On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 12:23:26 +1000, Steven Haigh wrote:
So in theory, the only repos that require to be enabled are [sl6x]
and [sl6x-security]?
Yes.
Best regards,
Morten
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 13:24:01 +0200, Artifex Maximus wrote:
Here's a list of upgrade options from SL 6.0 to SL 6.1.
And what about 'yum --releasever=6.1 update'? Looks like a working
solution.
Yes, that should work.
yum --releasever=6.1 update sl-release
yum clean all
yum update
Best
Hi,
Here's a list of upgrade options from SL 6.0 to SL 6.1.
Option 1: similar to RHEL / CentOS for i386 and x86_64:
yum install yum-conf-sl6x
yum clean all
yum update
Option 2: Scientific Linux way
i386:
rpm -Uvh
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:58:00 -0500, Doug Benjamin wrote:
Hi,
What is the estimated release date for SL 6.1?
Tomorrow.
Best regards,
Morten
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:42:10 +0200, Andreas Redelbach wrote:
I am using 32 bit and just recognized that for SL5 the mkfs.xfs
command
like
mkfs.xfs -f /dev/sdb1
had worked to allow xfs mounting.
Any other ideas?
Cheers,
Andreas
Hi Andreas,
As mentioned, XFS is not supported on 32 bit
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 21:44:24 +0200, Victor Stinner wrote:
Should I try other KVM option (e.g. use another type of image)? Try
btrfs RAID instead of Linux MD RAID? Try to disable some CPU cores?
Or
maybe not using btrfs for KVM images? :-)
Hi,
I would suggest you the following points:
-
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 11:33:11 -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
Anyone packaging the new kernel for RH / CentOS?
You need a new version of module-init-tools that is compatible with
Linux 3.x series.
See: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=245705
- Fix handling of Linux 3.x series
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:56:31 +0200, bert hubert wrote:
PowerDNS Authoritative Server 3.0-RC3
This is fully expected to be the 'real 3.0' release! It can be
downloaded from:
http://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/pdns-3.0-rc3.tar.gz
2011/5/10 David Sterba d...@jikos.cz
Hi,
I've hit this lockdep warning, 2.6.39rc6. Single btrfs partition, 30GB,
filled with 2GB, compress-force=lzo, warning trigered after normal copy+du.
Happened only once.
[Might be a false positive.]
Hi,
I have a similar error with 3.0-rc6.
OS:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:00:34 +0200, Christian Roessner wrote:
Hi,
I use Dovecot-2.0.13 with mdbox and Thunderbird (IMAP). I have dozens
of
imap folders and sometimes I wish to delete several folders:
First Problem:
If I remove a folder under TB, it get moved to my Trash folder. After
that I
Hi,
We are currently testing Dovecot 2.0.13 with mdbox. If I delete large
objects with refcount=0 the index is not updated apparently.
Here's an example:
[root@mail-004 storage]# ls -l
total 194776
-rw--- 1 vmail vmail 482960 Jul 9 14:58 dovecot.map.index
-rw--- 1 vmail vmail
Hi folks,
I noticed the following in the dovecot log files:
/var/log/maillog
Jun 9 00:12:34 mail dovecot: master: Error: service(imap): child 8970
killed with signal 11 (core dumps disabled)
Jun 9 00:12:34 mail dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=username,
method=PLAIN, rip=IP, lip=IP,
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:39:57 -0400, Chris wrote:
Hopefully this is the right list, but here goes.
I realize there was just a kernel update, however there's been bug
with the bnx2 Broadcom driver which apparently has been fixed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678429
Previously I
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 19:00:38 +0200, Troy Dawson wrote:
June 1, 2011
The first alpha release for Scientific Linux 6.1 has been released.
This release has all the new updated packages from
The Upstream Vendors (TUV) Update 1.
It will install, and it appears to work, but no major testing has
been
2011/5/23 Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org:
I have said this a million times ... but you are flat out wrong.
The community does many, many things for CentOS.
It is the community that makes the CentOS Fora one of the best place to
get information.
The community does all the articles on the
2011/4/18 fakessh fake...@fakessh.eu:
I would like to add anti-abuse headers. I just spent a good little time to
watch list archives and found no answers
example of a header that I want to appear in my mail
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any
abuse
-Original Message-
From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov [mailto:owner-
scientific-linux-users@listserv.fnal.gov] On Behalf Of Robert Hendrickx
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 4:00 PM
To: scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov
Subject: SL6 - Bug in upstream httpd package
-Original Message-
From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov [mailto:owner-
scientific-linux-users@listserv.fnal.gov] On Behalf Of Troy Dawson
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 4:55 PM
To: Simon Butcher
Cc: scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov
Subject: Re: Web site dpwn?
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: owner-scientific-linux-de...@listserv.fnal.gov [mailto:owner-
scientific-linux-de...@listserv.fnal.gov] On Behalf Of Jonathan G.
Underwood
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 11:25 PM
To: Scientific Linux Developers Mailinglist
Subject: Missing dependency during
2011/2/16 Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org:
Oracle has supposedly released their EL 6 build (last Friday) ... but
they have not released their sources as of this post.
http://oss.oracle.com/el5/ === EL 5 Sources
http://oss.oracle.com/el6/ === 404 Error
No, the sources are here:
2011/2/16 David Sommerseth d...@users.sourceforge.net:
That Red Hat keeps their work schedule private is not directly comparable
to a CentOS community effort, how I see it.
Red Hat is also a big financial organisation, which CentOS is not. In that
context, Red Hat is much more responsible
2011/2/16 Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org:
On 02/16/2011 02:22 PM, Morten P.D. Stevens wrote:
The best example is Scientific Linux. There are schedules and an open
development process.
What is the reason for the closed development process in CentOS?
Its funny you say that Morten, since
2011/2/14 robert mena robert.m...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Despite the mailing list and twitter I did not find any updated info on
either versions regarding the current status.
So, what is the current status of both versions? (like 60%)
I wonder for a long time why there is no detailed information
Hi,
Apparently the package is missing for i386.
x86_64:
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/x86_64/os/Packages/btrfs-progs-0.19-11.el6.x86_64.rpm
But there is no btrfs package for i386:
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/i386/os/Packages/
Best
Hi,
We have exactly the same problem in our test environment. (identical IBM
xSeries hardware) Some machines crashing after a few days.
Note: We are testing with Scientific Linux 6 kernel 2.6.32-71.14.1.el6.x86_64.
(But should make no difference to RHEL6)
Particularly striking: the large size
2011/1/31 varad gupta postfix@gmail.com:
But then, is postfix not running the same risk as sendmail ?
Sendmail is not a security risk. These are old horror stories. Why use big
companies like IBM or Red Hat still sendmail when postfix is supposed to be so
much safer? Why is sendmail the
Hi,
If any of you want to have Postfix 2.8 on RHEL6:
http://oss.imt-systems.com/mstevens/el6/postfix28/
This is a rebuild of postfix-2.8.0-1.fc15.src.rpm for RHEL6, CentOS6 and
Scientific Linux 6.
@Wietse: Thanks for your great work on Postfix 2.8.
Best regards,
Morten
2011/1/26 Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 05:21:37PM +0100, Morten P.D. Stevens wrote:
If any of you want to have Postfix 2.8 on RHEL6:
http://oss.imt-systems.com/mstevens/el6/postfix28/
This is a rebuild of postfix-2.8.0-1.fc15.src.rpm for RHEL6
-Original Message-
From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov [mailto:owner-
scientific-linux-users@listserv.fnal.gov] On Behalf Of Garrett
Holmstrom
What do you mean with production install base?
SL6.0 will be based on RHEL 6 (6.0)
SL5.6 will be based on RHEL 5
Hi Troy,
Thanks for this this information.
Which release has the higher priority? SL 6.0 or SL 5.6?
Thank you for your work on SL Linux.
Best regards,
Morten
-Original Message-
From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov [mailto:owner-
Hi James,
here is it:
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html/Virtualization/chap-Virtualization-KVM_live_migration.html
Best regards,
Morten
From: rhelv5-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:rhelv5-list-boun...@redhat.com] On
Behalf Of James Harrison
Sent: Thursday,
2010/12/9 masatheesh masathe...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I have CentOS 5.0 installed my system.It shows kernel panic - not
syncing : fatal exception error during boot process.Can any one please
suggest to resolve this kernel panic? I am very eager to solve this without
upgrade the version for
2010/11/30 Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Pascal Robert prob...@macti.ca wrote:
[r...@hylafax SPECS]# rpmbuild -ba --target x86_64 kernel-2.6.spec
You are building as root. This is a bad practice. When building a
CentOS custom kernel, please try following
2010/11/26 Terry Gilsenan terry.gilse...@interoil.com:
Microsoft's b0rged hosted exchange and frontbridge system is very broken.
Yes, that's right.
The other question is ...
Why has Microsoft changed from Postfix to Forefront?
Postfix is faster, safer and more compatible with RFC.
Added to
Hi Martin,
der PTR sollte gleich mit dem Hostname/Mailname sein.
Ob das schön aussieht oder nicht ist eine andere Frage.
Wenn der PTR nicht zum Mailname (z.B. mail.domain.tld) passt kann es unter
Umständen passieren, dass andere Server deine Mails ablehnen.
Wenn du mehrere Dienste auf dem
@de.postfix.org
Subject: Re: [postfix-users] 1 Server, mehere Domains, mehrer IPs
On Behalf Of Morten P.D. Stevens
der PTR sollte gleich mit dem Hostname/Mailname sein.
Ob das schön aussieht oder nicht ist eine andere Frage.
Schaut immer gut aus. Der Mailserver muß durch die
Am 26. November 2010 14:50 schrieb Driessen dries...@fblan.de:
Das hat nichts mit professionell oder unprofessionell zu tun.
Der Mailserver muß durch die Gesichtskontrolle!
Habe ich das bestritten?
Wir legen besonders großen Wert darauf, dass jeder unserer Server oder der
Mailserver unserer
2010/11/22 Dave Stevens g...@uniserve.com:
Hi,
I'm using CentOS on a box that, among other things, offers mailman
mailing lists, currently mailman 2.1.9. Version 2.1.14 is avilable
from the developers but integrating it into the system promises to be
tedious. I looked at RHEL 6 and don't
2010/11/16 Dave Stevens g...@uniserve.com:
I am curious what is the best way to upgrade my dom0 and domUs to V.6
(currently 5) when it releases. Any experience or docs on this?
Hi,
take a look at here:
2010/11/11 Steve Thompson s...@vgersoft.com:
Having done several upgrades from CentOS 4 to CentOS 5, my recommendation
would be to not even try it. There is all kinds of ugliness left over that
has to be cleaned up; I did it in the end, but it took a lot longer than
doing a clean install.
2010/11/10 Juergen Gotteswinter j...@internetx.de:
oh nice, seems that they upgraded php to 5.3? no more 5.1
No, that are additional packages. (called bind97 and php53)
For example:
yum install bind97-utils or
yum install php53-mysql
The old versions continue to be supported by Red Hat.
2010/11/10 Digimer li...@alteeve.com:
I expect that 5.6 will get the first priority, if for no other reason
than it was out first, and thus probably already being worked on.
RHEL 5.6 isn´t released yet. Only the beta of RHEL 5.6 was released yesterday.
Best regards,
Morten
2010/11/10 mattias m...@mjw.se:
sound intrested
ddownload link?
The beta of RHEL 5.6 is only available via the Red Hat Network. (RHN)
Best regards,
Morten
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
2010/11/9 Scott Robbins scot...@nyc.rr.com:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-announce/2010-November/msg0.html
So, now we can all start saying, when will 5.6 be ready. :)
Hi,
RHEL 5.6 Beta:
- bind 9.7 - improved DNSsec support
- PHP 5.3 - support for namespaces
That sounds
2010/11/9 Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com:
My DNS server has been running Centos for some time.
I am in the process of upgrading it to Centos 5.5 (long overdue, I know).
Since we now have .com signed I want to get my domain signed as well,
but I see that Centos 5.5 is running BIND
2010/11/9 Edward Rudd er...@netfor.com:
Are you using Ext3 or Ext4 on the RHEL 6 system? Might try to use ext3 and
see if it makes any difference,
I've tried it with ext3 and ext4 and it makes no difference.
Also are these in VMs or bare hardware? and are the two servers the same?
Both
2010/11/9 Marco Shaw marco.s...@gmail.com:
Well, right off, when you listed your hardware, I never assumed it was
virtualized. At the very least, I would want to see this test in a
hypervisor virtualized environment, and even better directly on
hardware.
Adding an virtual application layer
Here is a small btrfs vs. ext4 benchmark with kernel 2.6.37-rc1.
compilebench with options -i 10 -r 30 on 2.6.37-rc1
btrfs
==
intial create total runs 10 avg 73.11 MB/s (user 0.34s sys 1.96s)
create total runs 5 avg 49.53
2010/11/1 cwillu cwi...@cwillu.com:
Can you include the mkfs and mount options in use?
mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb
mount -t btrfs /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs
and for ext4:
mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdb
mount -t ext4 /dev/sdb/ mnt/btrfs
Best regards,
Morten
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org wrote:
What is the rationale behind deactivating Sendmail. Just curious. Or is it
the typical rant Sendmail is insecure, see its history?
I don't understand why many people calling sendmail insecure.
Sendmail is the default
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:30 PM, sync jian...@gmail.com wrote:
I have the same problem on it . Isn't the CentOS very safe?
CentOS (RHEL 5) is one of the most secure operating systems worldwide.
Best regards,
Morten
___
CentOS mailing list
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Miguel Medalha miguelmeda...@sapo.pt wrote:
I was just a little worried at the response from Brent earlier quote
Don't play Russian Roulette and use ext4. .
Maybe he was referring to some old information dating back to the
development period.
ext4 has been
Update:
RPMFORGE fixed the broken dependency and the problem is solved.
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
-- Running transaction check
--- Package clamav.x86_64 0:0.96.3-2.el5.rf set to be updated
--- Package clamav-db.x86_64 0:0.96.3-2.el5.rf set to be updated
--- Package
Hi,
We are using the rpmforge repository for amavisd-new, spamassassin and clamav.
All is working great.
Today, I'd like to update some CentOS 5 servers and get this dependency problem:
[r...@mx1 ~]# yum update
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* addons:
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.rpmforge.net [mailto:users-
boun...@lists.rpmforge.net] On Behalf Of Yury V. Zaytsev
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 5:50 PM
To: RPMforge users
Subject: Re: [users] Dependency problem
Unless you really need these newer Perl packages,
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.rpmforge.net [mailto:users-
boun...@lists.rpmforge.net] On Behalf Of Yury V. Zaytsev
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 9:38 PM
To: RPMforge users
Subject: Re: [users] Dependency problem
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 21:33 +0200, Morten P.D
-Original Message-
From: postfix-users-bounces+mstevens=imt-systems@de.postfix.org
[mailto:postfix-users-bounces+mstevens=imt-systems@de.postfix.org]
On Behalf Of i...@iscgr.de
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 4:28 PM
To: postfix-users@de.postfix.org
Subject:
...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Alexander Dalloz
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 9:55 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Sendmail TLS verify=fail
Am 21.09.2010 01:28, schrieb Morten P.D. Stevens:
Hi,
I have a small question with sendmail and tls verification.
The tls verify fails
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
All centos-5 kernels are affected.
- KB
Here is the updated kernel source from upstream:
kernel-2.6.18-194.11.4.el5.src.rpm
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0704.html
Best regards,
Morten
Hi,
I have a small question with sendmail and tls verification.
The tls verify fails on our internal/external sendmail servers.
For example:
STARTTLS=server, relay=mx1.imt-systems.com [89.146.219.60],
version=TLSv1/SSLv3, verify=FAIL, cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA, bits=256/256
STARTTLS=server,
Hi CentOS Mailinglist,
we are using amavisd-new (with all dependencies) from Fedora/Redhat EPEL repo.
Some packages from EPEL repo are very old. (amavisd-new, clamav, spamassassin)
What's the best way to remove all amavisd-new packages (and it's dependencies)
from EPEL repo and reinstall it
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
To see the packages from a
particular Vendor, for example EPEL:[code]
rpm -qa --qf %{NAME} %{VENDOR} \n | grep Fedora Project | cut -d ' '
-f 1 | sort
[/code]
The result should be a list of EPEL packages.
Hi Phil,
This command is
Hi,
Does anyone know something about this issue?
Setting APIC routing to flat
..TIMER: vector=0x30 apic1=0 pin1=2 apic2=-1 pin2=-1
CPU0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5450 @ 3.00GHz stepping 0a
lockdep: fixing up alternatives.
===
[ INFO:
2010 17:44:47 +0200 Morten P.D. Stevens wrote:
Does anyone know something about this issue?
[...]
===
[ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
---
kernel/sched.c:616 invoked
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of fakessh
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 7:11 PM
To: Postfix users
Subject: force startssl on port 25
hi guru of postfix
hi mouss and wieste
hi all the users of ths
Hi Wietse,
that sounds great.
Is there a RHEL5 source package available for building postfix-2.8-20100913?
Thanks
Morten
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 3:01 AM, Tim Connors tim.w.conn...@gmail.com wrote:
But if you know what you're doing, often debian is better. Depends on
your needs and skills. We run debian fine here, with no difficulty
talking to the raid cards and hardware sensors etc that we use, and
because
Hi Emmanuel,
my suggestion is to use CentOS with Dell Poweredge servers. All Dell Poweredge
machines are certified for RHEL and CentOS is 100% binary compatible with RHEL.
If you need without fail a debian based linux distro then use Ubuntu 10.04 LTS
server.
Best regards,
Morten
mightydre...@gmail.com
To: linux-poweredge@dell.com
Sent: Monday, September 06, 2010 13:13
Subject: Re: Advice for a debian server
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Morten P.D. Stevens
mstev...@imt-systems.com wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
my suggestion is to use CentOS with Dell Poweredge
Hi all,
a small question regard to the postfix message id process.
Every message has a unique ID provided by the postfix messaging process.
Some messages have a 11 characters message id and other a 12 characters message
ID although our servers all running exactly the same postfix version.
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 1:31 AM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Postfix Message ID process
The queue file name contains time information
Hi,
is there a greet_pause feature in postfix comparable with the sendmail
greet_pause feature?
For example: FEATURE(`greet_pause',5000)
Thank you.
Best regards,
Morten
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 11:30 PM
To: Morten P.D. Stevens
Cc: Postfix users
Subject: Re: greet_pause feature with postfix?
Morten P.D. Stevens
2010/8/18 Miao Xie mi...@cn.fujitsu.com:
Hi,
We did some performance test and found the create/delete files performance
of btrfs is very poor.
The test is that we create 5 files and measure the file-create time
first, and then delete these 5 files and measure the file-delete time.
:49:05PM +0200, Morten P.D. Stevens wrote:
Hi,
i can confirm this issue with poor create and delete performance.
For example with unpacking and deleting the linux kernel:
Btrfs:
[r...@fc13 btrfs]# time tar xfj linux-2.6.36-rc1.tar.bz2
real0m18.794s
user0m12.045s
sys 0m8.241s
with hardware raid 0 on a LSI 1068e
controller.
Best regards,
Morten
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:28:44PM +0200, Morten P.D. Stevens wrote:
Hi Chris,
Your compilebench results are very interesting.
Here are my results
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:46:22AM +0300, Ameya Palande wrote:
Hi Chris,
Today I was checking the Kconfig option for btrfs and it still says,
Btrfs filesystem (EXPERIMENTAL) Unstable disk format
I remember
Hi,
does anyone know something about this error with postfix and amavis?
Jul 13 17:57:25 e200 amavis[27308]: (27308-05) Passed CLEAN, [209.132.180.67]
[213.165.64.20] linux-kernel-ow...@vger.kernel.org -
li...@imt-systems.com,mstev...@imt-systems.com, Message-ID:
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 10:46 PM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: TROUBLE in process_request: Error writing a SMTP response
to the socket
What the
: Error writing a SMTP response
to the socket
Morten P.D. Stevens:
What the previous logfile record from process amavis[27308]?
Wietse
This one:
Jul 13 17:48:34 e200 amavis[27308]: (27308-04) Passed CLEAN,
[168.100.1.7] [80.101.24.220] owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org -
li
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 11:30 PM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: TROUBLE in process_request: Error writing a SMTP response
to the socket
Morten P.D
-Original Message-
From: Wietse Venema [mailto:wie...@porcupine.org]
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 1:20 AM
To: Morten P.D. Stevens
Cc: Postfix users
Subject: Re: TROUBLE in process_request: Error writing a SMTP response
to the socket
Morten P.D. Stevens:
Jul 13 17:57:24 e200
Hi,
Does anyone know backported Postfix 2.6.x or 2.7.x RPM packages for RHEL5?
Thank you.
Best regards,
Morten
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Stan Hoeppner
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2010 9:54 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Postfix 2.7 for RHEL 5?
Morten P.D. Stevens put forth on 7/3/2010 2:40 PM
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of b.j. mcclure
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 4:49 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] RHEL 6b2 Release
For those who might be interested, RHEL 6b2 has just been announced.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Morten P.D. Stevens
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 5:13 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6b2 Release
Hi,
And here are the Release Notes for RHEL 6 Beta 2
Hi Nick,
what is with:
cat /proc/mtrr
Does it show your full installed memory?
Best regards,
Morten
From: linux-poweredge-boun...@dell.com
[mailto:linux-poweredge-boun...@dell.com] On Behalf Of Nick Lunt
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 2:09 PM
To: linux-poweredge@dell.com
Subject: Where did the
From: linux-poweredge-boun...@dell.com
[mailto:linux-poweredge-boun...@dell.com] On Behalf Of Nick Lunt
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 2:08 PM
To: linux-poweredge@dell.com
Subject: RE: Where did the RAM go ..
Hi Morten
# cat /proc/mtrr
reg00: base=0x ( 0MB), size=131072MB: write-back,
-Original Message-
From: postfix-users-bounces+mstevens=imt-systems@de.postfix.org
[mailto:postfix-users-bounces+mstevens=imt-systems@de.postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Robert Schetterer
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 9:05 AM
To: postfix-users@de.postfix.org
Subject: Re:
On Behalf Of Christopher Stolzenberg
Am 15. Juni 2010 11:53 schrieb Robert Schetterer
rob...@schetterer.org:
ansonsten hast du ja genug Tips bekommen wie du
das in den Griff kriegen kannst
Hier nochmal vielen Dank für alle Vorschläge.
Für 2 Sachen habe ich mich jetzt entschieden:
On Behalf Of Robert Schetterer
Zu 2)
Du kannst das auch variabel gestalten.
Als Beispiel: Spam Mails bis zu einem Score von 7.8 gehen in die
Mailbox des Mitarbeiters und alles darüber hinaus geht in eine
Quarantäne Mailbox die von der IT Abteilung (täglich) überwacht wird.
Ab
Hallo Christopher,
dieses Problem hatten wir mit Kunden teilweise auch schon. Wir haben das so
gelöst, dass alle Mails die mit ***SPAM*** gekennzeichnet wurden automatisch in
einen Spam Ordner des Benutzers laufen. Letztlich lassen wir mehr Spam Mails
durch, die den Benutzer allerdings kaum
] Alternative zu postgrey
On Behalf Of Morten P.D. Stevens
Hallo Morten
Hallo Christopher,
dieses Problem hatten wir mit Kunden teilweise auch schon. Wir haben
das so gelöst, dass
alle Mails die mit ***SPAM*** gekennzeichnet wurden automatisch in
einen Spam Ordner des
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of mattias jonsson
Can i downgrade from centos 5.5 to 5.0
This is a big security risk because the CentOS team is only supporting the
latest CentOS version. (5.5, 4.8 and so on)
Hi,
I get the following error while installing the newest centos patches.
[r...@gateway ~]# yum update
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* addons: centos.intergenia.de
* base: centos.intergenia.de
* extras: centos.intergenia.de
* updates:
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Yes, you see you have Perl 64-bit and 32-bit installed. You really need
it as an i386 package?
I have no problem updating x86_64 packages only.
Hi Alexander,
thank you. I removed perl.i386 and the yum update process is
-Original Message-
From: Jaroslav Imrich [mailto:jaroslav.imr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 3:14 PM
To: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Subject: Installing to VMWare
I wanted to install kfreebsd into VMWare so I've downloaded image from
-Original Message-
From: linux-btrfs-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-btrfs-
ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Sebastian 'gonX' Jensen
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 2:22 AM
To: linux-btrfs
Subject: Regarding full drives
I'm by no means a Linux guru... but btrfs-show shows me
-Original Message-
From: postfix-users-bounces+mstevens=imt-systems@de.postfix.org
[mailto:postfix-users-bounces+mstevens=imt-systems@de.postfix.org]
On Behalf Of lst_ho...@kwsoft.de
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 10:36 AM
To: postfix-users@de.postfix.org
Subject: Re:
-Original Message-
From: Jared Barneck [mailto:rhy...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 6:00 PM
To: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Subject: Installing on VMWare Workstaiton 6.5
Hey,
So I tried to install kFreeBSD on VMWare Workstaiton 6.5 but it seems
to fail when trying to
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
