[porting-issues] [Issue 58332] 64bit: pyuno

2005-12-10 Thread pjanik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58332 User pjanik changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 58332] 64bit: pyuno

2005-12-05 Thread kendy
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58332 User kendy changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 58332] 64bit: pyuno

2005-12-01 Thread kendy
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58332 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 1 08:54:24 -0800 2005 --- I'll try with -int operator () ( const PyRef r) const { return (int)

[porting-issues] [Issue 58332] 64bit: pyuno

2005-12-01 Thread kendy
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58332 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 1 09:13:53 -0800 2005 --- OK on 64bit - I'll add the task as planned for 'pj34'.

[porting-issues] [Issue 58332] 64bit: pyuno

2005-12-01 Thread kendy
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58332 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 1 09:14:29 -0800 2005 --- Argh, 'pj43', sorry :-(

[porting-issues] [Issue 58332] 64bit: pyuno

2005-11-30 Thread jbu
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58332 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 30 13:21:04 -0800 2005 --- Hi, so the correct fix is to -int operator () ( const PyRef r) const {

[porting-issues] [Issue 58332] 64bit: pyuno

2005-11-27 Thread mkretzschmar
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58332 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 27 05:21:12 -0800 2005 --- Unfortunately on Win64 it is (at least that's what I've just read) sizeof (int) =

[porting-issues] [Issue 58332] 64bit: pyuno

2005-11-26 Thread pjanik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58332 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 26 07:20:03 -0800 2005 --- jbu: pointer (PyObject*) in this case is: 32bit on 32bit archs 64bit on 64bit

[porting-issues] [Issue 58332] 64bit: pyuno

2005-11-25 Thread jbu
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58332 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 25 15:27:51 -0800 2005 --- Hi, sorry, but I am not yet used to typical problems in the 64bit world. Why does

[porting-issues] [Issue 58332] 64bit: pyuno

2005-11-24 Thread pjanik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58332 User pjanik changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 58332] 64bit: pyuno

2005-11-24 Thread mkretzschmar
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58332 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 23 05:05:44 -0800 2005 --- [my account name is mkretzschmar, not martink] pjanik: I see you didn't want to