Mailing lists matching lists.llvm.org
cfe-commits lists.llvm.orglldb-commits lists.llvm.org
llvm-branch-commits lists.llvm.org
llvm-bugs lists.llvm.org
Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] Attn Buildbot Owners: Would you like your builder to test the release branch?
> We are interested in doing this for PPC as well. Not likely for all of our bots, but one or two select ones. > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 11:51 AM Tom Stellard via cfe-dev mailto:cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> <mailto:cfe-...@lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-...@lists
Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] Attn Buildbot Owners: Would you like your builder to test the release branch?
rote: > > > > We are interested in doing this for PPC as well. Not likely for all > of our bots, but one or two select ones. > > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 11:51 AM Tom Stellard via cfe-dev < > cfe-...@lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-...@lists
Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Mailing list changes this week
r > > > > *From:* llvm-dev mailto:llvm-dev-boun...@lists.llvm.org>> *On Behalf Of *Shoaib Meenai via llvm-dev > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 16, 2019 1:42 AM > *To:* tstel...@redhat.com <mailto:tstel...@redhat.com>; Mehdi AMINI mailto:joker
Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] Attn Buildbot Owners: Would you like your builder to test the release branch?
@gmail.com>> wrote: We are interested in doing this for PPC as well. Not likely for all of our bots, but one or two select ones. On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 11:51 AM Tom Stellard via cfe-dev mailto:cfe-...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: On 2/12/21 1:49 AM, Omair Javaid wrote:
Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] LLVM 9.0.1-final has been tagged
x27;t see them on the server. -Tom > Thanks > Russ > > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 20:05, Tom Stellard via cfe-dev <mailto:cfe-...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > On 01/09/2020 09:11 AM, Brian Cain wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 9,
Re: [llvm-dev] Upgrading phabricator
One of the new “feature” is that emails are HTML only right now. Not quite nice for the archive (or for interacting by email). See for instance: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20160926/172081.html (Also the funky "[Changed Subscribers] “ in the title) Another iss
Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [cfe-dev] LLVM 9.0.1-final has been tagged
s > > > > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 20:05, Tom Stellard via cfe-dev > > mailto:cfe-...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > > > On 01/09/2020 09:11 AM, Brian Cain wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 12:29 AM Tom Stellard > &
Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] Mailing list changes this week
Right, and I'm not sure we would even be able to get the changes done in time for the switch over anyway. -Tom > -- > Mehdi > > > > > > > -Tom > > > --paulr > > > > > > > > *From:* llvm-dev <mailto:llvm-dev-
Re: [llvm-dev] Upgrading phabricator
features or bugfixes to be aware of? On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 9:26 PM Eric Liu via llvm-commits mailto:llvm-comm...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: Hi all, Phabricator is (finally) back online! Let me know if you have any feedback or problem :) Thanks, Eric On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at
Re: [PATCH] D19175: Fix for PR27015 (variable template initialized with a generic lambda expression)
11:07 AM, Akira Hatanaka via cfe-commits > mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > If I add an assert to check (F != Flags) in setFlags, 2700+ out of 5000+ > clang regression tests fail. I haven’t figured out which parts of clang are > passing the same value to setFlags. >
Re: [llvm-dev] Upgrading phabricator
at 7:39 AM Mehdi Amini <mailto:mehdi.am...@apple.com>> wrote: > One of the new “feature” is that emails are HTML only right now. Not quite > nice for the archive (or for interacting by email). > See for instance: > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon
Re: [PATCH] D19175: Fix for PR27015 (variable template initialized with a generic lambda expression)
PM, Richard Smith wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Akira Hatanaka via cfe-commits > mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > Scope’s constructor passes the parameter ScopeFlags to Scope::Init, which > calls setFlags(Scope *parent, unsigned flags) and setFlags ini
Re: [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] Upgrading phabricator
AM Mehdi Amini <mailto:mehdi.am...@apple.com>> wrote: > One of the new “feature” is that emails are HTML only right now. Not quite > nice for the archive (or for interacting by email). > See for instance: > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20160926/172
Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [Attn: Bot Owners!] Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3
t 2:39 AM Daniel Sanders via lldb-dev > mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > All the MIPS buildbots are ready too. > > __ __ > > *From:*llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-boun...@lists.llvm.org > <mailto:llvm-dev-boun...@lists.llvm.org>] *On
Re: [lldb-dev] [Openmp-dev] [Release-testers] 13.0.0-rc3 has been tagged
inux-gnu-ubuntu-20.04.tar.xz.sha256 > 488ff13c9a54f6b7b2aeb26e930da7d72e32a15542929cd642fc0b7d37e79967 > clang+llvm-13.0.0-rc3-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-20.04.tar.xz > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 11:40 PM Tom Stellard via Release-testers > mailto:release-test...@list
Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [cfe-dev] 7.0.1-final has been tagged
are up now. > Also, the front page of https://releases.llvm.org/ needs a new entry for > 7.0.1 in the table under "Download". > This has been fixed too. -Tom > > > > On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 7:38 AM Brian Cain via cfe-dev > mailto:cfe-...@lists.llvm.org&g
Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] December LLVM bay-area social is this Thursday!
e want to > move to downtown San Jose. > > On Sat, Dec 28, 2019, 8:47 PM Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev > mailto:llvm-...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > +1, i'm just glad you're making progress on a promising option! > > On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 8:33 PM JF Bastien
Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] Attn Buildbot Owners: Would you like your builder to test the release branch?
Ping! Tom, any update on this? On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 at 20:02, Nemanja Ivanovic wrote: > We are interested in doing this for PPC as well. Not likely for all of our > bots, but one or two select ones. > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 11:51 AM Tom Stellard via cfe-dev < > cfe-...@lis
[llvm-bugs] [Bug 40955] New: lists.llvm.org accepts passwords and is not requiring an SSL connection.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40955 Bug ID: 40955 Summary: lists.llvm.org accepts passwords and is not requiring an SSL connection. Product: Website Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: All
Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] December LLVM bay-area social is this Thursday!
Yep! On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 5:53 PM George Burgess IV via cfe-dev < cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Thank you all! > > To clarify, a booking with Steins has already been made, yeah? > > George > > On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 10:28 AM Tanya Lattner via cfe-dev < &
Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] December LLVM bay-area social is this Thursday!
Woo hoo :) On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 6:06 PM Eric Christopher wrote: > Yep! > > On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 5:53 PM George Burgess IV via cfe-dev < > cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Thank you all! >> >> To clarify, a booking with Steins has already been mad
Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Break/Watchpoint refactor
macros > either. > > Sean > >> On Sep 27, 2016, at 3:07 PM, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev >> mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> FWIW LLVM removed all it's disallow copy / assign macros in favor of >> explicitly writing it. I agree i
Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Break/Watchpoint refactor
3:13 PM, Sean Callanan via lldb-dev >> mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> Doing it everywhere would be a public service IMO. I don't like macros >> either. >> >> Sean >> >>> On Sep 27, 2016, at 3:07 PM, Zachary Turner
Re: [llvm-dev] Upgrading phabricator
You mentioned this was for an upgrade. Are there any major new features or bugfixes to be aware of? On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 9:26 PM Eric Liu via llvm-commits < llvm-comm...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > Phabricator is (finally) back online! Let me know if you have any feedba
Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] FYI: Landing the initial draft for an LLVM Code of Conduct
Carruth via llvm-dev >> mailto:llvm-...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> Hello folks, >> >> As mentioned some time ago[1], we’ve had a long (looong) series of >> discussions about establishing a code-of-conduct for the LLVM project as a >> whole over on the
Re: r365030 - Make a buildbot using a buggy gcc happy
Thanks Richard! > On Jul 8, 2019, at 12:46 PM, Richard Smith via cfe-commits > wrote: > > Committed as r365377. > > On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 at 12:43, Kristóf Umann via cfe-commits > mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > Thank you so much! Sorry for the inc
Re: [PATCH] D19175: Fix for PR27015 (variable template initialized with a generic lambda expression)
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Akira Hatanaka via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Scope’s constructor passes the parameter ScopeFlags to Scope::Init, which > calls setFlags(Scope *parent, unsigned flags) and setFlags initializes > Scope::Flags to the valu
Re: [PATCH] D19175: Fix for PR27015 (variable template initialized with a generic lambda expression)
OK. Feel free to add an early exit if you like if F == Flags. On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Akira Hatanaka via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > OK, I understand your question now. > > I added the assert to the public overload of setFlags that has one > p
Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] December LLVM bay-area social is this Thursday!
Thank you all! To clarify, a booking with Steins has already been made, yeah? George On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 10:28 AM Tanya Lattner via cfe-dev < cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > In case Steins doesn't work out.. BJs in Cupertino has a large space for > groups but that wou
Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues [UPDATED]
gs even harder, since you had to spend three > times as long trying to guess. > > In other words +1 to using unique numbers, however we do it. > > On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 03:44, Johannes Doerfert via cfe-dev > mailto:cfe-...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > On 4/2
Re: [PATCH] D19175: Fix for PR27015 (variable template initialized with a generic lambda expression)
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Akira Hatanaka via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > If I add an assert to check (F != Flags) in setFlags, 2700+ out of 5000+ > clang regression tests fail. I haven’t figured out which parts of clang are > passing the same va
Re: [llvm-dev] Upgrading phabricator
just really slow. Apologies if > this is blocking you. > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:17 PM Zachary Turner via llvm-dev < > llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Still no word on when it will be back up? It's not hung is it? :D > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 a
Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] FYI: Landing the initial draft for an LLVM Code of Conduct
ead the discussion that has already > taken place to avoid revisiting areas that have already been heavily > discussed. > > Also, many thanks to the folks who provided all their opinions on the mailing > list threads and in person in long discussions about this topic. > > Than
Re: [lldb-dev] clang::VersionTuple
I'm good if Apple is good. > On May 8, 2018, at 11:31 AM, Frédéric Riss wrote: > > > >> On May 8, 2018, at 10:04 AM, Greg Clayton via lldb-dev >> mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On May 8, 2018, at
Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Attn Buildbot Owners: Would you like your builder to test the release branch?
t enabling individual builders. I'll follow up with you once this patch lands. -Tom [1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D96046 On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 at 21:49, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev mailto:llvm-...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: On 2/2/21 1:23 AM, Diana Picus wrote: > Hi Tom, >
Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 3 source and binaries available
Hans, Are these new RC3 Windows binaries now with asserts disabled? Kind Regards Dan From: Hans Wennborg via cfe-dev<mailto:cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> Sent: 26 August 2016 22:30 To: llvm-dev<mailto:llvm-...@lists.llvm.org>; cfe-dev<mailto:cfe-...@lists.llvm.org>; LLDB D
Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] LLVM 9.0.1-final has been tagged
rking on fixing the releases.llvm.org <http://releases.llvm.org> > page. > > -Tom > > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 10:07 PM Tom Stellard via cfe-dev > mailto:cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> > <mailto:cfe-...@lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-...@li
Re: r341697 - warn_stdlibcxx_not_found: suggest '-stdlib=libc++' instead of '-std'
es in trunk, let me know I can merge it to the branch. -Tom > On Sat, 17 Nov 2018, 19:00 Arthur O'Dwyer via cfe-commits > mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Peanut gallery says: I think the one remaining instance of `-std=libc++` > in the tests should be
Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Break/Watchpoint refactor
rather than having to deduce >> it from details scattered through the class definition. >> >> Jim >> >>> On Sep 27, 2016, at 3:13 PM, Sean Callanan via lldb-dev >>> mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >>> >>> Doing it everyw
Re: [llvm-dev] Upgrading phabricator
new “feature” is that emails are HTML only right now. Not quite > nice for the archive (or for interacting by email). > See for instance: > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20160926/172081.html > > (Also the funky "[Changed Subscribers] “ in the title) &g
Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] FYI, Phabricator is really slow due to HN about LLD
Nah, its fine. Would have been completely easy to throw the necessary hardware at handling the load if I hadn't messed up the config. =] On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 2:39 PM Andrew Kelley via llvm-dev < llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Ah, sorry about that. Maybe I should have linked
Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] Trunk is now 13.0.0
Looks like it's https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=release-12.0.0 On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 9:58 AM Kadir Çetinkaya via cfe-dev < cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Is there a canonical bug for 12.0.0 release blockers where we can make > cherry-pick requests (I couldn't find
Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [cfe-dev] 7.0.1-final has been tagged
om, releases.llvm.org only shows Windows and FreeBSD tarballs for 7.0.1 from what I can see. Also, the front page of https://releases.llvm.org/ needs a new entry for 7.0.1 in the table under "Download". > > > On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 7:38 AM Brian Cain via cfe-dev < > cfe-
Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] Mailing list changes this week
: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 1:42 AM To: tstel...@redhat.com; Mehdi AMINI Cc: llvm-dev ; cfe-dev ; openmp-dev (openmp-...@lists.llvm.org) ; LLDB Dev Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Mailing list changes this week I thought we were just going to count commits on a particular branch and use the
Re: [lldb-dev] Leaks from static variables
nce its not always just a > simple matter of releasing resources, sometimes actual shutdown code needs to > be interspersed with the cleanup > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 3:15 PM Kate Stone via lldb-dev > mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > Greg Clayton will almost certainly
Re: [lldb-dev] [Openmp-dev] [Release-testers] 13.0.0-rc3 has been tagged
was discussed in the past: * https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50059 * https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/2019-November/61.html It's not great, but sadly it is rather unlikely to improve in the near future. Thanks, -Andrzej $ cat clang+llvm-13.0.0-rc3-x86_64-linux-gnu-u
Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [RFC] Deprecate pre-commit email code reviews in favor of Phabricator
clangd-...@lists.llvm.org; openmp-...@lists.llvm.org; lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org; cfe-...@lists.llvm.org; libcxx-...@lists.llvm.org; flang-...@lists.llvm.org; parallel_libs-...@lists.llvm.org Subject: [EXT] Re: [cfe-dev] [RFC] Deprecate pre-commit email code reviews in favor of Phabricator On Tue,
Re: [PATCH] D19175: Fix for PR27015 (variable template initialized with a generic lambda expression)
6 at 7:34 PM, Akira Hatanaka via cfe-commits > mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > ahatanak added a comment. > > Thanks for the review. I committed the patch in r267956 and r267975. > > Do you think I should make setFlags(unsigned F) return early if F == Flags? >
Re: [lldb-dev] Forcing lldb to refresh process state
rocess stopped event. > > > On Aug 18, 2017, at 7:19 PM, Vadim via lldb-dev > <mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > > > I'm trying to reverse-step. So I think I'd need to refresh all thread > > states? > > > >>
Re: [lldb-dev] how do i submit my patch for 'Support demangling for D symbols via dlopen'
org/docs/Contributing.html > > -- > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a > Linux Foundation Collaborative Project > >> -Original Message- >> From: lldb-dev [mailto:lldb-dev-boun...@lists.llvm.or
Re: [lldb-dev] clang::VersionTuple
out for you guys. Greg > On May 8, 2018, at 11:35 AM, Greg Clayton wrote: > > I'm good if Apple is good. > >> On May 8, 2018, at 11:31 AM, Frédéric Riss > <mailto:fr...@apple.com>> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On May 8, 2018, at 10:04 AM,
Re: [lldb-dev] lldb-3.8.1 prebuilt binary for windows7
He said he did, so I don't know. Vadim, can you elaborate? When you run `lldb -P` from the command line, what do you see? On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 4:00 PM Reid Kleckner via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I imagine that Hans doesn't have Python 3 installed on
Re: [lldb-dev] Moderator needed for lldb-commits
t; >>> Moderators are needed for the lldb-commits mailing list. Is anyone >>> interested in helping out? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Tanya >>> ___ >>> lldb-dev mailing list >>> lldb-dev@lists.llv
Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Break/Watchpoint refactor
27;s easier to just change the macro, but I > would just do what LLVM does as long as you don't mind the extra work. > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 3:01 PM Daniel Austin Noland via lldb-dev > mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > > On 09/27/2016 03:37 PM, Enr
Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [5.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 3 tagged
Yes, the removal of RISC-V from LLVM_ALL_TARGETS was intentional. See https://reviews.llvm.org/D36538 and the accompanying message to llvm-dev: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-August/116347.html for the rationale. Thanks, Simon From: Release
Re: [PATCH] D42157: [clang-cl] Let /FA output use intel assembly.
r322674 attempts to fix. On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Yvan Roux via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi Nico, > > On 17 January 2018 at 14:35, Nico Weber via Phabricator via > cfe-commits wrote: > > thakis closed this revision. > > thakis ad
Re: [lldb-dev] clang::VersionTuple
and what issues you’re referring to, we don’t link new LLDBs to old clangs (and even if we did, it wouldn’t be something the that drives community decisions). Fred > Greg > >> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 9:26 AM Greg Clayton via lldb-dev >> mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>>
Re: [lldb-dev] clang::VersionTuple
gt;> On May 8, 2018, at 11:31 AM, Frédéric Riss >> <mailto:fr...@apple.com>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On May 8, 2018, at 10:04 AM, Greg Clayton via lldb-dev >>>> mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >>>> >>
Re: r273950 -
Any tests? On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Nico Weber via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Did you land this intentionally? What was the commit message supposed to > be? > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Chris Dewhurst via cfe-commits < > cfe-commi
Re: [lldb-dev] How to link lldb on i386
cross building on a 64-bit machine using a 64-bit toolchain is what we have to do on Windows. On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:21 PM Greg Clayton via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Don't generate debug info would be one that comes to mind. The other is to > cross build
Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] lldb-mi functionality
-llvm-dev We support most MI commands and lldb-mi can be used alongside with Eclipse. So probably it would work also with gdbgui. They are pretty compatible :) On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Not too much docu
Re: [cfe-users] cfe-users Digest, Vol 62, Issue 11
unsubscribe On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:02 PM via cfe-users wrote: > Send cfe-users mailing list submissions to > cfe-users@lists.llvm.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-users > o
Re: [lldb-dev] how do i submit my patch for 'Support demangling for D symbols via dlopen'
Also see http://llvm.org/docs/Contributing.html -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project > -Original Message- > From: lldb-dev [mailto:lldb-dev-boun...@lists.llvm.org] On
Re: [lldb-dev] clang::VersionTuple
itories that link against older llvm/clang. Doesn't affect me anymore, but Apple will be affected. Greg > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 9:26 AM Greg Clayton via lldb-dev > mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > No issues from me. > > > On May 8, 2018, at 9:11 AM, Pavel
Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] How soon after the GitHub migration should committing with git-llvm become optional?
cript that polls for new branches every five minutes and deletes them unless on a while list would work just fine. :) Philip On 10/15/19 9:26 PM, Mehdi AMINI via cfe-dev wrote: On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:26 PM Hubert Tong via llvm-dev mailto:llvm-...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: On T
Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues [UPDATED]
On 4/21/20 6:50 PM, Richard Smith wrote: On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 17:00, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev mailto:llvm-...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: On 04/21/2020 03:36 PM, Richard Smith via llvm-dev wrote: > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 11:04, Philip Reames via cfe-dev m
Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues [UPDATED]
On 04/21/2020 06:50 PM, Richard Smith wrote: > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 17:00, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev > mailto:llvm-...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > On 04/21/2020 03:36 PM, Richard Smith via llvm-dev wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 11:04, Philip Reames v
Re: r278882 - If possible, set the stack rlimit to at least 8MiB on cc1 startup, and work
llvm-config.h doesn't provide the necessary macros. I've applied a different fix for out-of-tree builds in r279112. On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 11:51 PM, Vedant Kumar via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Done in clang/r279035. > > thanks, > vedant >
Re: [lldb-dev] Connecting to lldb-rpc-server
ols > >> On Oct 6, 2016, at 6:11 PM, Rex Fenley via lldb-dev > <mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> Hi! I'm trying to connect to Xcode's lldb rpc server but I'm having trouble. >> >> This doesn't seem to work to list the
Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] GitHub Survey - Results
rs if we can't see (and don't remember) the question. > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 12:39 PM Renato Golin via llvm-dev > mailto:llvm-...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > Folks, > > Please note that the survey is still open! > > But it's almost time for the US
Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] [RFC] Deprecate email code reviews in favor of Phabricator
v Cc: clangd-...@lists.llvm.org; openmp-...@lists.llvm.org; lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org; cfe-...@lists.llvm.org; libcxx-...@lists.llvm.org; flang-...@lists.llvm.org; parallel_libs-...@lists.llvm.org Subject: [EXT] Re: [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] [RFC] Deprecate email code reviews in favor of Phabricator O
Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [Attn: Bot Owners!] Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3
Windows LLDB is done On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 2:39 AM Daniel Sanders via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > All the MIPS buildbots are ready too. > > > > *From:* llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-boun...@lists.llvm.org] *On Behalf Of > *NAKAMURA > Takumi via llvm-d
Re: [lldb-dev] LLDB 4.0.0 crashes on Windows 7
I'm not able to repro at head (on Windows 7). On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Ted Woodward via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I've also never seen either problem. I'm not debugging Windows apps, but > Hexagon apps, running lldb and
Re: [lldb-dev] lldb-instr not working
file. Can you verify that the file exists in the > directory you're running lldb-instr from? > > Cheers, > Jonas > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 1:29 PM Walter via lldb-dev <mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > Hi, I've recently tried to use lldb-instr,
Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] How soon after the GitHub migration should committing with git-llvm become optional?
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 9:26 PM Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev < llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:26 PM Hubert Tong via llvm-dev < > llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 3:47 AM Marcus Johnson via llvm-dev &l
Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] Mailing list changes this week
t adding it in later. -Tom > --paulr > > > > *From:* llvm-dev *On Behalf Of *Shoaib > Meenai via llvm-dev > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 16, 2019 1:42 AM > *To:* tstel...@redhat.com; Mehdi AMINI > *Cc:* llvm-dev ; cfe-dev ; > openmp-dev (openmp-...@lists.llvm
Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] December LLVM bay-area social is this Thursday!
ed, it seemed optimistic in our phone chat. > > > On Dec 24, 2019, at 11:06 AM, George Burgess IV via cfe-dev < > cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Oof. :( > > Offhand, I can’t think of any place in particular. As one might imagine, > accommodating 50+ people i
Re: r273950 -
Reverted it in r273994. I expect you may recommit it. ;) On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 9:12 AM Nico Weber via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Did you land this intentionally? What was the commit message supposed to > be? > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Chri
Re: [lldb-dev] llvm changing line table info from DWARF 2 to DWARF 4
lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I believe we are good, but it would be good to verify via testing once a > compiler becomes available. > > Greg > > > On Oct 19, 2016, at 12:19 PM, Ted Woodward via lldb-dev < > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > &
Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [cfe-dev] 7.0.1-final has been tagged
On 01/08/2019 11:36 AM, Ian Tessier via Release-testers wrote: > Can the ubuntu tarballs be published to the download site? They're not > available yet. > These are up on the download site now. -Tom > On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 7:38 AM Brian Cain via cfe-dev > mailto:cf
Re: [PATCH] D18479: [CodeGenCXX] Fix ItaniumCXXABI::getAlignmentOfExnObject to return 8-byte alignment on Darwin
> On Mar 25, 2016, at 2:23 PM, Akira Hatanaka via cfe-commits > wrote: > >> >> On Mar 25, 2016, at 2:06 PM, David Majnemer via cfe-commits >> mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 12:57
Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] FYI: Landing the initial draft for an LLVM Code of Conduct
aulr From: cfe-dev [mailto:cfe-dev-boun...@lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Berlin via cfe-dev Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 1:37 PM To: Rafael Espíndola Cc: llvm-dev; cfe-dev; openmp-dev (openmp-...@lists.llvm.org); LLDB Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] FYI: Landing the initial draft for an LLV
Re: [lldb-dev] lldb-server stripped binary size: AArch64 ~16Mb vs ARM ~9 Mb
get a glimpse on the direction of development for that target. Regards, Mikhail From: Tamas Berghammer [mailto:tbergham...@google.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2016 1:34 PM To: Pavel Labath ; Mikhail Filimonov Cc: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] lldb-server stripped binary size
Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [llvm-dev] [5.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 3 tagged
via llvm-dev > mailto:llvm-...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > Dear testers, > > 5.0.0-rc3 was just tagged. > > This is a release candidate in the real sense: if nothing bad comes up > in testing, this is what the release is going to look like. > > Please b
Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues [UPDATED]
On 4/22/20 2:35 PM, Richard Smith wrote: On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 09:45, Philip Reames via cfe-dev mailto:cfe-...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: On 4/21/20 6:50 PM, Richard Smith wrote: On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 17:00, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev mailto:llvm-...@lists.llvm.org&g
Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [3.7 Release] 3.7.0-final has been tagged
The last one has finished and it was ok too. From: hwennb...@google.com [hwennb...@google.com] on behalf of Hans Wennborg [h...@chromium.org] Sent: 01 September 2015 18:43 To: Daniel Sanders Cc: llvm-dev; cfe-...@lists.llvm.org; lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
Re: [libcxx] r249738 - Split out of .
13, 2016 at 12:53 AM, Adrian Prantl via cfe-commits > mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > On Mar 11, 2016, at 4:11 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith > <mailto:dexonsm...@apple.com>> wrote: > > > > Did anyone file a PR for this? > > > > I fil
Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] Release 13.0.1-rc1 has been tagged
On 12/2/21 06:45, Nemanja Ivanovic wrote: Hi Tom, would it be OK to directly send you git hashes for patches we would like back ported until the bugzilla transition completes? Yes, that's fine. -Tom On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 1:08 AM Tom Stellard via cfe-dev mailto:cfe-...@lists.llv
RE: r350643 - Limit COFF 'common' emission to <=32 alignment types.
Thank you for that! From: Shoaib Meenai [mailto:smee...@fb.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 4:48 PM To: David Majnemer Cc: Keane, Erich ; cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org; Martin Storsjo Subject: Re: r350643 - Limit COFF 'common' emission to <=32 alignment types. I s
Re: r257827 - [CMake] Set SVN_REVISION if CLANG_APPEND_VC_REV=On
eck it instead of SVN_VERSION? The way it is now if the first > if body executes, the second if does too since add_version_info_from_vcs sets > SVN_VERSION and thus satisfies the second if. > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 6:06 AM, Daniel Sanders via cfe-commits > mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm
Re: [libcxx] r278191 - test/hard_link_count(): Fix test on darwin
-commits > wrote: > > Thanks Matthias. My apoligies, I lost track of this patch. > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Bruno Cardoso Lopes via cfe-commits > mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > Thanks Matthias! > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Matthias B
Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] FYI: Landing the initial draft for an LLVM Code of Conduct
- Original Message - > From: "Aaron Ballman via cfe-dev" > To: "Chandler Carruth" > Cc: "llvm-dev" , "cfe-dev" , > "openmp-dev > (openmp-...@lists.llvm.org)" , "LLDB" > > Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 5:
Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] FYI: Landing the initial draft for an LLVM Code of Conduct
+1. On 06/30/2016 04:01 PM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev wrote: - Original Message - From: "Aaron Ballman via cfe-dev" To: "Chandler Carruth" Cc: "llvm-dev" , "cfe-dev" , "openmp-dev (openmp-...@lists.llvm.org)" , "LLDB" Se
[libcxx] r312260 - [libcxx] [www] Manually change http links to https.
60&view=diff == --- libcxx/trunk/www/atomic_design.html (original) +++ libcxx/trunk/www/atomic_design.html Thu Aug 31 10:59:42 2017 @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ -http://llvm.org/";>LLVM Home +https://llvm.org/";>LLVM Home @@ -22,11 +22,11 @@ Quick Links -
Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r283351 - Try to fix Android build.
-commits < lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > It is using "gcc version 4.9 20150123 (prerelease) (GCC)" > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:12 AM Zachary Turner via lldb-commits < > lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> I don't know for sure, but I&#x
Re: [PATCH] trivial documentation fix regarding Obj-C ARC objc_arc_weak_reference_unavailable
: objc_arc_weak_reference_unavailable Cheers, Sean ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits
Re: Allow tools to work without compilation database
FixedCompilationDatabase::loadFromCommandLine(argc, argv)); Just Compilations.reset(new FixedCompilationDatabase(".", std::vector()))? On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:51 AM Russell Wallace via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Per discussion at > http://lists.llvm
Re: [Lldb-commits] Use explicit delete in DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN
Not sure why operator= is returning a const&. It doesn't matter in practice but it's a bit strange. Anyway lgtm On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 7:11 PM Daniel Austin Noland via lldb-commits < lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Explicit delete is preferable to declaring a met
Re: [lldb-dev] Moderator needed for lldb-commits
dev > > wrote: > > > > LLDB Developers, > > > > Moderators are needed for the lldb-commits mailing list. Is anyone > > interested in helping out? > > > > Thanks, > > Tanya > > ___ > > lld
Re: [PATCH] D16360: unordered_map: Avoid unnecessary mallocs when no insert occurs
Great! I think we should proceed with your is_trivially_copyable idea and I'll see if I can come up with a pathological test case that breaks it. Hopefully we can find something that works. On Mar 17, 2016 2:54 PM, "Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via cfe-commits" < cfe-commits@lis
