kworm-pu: #1077916
Andreas
PS: if the salsa repository were up-to-date, you could get a merge
request with these changes
diff -Nru rapiddisk-9.1.0/debian/changelog rapiddisk-9.1.0/debian/changelog
--- rapiddisk-9.1.0/debian/changelog2024-07-22 15:57:51.0 +0200
+++ rapiddisk-9.1.0/d
kworm-pu: #1077916
Andreas
PS: if the salsa repository were up-to-date, you could get a merge
request with these changes
diff -Nru rapiddisk-9.1.0/debian/changelog rapiddisk-9.1.0/debian/changelog
--- rapiddisk-9.1.0/debian/changelog2024-07-22 15:57:51.0 +0200
+++ rapiddisk-9.1.0/d
Public bug reported:
[ Impact ]
rapiddisk-dkms does not compile from source in Noble with kernel 6.11:
/var/lib/dkms/rapiddisk-dkms/9.1.0/build/rapiddisk-cache.c: In function
‘dm_io_async_bvec’:
/var/lib/dkms/rapiddisk-dkms/9.1.0/build/rapiddisk-cache.c:198:16: error: too
few arguments to
The packet in proposed builds, installs and loads correctly on both GA
and HWE kernel.
GA:
$ sudo apt install -t noble-proposed rapiddisk-dkms
$ dkms status
rapiddisk-dkms/9.1.0, 6.8.0-51-generic, x86_64: installed
$ sudo modprobe rapiddisk
$ lsmod | grep rapiddisk
rapiddisk 20480 0
Package: rapiddisk-dkms
Version: 8.2.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
rapiddisk-dkms fails to build a module for Linux 6.1:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/rapiddisk/-/jobs/3824488
E: rapiddisk/8.2.0 failed to build for 6.1.0-2-amd64
== /var/lib/dkms/rapiddisk/8.2.0/build/make.log
Package: rapiddisk-dkms
Version: 8.2.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
rapiddisk-dkms fails to build a module for Linux 6.1:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/rapiddisk/-/jobs/3824488
E: rapiddisk/8.2.0 failed to build for 6.1.0-2-amd64
== /var/lib/dkms/rapiddisk/8.2.0/build/make.log
Followup-For: Bug #1027882
Control: tag -1 patch
Attached is a patch with the proposed dkms updates.
Andreas
diff -Nru rapiddisk-8.2.0/debian/changelog rapiddisk-8.2.0/debian/changelog
--- rapiddisk-8.2.0/debian/changelog2022-09-14 09:57:07.0 +0200
+++ rapiddisk-8.2.0/debian
Package: rapiddisk,rapiddisk-dkms
Version: 8.2.0-2
Severity: serious
User: [email protected]
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
because it tries to overwrite other packages files.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bot
Package: rapiddisk,rapiddisk-dkms
Version: 8.2.0-2
Severity: serious
User: [email protected]
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
because it tries to overwrite other packages files.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bot
Processing control commands:
> found -1 8.2.0-3
Bug #1016508 {Done: Gürkan Myczko } [rapiddisk,rapiddisk-dkms]
rapiddisk,rapiddisk-dkms: both ship /usr/src/rapiddisk-8.2.0-2/*
Marked as found in versions rapiddisk/8.2.0-3; no longer marked as fixed in
versions rapiddisk/8.2.0-3 and reope
Followup-For: Bug #1016508
Control: found -1 8.2.0-3
The following files are still shipped by both packages:
usr/src/rapiddisk-8.2.0/Makefile
usr/src/rapiddisk-8.2.0/dkms.conf
usr/src/rapiddisk-8.2.0/rapiddisk-cache.c
usr/src/rapiddisk-8.2.0/rapiddisk.c
usr/src/rapiddisk-8.2.0/rapiddisk.txt
Followup-For: Bug #1016508
Control: found -1 8.2.0-3
The following files are still shipped by both packages:
usr/src/rapiddisk-8.2.0/Makefile
usr/src/rapiddisk-8.2.0/dkms.conf
usr/src/rapiddisk-8.2.0/rapiddisk-cache.c
usr/src/rapiddisk-8.2.0/rapiddisk.c
usr/src/rapiddisk-8.2.0/rapiddisk.txt
failures of rapiddisk-dkms in
stable since the interface of dm_io() has changed.
[ Impact ]
rapiddisk is unusable with the current (and future) stable kernels.
[ Tests ]
autopkgtest-pkg-dkms
local autopkgtest run in bookworm
[ Risks ]
Low. It's unusable right now.
[ Checklist ]
[*]
failures of rapiddisk-dkms in
stable since the interface of dm_io() has changed.
[ Impact ]
rapiddisk is unusable with the current (and future) stable kernels.
[ Tests ]
autopkgtest-pkg-dkms
local autopkgtest run in bookworm
[ Risks ]
Low. It's unusable right now.
[ Checklist ]
[*]
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 02:43:16PM -0500, Petros Koutoupis wrote:
> Attached is a patch for two modules: RapidDisk & RapidCache. RapidDisk is a
> Linux
> RAM drive module which allows the user to dynamically create, remove, and
> resize
> RAM-based block devices. RapidDisk
Source: rapiddisk
Version: 9.1.0-2
Severity: serious
User: [email protected]
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it recently started
failing in unstable and testing. Can you please investigate the
situation and fix it? I copied
Source: rapiddisk
Version: 9.1.0-2
Severity: serious
User: [email protected]
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it recently started
failing in unstable and testing. Can you please investigate the
situation and fix it? I copied
Package: rapiddisk-dkms
Version: 9.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Control: found -1 9.0.0-1
DKMS make.log for rapiddisk-dkms-9.1.0 for kernel 6.7.12-amd64 (x86_64)
Fri Apr 26 21:35:41 UTC 2024
make: Entering directory '/usr/src/linux-headers-6.7.12-amd64'
CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/rapiddisk-
Package: rapiddisk-dkms
Version: 9.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Control: found -1 9.0.0-1
DKMS make.log for rapiddisk-dkms-9.1.0 for kernel 6.7.12-amd64 (x86_64)
Fri Apr 26 21:35:41 UTC 2024
make: Entering directory '/usr/src/linux-headers-6.7.12-amd64'
CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/rapiddisk-
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2025 09:44:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Close 1077916
has caused the Debian Bug report #1077916,
regarding bookworm-pu: package rapiddisk/9.0.0-1+deb12u1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2025 09:44:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Close 1077916
has caused the Debian Bug report #1077916,
regarding bookworm-pu: package rapiddisk/9.0.0-1+deb12u1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 10:17:26 +0200
Source: rapiddisk
Binary: rapiddisk rapiddisk-dbgsym rapiddisk-dkms
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 8.2.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Gürkan Myczko
Changed-By
Package: rapiddisk-dkms
Version: 9.2.0-2
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/pkoutoupis/rapiddisk/issues/205
Hi,
rapiddisk-dkms fails to build a module for Linux 7.2 in experimental:
DKMS (dkms-3.2.2) make.log for rapiddisk/9.2.0 for kernel 7.2-amd64
Package: rapiddisk-dkms
Version: 9.2.0-2
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/pkoutoupis/rapiddisk/issues/205
Hi,
rapiddisk-dkms fails to build a module for Linux 7.2 in experimental:
DKMS (dkms-3.2.2) make.log for rapiddisk/9.2.0 for kernel 7.2-amd64
Your message dated Sun, 05 Feb 2023 14:50:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1029266: fixed in rapiddisk 8.2.0-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1029266,
regarding rapiddisk-dkms: module fails to build for Linux 6.1: error: ‘struct
dm_io_request’ has no member named ‘bi_op’
to be
Your message dated Sun, 05 Feb 2023 14:50:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1029266: fixed in rapiddisk 8.2.0-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1029266,
regarding rapiddisk-dkms: module fails to build for Linux 6.1: error: ‘struct
dm_io_request’ has no member named ‘bi_op’
to be
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2022 08:50:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016508: fixed in rapiddisk 8.2.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016508,
regarding rapiddisk,rapiddisk-dkms: both ship /usr/src/rapiddisk-8.2.0-2/*
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2022 15:24:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016508: fixed in rapiddisk 8.2.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016508,
regarding rapiddisk,rapiddisk-dkms: both ship /usr/src/rapiddisk-8.2.0-2/*
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2022 15:24:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016508: fixed in rapiddisk 8.2.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016508,
regarding rapiddisk,rapiddisk-dkms: both ship /usr/src/rapiddisk-8.2.0-2/*
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2022 08:50:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016508: fixed in rapiddisk 8.2.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016508,
regarding rapiddisk,rapiddisk-dkms: both ship /usr/src/rapiddisk-8.2.0-2/*
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Modules built and installed successfully. Modules loaded successfully.
Noble 6.8 kernel:
root@noble-lts-vm:~# uname -r
6.8.0-90-generic
root@noble-lts-vm:~# modprobe rapiddisk; modprobe rapiddisk-cache
root@noble-lts-vm:~#
Noble 6.14 kernel:
root@noble-614-vm:~# uname -r
6.14.0-37-generic
Public bug reported:
[ Impact ]
DKMS make.log for rapiddisk-dkms-9.1.0 for kernel 6.17.0-7-generic (x86_64)
Tue Dec 9 23:00:44 UTC 2025
make: Entering directory '/usr/src/linux-headers-6.17.0-7-generic'
make[1]: Entering directory '/var/lib/dkms/rapiddisk-dkms/9.1.0/build'
w
Package: rapiddisk-dkms
Version: 9.1.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/pkoutoupis/rapiddisk/issues/190
DKMS make.log for rapiddisk-9.1.0 for kernel 6.11-rc5-amd64 (x86_64)
Thu Sep 12 11:51:16 UTC 2024
make: Entering directory '/usr/src/linux-he
Package: rapiddisk-dkms
Version: 9.1.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/pkoutoupis/rapiddisk/issues/190
DKMS make.log for rapiddisk-9.1.0 for kernel 6.11-rc5-amd64 (x86_64)
Thu Sep 12 11:51:16 UTC 2024
make: Entering directory '/usr/src/linux-he
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 06:46:26PM -0500, Petros Koutoupis wrote:
> Attached is a patch for two modules: RapidDisk & RapidCache. RapidDisk is a
> Linux RAM drive module which allows the user to dynamically create, remove,
> and
> resize RAM-based block devices. RapidDisk is desig
Public bug reported:
This is a scripted bug report about ADT failures while running rapiddisk
tests for linux/6.8.0-38.38 on noble. Whether this is caused by the dep8
tests of the tested source or the kernel has yet to be determined.
Testing failed on:
amd64:
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com
Your message dated Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:34:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1069945: fixed in rapiddisk 9.1.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1069945,
regarding rapiddisk-dkms: module fails to build for Linux 6.7.12, 6.1.85:
rapiddisk-cache.c:198:16: error: too few arguments to
Your message dated Fri, 07 Feb 2025 14:14:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1069945: fixed in rapiddisk 9.0.0-1+deb12u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1069945,
regarding rapiddisk-dkms: module fails to build for Linux 6.7.12, 6.1.85:
rapiddisk-cache.c:198:16: error: too few
Your message dated Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:34:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1069945: fixed in rapiddisk 9.1.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1069945,
regarding rapiddisk-dkms: module fails to build for Linux 6.7.12, 6.1.85:
rapiddisk-cache.c:198:16: error: too few arguments to
Your message dated Fri, 07 Feb 2025 14:14:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1069945: fixed in rapiddisk 9.0.0-1+deb12u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1069945,
regarding rapiddisk-dkms: module fails to build for Linux 6.7.12, 6.1.85:
rapiddisk-cache.c:198:16: error: too few
Your message dated Fri, 07 Feb 2025 14:14:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1069945: fixed in rapiddisk 9.0.0-1+deb12u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1069945,
regarding rapiddisk-dkms: module fails to build for Linux 6.7.12, 6.1.85:
rapiddisk-cache.c:198:16: error: too few
Your message dated Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:34:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1070418: fixed in rapiddisk 9.1.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1070418,
regarding rapiddisk: autopkgtest regression: Bad return status for module build
on kernel: 6.7.12-rt-amd64 (x86_64)
to be marked
Your message dated Fri, 07 Feb 2025 14:14:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1070418: fixed in rapiddisk 9.0.0-1+deb12u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1070418,
regarding rapiddisk: autopkgtest regression: Bad return status for module build
on kernel: 6.7.12-rt-amd64 (x86_64)
to be
Your message dated Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:34:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1070418: fixed in rapiddisk 9.1.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1070418,
regarding rapiddisk: autopkgtest regression: Bad return status for module build
on kernel: 6.7.12-rt-amd64 (x86_64)
to be marked
Your message dated Fri, 07 Feb 2025 14:14:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1070418: fixed in rapiddisk 9.0.0-1+deb12u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1070418,
regarding rapiddisk: autopkgtest regression: Bad return status for module build
on kernel: 6.7.12-rt-amd64 (x86_64)
to be
Your message dated Fri, 07 Feb 2025 14:14:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1070418: fixed in rapiddisk 9.0.0-1+deb12u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1070418,
regarding rapiddisk: autopkgtest regression: Bad return status for module build
on kernel: 6.7.12-rt-amd64 (x86_64)
to be
Processing control commands:
> found -1 9.0.0-1
Bug #1069945 [rapiddisk-dkms] rapiddisk-dkms: module fails to build for Linux
6.7.12, 6.1.85: rapiddisk-cache.c:198:16: error: too few arguments to function
'dm_io'
Marked as found in versions rapiddisk/9.0.0-1.
--
1
Your message dated Wed, 05 Feb 2025 14:53:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1093127: fixed in rapiddisk 9.1.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1093127,
regarding rapiddisk-dkms: module fails to build for Linux 6.11
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Wed, 05 Feb 2025 14:53:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1093127: fixed in rapiddisk 9.1.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1093127,
regarding rapiddisk-dkms: module fails to build for Linux 6.11
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Wed, 05 Feb 2025 14:53:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1093127: fixed in rapiddisk 9.1.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1093127,
regarding rapiddisk-dkms: module fails to build for Linux 6.11
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Processing commands for [email protected]:
> forwarded 1069945
> https://github.com/pkoutoupis/rapiddisk/commit/3d7944363e83389d56a82de931e4801d82d99b5f
Bug #1069945 [rapiddisk-dkms] rapiddisk-dkms: module fails to build for Linux
6.7.12, 6.1.85: rapiddisk-cache.c:198:16: error: t
Processing commands for [email protected]:
> forwarded 1069945
> https://github.com/pkoutoupis/rapiddisk/commit/3d7944363e83389d56a82de931e4801d82d99b5f
Bug #1069945 [rapiddisk-dkms] rapiddisk-dkms: module fails to build for Linux
6.7.12, 6.1.85: rapiddisk-cache.c:198:16: error: t
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 06:46:26PM -0500, Petros Koutoupis wrote:
> Attached is a patch for two modules: RapidDisk & RapidCache. RapidDisk is a
> Linux RAM drive module which allows the user to dynamically create, remove,
> and
> resize RAM-based block devices. RapidDisk is desig
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/pkoutoupis/rapiddisk/issues/190
Bug #1093127 [rapiddisk-dkms] rapiddisk-dkms: module fails to build for Linux
6.11
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/pkoutoupis/rapiddisk/issues/190'.
--
1
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/pkoutoupis/rapiddisk/issues/190
Bug #1093127 [rapiddisk-dkms] rapiddisk-dkms: module fails to build for Linux
6.11
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/pkoutoupis/rapiddisk/issues/190'.
--
1
Modules built and available at https://launchpad.net/~john-
cabaj/+archive/ubuntu/hwe-6.17-dkms
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
DKMS make.log for rapiddisk-dkms-9.1.0 for kernel 6.17.0-7-generic (x86_64)
Tue Dec 9 23:00:44 UTC 2025
make: Entering directory '/usr/src/linux-he
The debdiff in attach allows to build rapiddisk-dkms on linux-6.11. It
is a clean backport of the Oracular package.
The dkms has been tested both on linux-6.8 (to spot possible regressions) and
on linux-6.11.
The package builds correctly.
The module has been also loaded on both linux-6.8 and
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch
Bug #1069945 [rapiddisk-dkms] rapiddisk-dkms: module fails to build for Linux
6.7.12, 6.1.85: rapiddisk-cache.c:198:16: error: too few arguments to function
'dm_io'
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1069945: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/pkoutoupis/rapiddisk/issues/205
Bug #1146534 [rapiddisk-dkms] rapiddisk-dkms: module fails to build for Linux
7.2: error: implicit declaration of function 'strncpy'
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://git
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/pkoutoupis/rapiddisk/issues/205
Bug #1146534 [rapiddisk-dkms] rapiddisk-dkms: module fails to build for Linux
7.2: error: implicit declaration of function 'strncpy'
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://git
This bug was fixed in the package rapiddisk - 9.1.0-3ubuntu1~24.04.1
---
rapiddisk (9.1.0-3ubuntu1~24.04.1) noble; urgency=medium
* Backport to Noble to support Linux 6.11 (LP: #2092168)
-- Massimiliano Pellizzer Thu,
19 Dec 2024 08:31:49 +0100
** Changed in: rapiddisk (Ubuntu
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/pkoutoupis/rapiddisk/issues/196
Bug #1109903 [rapiddisk-dkms] rapiddisk-dkms: module fails to build for Linux
6.16: error: 'struct page' has no member named 'index'
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'h
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/pkoutoupis/rapiddisk/issues/196
Bug #1109903 [rapiddisk-dkms] rapiddisk-dkms: module fails to build for Linux
6.16: error: 'struct page' has no member named 'index'
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'h
This bug was fixed in the package rapiddisk - 9.2.0-2~25.10.1
---
rapiddisk (9.2.0-2~25.10.1) questing; urgency=medium
* Support 6.17 kernel (LP: #2134569)
- No change backport from Resolute to ensure it sorts before -devel version
-- John Cabaj Fri, 19 Dec 2025 22:02:30
Processing commands for [email protected]:
> forwarded 1029266 https://github.com/pkoutoupis/rapiddisk/pull/145
Bug #1029266 [rapiddisk-dkms] rapiddisk-dkms: module fails to build for Linux
6.1: error: ‘struct dm_io_request’ has no member named ‘bi_op’
Set Bug forwarded-to-address
Processing commands for [email protected]:
> forwarded 1029266 https://github.com/pkoutoupis/rapiddisk/pull/145
Bug #1029266 [rapiddisk-dkms] rapiddisk-dkms: module fails to build for Linux
6.1: error: ‘struct dm_io_request’ has no member named ‘bi_op’
Set Bug forwarded-to-address
Hi,
Here are a couple more comments. Hopefully not much duplication from
other reviews.
On 05/31/15 19:43, Petros Koutoupis wrote:
>
> diff -uNpr linux-next.orig/drivers/staging/rapiddisk/Kconfig
> linux-next/drivers/staging/rapiddisk/Kconfig
> --- linux-next.orig/drivers/stagi
This bug was fixed in the package rapiddisk - 9.1.0-3ubuntu1~24.04.2
---
rapiddisk (9.1.0-3ubuntu1~24.04.2) noble; urgency=medium
* Support 6.17 kernel (LP: #2134569)
-
debian/patches/0001-Page-struct-no-longer-has-index-member-so-switching-.patch
- Set compiler options to
Christoph (and all),
I hope this message finds you well. The unfortunate truth is, had I the
courage and confidence to submit this years ago, we wouldn't be having this
conversation. Anyway, to address your questions:
1. Unlike the already mainline ramdisk driver, RapidDisk is designed
Christoph (and all),
I hope this message finds you well. The unfortunate truth is, had I the
courage and confidence to submit this years ago, we wouldn't be having
this conversation. Anyway, to address your questions:
1. Unlike the already mainline ramdisk driver, RapidDisk is design
Christoph (and all),
I hope this message finds you well. The unfortunate truth is, had I the
courage and confidence to submit this years ago, we wouldn't be having
this conversation. Anyway, to address your questions:
1. Unlike the already mainline ramdisk driver, RapidDisk is design
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package rapiddisk
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
# https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
#
user [email protected]
# remote status report for #1093127 (http://bugs.debian.org
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package rapiddisk
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
# https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
#
user [email protected]
# remote status report for #1146534 (http://bugs.debian.org
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package rapiddisk
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
# https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
#
user [email protected]
# remote status report for #1109903 (http://bugs.debian.org
** Changed in: rapiddisk (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2092168
Title:
rapiddisk-dkms FTBS in Noble with linux-6.11-hwe kernel
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 12:17:24PM -0500, Petros Koutoupis wrote:
> Attached is a patch for two modules: RapidDisk & RapidCache. RapidDisk is a
> Linux RAM drive module which allows the user to dynamically create, remove,
> and resize RAM-based block devices. RapidDisk is designed
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1027882 [src:rapiddisk] rapiddisk: please switch to B-D: dh-sequence-dkms
(or dh-dkms)
Added tag(s) pending.
> tag 1029266 pending
Bug #1029266 [rapiddisk-dkms] rapiddisk-dkms: module fails to build for Linux
6.1: error: ‘struct dm_io_r
** Changed in: rapiddisk (Ubuntu Resolute)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2134569
Title:
rapiddisk-dkms FTBS in Noble with the linux-6.17 kernel
Questing uploaded, thanks
** Changed in: rapiddisk (Ubuntu Questing)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2134569
Title:
rapiddisk-dkms FTBS in No
Noble uploaded, thanks
** Changed in: rapiddisk (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2134569
Title:
rapiddisk-dkms FTBS in Noble with
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gürkan Myczko
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
* Package name: rapiddisk
Version : 8.1.0
Upstream Authors: Petros Koutoupis
URL : https://github.com/pkoutoupis/rapiddisk
* License : GPL-2.0-or-later
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gürkan Myczko
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
* Package name: rapiddisk
Version : 8.1.0
Upstream Authors: Petros Koutoupis
URL : https://github.com/pkoutoupis/rapiddisk
* License : GPL-2.0-or-later
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gürkan Myczko
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
* Package name: rapiddisk
Version : 8.1.0
Upstream Authors: Petros Koutoupis
URL : https://github.com/pkoutoupis/rapiddisk
* License : GPL-2.0-or-later
9.1.0-3ubuntu1~24.04.1 -> 9.1.0-3ubuntu1~24.04.2 debdiff
** Patch added: "rapiddisk_9.1.0-3ubuntu1~24.04.2.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rapiddisk/+bug/2134569/+attachment/5932575/+files/rapiddisk_9.1.0-3ubuntu1~24.04.2.debdiff
--
You received this bug
chabad360 [1] filed a orphan request for rapiddisk-dkms [2]:
Package is way out of date, and last update was in 2016
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/chabad360/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/rapiddisk-dkms/
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 12:17:24PM -0500, Petros Koutoupis wrote:
> Attached is a patch for two modules: RapidDisk & RapidCache. RapidDisk is a
> Linux RAM drive module which allows the user to dynamically create, remove,
> and resize RAM-based block devices. RapidDisk is designed
Your message dated Sat, 23 Jul 2022 23:35:16 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line rapiddisk was accepted
has caused the Debian Bug report #1013110,
regarding ITP: rapiddisk -- Linux RAM Drive and Caching kernel modules (DKMS)
to be marked a
Your message dated Sat, 23 Jul 2022 23:35:16 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line rapiddisk was accepted
has caused the Debian Bug report #1013110,
regarding ITP: rapiddisk -- Linux RAM Drive and Caching kernel modules (DKMS)
to be marked a
Hello John, or anyone else affected,
Accepted rapiddisk into questing-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rapiddisk/9.2.0-2~25.10.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hi Petros,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 09:12:13AM -0500, Petros Koutoupis wrote:
> 1. Unlike the already mainline ramdisk driver, RapidDisk is designed to be
> managed dynamically. That is, instead of configuring a fixed number of
> volumes and volume sizes as compile/boot time variables,
Upstream kernel change of API. DKMS package needs refresh.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Stefan Bader (smb)
** Changed
Your message dated Tue, 16 Dec 2025 13:35:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1109903: fixed in rapiddisk 9.2.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1109903,
regarding rapiddisk-dkms: module fails to build for Linux 6.16: error: 'struct
page' has no member named 'index&#
Your message dated Tue, 16 Dec 2025 13:35:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1109903: fixed in rapiddisk 9.2.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1109903,
regarding rapiddisk-dkms: module fails to build for Linux 6.16: error: 'struct
page' has no member named 'index&#
Your message dated Tue, 16 Dec 2025 13:35:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1109903: fixed in rapiddisk 9.2.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1109903,
regarding rapiddisk-dkms: module fails to build for Linux 6.16: error: 'struct
page' has no member named 'index&#
Hi Petros,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 09:12:13AM -0500, Petros Koutoupis wrote:
> 1. Unlike the already mainline ramdisk driver, RapidDisk is designed to be
> managed dynamically. That is, instead of configuring a fixed number of
> volumes and volume sizes as compile/boot time variables,
Hello Massimiliano, or anyone else affected,
Accepted rapiddisk into noble-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rapiddisk/9.1.0-3ubuntu1~24.04.1 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Your message dated Sun, 05 Feb 2023 14:50:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1027882: fixed in rapiddisk 8.2.0-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027882,
regarding rapiddisk: please switch to B-D: dh-sequence-dkms (or dh-dkms)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
The attachment "rapiddisk-dkms-support-noble-6.11.debdiff" seems to be a
debdiff. The ubuntu-sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report
so that they can review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If the
attachment isn't a patch, please remove the "patch" flag fr
Package: rapiddisk-dkms
Version: 9.2.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: sid forky upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/pkoutoupis/rapiddisk/issues/196
DKMS (dkms-3.2.0) make.log for rapiddisk/9.2.0 for kernel 6.16-rc7-rt-amd64
(x86_64)
Thu Jul 24 23:02:22 UTC 2025
Building module(s
Package: rapiddisk-dkms
Version: 9.2.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: sid forky upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/pkoutoupis/rapiddisk/issues/196
DKMS (dkms-3.2.0) make.log for rapiddisk/9.2.0 for kernel 6.16-rc7-rt-amd64
(x86_64)
Thu Jul 24 23:02:22 UTC 2025
Building module(s
1 - 100 of 269 matches
Mail list logo
