To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
User mh changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
User kso changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
User kso changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 4 13:47:50 +
2008 ---
Florian?!
Please either close this issue or change the target. It would help
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 11 14:03:47 +
2008 ---
Correct me if I'm wrong but I think this issue now is obsolete as the problem
was
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 3 09:51:48 +
2007 ---
I fixed this for issue 84019.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 3 10:29:58 +
2007 ---
*LOL*. So where is this solutions different from mine except that it allows you
to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 3 11:21:02 +
2007 ---
flr: re LOL: The difference is not a different concept, but that JL
implemented a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 3 11:29:58 +
2007 ---
And suddenly there are
a) no security concerns?
b) no use zip exec flags etc?
Why
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 3 12:29:39 +
2007 ---
flr: I really suggest you to (again) read the things that were said in this
issue
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
User thb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 14 15:04:53 +
2007 ---
flr: As I wrote on May 21, there is nothing to do for me. If you extend your
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 14 15:38:11 +
2007 ---
flr-kso: Hmmm --- got it wrong then. Thought we would work together on this...
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
User flr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 27 15:48:00 +
2007 ---
To prevent frustration among patch writers, all issues of type
PATCH are monitored
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
User kso changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
User jl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
User flr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 10 14:32:03 +
2007 ---
kso-flr: exec flag gets lost. A problem with the zlib we're using? Will check
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
User kso changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 10 14:52:57 +
2007 ---
Kind of:
a) we still need to get rid of the warning message in case of unknown
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 10 15:02:31 +
2007 ---
executable=true only sets the user exec flag (never others or all)
which leaves
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 10 15:09:44 +
2007 ---
kso-flr: If there is no manifest entry for a file contained in the package,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 10 15:19:04 +
2007 ---
Regarding security: I'm not an expert here, but my proposed solution does not
have
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 24 07:41:16 +
2007 ---
KSO-FLR: Please provide the missing bits of information.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 24 07:48:17 +
2007 ---
flr-kso: To the best of my knowledge .ZIPs can't store UNIX flags.
Have you ever
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 24 09:08:58 +
2007 ---
KSO-FLR: I used zip 2.31 / unzip 5.52 on openSuSE 10.2 and it seems to handle
UN*X
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73301
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
30 matches
Mail list logo