To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85136
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 8 08:58:55 +
2008 ---
Yes, looks good to me now. I can even build perl using a dmake.exe in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85136
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 7 09:29:01 +
2008 ---
I checked out cws_src680_dmake412, confirmed that the source contains your
patch,
|P3
Subcomponent|dmake
Assigned to|vq
Reported by|shay
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 10 11:25:46 +
2008 ---
dmake.exe can't find its configuration files when it is run from within a
directory that contains a $ character
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81252
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 20 10:24:54 +
2007 ---
I just noticed that the ChangeLog and NEWS files make no mention of this fix.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81252
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 19 17:03:11 +
2007 ---
Where do I check out the source from to test this? I'm guessing it is the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81252
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 10 08:49:30 +
2007 ---
I added your patch into the latest source and gave it a whirl. It does indeed
fix
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81252
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 6 13:10:29 +
2007 ---
Thanks for the quick reply.
I've mulled it over a bit, and can't really think of
Subcomponent|dmake
Assigned to|vq
Reported by|shay
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 4 10:26:34 +
2007 ---
dmake (on Windows XP, at least) seems unable to run a command such as:
command arg
(including the double-quotes
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66567
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 21 01:42:48 -0700
2006 ---
Thanks for making the -v[w] change. That's much appreciated.
I'm happy with
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66509
User shay changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64889
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 19 04:23:59 -0700
2006 ---
Tested, and I confirm that my problem is resolved by this change.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65281
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 19 04:25:41 -0700
2006 ---
Re-tested the makefile(s) that I had found were broken by SHELL not getting set,
Priority:|P3
Subcomponent:|dmake
Assigned to:|vq
Reported by:|shay
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 16 03:40:52 -0700
2006 ---
Volker,
As discussed by e-mail, dmake is no longer able to build itself using its own
:|dmake
Assigned to:|vq
Reported by:|shay
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 28 05:56:32 -0700
2006 ---
Hi Volker,
I've just had a bug report from a perl user complaining that he can't build a
certain perl module using my build
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64889
User shay changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64889
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 28 07:28:10 -0700
2006 ---
I told the person who reported the bug about just editing startup.mk as a quick
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61170
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 6 01:44:21 -0800
2006 ---
Yep, works for me. I tried using dmake to (re)build itself (which is what was
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47919
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 2 08:01:39 -0800
2006 ---
@vq: Thanks for the fix! I applied the patch manually and it builds fine for me
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47919
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 2 09:56:39 -0800
2006 ---
OK, I got it from anoncvs now, so it must have just been lagging behind a bit.
It
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47137
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 6 01:24:52 -0700
2005 ---
Who? Me?
Works fine for me. I retested the original problem description --
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43310
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 5 02:15:45 -0700
2005 ---
There were three problems outstanding:
- the one dated Thu Apr 21 03:32:30 -0700
Priority:|P3
Subcomponent:|dmake
Assigned to:|vq
Reported by:|shay
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 5 09:08:18 -0700
2005 ---
This is a re-log of a problem first described in issue #43310.
The problem
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43310
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 5 09:08:52 -0700
2005 ---
OK, the .PHONY problem is now fixed for me too.
I've opened a new issue for the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43310
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 01:18:06 -0700
2005 ---
I believe that I've now discovered yet another problem with :: targets, this
time
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43310
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 21 01:50:21 -0700
2005 ---
Is the new ChangeLog file not updated automatically when changes are committed?
Subcomponent:|dmake
Assigned to:|hjs
Reported by:|shay
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 21 02:08:31 -0700
2005 ---
When building the cws_src680_dmake43p01 version using MSVC++ 6.0 I get these
compilation warnings:
infer.c
infer.c(419
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47866
User shay changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47866
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 21 02:12:22 -0700
2005 ---
shay-vq: Sorry, I meant to assign this issue to you, as you previously asked me
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43310
User shay changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43310
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 21 03:44:00 -0700
2005 ---
One more thing: there seems to be a problem with .PRECIOUS too. In following
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43310
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 20 01:11:59 -0700
2005 ---
Yes, the patch works fine for me.
I tried out the example makefile in the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47135
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 20 01:17:35 -0700
2005 ---
Sorry for the delay in replying to this issue. I've been trying to reproduce
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47137
User shay changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47137
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 12 01:06:03 -0700
2005 ---
Thanks for the fix to improve the error message. I meant to say that the
previous
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47135
User shay changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47135
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 12 01:23:06 -0700
2005 ---
The previous patch uses _MAX_PATH for _POSIX_PATH_MAX too, and applies the
changes
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47004
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 11 01:33:25 -0700
2005 ---
Excellent. I think the ChangeLog will prove very useful. Thank you.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43254
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 11 01:36:21 -0700
2005 ---
I see that the verify request was directed at hjs, but I just thought I'd
confirm
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43252
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 11 01:37:15 -0700
2005 ---
I see that the verify request was directed at hjs, but I just thought I'd
confirm
Priority:|P3
Subcomponent:|dmake
Assigned to:|hjs
Reported by:|shay
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 11 01:56:56 -0700
2005 ---
The current dmake in cws_src680_dmake43p01 doesn't quite build perl
out-of-the-box on Win32
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47137
User shay changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
:|dmake
Assigned to:|hjs
Reported by:|shay
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 8 01:20:47 -0700
2005 ---
[Not sure if I filled in the version field correctly. This report relates to
the cws_src680_dmake43p01 branch of dmake.]
While
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47004
User shay changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43241
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 8 01:26:13 -0700
2005 ---
Yes, this builds (and rebuilds, using itself) fine out-of-the-box for me.
There
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43241
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 8 01:30:50 -0700
2005 ---
Oh - I meant to say: When does an entry for a committed change get added to the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43241
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 8 06:23:47 -0700
2005 ---
I'm not sure what documentation needs changing. The existing instructions in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43241
User shay changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43241
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 8 07:33:31 -0700
2005 ---
OK, how about the patch above, then?
This documents the self-building feature for
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43241
User shay changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47004
User shay changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43254
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 08:05:45 -0800
2005 ---
I e-mailed the JCA to [EMAIL PROTECTED] becuase he previously said, If need
be,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43254
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 24 02:24:56 -0800
2005 ---
I have just e-mailed a scanned copy of the JCA that I had previously faxed in to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43310
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 16 00:47:58 -0800
2005 ---
Looking back at this, I've just realised (in case you haven't) that when I
wrote:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43252
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 07:31:44 -0800
2005 ---
[Reply to an email, to keep the discussion recorded here.]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43252
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 09:41:05 -0800
2005 ---
I don't see any patch yet. Did you omit it, or am I being impatient?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43252
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 09:54:03 -0800
2005 ---
Are you sure that's the right patch? :-s
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43252
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 10:18:28 -0800
2005 ---
Works fine for me. Compiled with no errors using MSVC++ 6.0. Testing with a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43254
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 7 01:37:29 -0800
2005 ---
I just faxed a JCA. Is that enough or do I need to post a hard copy too?
(The
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43241
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 7 01:54:36 -0800
2005 ---
I agree that your smaller patch, removing just the 4NT syntax, works fine, but
it
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43252
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 7 02:09:14 -0800
2005 ---
I disagree that the other changes are not motivated here. The other changes
may
Subcomponent:|dmake
Assigned to:|hjs
Reported by:|shay
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 22 02:48:16 -0800
2005 ---
The following makefile.mk gives the error Don't know how to make `foo.b' when
invoked as dmake foo.b:
.a.b :
@copy
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43077
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 21 01:44:23 -0800
2005 ---
OK, I'm quite happy that this is not seen as an issue with the current dmake,
but
:|dmake
Assigned to:|hjs
Reported by:|shay
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 21 03:36:20 -0800
2005 ---
I've found that the current CVS code doesn't build properly out-of-the-box
using MS VC++ 6 on Win XP.
I'm running the command make win95
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43241
User shay changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Priority:|P3
Subcomponent:|dmake
Assigned to:|hjs
Reported by:|shay
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 21 04:45:38 -0800
2005 ---
I've built dmake.exe, copied it and its startup/ directory to C:\dmake, and put
C:\dmake
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43252
User shay changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Subcomponent:|dmake
Assigned to:|hjs
Reported by:|shay
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 21 05:12:57 -0800
2005 ---
On my Windows XP machine, I find that the OS itself sets an environment variable
called OS to the value Windows_NT
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43254
User shay changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
:|dmake
Assigned to:|hjs
Reported by:|shay
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 18 05:44:39 -0800
2005 ---
I have an existing makefile.mk for a project that I'm involved in which has long
been working with dmake 4.1. I've just tried
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43077
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 18 09:23:01 -0800
2005 ---
It is just the native Win32 dmake.exe that I was referring to. I haven't tried
a
70 matches
Mail list logo