To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
User lla changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 10 10:08:09 +
2008 ---
Okay, but I really would like to separate this out, as is the move to a more
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 10 10:54:55 +
2008 ---
Does there already exist an issue requesting this configure switch?
Yes, this
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 10 10:19:01 +
2008 ---
Ok, the cppunit-1.8.0 if from far before
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 10 10:22:32 +
2008 ---
-rene: There exist i91343 to do such update. It is planned to use a less
patched
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 10 14:00:21 +
2008 ---
fs: I've no idea how you QAed it, but a build fails miserably:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 10 14:03:54 +
2008 ---
fs-rene: I checked the build works - unfortunately it seems I used a CWS copy
with
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 10 14:08:52 +
2008 ---
-rene: Sorry, my fault, please take update your solenv/inc/tg_ext.mk and try
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 10 14:17:09 +
2008 ---
lla: ... just that cvs up -dP -r cws_ooo300_qadev34t in solenv removes all of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 10 14:34:24 +
2008 ---
ok, I used anoncvs and it was behind the tag/commit...
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 10 14:43:26 +
2008 ---
... but now it fails inside the cppunit build...
Making:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 10 15:26:33 +
2008 ---
FWIW, the quickest way to solve the legal issue is to add the README and COPYING
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 10 17:46:09 +
2008 ---
-rene: the next try.
My next fault. The problem was our build environment. It
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 10 17:46:43 +
2008 ---
after the lastest fix:
Making: ../../../../../../unxlngppc.pro/slo/TestResult.obj
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 10 21:10:28 +
2008 ---
-rene: next try
I removed the complete header directories cppunit, testshl2,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 11 00:28:26 +
2008 ---
lla: yes, that finally builds up to testshl2!
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
User sg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 8 14:34:42 +
2008 ---
fs: ah, and that's why you burn stuff on 3.1 which is far away instead? no,
sorry.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 8 14:46:40 +
2008 ---
fs-rene: Let's please stick to facts:
and that you didn't even check whether
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 8 14:59:45 +
2008 ---
update:
Module cppunit is part of the external project. As a consequence, it
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 8 15:05:32 +
2008 ---
fs: good joke.
a) most of the external libs are not in the tarball for external
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 8 15:24:42 +
2008 ---
fs:
16:22 @mmeeks _rene_: saw that come across the mail box ;-)
16:22 @mmeeks
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 8 15:25:47 +
2008 ---
s/DEV300/OOO300s and DEV300s/
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 8 15:27:08 +
2008 ---
b) I don't find the issue anymore but the legal problems were raised by
mmeeks
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 8 15:29:36 +
2008 ---
fs: convinced?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 8 16:24:46 +
2008 ---
Okay, just to see if we have a common ground.
We need to
- fix the cppunit module
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 8 16:26:33 +
2008 ---
Last I looked the legal problem consisted of taking a load of LGPL code, and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 8 16:37:38 +
2008 ---
fs: yes
and I'd add:
- add --with-system-cppunit if possible (but that can be
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 10 07:43:35 +
2008 ---
@cloph:
Read this:
http://external.openoffice.org/source/browse/external/
how to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 10 07:49:26 +
2008 ---
@lla: please read
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/CWS#Create_a_new_module
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
User rt changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
User sg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
User sg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
User cloph changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
User lla changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 9 18:13:44 +
2008 ---
building of the cws fails with:
Fetching dependencies for module cppunit from
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
User lla changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
User mh changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
User lla changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
User kendy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
User mh changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
Issue #|86509
Summary|testshl2: Need to move to external
Component|tools
Version|DEV300m0
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
User lla changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
53 matches
Mail list logo