Re: [all-audio] Olympus Ls-14

2019-02-12 Thread John Heath via Groups.Io

Thanks! Got it.

-Original Message- 
From: Andy via Groups.Io

Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 9:14 PM
To: all-audio@groups.io
Subject: Re: [all-audio] Olympus Ls-14

Here it is John.

Enjoy the device and the mp3.

Download link:

https://www.sendspace.com/file/9e6yku

Very best wishes.

Andy.
- Original Message - 
From: "John Heath via Groups.Io" 

To: 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 12:27 AM
Subject: Re: [all-audio] Olympus Ls-14



Thanks so much. It looks like quite the machine.

-Original Message- 
From: Andy via Groups.Io

Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 6:30 PM
To: all-audio@groups.io
Subject: Re: [all-audio] Olympus Ls-14

Hi John.

I have a podcaste doen by Neal Ewars, who is himself blind, and I'm
currently uploading it for you to Sendspace.

I will send you the download link as soon as it's up.

Very best wishes.

Andy.
- Original Message - 
From: "John Heath via Groups.Io" 

To: 
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: [all-audio] Olympus Ls-14


   Sorry for joining late, but I just realized that the recorder a friend 
gave me is in fact the one you are talking, the 14. Anyone know where I 
can get operating instructions? Looks like a wonderful solid machine.


-Original Message- 
From: Hamit Campos

Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2019 9:51 AM
To: all-audio@groups.io
Subject: Re: [all-audio] Olympus Ls-14

Yeah the most epic thing the LS-14 has is smart mode. I like smart mode
always came in handy. For those that don't know, what happens in smart
mode is you press record. The mics open up at a low level and thus you
may not hear much if at all on yuor headphones. But the machine is
listening. So the idea is you then if it's a practised thing make the
loudest sound you're gonna record for this recording. Than as you do
this you press record again or if it counts down you let it run out and
it re-opens the mics at a proper level for the loudest sound you are
having it hear. Too bad the LS-100 didn't have this and too bad the 14
doesn't have XLRs or phantum power for true studio mics. But I did and
still kinda do use it with my AT-8022. I like how it's mics are spread
apart. At 90 degrees the LS-14 I find gives me a wider immige than the
XY H6 mics. Meh even at 120 because of how the H6 mics are pointed they
are wider but not spacious like the Olympus mics. I did suggest making
an A B peace for the H6 and 5 now they're doing snap off peaces. I even
had them look up the LS-14 to see how the mics are. But again I don't
worry much. I use my AT-8022. And I really would like to get a
independent pare of mics. like the new SE Electronics SE7 mics. They're
199$ a factory matched stereo pair. You will have to get the XLR cables
your self though.

On 2/10/2019 12:02 AM, Dane Trethowan wrote:

I’m very glad you mentioned the Olympus LS-14 actually.
I tried to get hold of one last year but had to settle for the LS-P4 - 
no problem there -.

One did come up on eBay just recently so I snapped it up.
In a few days I will be able to see what the LS-14 offers and of course 
I’ll be using the excellent review Neal Ewers did on the machine as a 
reference.
Pity about not being able to use rechargeable batteries with the LS-14 
so I’ll use one of the Powerbanks I have instead.




On 10 Feb 2019, at 3:46 pm, Hamit Campos  wrote:

Ah well 48 KHZ 24 bits is the web standard anyways. I guess I'm just
coming from another perspective I heard on another of Scott's shows.
Where if you record in 96 let's say, when you resample you'll get a
better 48 24 recording. I've even used 44 thousand 100 16 bits CD audio
on mine just because the LS-14 can't play anything elase in mono. It 
has

to be CD quality for it to work in mono. Which I was confused by when I
got it. Because all the DMs I'd had before this even playeed 48 16 in
mono though they didn't record that. But oh well. I can't wait to hear
some F8N samples.

On 2/9/2019 9:51 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote:
I chose 96K 24-bit because not all functions of the Zoom F8N support 
higher bit rates, Auto Mix for example but nevertheless 96K is a damn 
good rate to be using with 24 bit.
I can understand where the engineer is coming from in a lot of ways 
setting the sampling rate at 48KHZ.
Whilst I prefer higher myself a lot of computers would probably have 
trouble handling any more than 48K depending on the software and Sound 
Card being used so that would be one factor to take into 
consideration.

With the Mac which I use most of the time this isn’t a problem.
The other point being here is that you’re making live recordings and 
you probably won’t be wanting to master them.

So back to the recorder itself.
I’ve been going through the menu options as I’ve been telling the list 
over the last month or so.
The first 2 options in the memory are “Finder” and “Medadata For Next 
Take”.
The Finder allows you to search for content within folders on the SD 
card or cards if you have more than one installed.
I’ve not examined this o

[all-audio] New TV Receiver - Anyone Use this One

2019-02-12 Thread Matthew Chao
Hi, Folks.  I just got a Pioneer VSX-932 receiver to make my TV (Samsung 
40-inch SmartTv) into a nice home theater system.  Also got 7.1 surround 
sound speakers to complete the package.  Has anyone used Pioneer 
equipment, and how accessible is it?  Thanks in advance.--Matthew Chao



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#1935): https://groups.io/g/all-audio/message/1935
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/29777940/21656
Group Owner: all-audio+ow...@groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/all-audio/leave/1074140/405281159/xyzzy  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



[all-audio] Question re Winamp 5.66

2019-02-12 Thread Donald L. Roberts
Many of the CDs in my collection are home brew. Winamp 5.66 is my player of 
choice. However, whenever I play one of these CDs, Winamp attempts to search a 
database. Where in the settings do I go to preclude such a search?

Thanks.

Don Roberts


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#1933): https://groups.io/g/all-audio/message/1933
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/29777868/21656
Group Owner: all-audio+ow...@groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/all-audio/leave/1074140/405281159/xyzzy  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



[all-audio] Total recorder - splitting lengthy audio files

2019-02-12 Thread Donald L. Roberts
I have the current version of Total Recorder, the professional version. I wish 
to split large mp3 files and am having difficulty figuring out just what comes 
first. Yes, I have read the help files. And If I understand what I read, I 
should first set the split criteria such as by size, by the length of pause, 
etc. I think I am on the right track because I was able to create a Queue file, 
but just what do I do to actually initiate the splitting of the large file?

Thanks.

Don Roberts


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#1934): https://groups.io/g/all-audio/message/1934
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/29777869/21656
Group Owner: all-audio+ow...@groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/all-audio/leave/1074140/405281159/xyzzy  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



Re: [all-audio] Olympus Ls-14

2019-02-12 Thread Andy via Groups.Io

Here it is John.

Enjoy the device and the mp3.

Download link:

https://www.sendspace.com/file/9e6yku

Very best wishes.

Andy.
- Original Message - 
From: "John Heath via Groups.Io" 

To: 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 12:27 AM
Subject: Re: [all-audio] Olympus Ls-14



Thanks so much. It looks like quite the machine.

-Original Message- 
From: Andy via Groups.Io

Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 6:30 PM
To: all-audio@groups.io
Subject: Re: [all-audio] Olympus Ls-14

Hi John.

I have a podcaste doen by Neal Ewars, who is himself blind, and I'm
currently uploading it for you to Sendspace.

I will send you the download link as soon as it's up.

Very best wishes.

Andy.
- Original Message - 
From: "John Heath via Groups.Io" 

To: 
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: [all-audio] Olympus Ls-14


   Sorry for joining late, but I just realized that the recorder a friend 
gave me is in fact the one you are talking, the 14. Anyone know where I 
can get operating instructions? Looks like a wonderful solid machine.


-Original Message- 
From: Hamit Campos

Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2019 9:51 AM
To: all-audio@groups.io
Subject: Re: [all-audio] Olympus Ls-14

Yeah the most epic thing the LS-14 has is smart mode. I like smart mode
always came in handy. For those that don't know, what happens in smart
mode is you press record. The mics open up at a low level and thus you
may not hear much if at all on yuor headphones. But the machine is
listening. So the idea is you then if it's a practised thing make the
loudest sound you're gonna record for this recording. Than as you do
this you press record again or if it counts down you let it run out and
it re-opens the mics at a proper level for the loudest sound you are
having it hear. Too bad the LS-100 didn't have this and too bad the 14
doesn't have XLRs or phantum power for true studio mics. But I did and
still kinda do use it with my AT-8022. I like how it's mics are spread
apart. At 90 degrees the LS-14 I find gives me a wider immige than the
XY H6 mics. Meh even at 120 because of how the H6 mics are pointed they
are wider but not spacious like the Olympus mics. I did suggest making
an A B peace for the H6 and 5 now they're doing snap off peaces. I even
had them look up the LS-14 to see how the mics are. But again I don't
worry much. I use my AT-8022. And I really would like to get a
independent pare of mics. like the new SE Electronics SE7 mics. They're
199$ a factory matched stereo pair. You will have to get the XLR cables
your self though.

On 2/10/2019 12:02 AM, Dane Trethowan wrote:

I’m very glad you mentioned the Olympus LS-14 actually.
I tried to get hold of one last year but had to settle for the LS-P4 - 
no problem there -.

One did come up on eBay just recently so I snapped it up.
In a few days I will be able to see what the LS-14 offers and of course 
I’ll be using the excellent review Neal Ewers did on the machine as a 
reference.
Pity about not being able to use rechargeable batteries with the LS-14 
so I’ll use one of the Powerbanks I have instead.




On 10 Feb 2019, at 3:46 pm, Hamit Campos  wrote:

Ah well 48 KHZ 24 bits is the web standard anyways. I guess I'm just
coming from another perspective I heard on another of Scott's shows.
Where if you record in 96 let's say, when you resample you'll get a
better 48 24 recording. I've even used 44 thousand 100 16 bits CD audio
on mine just because the LS-14 can't play anything elase in mono. It 
has

to be CD quality for it to work in mono. Which I was confused by when I
got it. Because all the DMs I'd had before this even playeed 48 16 in
mono though they didn't record that. But oh well. I can't wait to hear
some F8N samples.

On 2/9/2019 9:51 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote:
I chose 96K 24-bit because not all functions of the Zoom F8N support 
higher bit rates, Auto Mix for example but nevertheless 96K is a damn 
good rate to be using with 24 bit.
I can understand where the engineer is coming from in a lot of ways 
setting the sampling rate at 48KHZ.
Whilst I prefer higher myself a lot of computers would probably have 
trouble handling any more than 48K depending on the software and Sound 
Card being used so that would be one factor to take into 
consideration.

With the Mac which I use most of the time this isn’t a problem.
The other point being here is that you’re making live recordings and 
you probably won’t be wanting to master them.

So back to the recorder itself.
I’ve been going through the menu options as I’ve been telling the list 
over the last month or so.
The first 2 options in the memory are “Finder” and “Medadata For Next 
Take”.
The Finder allows you to search for content within folders on the SD 
card or cards if you have more than one installed.
I’ve not examined this option but will do in the future when I work 
out how to connect a Keyboard to the F8N though even then without 
speech there seems little point.
On the other hand Enter Metadat

Re: [all-audio] Olympus Ls-14

2019-02-12 Thread John Heath via Groups.Io

Thanks so much. It looks like quite the machine.

-Original Message- 
From: Andy via Groups.Io

Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 6:30 PM
To: all-audio@groups.io
Subject: Re: [all-audio] Olympus Ls-14

Hi John.

I have a podcaste doen by Neal Ewars, who is himself blind, and I'm
currently uploading it for you to Sendspace.

I will send you the download link as soon as it's up.

Very best wishes.

Andy.
- Original Message - 
From: "John Heath via Groups.Io" 

To: 
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: [all-audio] Olympus Ls-14


   Sorry for joining late, but I just realized that the recorder a friend 
gave me is in fact the one you are talking, the 14. Anyone know where I 
can get operating instructions? Looks like a wonderful solid machine.


-Original Message- 
From: Hamit Campos

Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2019 9:51 AM
To: all-audio@groups.io
Subject: Re: [all-audio] Olympus Ls-14

Yeah the most epic thing the LS-14 has is smart mode. I like smart mode
always came in handy. For those that don't know, what happens in smart
mode is you press record. The mics open up at a low level and thus you
may not hear much if at all on yuor headphones. But the machine is
listening. So the idea is you then if it's a practised thing make the
loudest sound you're gonna record for this recording. Than as you do
this you press record again or if it counts down you let it run out and
it re-opens the mics at a proper level for the loudest sound you are
having it hear. Too bad the LS-100 didn't have this and too bad the 14
doesn't have XLRs or phantum power for true studio mics. But I did and
still kinda do use it with my AT-8022. I like how it's mics are spread
apart. At 90 degrees the LS-14 I find gives me a wider immige than the
XY H6 mics. Meh even at 120 because of how the H6 mics are pointed they
are wider but not spacious like the Olympus mics. I did suggest making
an A B peace for the H6 and 5 now they're doing snap off peaces. I even
had them look up the LS-14 to see how the mics are. But again I don't
worry much. I use my AT-8022. And I really would like to get a
independent pare of mics. like the new SE Electronics SE7 mics. They're
199$ a factory matched stereo pair. You will have to get the XLR cables
your self though.

On 2/10/2019 12:02 AM, Dane Trethowan wrote:

I’m very glad you mentioned the Olympus LS-14 actually.
I tried to get hold of one last year but had to settle for the LS-P4 - no 
problem there -.

One did come up on eBay just recently so I snapped it up.
In a few days I will be able to see what the LS-14 offers and of course I’ll 
be using the excellent review Neal Ewers did on the machine as a 
reference.
Pity about not being able to use rechargeable batteries with the LS-14 so 
I’ll use one of the Powerbanks I have instead.




On 10 Feb 2019, at 3:46 pm, Hamit Campos  wrote:

Ah well 48 KHZ 24 bits is the web standard anyways. I guess I'm just
coming from another perspective I heard on another of Scott's shows.
Where if you record in 96 let's say, when you resample you'll get a
better 48 24 recording. I've even used 44 thousand 100 16 bits CD audio
on mine just because the LS-14 can't play anything elase in mono. It has
to be CD quality for it to work in mono. Which I was confused by when I
got it. Because all the DMs I'd had before this even playeed 48 16 in
mono though they didn't record that. But oh well. I can't wait to hear
some F8N samples.

On 2/9/2019 9:51 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote:
I chose 96K 24-bit because not all functions of the Zoom F8N support 
higher bit rates, Auto Mix for example but nevertheless 96K is a damn 
good rate to be using with 24 bit.
I can understand where the engineer is coming from in a lot of ways 
setting the sampling rate at 48KHZ.
Whilst I prefer higher myself a lot of computers would probably have 
trouble handling any more than 48K depending on the software and Sound 
Card being used so that would be one factor to take into consideration.

With the Mac which I use most of the time this isn’t a problem.
The other point being here is that you’re making live recordings and 
you probably won’t be wanting to master them.

So back to the recorder itself.
I’ve been going through the menu options as I’ve been telling the list 
over the last month or so.
The first 2 options in the memory are “Finder” and “Medadata For Next 
Take”.
The Finder allows you to search for content within folders on the SD 
card or cards if you have more than one installed.
I’ve not examined this option but will do in the future when I work out 
how to connect a Keyboard to the F8N though even then without speech 
there seems little point.
On the other hand Enter Metadata for Next Take may be slightly useable 
with a keyboard. No, I won’t get any feedback however I should be able 
to remember the order in which the metadata is presented thus I can 
move through the fields etc.
The manual for the F8N gives specific keyboard commands to do just 
that.
The

Re: [all-audio] Olympus Ls-14

2019-02-12 Thread Andy via Groups.Io

Hi John.

I have a podcaste doen by Neal Ewars, who is himself blind, and I'm 
currently uploading it for you to Sendspace.


I will send you the download link as soon as it's up.

Very best wishes.

Andy.
- Original Message - 
From: "John Heath via Groups.Io" 

To: 
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: [all-audio] Olympus Ls-14


   Sorry for joining late, but I just realized that the recorder a friend 
gave me is in fact the one you are talking, the 14. Anyone know where I 
can get operating instructions? Looks like a wonderful solid machine.


-Original Message- 
From: Hamit Campos

Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2019 9:51 AM
To: all-audio@groups.io
Subject: Re: [all-audio] Olympus Ls-14

Yeah the most epic thing the LS-14 has is smart mode. I like smart mode
always came in handy. For those that don't know, what happens in smart
mode is you press record. The mics open up at a low level and thus you
may not hear much if at all on yuor headphones. But the machine is
listening. So the idea is you then if it's a practised thing make the
loudest sound you're gonna record for this recording. Than as you do
this you press record again or if it counts down you let it run out and
it re-opens the mics at a proper level for the loudest sound you are
having it hear. Too bad the LS-100 didn't have this and too bad the 14
doesn't have XLRs or phantum power for true studio mics. But I did and
still kinda do use it with my AT-8022. I like how it's mics are spread
apart. At 90 degrees the LS-14 I find gives me a wider immige than the
XY H6 mics. Meh even at 120 because of how the H6 mics are pointed they
are wider but not spacious like the Olympus mics. I did suggest making
an A B peace for the H6 and 5 now they're doing snap off peaces. I even
had them look up the LS-14 to see how the mics are. But again I don't
worry much. I use my AT-8022. And I really would like to get a
independent pare of mics. like the new SE Electronics SE7 mics. They're
199$ a factory matched stereo pair. You will have to get the XLR cables
your self though.

On 2/10/2019 12:02 AM, Dane Trethowan wrote:

I’m very glad you mentioned the Olympus LS-14 actually.
I tried to get hold of one last year but had to settle for the LS-P4 - no 
problem there -.

One did come up on eBay just recently so I snapped it up.
In a few days I will be able to see what the LS-14 offers and of course I’ll 
be using the excellent review Neal Ewers did on the machine as a 
reference.
Pity about not being able to use rechargeable batteries with the LS-14 so 
I’ll use one of the Powerbanks I have instead.




On 10 Feb 2019, at 3:46 pm, Hamit Campos  wrote:

Ah well 48 KHZ 24 bits is the web standard anyways. I guess I'm just
coming from another perspective I heard on another of Scott's shows.
Where if you record in 96 let's say, when you resample you'll get a
better 48 24 recording. I've even used 44 thousand 100 16 bits CD audio
on mine just because the LS-14 can't play anything elase in mono. It has
to be CD quality for it to work in mono. Which I was confused by when I
got it. Because all the DMs I'd had before this even playeed 48 16 in
mono though they didn't record that. But oh well. I can't wait to hear
some F8N samples.

On 2/9/2019 9:51 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote:
I chose 96K 24-bit because not all functions of the Zoom F8N support 
higher bit rates, Auto Mix for example but nevertheless 96K is a damn 
good rate to be using with 24 bit.
I can understand where the engineer is coming from in a lot of ways 
setting the sampling rate at 48KHZ.
Whilst I prefer higher myself a lot of computers would probably have 
trouble handling any more than 48K depending on the software and Sound 
Card being used so that would be one factor to take into consideration.

With the Mac which I use most of the time this isn’t a problem.
The other point being here is that you’re making live recordings and 
you probably won’t be wanting to master them.

So back to the recorder itself.
I’ve been going through the menu options as I’ve been telling the list 
over the last month or so.
The first 2 options in the memory are “Finder” and “Medadata For Next 
Take”.
The Finder allows you to search for content within folders on the SD 
card or cards if you have more than one installed.
I’ve not examined this option but will do in the future when I work out 
how to connect a Keyboard to the F8N though even then without speech 
there seems little point.
On the other hand Enter Metadata for Next Take may be slightly useable 
with a keyboard. No, I won’t get any feedback however I should be able 
to remember the order in which the metadata is presented thus I can 
move through the fields etc.
The manual for the F8N gives specific keyboard commands to do just 
that.
The next 2 options in the menu system are Input and Output respectively 
and I’ll be working on those next week.



On 10 Feb 2019, at 7:48 am, Hamit Campos  
wrote:


Ah yes I forgot that. Yes the higher the q

Re: [all-audio] Olympus Ls-14

2019-02-12 Thread John Heath via Groups.Io
   Sorry for joining late, but I just realized that the recorder a friend 
gave me is in fact the one you are talking, the 14. Anyone know where I can 
get operating instructions? Looks like a wonderful solid machine.


-Original Message- 
From: Hamit Campos

Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2019 9:51 AM
To: all-audio@groups.io
Subject: Re: [all-audio] Olympus Ls-14

Yeah the most epic thing the LS-14 has is smart mode. I like smart mode
always came in handy. For those that don't know, what happens in smart
mode is you press record. The mics open up at a low level and thus you
may not hear much if at all on yuor headphones. But the machine is
listening. So the idea is you then if it's a practised thing make the
loudest sound you're gonna record for this recording. Than as you do
this you press record again or if it counts down you let it run out and
it re-opens the mics at a proper level for the loudest sound you are
having it hear. Too bad the LS-100 didn't have this and too bad the 14
doesn't have XLRs or phantum power for true studio mics. But I did and
still kinda do use it with my AT-8022. I like how it's mics are spread
apart. At 90 degrees the LS-14 I find gives me a wider immige than the
XY H6 mics. Meh even at 120 because of how the H6 mics are pointed they
are wider but not spacious like the Olympus mics. I did suggest making
an A B peace for the H6 and 5 now they're doing snap off peaces. I even
had them look up the LS-14 to see how the mics are. But again I don't
worry much. I use my AT-8022. And I really would like to get a
independent pare of mics. like the new SE Electronics SE7 mics. They're
199$ a factory matched stereo pair. You will have to get the XLR cables
your self though.

On 2/10/2019 12:02 AM, Dane Trethowan wrote:

I’m very glad you mentioned the Olympus LS-14 actually.
I tried to get hold of one last year but had to settle for the LS-P4 - no 
problem there -.

One did come up on eBay just recently so I snapped it up.
In a few days I will be able to see what the LS-14 offers and of course I’ll 
be using the excellent review Neal Ewers did on the machine as a 
reference.
Pity about not being able to use rechargeable batteries with the LS-14 so 
I’ll use one of the Powerbanks I have instead.




On 10 Feb 2019, at 3:46 pm, Hamit Campos  wrote:

Ah well 48 KHZ 24 bits is the web standard anyways. I guess I'm just
coming from another perspective I heard on another of Scott's shows.
Where if you record in 96 let's say, when you resample you'll get a
better 48 24 recording. I've even used 44 thousand 100 16 bits CD audio
on mine just because the LS-14 can't play anything elase in mono. It has
to be CD quality for it to work in mono. Which I was confused by when I
got it. Because all the DMs I'd had before this even playeed 48 16 in
mono though they didn't record that. But oh well. I can't wait to hear
some F8N samples.

On 2/9/2019 9:51 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote:
I chose 96K 24-bit because not all functions of the Zoom F8N support 
higher bit rates, Auto Mix for example but nevertheless 96K is a damn 
good rate to be using with 24 bit.
I can understand where the engineer is coming from in a lot of ways 
setting the sampling rate at 48KHZ.
Whilst I prefer higher myself a lot of computers would probably have 
trouble handling any more than 48K depending on the software and Sound 
Card being used so that would be one factor to take into consideration.

With the Mac which I use most of the time this isn’t a problem.
The other point being here is that you’re making live recordings and you 
probably won’t be wanting to master them.

So back to the recorder itself.
I’ve been going through the menu options as I’ve been telling the list 
over the last month or so.
The first 2 options in the memory are “Finder” and “Medadata For Next 
Take”.
The Finder allows you to search for content within folders on the SD 
card or cards if you have more than one installed.
I’ve not examined this option but will do in the future when I work out 
how to connect a Keyboard to the F8N though even then without speech 
there seems little point.
On the other hand Enter Metadata for Next Take may be slightly useable 
with a keyboard. No, I won’t get any feedback however I should be able 
to remember the order in which the metadata is presented thus I can move 
through the fields etc.

The manual for the F8N gives specific keyboard commands to do just that.
The next 2 options in the menu system are Input and Output respectively 
and I’ll be working on those next week.




On 10 Feb 2019, at 7:48 am, Hamit Campos  wrote:

Ah yes I forgot that. Yes the higher the quality, the more memory 
you'll

need. Especially if you're also planning to go multi channal.
On 2/9/2019 3:28 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote:


I can’t argue with the statements below.
I actually have my F8N and other recorders set to 96K 24-bit but in 
the end its up to the individual how they want things done.
One has to remember too that with higher bit rates