To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
User tml changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
User thorstenziehm changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from ke...@openoffice.org Wed Dec 2 09:50:35 +
2009 ---
kso: I like your approach :-) In addition to the abovementioned, far too many
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from k...@openoffice.org Wed Dec 2 09:59:27 +
2009 ---
kso: I like your approach :-)
Thanks. :-)
[Just a note about the indefinite
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from k...@openoffice.org Tue Dec 1 10:48:37 +
2009 ---
tml wrote:
It means that the more time I spend staring in my editor or the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from k...@openoffice.org Tue Dec 1 10:54:47 +
2009 ---
we would prefer an implicit locking approach. Every UCB content implementation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from t...@openoffice.org Tue Dec 1 12:38:19 +
2009 ---
Resyncing will be like hell,I'm afraid.
Indeed. I spent an evening trying but
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Wed Oct 21 08:35:54 +
2009 ---
There is no special webdav UCP, we have the same UCP for webdav and http. As the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from k...@openoffice.org Wed Oct 21 09:15:18 +
2009 ---
tml: Could you please attach the current reincarnation of kendy's patch to
this
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from t...@openoffice.org Wed Oct 21 09:31:47 +
2009 ---
There is no special webdav UCP, we have the same UCP for webdav and http.
Yes,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
User tml changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from k...@openoffice.org Wed Oct 21 10:52:53 +
2009 ---
UCB clients, when executing the command open, can supply information whether
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from t...@openoffice.org Tue Oct 20 14:55:14 +
2009 ---
BTW, we have noticed that in ooo-build, where we use a current reincarnation of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from k...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 8 13:13:16 +
2009 ---
*** Issue 105464 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
User mh changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from t...@openoffice.org Tue Oct 6 08:41:48 +
2009 ---
A disaster.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from t...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 30 09:03:40 +
2009 ---
As these patches you mention have not been included the upstream OpenOffice.org,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
User topquark_net changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from topquark_...@openoffice.org Tue Sep 29
22:08:20 + 2009 ---
I'm using OpenOffice from Ubuntu Jaunty, which incorporates these
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
User rail changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
User mh changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
User tml changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Thu Jan 29 09:25:17 +
2009 ---
Ah, great! Please let me know if something gets stuck.
wrt. issue 91151: we are
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from ke...@openoffice.org Thu Jan 29 01:37:56 +
2009 ---
mba: No deadlock ;-) I resynced the CWS to m37, but unfortunately failed to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Tue Jan 27 13:20:59 +
2009 ---
Do we have a deadlock here?
Is somebody waiting for somebody else?
And what
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
User kendy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 29 09:09:48 +
2008 ---
mav: For non-dav resources, it implicitly returned IsDocument == true; the
patch
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 29 12:08:51 +
2008 ---
mav-kendy: Yes, the patch solves the problem.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 28 10:42:48 +
2008 ---
mav-kendy: I have integrated the changes from mav37 into this cws and it looks
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 28 10:46:17 +
2008 ---
just a small correction to my last comment: I have integrated the changes
locally,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 27 15:07:37 +
2008 ---
mav-kandy: The reported by you problem ( open a document, save it, save it
second
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 27 15:34:09 +
2008 ---
mav: Thank you! I'll resync retry when it's integrated - hopefully all will
be
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
User kendy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 19 08:50:17 +
2008 ---
I am building the cws currently and will investigate the problem as soon as
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 15 16:01:14 +
2008 ---
mav: So I got to this again; I've resynced to m29, and again I'm getting
Error
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 6 08:00:11 +
2008 ---
mav: Great, thank you a lot! Let me resync the CWS to the most current
milestone
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
User mav changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 1 07:56:57 +
2008 ---
any news?
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 1 08:11:28 +
2008 ---
After the task has got the new target, I have postponed the investigations. But
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
User tkr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 3 13:56:21 +
2008 ---
mav: Tracked again the 1st case, and it is the same even with the changes -
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 3 14:03:53 +
2008 ---
mav-kendy: I am in progress with building the cws locally.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 2 14:54:23 +
2008 ---
mav: Unfortunately, did not help :-( I'm now trying to catch all the places
that
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 2 15:04:03 +
2008 ---
mav-kendy: Does the patch solve the problem the stack points to?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 2 15:50:33 +
2008 ---
mav: It did not help, so still clueless :-( If you can get this CWS
environment
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 1 14:44:55 +
2008 ---
There were actually two problems. The first one, the main reason is that the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
User mav changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 1 15:06:28 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=54863)
mav-kendy: A schematic patch. Sorry, did not
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 30 12:02:04 +
2008 ---
mav: I've been testing the stuff a bit more now (due to resync to m21), and
found
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 30 13:19:01 +
2008 ---
mav: A thing that seems to be related: The SfxMedium tries to create backup on
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
User kendy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
User kendy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 27 17:39:08 +
2008 ---
up-stream version has too old gnome-vfs, and so the gnome-vfs part cannot be
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 10 09:16:06 +
2008 ---
I see the problem. The InteractionHandler is still not transported to UCB
always.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
User kendy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
User kendy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
User kendy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
User kendy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
User kendy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 4 16:21:42 +
2008 ---
sb: I kind of do ;-) - so I've let it there.
kso: As we discussed by mail, let's
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 4 16:39:22 +
2008 ---
mav: OK, the error dialog box looks unrelated, I get it even without the
CWS ;-)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 4 16:55:05 +
2008 ---
The error message is a result of an installed extension that was not properly
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 4 07:35:41 +
2008 ---
kendy, mav: Thanks guys for sorting the Interaction Handler stuff out.
kendy:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 4 14:17:16 +
2008 ---
sb: The introduction of INET_PROT_GENERIC_HIERARCHICAL is from 79843, so it's
not
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 4 14:50:21 +
2008 ---
kso: getProcessServiceFactory() calls are gone, and it still seems to work ;-)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 4 15:07:10 +
2008 ---
kendy: I checked for the potential multithreading issue I mentioned earlier.
Looks
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 4 15:36:55 +
2008 ---
@kendy:
Re INET_PROT_GENERIC_HIERARCHICAL: The code did look like deja vu, but I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 3 07:54:49 +
2008 ---
kendy: No, I'm talking about the IH implementation mav mentioned before. The
one,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 3 08:51:24 +
2008 ---
kso: There are three interaction handlers that are used during the loading
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 3 10:13:04 +
2008 ---
While thinking a little bit more about this I have recognized that it is indeed
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 3 11:15:05 +
2008 ---
I have just commited the changes to the cws. I have compiled them but did not
test
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 3 15:37:31 +
2008 ---
mav: Thank you a lot! Works great now without the 'the hack to create your
own
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 2 07:18:03 +
2008 ---
kendy:
#i84137# Remove gnome-vfs from startup procedure
Sorry, this was a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 2 09:19:27 +
2008 ---
I suggest to change it in this CWS. I'm afraid, it would stay that bad
forever,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 2 09:55:37 +
2008 ---
kendy: what's the problem with the InteractionHandler here? Why do you think
that
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 2 10:17:10 +
2008 ---
kendy:
Without knowing any details, I think that a 'IsLocked' property is
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
User tbe changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 2 11:09:20 +
2008 ---
The new locking mechanics in calcshare2 cws is just a workaround for
heterogeneous
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 2 11:11:53 +
2008 ---
Sorry in the block
The current usage of IsReadOnly property is no hack from my
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 2 12:06:53 +
2008 ---
mba: The code in question is this:
int DAVAuthListener_Impl::authenticate(
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 2 12:18:28 +
2008 ---
mav: For me, it would be perfectly OK to create a follow-up CWS for WebDAV
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 2 12:42:08 +
2008 ---
kendy: I hope that we have the common understanding that creating an IH inside
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 2 12:44:08 +
2008 ---
As MBA has already mentioned, only the InteractionHandler from MediaDescriptor
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 2 13:27:09 +
2008 ---
kso: Well, I guess it really is wrong, but I really don't know how to solve
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 2 13:37:10 +
2008 ---
kendy: using a customized IH, like mav suggested, sounds really very good to me.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 2 13:42:01 +
2008 ---
mav: Thank you for your answer, this is what I needed.
The only solution, that I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 2 13:43:13 +
2008 ---
Please - would that be OK for you? (Until calcshare2 is not in, show it as
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
User dsherwin changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 2 14:05:09 +
2008 ---
mav: The special IH we're using while loading documents, isn't this exactly
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 2 14:36:23 +
2008 ---
kendy: I can implement the wrapper and use it in sfx2 and comphelper tomorrow.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 2 15:05:38 +
2008 ---
mav: Thank you a lot! Added the 'comphelper' module to the CWS. Also I now
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 2 15:19:18 +
2008 ---
kendy: I assume that Kai's reservation against using uui is that this will
create
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 2 15:33:52 +
2008 ---
mba: OTOH - UNO handles it correctly, and in VCL-free environments, the query
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 2 16:06:35 +
2008 ---
kendy, mav: I still cannot understand why we cannot use the already existing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 2 16:49:05 +
2008 ---
kso: You mean the CommandEnvironment_Impl in webdavcontent.cxx? I did not use
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 31 15:52:20 +
2008 ---
kso: I knew this was not going to be easy ;-) So:
#i84137# Remove gnome-vfs
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
User kso changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 27 11:15:24 +
2008 ---
kendy: Sounds good. Go ahead and let me know if you need any help.
If we don't
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
User kendy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
