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.13-RC1 as GA

I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community builds of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.13-RC1 as GA. These artifacts can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.13-RC1/ Please cast your vote: The Release Candidate is good for production/GA: [ ] yes

Re: Named shared memory on macOS Monterey

ded? I've > lost the errors, ended up commenting out the mod and re-running > Makefiles.PL to get unblocked. > > On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 3:26 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> Anyone else notice that the later version of macOS really prefer >> that APR use posix for sha

Re: Named shared memory on macOS Monterey

ded? I've > lost the errors, ended up commenting out the mod and re-running > Makefiles.PL to get unblocked. > > On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 3:26 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> Anyone else notice that the later version of macOS really prefer >> that APR use posix for sha

Named shared memory on macOS Monterey

Anyone else notice that the later version of macOS really prefer that APR use posix for shared memory for both anon and name-based, instead of posix for anon and sysv/ipc for name? The issue seems to be that the kernel params are much lower than previous versions as well as it being

Named shared memory on macOS Monterey

Anyone else notice that the later version of macOS really prefer that APR use posix for shared memory for both anon and name-based, instead of posix for anon and sysv/ipc for name? The issue seems to be that the kernel params are much lower than previous versions as well as it being

Re: [CLOSED] [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.12-RC1 as GA

i Jim, >> >> Am 26.04.22 um 15:24 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> I was hoping for more testing and feedback, but we have rec'd the necessary >>> number of >>> binding votes, and so this VOTE PASSES. >> Yes, I also hoped for more... >> >> Howe

[CLOSED] Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.12-RC1 as GA

I was hoping for more testing and feedback, but we have rec'd the necessary number of binding votes, and so this VOTE PASSES. > On Apr 13, 2022, at 9:54 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community > builds of > Apache Op

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.12-RC1 as GA

I'll keep this open for a few more days to allow for more testing and voting... > On Apr 21, 2022, at 1:36 AM, Don Lewis wrote: > > On 13 Apr, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community >> builds of >> Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.12-RC1 as GA

+1 > On Apr 13, 2022, at 9:54 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community > builds of > Apache OpenOffice 4.1.12-RC1 as GA. > > These artifacts can be found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dis

Re: Building 4.1.12-RC1 Linux x86

The source of truth on how we build the community packages are the build script and the config.log file, which shows exactly what packages, features, and libraries are included. Have you ensured that all the packages from

[VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.12-RC1 as GA

I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community builds of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.12-RC1 as GA. These artifacts can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.12-RC1/ Please cast your vote: The Release Candidate is good for production/GA: [ ] yes

Re: 4.1.12-dev developer test builds...

I'll start work on an RC1 this week. RC1 will be based on 60e0a1c111c55ed3416146f0d2a848c993474018 > On Apr 7, 2022, at 5:21 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 05.04.22 um 14:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Are we ready for a RC1? > > So, basically on

Re: 4.1.12-dev developer test builds...

Are we ready for a RC1? > On Mar 27, 2022, at 9:44 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 25.03.22 um 13:24 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> ... Are available at >> >> http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ > > Thanks! > > I tested

Re: svn commit: r1899390 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h

It was added in anticipation of the capability to be folded in, and done so "now" so that it would;t require any API changes. Unless it's actually breaking something, I'd vote to simply keep it > On Apr 1, 2022, at 3:42 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > > On 01/04/2022 08:47, jean-frederic

4.1.12-dev developer test builds...

... Are available at http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ Assuming these look good, we can progress to an RC1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >