To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98028
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98028
--- Additional comments from c...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 30 08:47:07 +
2009 ---
we are unable to obtain the small structs through registers (I mean, to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98028
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98028
--- Additional comments from c...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 30 10:22:30 +
2009 ---
cmc-sb: UNO structs map to C++ structs/classes, but also other UNO types like
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98028
User kendy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98028
--- Additional comments from ke...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 29 21:39:44 +
2009 ---
cmc: I would believe that by not having the cpp2uno.cxx part you killed, we
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98028
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98028
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98028
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98028
--- Additional comments from c...@openoffice.org Thu Jan 29 08:43:58 +
2009 ---
Yeah, I don't think its critical. If these constructs were common we'd be seeing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98028
--- Additional comments from ke...@openoffice.org Thu Jan 29 01:48:28 +
2009 ---
cmc: Still having this in my queue, but did not look yet, sorry :-( Will do
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98028
--- Additional comments from c...@openoffice.org Fri Jan 16 15:42:02 +
2009 ---
cmc-kendy: Any opinions on this ?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98028
Issue #|98028
Summary|x86_64 doesn't pass SmallStructs and AllFloats testcpp
|u tests
Component|porting
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98028
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98028
--- Additional comments from c...@openoffice.org Tue Jan 13 16:30:05 +
2009 ---
We need to fill in rdx on return of such a struct anyway
Also when *passing in*
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98028
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
16 matches
Mail list logo
