To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77486
User cornouws changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76758
User oj changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76242
User pj changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72764
User pj changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70728
User rafaelda changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77454
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 06:37:33 +
2007 ---
mmh, can you verify if it works with your database InputStream and a normal
client
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77636
Issue #|77636
Summary|Maintenance Notification should be removed
Component|www
Version|current
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69665
User mox changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77313
User jnavrati changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77631
User liutao changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76894
User dv changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72764
User pj changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77631
User pj changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77631
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 07:07:20 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=45278)
the patch file
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77631
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 07:09:00 +
2007 ---
I have fixed this issue, please have a look at the patch file.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77023
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 07:14:46 +
2007 ---
Petr,
good catch. The problem is actually that a bogus URL is handed over to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54695
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 07:24:10 +
2007 ---
As could be expected, not yet corrected in OOo 2.2.0.
Next attachment
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58474
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 07:28:59 +
2007 ---
geki: I understand obsolete as does no longer apply, but is still needed for
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54695
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 07:31:20 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=45279)
Python script to reproduce problem
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77626
User cgu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55037
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 07:33:47 +
2007 ---
As could be expected, not yet corrected in OOo 2.2.0.
Next attachment
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55037
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 07:34:38 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=45280)
Python script to reproduce problem
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 07:37:47 +
2007 ---
Pavel, it seems that sal_Int32 is mapped to int on x86-64 while it is mapped
to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77631
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77627
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77621
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77567
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 07:41:05 +
2007 ---
Could it be a problem with going from extended desktop to a single screen?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77620
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 07:43:56 +
2007 ---
kr: yes, it is intentional. It can't be long, because long is 8 bit on x86-64,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77609
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68562
User wg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72757
User wg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77632
User cloph changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77632
User cloph changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 07:47:30 +
2007 ---
Ahh, I think I understand: sal_Int32 being long on x86 is the bug. - I
would be
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74628
User wg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77637
Issue #|77637
Summary|hide/unhide of text sections is not reliable
Component|Word processor
Version|OOo 2.2
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74631
User wg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77637
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 07:50:09 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=45281)
An example that shows that hiding/unhiding of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75163
User wg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77486
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77638
User jlcheng changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77638
Issue #|77638
Summary|Outline view UI has problem after Promote/Demote the a
|ll selected outline text
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76201
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 07:53:58 +
2007 ---
Tested in master m212. Closed.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77318
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 07:54:45 +
2007 ---
fme-uwegalle: Thank you for your bug report. All of these loops seem to have
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77638
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 07:54:47 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=45282)
bugdoc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77638
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 07:55:46 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=45283)
screenshot of m212
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77637
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 07:56:36 +
2007 ---
Sorry, the last section that should be visible is called Berdeutschland GROUPS
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76239
User wg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76201
User wg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77632
User cloph changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77617
User jsc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77628
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76617
User wg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76950
User wg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77632
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 08:00:33 +
2007 ---
cloph: yes...
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76647
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
User kso changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77478
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77478
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48409
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 08:09:24 +
2007 ---
Great! Looking forward to the improvements.
We should define which of the known
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77478
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 08:14:25 +
2007 ---
Screenshot please.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68097
User cl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77480
User gercokees changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58982
User hbrinkm changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66590
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 08:19:48 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 77481 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77481
User gercokees changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77436
User npower changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77632
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 08:37:18 +
2007 ---
BTW: in some cases it builds without flaws...
* top level dmake...seems to be
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68097
User af changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 08:38:12 +
2007 ---
? There does not seem to be any getPixelSize() in vcl ?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77436
User npower changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77278
User oj changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77278
User oj changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77097
User oj changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77639
Issue #|77639
Summary|MS-Word document embedded into MS-Word document
Component|Word processor
Version|OOo 2.2
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77447
User kla changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75416
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 09:07:45 +
2007 ---
lijian-os:
The provided patch has the drawback that the navigation toolbox is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77640
Issue #|77640
Summary|Single Dialog Export in Dialog Editor
Component|scripting
Version|OOo 2.2
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75114
User tl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52759
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 09:12:28 +
2007 ---
We have tested document signing with OOo version 2.2 using a similar qualified
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77641
Issue #|77641
Summary|Changing language in Spellcheck doesn't work
Component|Word processor
Version|OOo 2.2
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77462
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52759
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 09:17:18 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=45285)
Test certificates for root-ca, sub-ca, valid
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77482
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52759
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 09:23:41 +
2007 ---
Password for PFX files is 123456
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77640
User ab changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77632
User rt changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77334
User os changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77009
User os changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77632
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73321
User os changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72805
User os changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55988
User os changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77631
User es changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77436
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 09:50:52 +
2007 ---
just to clarify this patch is of course a fix for this issue. The root cause was
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77641
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77609
User es changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77470
User hdu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77632
User sparcmoz changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
1 - 100 of 333 matches
Mail list logo