[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 User hr changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 26 11:57:41 + 2007 --- KR-HR: Could you please enable this for our builds as well? Thanks.

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 User pjanik changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 User rene changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 9 07:26:05 -0800 2007 --- disregard the last line, some cut'n'waste fuckup

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 22 01:07:27 -0800 2006 --- Rene, I am going to take a look at ... ;-)

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 22 07:16:09 -0800 2006 --- Rene, it actually seems, that the proc filesystem under Solaris is not LFS

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 User kr changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 User kr changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 User hro changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 User rene changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 User kr changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 User rene changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 19 05:00:19 -0800 2006 --- kr: I committed it longer ago. Is there a status now?

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 19 09:12:48 -0800 2006 --- KR-Rene: Actually I did build the CWS last week on Linux and Solaris,

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 30 07:08:27 -0800 2006 --- kr: any status on this? I gave you the answer two weeks ago

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 30 07:48:12 -0800 2006 --- Rene, I somehow expected that you would provide a fix and would apply it to the

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 30 08:00:08 -0800 2006 --- Then you should have said that. You asked a question and I answered on which basis

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 30 08:12:04 -0800 2006 --- Rene, since you provided the first patch, why should it be different for the

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 30 08:15:25 -0800 2006 --- kr: It was just a misunderstanding. I thought you just wanted to ask me a

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 30 08:32:28 -0800 2006 --- fixed (I hope I didn't miss a file)

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 13 01:35:51 -0800 2006 --- -Rene, are you listening?!

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 13 22:35:52 -0800 2006 --- kr: as long as it fixes this bug (i.e. LFS support for all of OOo and whatever

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 31 06:41:15 -0800 2006 --- Rene, just spend some more thoughts on this ... took me a while to understand

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 30 03:14:48 -0700 2006 --- kr: asked aj, he also recommends usage of the autoconf macro

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 30 03:48:51 -0700 2006 --- Rene, that is fine for me, just wanted to avoid kind of platform #ifdef ...

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 User rene changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 30 09:38:22 -0700 2006 --- rene: can do. But are there really no negative effects with this defines on Linux

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 29 02:08:26 -0700 2006 --- Hi Rene, some comments: - I would avoid defining LARGEFILE_SOURCE, as it seems to

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 29 02:59:03 -0700 2006 --- - Should one use getconf for getting the linker and compiler flags (e.g. as

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 29 03:14:02 -0700 2006 --- For portability with other platforms you should use getconf LFS_CFLAGS which will

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 29 03:43:34 -0700 2006 --- kr: and (on Linux): getconf LFS_CFLAGS -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 29 04:03:33 -0700 2006 --- on my old SuSE 9.0 Linux system: $ getconf LFS_CFLAGS -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 on

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 29 04:37:00 -0700 2006 --- Unfortunately I am not an autoconf expert at all ... so I am wondering if

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 29 07:00:58 -0700 2006 --- kr: oh, I don't mind replacing the autoconf check with getconf for LFS_CFLAGS and

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 User rene changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 26865] Large file support

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26865 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 21 13:13:18 -0700 2006 --- Is this still an outstanding issue ?