To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78218
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78218
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83759
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83759
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84499
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83759
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 18 15:13:15 +
2007 ---
-Rene: I am surprised, does that mean all the documentation on OOo is
unavailable
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84497
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 18 15:20:30 +
2007 ---
Michael, I think providing the command line in case of an error is quite helpful
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84497
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 13 16:36:25 +
2007 ---
I was also playing with not echoing compiler command lines, in the spirit I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84358
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 12 08:19:36 +
2007 ---
Seems that I created some confusion here, so again:
1) It may be _me_ only, who
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84358
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 11 15:03:41 +
2007 ---
Adapting the bootstraprc (.ini) to resolve the UserInstallation variable by
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84263
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 11 15:15:05 +
2007 ---
-Rene: As said, I very much like what the Linux kernel does, it first looked
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84347
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84263
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 7 14:58:02 +
2007 ---
Hi guys, seems that there are only vague opinions regarding verbosity.
So, let me
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80300
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 4 15:16:37 +
2007 ---
-Pavel, if I understand correctly, this means it still dies abnormally, right?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80300
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 3 10:41:43 +
2007 ---
-Pavel: Yes, exactly.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 3 13:44:29 +
2007 ---
For what it's worth, VCL _always_ gets initialized in the main thread. Later on
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83960
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83759
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 23 15:51:46 +
2007 ---
Hi Joerg!
just talked with Frank Peters about that, and learned that
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79961
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 22 16:34:03 +
2007 ---
I took a brief look at this.
If I understand correctly, this is a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79961
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 23 07:43:41 +
2007 ---
Hey Caolan, just wanted to see if I understood the issue.
And yes, I follow your
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83669
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83724
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83648
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 16 08:05:51 +
2007 ---
-Caolan: Yes, I like it. Your patch looks pretty.
Thanks
Kay
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83648
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 15 13:38:40 +
2007 ---
-Hennes, when you are going to apply this, please add some comments regarding
why
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83648
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 15 15:38:20 +
2007 ---
Rene,
thought the same the first moment, but unfortunately we would need to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83648
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 15 16:21:31 +
2007 ---
This introduces some marginal runtime overhead for mapping the values, but
allows
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80300
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 12 08:28:28 +
2007 ---
Hi Pavel,
workaround (though ugly) for this is, to use _exit in regcomp.bin. A
Subcomponent|code
Assigned to|kr
Reported by|kr
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 12 08:44:27 +
2007 ---
Output e.g. looks like the following:
HelpLinker @/tmp/mkWmaqIU
Making /tmp/kr/SRC680/helpcontent2/unxsols4.pro/bin/sbasic_en-US.zip
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79798
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 8 09:44:43 +
2007 ---
Ruediger, it is very unlikely that I find the time to work on this the next
weeks.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83192
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80735
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82692
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82588
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80735
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 18 14:49:58 +
2007 ---
-Caolan: Please give me two weeks. I am currently away and going on vacation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81297
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82210
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81321
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 27 11:14:08 +
2007 ---
I can not reproduce this on my Debian, neither with 4.1 nor 4.2. Taking a look
at
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80300
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 27 11:31:21 +
2007 ---
Posted recently a proposal regarding threads lifecycle
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77664
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78284
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80134
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77885
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78830
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79647
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78899
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77600
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77664
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 27 12:57:42 +
2007 ---
-Cloph: The attached patch addresses an issue regarding
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81482
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79655
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79655
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80300
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 29 10:54:57 +
2007 ---
I created a short program actually showing the race:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80300
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80300
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80300
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 29 11:17:10 +
2007 ---
I just added two patches for bridges and pyuno, delaying the pyuno GC for 5s and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80300
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 29 12:39:49 +
2007 ---
-SB: Good question. You probably have seen my little proof regarding the race
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80300
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 29 12:58:20 +
2007 ---
-SB: This issue is duplicate to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80300
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 28 14:33:10 +
2007 ---
I put some more thoughts on this: The point basically is, that any
multi-threaded
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80300
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 23 08:49:42 +
2007 ---
Thanks to Pavel I have a core dump and a stack-trace, and guess what, it dies
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80300
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77664
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77664
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77664
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 23 10:59:54 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=47748)
Workaround for G++ 3.3 not calling
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77664
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 23 11:01:08 +
2007 ---
Just add three attachments fixing the vtable construction problem at least on
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80300
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80735
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 22 09:27:21 +
2007 ---
-SB: Not sure if I understand you correctly. The Mac OS X mechanism does a nm
on
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80735
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80735
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 22 14:44:47 +
2007 ---
-Tono: Do you think it would be possible to re-use the Mac OS X stuff? Though
not
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80300
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 21 07:15:41 +
2007 ---
Pavel, I just logged into your box, is there a core dump or something flying
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80735
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80300
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 20 15:39:28 +
2007 ---
Pavel, is this still happening? jkim and cmc could build successfully ... and
your
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77664
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 16 15:34:17 +
2007 ---
Spend some time on this ... unfortunately the gcc-3.3s on our local Macs don't
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77664
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 15 13:56:45 +
2007 ---
Anything else I need to know to reproduce this? Just successfully build i18npool
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77664
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 13 14:24:05 +
2007 ---
Looking into this ...
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80134
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80300
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 13 14:29:59 +
2007 ---
Looking into this ...
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80017
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79798
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 27 14:45:57 +
2007 ---
-Ruediger: Thanks for your comments, going to do as you suggested :-)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79907
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 24 11:55:21 +
2007 ---
-Caolan: I suggest to remove mingw_intel.map and to use gcc3.map for the
mingw
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79907
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 24 11:56:23 +
2007 ---
-Caolan: I forgot to say, your changes look good to me :-)
Reported by|kr
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 19 15:01:38 +
2007 ---
While building OOo, deliver.pl comments on all of its actions, this may be
useful when delivering a particular module by hand, but IMHO just clutters the
console in case of building whole OOo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79798
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79798
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79798
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 19 15:11:48 +
2007 ---
Tried the patch on Linux and windows ...
Reported by|kr
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 18 15:01:23 +
2007 ---
While building OOo, dmake frequently reports the execution of shell macros, e.g.
dmake: Executing shell macro: $(MAKEDEPEND) @$(mktmp -f - -p$(SLO) $(MKDEPFLAGS)
$(CDEFS
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79760
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 18 15:04:27 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=46892)
Patches for various makefiles, adding a @ after
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77333
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79647
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 17 11:22:32 +
2007 ---
-Rene: Does this happen with the Sun JDK as well? Or is it gcj only?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79647
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 17 12:01:03 +
2007 ---
-Rene: Sorry, forget about the jdk ;-) Could you give me a log-in, otherwise I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79565
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79647
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 16 08:54:58 +
2007 ---
Rene, could you check if this as the same as
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78300
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
by|kr
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 16 10:30:54 +
2007 ---
As discussed on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tools.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?listName=devmsgNo=6249
-
Please do not reply
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79647
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 16 14:02:57 +
2007 ---
Rene,
could it be that this is the same issue as
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79646
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 16 15:21:11 +
2007 ---
Commenting as Eric put me on CC: ;-)
-Eric: I don't think so, seems to be related
Platform|All
URL|
OS/Version|Mac OS X
Status|NEW
Status whiteboard|
Keywords|
Resolution|
Issue type|DEFECT
Priority|P3
Subcomponent|code
Assigned to|kr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79552
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79384
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=71335
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78220
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
301 - 400 of 980 matches
Mail list logo