To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50062
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to:|mh
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 30 10:50:07 -0700
2005 ---
The new gcc-4.0-pre is more strict about forward declarations in the C++ code.
The problems are even marked as errors. The most typical mistake
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50063
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to:|cp
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 30 10:52:09 -0700
2005 ---
The new gcc-4.0-pre is more strict about forward declarations in the C++ code.
The problems are even marked as errors. The most typical mistake
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50064
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to:|cp
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 30 10:54:19 -0700
2005 ---
The new gcc-4.0-pre is more strict about forward declarations in the C++ code.
The problems are even marked as errors. The most typical mistake
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50066
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50067
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to:|cp
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 30 10:56:24 -0700
2005 ---
The new gcc-4.0-pre is more strict about forward declarations in the C++ code.
The problems are even marked as errors. The most typical mistake
Assigned to:|spreadsheet
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 30 10:58:17 -0700
2005 ---
The new gcc-4.0-pre is more strict about forward declarations in the C++ code.
The problems are even marked as errors. The most typical
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50068
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to:|wg
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 30 10:59:45 -0700
2005 ---
The new gcc-4.0-pre is more strict about forward declarations in the C++ code.
The problems are even marked as errors. The most typical mistake
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50069
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to:|tm
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 30 11:01:30 -0700
2005 ---
The new gcc-4.0-pre is more strict about forward declarations in the C++ code.
The problems are even marked as errors. The most typical mistake
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50070
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to:|mh
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 30 11:05:43 -0700
2005 ---
The new gcc-4.0-pre is more strict about forward declarations in the C++ code.
The problems are even marked as errors. The most typical mistake
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50071
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to:|tl
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 30 11:07:09 -0700
2005 ---
The new gcc-4.0-pre is more strict about forward declarations in the C++ code.
The problems are even marked as errors. The most typical
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50072
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to:|kr
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 30 11:08:56 -0700
2005 ---
The new gcc-4.0-pre is more strict about forward declarations in the C++ code.
The problems are even marked as errors. The most typical mistake
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50073
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to:|mh
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 30 11:11:22 -0700
2005 ---
The new gcc-4.0-pre is more strict about forward declarations in the C++ code.
The problems are even marked as errors. The most typical mistake
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50074
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to:|mru
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 30 11:14:10 -0700
2005 ---
The new gcc-4.0-pre is more strict about forward declarations in the C++ code.
The problems are even marked as errors. The most typical mistake
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50075
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to:|mru
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 30 11:15:35 -0700
2005 ---
The new gcc-4.0-pre is more strict about forward declarations in the C++ code.
The problems are even marked as errors. The most typical mistake
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50076
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to:|mh
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 30 11:18:03 -0700
2005 ---
The new gcc-4.0-pre is more strict about forward declarations in the C++ code.
The problems are even marked as errors. The most typical mistake
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50077
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to:|mhu
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 30 11:19:36 -0700
2005 ---
The new gcc-4.0-pre is more strict about forward declarations in the C++ code.
The problems are even marked as errors. The most typical mistake
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50078
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to:|cp
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 30 11:21:30 -0700
2005 ---
The new gcc-4.0-pre is more strict about forward declarations in the C++ code.
The problems are even marked as errors. The most typical mistake
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50079
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to:|jsi
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 30 11:24:06 -0700
2005 ---
The new gcc-4.0-pre is more strict about forward declarations in the C++ code.
The problems are even marked as errors. The most typical mistake
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50080
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to:|jsi
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 30 11:25:52 -0700
2005 ---
The new gcc-4.0-pre is more strict about forward declarations in the C++ code.
The problems are even marked as errors. The most typical mistake
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50081
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to:|tm
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 23 04:28:12 -0700
2005 ---
The mozilla NSPR (Netscape Portable Runtime) part exists as a standalone project
now and can be distributed apart from mozilla, see
http
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49720
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
:|code
Assigned to:|tm
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 20 07:44:35 -0700
2005 ---
It is partly related to the issue #45894 but the actual state is quite different
from the state described in the issue.
I have
Priority:|P3
Subcomponent:|code
Assigned to:|tm
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 20 07:57:40 -0700
2005 ---
Mozilla crashes if I open an OOo document using the mozilla plugin and then
select another page
Assigned to:|tm
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 20 08:05:23 -0700
2005 ---
If I open in mozilla an OOo document using the mozilla plugin, I am not able to
enter another URL in the browser. It seems that the plugin eats
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29757
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 19 01:32:17 -0700
2005 ---
I got some more tips from our layer. He suggests the following additional
Assigned to:|wg
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 17 04:54:55 -0700
2005 ---
The new gcc-4.0-pre has a better detection of problems with uninitialized
variables and prints the new warning: FOO is used uninitialized. We
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49381
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
:|code
Assigned to:|hro
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 17 05:29:09 -0700
2005 ---
The new gcc-4.0-pre has a better detection of problems with uninitialized
variables and prints the new warning: FOO is used
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49384
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
:|code
Assigned to:|mru
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 17 05:41:08 -0700
2005 ---
The new gcc-4.0-pre has a better detection of problems with uninitialized
variables and prints the new warning: FOO is used
Assigned to:|kla
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 17 05:55:46 -0700
2005 ---
The new gcc-4.0-pre has a better detection of problems with uninitialized
variables and prints the new warning: FOO is used uninitialized. We
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49387
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 16 04:24:20 -0700
2005 ---
OK, I have re-merged the four patches and created another 3 patches that are not
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49174
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49174
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49174
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
:|code
Assigned to:|spreadsheet
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 16 11:03:18 -0700
2005 ---
The new gcc-4.0-pre has a better detection of problems with uninitialized
variables and prints the new warning: FOO is used
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47239
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 12 02:10:59 -0700
2005 ---
The latest patch does not help because PKGFORMAT is set only if EPM is enabled.
Assigned to:|wg
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 12 10:01:07 -0700
2005 ---
Michael Meeks and me created a commandline tool, which allows to generare and
update OOo galleries from given bitmaps.
The tool consists
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49174
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49174
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49174
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49174
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to:|mh
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 6 07:20:22 -0700
2005 ---
The following warnings are printed when compiling the module np_sdk on Linux:
npunix.c: In function Private_GetValue:
npunix.c:289: warning
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48819
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
:|code
Assigned to:|mh
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 10:00:26 -0700
2005 ---
There is possible to set some extra CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS flags via the variable
ARCH_FLAGS, see the issue #29537.
I found
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48387
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48387
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to:|sw
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 11:03:36 -0700
2005 ---
The warning: control reaches end of non-void function, could point out a real
bug. So, we want to fix all packages to be built without
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48392
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
:|openoffice.org CVS
Assigned to:|ssh2key
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 27 03:53:10 -0700
2005 ---
I maintain the OOo packages for SUSE/Novell and create fixes/patches from time
to time. I was asked repeatedly if I could
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48259
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47954
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 27 03:58:55 -0700
2005 ---
I have read the documentation about CWS and asked for access to CVS, issue
Assigned to:|mh
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 22 06:59:56 -0700
2005 ---
There is possible to set some extra CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS flags via the variable
ARCH_FLAGS when building with gcc-3.x, see the issue #29537
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47954
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to:|cp
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 22 07:09:26 -0700
2005 ---
Our gcc experts said that the warning: missing sentinel in function call, that
is printed by gcc-4.x, could cause real problems in some
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47957
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
:|code
Assigned to:|mh
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 22 07:14:21 -0700
2005 ---
Our gcc experts said that the warning: missing sentinel in function call, that
is printed by gcc-4.x, could cause real problems in some
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47958
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
:|code
Assigned to:|mh
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 22 07:17:38 -0700
2005 ---
Our gcc experts said that the warning: missing sentinel in function call, that
is printed by gcc-4.x, could cause real problems in some
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47959
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
:|code
Assigned to:|wg
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 22 07:23:22 -0700
2005 ---
The warning: control reaches end of non-void function, could point out a real
bug. So, we want to fix all packages to be built without
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47960
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to:|ft
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 22 07:30:19 -0700
2005 ---
The warning: control reaches end of non-void function, could point out a real
bug. So, we want to fix all packages to be built without
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47962
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
:|code
Assigned to:|mh
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 22 07:35:02 -0700
2005 ---
The warning: control reaches end of non-void function, could point out a real
bug. So, we want to fix all packages to be built without
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47963
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47964
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
:|code
Assigned to:|mh
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 22 07:42:10 -0700
2005 ---
The warning: control reaches end of non-void function, could point out a real
bug. So, we want to fix all packages to be built without
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47965
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46384
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46226
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 4 02:45:21 -0700
2005 ---
I din't like the my two suggested fixes as well. I knew they were hacks.
I agree
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46499
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46226
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 4 05:19:02 -0700
2005 ---
I am not sure but I think that %ghost files and directories do not conflict.
But
Subcomponent:|code
Assigned to:|cp
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 1 07:04:13 -0800
2005 ---
GTK uses another backgroud color for the tips and the extended tips.
I'll attach a patch that detects
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46499
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to:|mh
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 31 02:47:22 -0800
2005 ---
sysui/desktop/util/makefile.mk includes the following line:
LINKFLAGS+=-z now
But -z now is a linker flag, so it should be marked by -Wl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46384
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to:|cp
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 06:36:53 -0800
2005 ---
I had problems to cutpaste more than 12 pages with OOo-1.1.3. It is strange but
it helped to increase the default graphics chache size in Tools/Options
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46215
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to:|mh
Reported by:|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 08:54:58 -0800
2005 ---
I was not able to build 680m86 on the upcomming SUSE Linux 9.3, which
includes a new rpm check for symlinks. The new check:
- makes relative
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46226
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
801 - 900 of 921 matches
Mail list logo
