Bug#1069792: transition: pandas 2.1 -> 2.2

2024-04-24 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-pandas Version: 2.1.4+dfsg-7 Severity: wishlist Upstream have released pandas 2.2. (Filing this now to have a bug number - I haven't actually uploaded to experimental yet.) Reverse dependencies to be tested: abinit astropy augur azure-kusto-python bmtk bqplot busco

Bug#1069792: transition: pandas 2.1 -> 2.2

2024-04-24 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-pandas Version: 2.1.4+dfsg-7 Severity: wishlist Upstream have released pandas 2.2. (Filing this now to have a bug number - I haven't actually uploaded to experimental yet.) Reverse dependencies to be tested: abinit astropy augur azure-kusto-python bmtk bqplot busco

Bug#1069608: topplot: missing test-depends on python3-all

2024-04-21 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Source: topplot Version: 0.2.2+repack-1 Tags: patch Severity: serious Justification: blocks testing migration of other packages topplot tries to run its autopkgtest in all versions of Python (which is good), but does not test-depend on all those versions of Python. This previously worked

Bug#1069608: topplot: missing test-depends on python3-all

2024-04-21 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Source: topplot Version: 0.2.2+repack-1 Tags: patch Severity: serious Justification: blocks testing migration of other packages topplot tries to run its autopkgtest in all versions of Python (which is good), but does not test-depend on all those versions of Python. This previously worked

Bug#1068422: possibly caused by python 3.12.3 Re: Bug#1068422: can't import dask.dataframe - TypeError: descriptor '__call__' for 'type' objects doesn't apply to a 'property' object

2024-04-21 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
This bug is not *obviously* known to dask upstream, but their CI is failing and I haven't checked why. It happens only in Python 3.12, not 3.11: https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/dask/unstable/amd64/45013666/ and still doesn't happen in testing, but does happen in mostly-testing with

Bug#1068422: possibly caused by python 3.12.3 Re: Bug#1068422: can't import dask.dataframe - TypeError: descriptor '__call__' for 'type' objects doesn't apply to a 'property' object

2024-04-21 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
This bug is not *obviously* known to dask upstream, but their CI is failing and I haven't checked why. It happens only in Python 3.12, not 3.11: https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/dask/unstable/amd64/45013666/ and still doesn't happen in testing, but does happen in mostly-testing with

Bug#1068349: nbsphinx/nbconvert broken by lxml 5.2: lxml.html.clean

2024-04-07 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: unblock 1068104 by -1 Control: unblock 1068104 by 1068422 To avoid being blocked by this bug, the pandas version I just uploaded temporarily disables the documentation. This is also an option for any other affected packages that urgently need to be uploaded. (I don't know whether

Bug#1068349: nbsphinx/nbconvert broken by lxml 5.2: lxml.html.clean

2024-04-07 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: unblock 1068104 by -1 Control: unblock 1068104 by 1068422 To avoid being blocked by this bug, the pandas version I just uploaded temporarily disables the documentation. This is also an option for any other affected packages that urgently need to be uploaded. (I don't know whether

[med-svn] [Git][med-team/snakemake] Pushed new tag debian/7.32.4-3

2024-04-07 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer (@rnpalmer-guest)
Rebecca N. Palmer pushed new tag debian/7.32.4-3 at Debian Med / snakemake -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/snakemake/-/tree/debian/7.32.4-3 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org. ___ debian

Bug#1068422: can't import dask.dataframe - TypeError: descriptor '__call__' for 'type' objects doesn't apply to a 'property' object

2024-04-04 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-dask Version: 2023.12.1+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Control: affects -1 src:pandas Control: block 1068104 by -1 Importing dask.dataframe currently fails with the error TypeError: descriptor '__call__' for 'type' objects doesn't apply to a 'property' object amd64

Bug#1068422: can't import dask.dataframe - TypeError: descriptor '__call__' for 'type' objects doesn't apply to a 'property' object

2024-04-04 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-dask Version: 2023.12.1+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Control: affects -1 src:pandas Control: block 1068104 by -1 Importing dask.dataframe currently fails with the error TypeError: descriptor '__call__' for 'type' objects doesn't apply to a 'property' object amd64

Bug#1068349: nbsphinx/nbconvert broken by lxml 5.2: lxml.html.clean

2024-04-04 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 patch Control: severity -1 serious (probably makes nbconvert/nbsphinx unusable) xml-html-clean is in NEWhttps://ftp-master.debian.org/new/lxml-html-clean_0.1.0-1.html Thanks - that and adding it to the Depends of python3-nbconvert should fix this bug. From codesearch,

Bug#1068349: nbsphinx/nbconvert broken by lxml 5.2: lxml.html.clean

2024-04-03 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-nbconvert,python3-lxml Version: 6.5.3-4,5.2.0-1 Control: affects -1 src:pandas Control: affects -1 python3-nbsphinx Control: block 1068104 by -1 The pandas documentation fails to build in current unstable with: Running Sphinx v7.2.6 nbconvert not installed. Skipping notebooks.

Bug#1068104: pandas: FTBFS on 32-bit architectures with -D_TIME_BITS=64

2024-04-01 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Thanks - I plan to look at this tomorrow.

Bug#1068104: pandas: FTBFS on 32-bit architectures with -D_TIME_BITS=64

2024-04-01 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Thanks - I plan to look at this tomorrow.

Bug#1068104: pandas: FTBFS on 32-bit architectures with -D_TIME_BITS=64

2024-04-01 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Thanks - I plan to look at this tomorrow. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#1063959: pandas and pytest 8

2024-03-15 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
what's now in Salsa should be. (but please do *not* upload that right now, it is rather likely to have (unrelated) issues) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net

Bug#1063959: pandas and pytest 8

2024-03-14 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: reopen -1 Control: tags -1 pending Control: tags 1066801 pending Control: tags 1064384 pending Sorry, that wasn't actually a fix, but what's now in Salsa should be. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net

Bug#1063959: pandas and pytest 8

2024-03-14 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: reopen -1 Control: tags -1 pending Control: tags 1066801 pending Control: tags 1064384 pending Sorry, that wasn't actually a fix, but what's now in Salsa should be.

Bug#1066801: pandas: FTBFS: /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/dateutil/zoneinfo/__init__.py:26: UserWarning: I/O error(2): No such file or directory

2024-03-14 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: retitle -1 pandas: test-failing warning with new xarray This is a warning being treated as an error, but the one in test_to_xarray (probably due to the new version of xarray), not the zoneinfo one. This is a FutureWarning, so it should be OK to *use* the current pandas with the new

Bug#1066801: pandas: FTBFS: /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/dateutil/zoneinfo/__init__.py:26: UserWarning: I/O error(2): No such file or directory

2024-03-14 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: retitle -1 pandas: test-failing warning with new xarray This is a warning being treated as an error, but the one in test_to_xarray (probably due to the new version of xarray), not the zoneinfo one. This is a FutureWarning, so it should be OK to *use* the current pandas with the new

Bug#1066801: pandas: FTBFS: /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/dateutil/zoneinfo/__init__.py:26: UserWarning: I/O error(2): No such file or directory

2024-03-14 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: retitle -1 pandas: test-failing warning with new xarray This is a warning being treated as an error, but the one in test_to_xarray (probably due to the new version of xarray), not the zoneinfo one. This is a FutureWarning, so it should be OK to *use* the current pandas with the new

Bug#1064368: python-xarray: intermittent segfault in test_open_mfdataset_manyfiles[netcdf4-20-True-*-5]

2024-02-21 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7079 (actually found independently) The above upstream report suggests that this is because netcdf-python is no longer thread-safe. The 3 random-autopkgtest-fail bugs (this, #1064326 and #1064370) together seem to be more common

Bug#1064368: python-xarray: intermittent segfault in test_open_mfdataset_manyfiles[netcdf4-20-True-*-5]

2024-02-21 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7079 (actually found independently) The above upstream report suggests that this is because netcdf-python is no longer thread-safe. The 3 random-autopkgtest-fail bugs (this, #1064326 and #1064370) together seem to be more common

Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1

2024-02-20 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Remaining blockers for testing migration: - python-ulmo #1044057: has a patch, please upload - pydevd #1063274: unclear whether my patch breaks something else, please leave alone for now Status unclear: - python-xarray: autopkgtest has failed 3 times, but all 3 are (different) failures that

Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1

2024-02-20 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Remaining blockers for testing migration: - python-ulmo #1044057: has a patch, please upload - pydevd #1063274: unclear whether my patch breaks something else, please leave alone for now Status unclear: - python-xarray: autopkgtest has failed 3 times, but all 3 are (different) failures that

Bug#1063274: pydevd: autopkgtest-failing warning with pandas 2.1

2024-02-20 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Is that a yes to>> Does just the patch (not the new upstream) also break debugpy?or have you not tried specifically that? (I'm looking for a quick fix for the autopkgtest fail to unblock the pandas 2.x transition. I agree that upgrading to a new upstream is a good idea in the long run.)

Bug#1063274: pydevd: autopkgtest-failing warning with pandas 2.1

2024-02-20 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Is that a yes to>> Does just the patch (not the new upstream) also break debugpy?or have you not tried specifically that? (I'm looking for a quick fix for the autopkgtest fail to unblock the pandas 2.x transition. I agree that upgrading to a new upstream is a good idea in the long run.)

Bug#1064370: python-xarray: intermittent fail in TestOpenMFDatasetWithDataVarsAndCoordsKw

2024-02-20 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-xarray Version: 2023.12.0-3 The xarray autopkgtest sometimes (~20% of the time) fails with RuntimeError: NetCDF: Not a valid ID in tests/test_backends.py::TestOpenMFDatasetWithDataVarsAndCoordsKw Unlike the other random failures, this seems to be amd64-specific. Exactly which

Bug#1064370: python-xarray: intermittent fail in TestOpenMFDatasetWithDataVarsAndCoordsKw

2024-02-20 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-xarray Version: 2023.12.0-3 The xarray autopkgtest sometimes (~20% of the time) fails with RuntimeError: NetCDF: Not a valid ID in tests/test_backends.py::TestOpenMFDatasetWithDataVarsAndCoordsKw Unlike the other random failures, this seems to be amd64-specific. Exactly which

Bug#1064368: python-xarray: intermittent segfault in test_open_mfdataset_manyfiles[netcdf4-20-True-*-5]

2024-02-20 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-xarray Version: 2023.12.0-3 xarray sometimes (~10% of the time) segfaults in tests/test_backends.py::test_open_mfdataset_manyfiles, usually [netcdf4-20-True-None-5] but sometimes [netcdf4-20-True-5-5]. This has happened in both Python 3.11 and 3.12, and on various

Bug#1064368: python-xarray: intermittent segfault in test_open_mfdataset_manyfiles[netcdf4-20-True-*-5]

2024-02-20 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-xarray Version: 2023.12.0-3 xarray sometimes (~10% of the time) segfaults in tests/test_backends.py::test_open_mfdataset_manyfiles, usually [netcdf4-20-True-None-5] but sometimes [netcdf4-20-True-5-5]. This has happened in both Python 3.11 and 3.12, and on various

Bug#1064326: python-xarray: intermittent hang in test_roundtrip_coordinates

2024-02-19 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-xarray Version: 2023.12.0-3 The xarray autopkgtest sometimes (~10% of the time) hangs in test_roundtrip_coordinates, and hence fails with a timeout. Example failure log (but this is _not_ specific to pandas 2.x):

Bug#1064326: python-xarray: intermittent hang in test_roundtrip_coordinates

2024-02-19 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-xarray Version: 2023.12.0-3 The xarray autopkgtest sometimes (~10% of the time) hangs in test_roundtrip_coordinates, and hence fails with a timeout. Example failure log (but this is _not_ specific to pandas 2.x):

Bug#1063274: pydevd: autopkgtest-failing warning with pandas 2.1

2024-02-19 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Thank you for caring about not breaking other packages, and yes, that's a good reason to not upload that new upstream for now. Does just the patch (not the new upstream) also break debugpy? (It shouldn't be able to, since it only touches test code.)

Bug#1063274: pydevd: autopkgtest-failing warning with pandas 2.1

2024-02-19 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Thank you for caring about not breaking other packages, and yes, that's a good reason to not upload that new upstream for now. Does just the patch (not the new upstream) also break debugpy? (It shouldn't be able to, since it only touches test code.)

Bug#1063274: pydevd: autopkgtest-failing warning with pandas 2.1

2024-02-19 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
This has been merged but not uploaded - is there a reason it shouldn't be, or have you just not had time?

Bug#1063274: pydevd: autopkgtest-failing warning with pandas 2.1

2024-02-19 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
This has been merged but not uploaded - is there a reason it shouldn't be, or have you just not had time?

Bug#1044057: python-ulmo and pandas 2

2024-02-18 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
tests.Description: Don't fail on malformed or changed test data CDEC has malformed lines that pandas 1.4+ errors out on (I'm not sure why earlier pandas didn't do the same); GHCN has simply changed at the source. Author: Rebecca N. Palmer (but upstream independently came up with the on_bad_lines part

Bug#1044057: python-ulmo and pandas 2

2024-02-18 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
tests.Description: Don't fail on malformed or changed test data CDEC has malformed lines that pandas 1.4+ errors out on (I'm not sure why earlier pandas didn't do the same); GHCN has simply changed at the source. Author: Rebecca N. Palmer (but upstream independently came up with the on_bad_lines part

Bug#1044057: python-ulmo and pandas 2

2024-02-18 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
tests.Description: Don't fail on malformed or changed test data CDEC has malformed lines that pandas 1.4+ errors out on (I'm not sure why earlier pandas didn't do the same); GHCN has simply changed at the source. Author: Rebecca N. Palmer (but upstream independently came up with the on_bad_lines part

[med-svn] [Git][med-team/snakemake] Pushed new tag debian/7.32.4-2

2024-02-09 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer (@rnpalmer-guest)
Rebecca N. Palmer pushed new tag debian/7.32.4-2 at Debian Med / snakemake -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/snakemake/-/tree/debian/7.32.4-2 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org. ___ debian

[med-svn] [Git][med-team/snakemake] Pushed new tag upstream/8.2.3

2024-02-09 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer (@rnpalmer-guest)
Rebecca N. Palmer pushed new tag upstream/8.2.3 at Debian Med / snakemake -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/snakemake/-/tree/upstream/8.2.3 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org. ___ debian

[med-svn] [Git][med-team/snakemake][pristine-tar] pristine-tar data for snakemake_8.2.3.orig.tar.gz

2024-02-09 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer (@rnpalmer-guest)
Rebecca N. Palmer pushed to branch pristine-tar at Debian Med / snakemake Commits: 66a8a8a6 by Rebecca N. Palmer at 2024-01-20T10:42:57+00:00 pristine-tar data for snakemake_8.2.3.orig.tar.gz - - - - - 2 changed files: - + snakemake_8.2.3.orig.tar.gz.delta - + snakemake_8.2.3

[med-svn] [Git][med-team/snakemake][upstream] New upstream version 8.2.3

2024-02-09 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer (@rnpalmer-guest)
Rebecca N. Palmer pushed to branch upstream at Debian Med / snakemake Commits: cc1b5000 by Rebecca N. Palmer at 2024-01-20T10:42:31+00:00 New upstream version 8.2.3 - - - - - 30 changed files: - .github/workflows/docker-publish.yml - .github/workflows/main.yml - .github/workflows/release

[med-svn] [Git][med-team/snakemake][debian-v7] work around patch not adding empty files

2024-02-09 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer (@rnpalmer-guest)
Rebecca N. Palmer pushed to branch debian-v7 at Debian Med / snakemake Commits: 26e21c8f by Rebecca N. Palmer at 2024-02-09T19:11:31+00:00 work around patch not adding empty files - - - - - 2 changed files: - debian/changelog - debian/patches/fstring.patch Changes

[med-svn] [Git][med-team/snakemake][debian-v7] revert accidental interface change

2024-02-08 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer (@rnpalmer-guest)
Rebecca N. Palmer pushed to branch debian-v7 at Debian Med / snakemake Commits: a0c4af75 by Rebecca N. Palmer at 2024-02-09T07:52:23+00:00 revert accidental interface change - - - - - 2 changed files: - debian/changelog - debian/patches/fstring.patch Changes

Bug#1044071: feather and pandas 2.0

2024-02-08 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 patch It does sometimes happen that fixing "can't import the tests" reveals "the tests fail". Fixed in the Salsa merge request.

Bug#1044071: feather and pandas 2.0

2024-02-08 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 patch It does sometimes happen that fixing "can't import the tests" reveals "the tests fail". Fixed in the Salsa merge request.

Bug#1063435: pandas 2.x fixes

2024-02-08 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 patch See the Salsa merge request. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel

Bug#1063274: pandas 2.x fixes

2024-02-08 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 patch See the Salsa merge request.

Bug#1063274: pandas 2.x fixes

2024-02-08 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 patch See the Salsa merge request.

Bug#1061761: marked as pending in snakemake

2024-02-08 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1061761 in snakemake reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1063273: seaborn: autopkgtest fail on i386 - probable rounding error

2024-02-08 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 pending This appears to be fixed in Salsa (before I reported it) - is there any reason not to upload this now? -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net

Bug#1063273: seaborn: autopkgtest fail on i386 - probable rounding error

2024-02-08 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 pending This appears to be fixed in Salsa (before I reported it) - is there any reason not to upload this now?

Bug#1063273: seaborn: autopkgtest fail on i386 - probable rounding error

2024-02-08 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 pending This appears to be fixed in Salsa (before I reported it) - is there any reason not to upload this now?

Bug#1063435: geopandas: test fail with pandas 2.x on 32 bit - int32 vs int64 mismatch

2024-02-07 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-geopandas Version: 0.14.3-1 Severity: serious Control: block 1043240 by -1 In pandas 2.x (now in unstable), there are a few places where geopandas uses native-size int but the plain pandas objects used as test references are always int64, failing the test:

Bug#1063435: geopandas: test fail with pandas 2.x on 32 bit - int32 vs int64 mismatch

2024-02-07 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-geopandas Version: 0.14.3-1 Severity: serious Control: block 1043240 by -1 In pandas 2.x (now in unstable), there are a few places where geopandas uses native-size int but the plain pandas objects used as test references are always int64, failing the test:

Bug#1063435: geopandas: test fail with pandas 2.x on 32 bit - int32 vs int64 mismatch

2024-02-07 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-geopandas Version: 0.14.3-1 Severity: serious Control: block 1043240 by -1 In pandas 2.x (now in unstable), there are a few places where geopandas uses native-size int but the plain pandas objects used as test references are always int64, failing the test:

Bug#1063325: mdanalysis: random autopkgtest hangs

2024-02-06 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-mdanalysis Version: 2.5.0+dfsg1-2 The autopkgtest sometimes hangs at the 85% point, causing it to time out and fail. (This is probably a hang and not just slowness, because when it doesn't fail, this test doesn't take anywhere near that long.)

Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1

2024-02-05 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: block -1 by 1063274 Thank you for uploading those fixes. Note to self: pandas will need another upload, to remove the numba B-D and skip those tests (because numba is not in testing), and do something about 'ignoredtests' being slow enough to time out in i386 and arm64.

Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1

2024-02-05 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: block -1 by 1063274 Thank you for uploading those fixes. Note to self: pandas will need another upload, to remove the numba B-D and skip those tests (because numba is not in testing), and do something about 'ignoredtests' being slow enough to time out in i386 and arm64. --

Bug#1063274: pydevd: autopkgtest-failing warning with pandas 2.1

2024-02-05 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Source: pydevd Severity: serious Tags: patch A pydevd test uses DataFrame.applymap(), and fails because this now raises a FutureWarning. Replacing it with DataFrame.map() as this message suggests would probably fix it.

Bug#1063274: pydevd: autopkgtest-failing warning with pandas 2.1

2024-02-05 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Source: pydevd Severity: serious Tags: patch A pydevd test uses DataFrame.applymap(), and fails because this now raises a FutureWarning. Replacing it with DataFrame.map() as this message suggests would probably fix it.

Bug#1063273: seaborn: autopkgtest fail on i386 - probable rounding error

2024-02-05 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-seaborn Version: 0.13.2-1 Severity: serious seaborn's autopkgtest failed on i386, with differences small enough that they are plausibly rounding error (i.e. should be ignored, by using *almost_equal instead of exact comparisons), but I haven't looked carefully.

Bug#1063273: seaborn: autopkgtest fail on i386 - probable rounding error

2024-02-05 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-seaborn Version: 0.13.2-1 Severity: serious seaborn's autopkgtest failed on i386, with differences small enough that they are plausibly rounding error (i.e. should be ignored, by using *almost_equal instead of exact comparisons), but I haven't looked carefully.

Bug#1063273: seaborn: autopkgtest fail on i386 - probable rounding error

2024-02-05 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-seaborn Version: 0.13.2-1 Severity: serious seaborn's autopkgtest failed on i386, with differences small enough that they are plausibly rounding error (i.e. should be ignored, by using *almost_equal instead of exact comparisons), but I haven't looked carefully. --

Bug#1044073: Sorry Re: python-altair and pandas 2.0

2024-02-03 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On 03/02/2024 22:01, Andreas Tille wrote: The point I was making in my mail was that I had trouble running the tests in **latest** upstream version (5.2.0). Sorry - I'd misread your previous message as you having tried 5.x, found that it didn't work due to the missing dependency, and decided

Bug#1044073: Sorry Re: python-altair and pandas 2.0

2024-02-03 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On 03/02/2024 22:01, Andreas Tille wrote: The point I was making in my mail was that I had trouble running the tests in **latest** upstream version (5.2.0). Sorry - I'd misread your previous message as you having tried 5.x, found that it didn't work due to the missing dependency, and decided

Bug#1061761: snakemake issues with Python 3.12

2024-02-03 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
It looks like this is at least two issues: - Tests mix tabs and spaces, which is no longer allowed = upstream 2459 - Assumes f-strings are not tokenized, which they now are = upstream 2485/2588/2649 Fix in progress on the debian-v7 branch. (The main branch has 8.x, which doesn't work due to

Bug#1061761: snakemake issues with Python 3.12

2024-02-03 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
It looks like this is at least two issues: - Tests mix tabs and spaces, which is no longer allowed = upstream 2459 - Assumes f-strings are not tokenized, which they now are = upstream 2485/2588/2649 Fix in progress on the debian-v7 branch. (The main branch has 8.x, which doesn't work due to

[med-svn] [Git][med-team/snakemake] Pushed new branch debian-v7

2024-02-03 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer (@rnpalmer-guest)
Rebecca N. Palmer pushed new branch debian-v7 at Debian Med / snakemake -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/snakemake/-/tree/debian-v7 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org. ___ debian-med

Bug#1044073: python-altair and pandas 2.0

2024-02-03 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Please don't skip/xfail tests - my suggestion above is an actual fix: https://salsa.debian.org/rnpalmer-guest/python-altair/-/tree/fix1044073?ref_type=heads (In a fork because, despite its description, this is not actually a debian-science package. The Salsa CI "fail" is because the *old*

Bug#1044073: python-altair and pandas 2.0

2024-02-03 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Please don't skip/xfail tests - my suggestion above is an actual fix: https://salsa.debian.org/rnpalmer-guest/python-altair/-/tree/fix1044073?ref_type=heads (In a fork because, despite its description, this is not actually a debian-science package. The Salsa CI "fail" is because the *old*

Bug#1044076: influxdb-python and pandas 2.1

2024-02-03 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
My fixes are pushed to Salsa, but they're in a fork because this isn't a debian-science package: https://salsa.debian.org/rnpalmer-guest/influxdb-python

Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 - please upload fixes

2024-02-03 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
seaborn has now been fixed. I intend to look at python-altair later. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#1044076: influxdb-python and pandas 2.1

2024-02-03 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
My fixes are pushed to Salsa, but they're in a fork because this isn't a debian-science package: https://salsa.debian.org/rnpalmer-guest/influxdb-python

Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 - please upload fixes

2024-02-03 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
seaborn has now been fixed. I intend to look at python-altair later.

Re: Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 - please upload fixes

2024-01-30 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
I intend to upload pandas 2.x to unstable soon. These packages have a patch in their bug - please upload them (I'm a DM, I can't do that), or if you think this patch won't work or isn't a good idea, tell me why: dials influxdb-python python-altair python-feather-format seaborn tqdm In

Bug#1044076: influxdb-python and pandas 2.1

2024-01-30 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Note that this uncertainty is only around whether this is a complete fix - even in the case where it's not, it *wouldn't* be actively worse than doing nothing, though it would be hiding the problem.

Bug#1044076: influxdb-python and pandas 2.1

2024-01-30 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Note that this uncertainty is only around whether this is a complete fix - even in the case where it's not, it *wouldn't* be actively worse than doing nothing, though it would be hiding the problem.

Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 - please upload fixes

2024-01-30 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
I intend to upload pandas 2.x to unstable soon. These packages have a patch in their bug - please upload them (I'm a DM, I can't do that), or if you think this patch won't work or isn't a good idea, tell me why: dials influxdb-python python-altair python-feather-format seaborn tqdm In

Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 - please upload fixes

2024-01-30 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
I intend to upload pandas 2.x to unstable soon. These packages have a patch in their bug - please upload them (I'm a DM, I can't do that), or if you think this patch won't work or isn't a good idea, tell me why: dials influxdb-python python-altair python-feather-format seaborn tqdm In

Bug#1044076: influxdb-python and pandas 2.1

2024-01-29 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Some looking through the code suggests that the precision is user-set and hence constant within a single query, and hence that this fix is OK, but I'm not entirely certain of that. There are ways to make pandas 2.x accept mixed time format, but I think they're 2.x _only_ and/or slow.

Bug#1044076: influxdb-python and pandas 2.1

2024-01-29 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Some looking through the code suggests that the precision is user-set and hence constant within a single query, and hence that this fix is OK, but I'm not entirely certain of that. There are ways to make pandas 2.x accept mixed time format, but I think they're 2.x _only_ and/or slow.

Bug#1053946: tqdm and pandas 2.1 / python 3.12

2024-01-29 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
That turned out to be easier than it looked - fixing the easy one also made the others go away. Please upload this: https://salsa.debian.org/rnpalmer-guest/tqdm

Bug#1053946: tqdm and pandas 2.1 / python 3.12

2024-01-29 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
That turned out to be easier than it looked - fixing the easy one also made the others go away. Please upload this: https://salsa.debian.org/rnpalmer-guest/tqdm

Bug#1058160: tqdm and pandas 2.1 / python 3.12

2024-01-28 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: retitle 1058160 tqdm: tests failing/hanging in Python 3.12 That works for #1053946 (pandas 2.x), but #1058160 (python 3.12) is more than a single hanging test, and it's not immediately obvious what should be done. Attempted fix (caution, currently just skips the hanging test) and

Bug#1053946: tqdm and pandas 2.1 / python 3.12

2024-01-28 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: retitle 1058160 tqdm: tests failing/hanging in Python 3.12 That works for #1053946 (pandas 2.x), but #1058160 (python 3.12) is more than a single hanging test, and it's not immediately obvious what should be done. Attempted fix (caution, currently just skips the hanging test) and

Bug#1053945: seaborn: test-failing warning in pandas 2.1

2024-01-28 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
The above by itself wasn't enough, but what I have now pushed to Salsa is. Please upload it.

Bug#1053945: seaborn: test-failing warning in pandas 2.1

2024-01-28 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
The above by itself wasn't enough, but what I have now pushed to Salsa is. Please upload it. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#1044076: influxdb-python and pandas 2.1

2024-01-28 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
That's not the only problem: some of the tests mix timestamps in slightly different formats (with and without fractional seconds), which is no longer allowed by default: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/version/2.1.4/whatsnew/v2.0.0.html#datetimes-are-now-parsed-with-a-consistent-format

Re: Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1

2024-01-22 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On 22/01/2024 11:51, Julian Gilbey wrote: Please could we wait until the "Python 3.12 is a supported version" transition is completed? How are you defining that? python3-defaults 3.11.6+ in testing? (I was previously told 3.12-supporting pandas and numpy in testing, which has happened. I

Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1

2024-01-22 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On 22/01/2024 11:51, Julian Gilbey wrote: Please could we wait until the "Python 3.12 is a supported version" transition is completed? How are you defining that? python3-defaults 3.11.6+ in testing? (I was previously told 3.12-supporting pandas and numpy in testing, which has happened. I

Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1

2024-01-22 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On 22/01/2024 11:51, Julian Gilbey wrote: Please could we wait until the "Python 3.12 is a supported version" transition is completed? How are you defining that? python3-defaults 3.11.6+ in testing? (I was previously told 3.12-supporting pandas and numpy in testing, which has happened. I

Please give back pandas on i386

2024-01-21 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Please give back pandas_1.5.3+dfsg-11 (unstable) on i386: that looks like a rare random failure. (DMs can't use the self-service method.)

Bug#1044076: pandas 2.x

2024-01-21 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
What, if anything, blocks the above fix from being applied now? tqdm, influxdb-python and seaborn are the highest-popcon packages broken by pandas 2.x.

Bug#1053945: pandas 2.x

2024-01-21 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
What, if anything, blocks the above fix from being applied now? tqdm, influxdb-python and seaborn are the highest-popcon packages broken by pandas 2.x. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net

Re: Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1

2024-01-21 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: severity 1053943 1053939 1053942 1044053 1044056 serious Control: severity 1044074 1053946 1044078 1044079 1044077 serious Control: severity 1044071 1044067 1044068 1044055 1044060 serious Control: severity 1044072 1044073 1044064 1053945 1044054 serious Control: severity 1044076 1053940

Re: Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1

2024-01-21 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: severity 1053943 1053939 1053942 1044053 1044056 serious Control: severity 1044074 1053946 1044078 1044079 1044077 serious Control: severity 1044071 1044067 1044068 1044055 1044060 serious Control: severity 1044072 1044073 1044064 1053945 1044054 serious Control: severity 1044076 1053940

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >