To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
User clu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
--- Additional comments from a...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 9 10:50:04 +
2009 ---
*** Issue 105719 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
User r4zoli changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Wed Oct 7 08:28:37 +
2009 ---
*** Issue 105671 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
User r4zoli changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Wed Oct 7 08:52:42 +
2009 ---
Sigh. There have been build problems with m61, which have been discovered only
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
User clu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
User sba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
User kla changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Tue Sep 22 10:28:30 +
2009 ---
just for the record: this bug breaks the following unoapi tests:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
--- Additional comments from c...@openoffice.org Mon Sep 21 15:48:40 +
2009 ---
additional qa comment: save db file with a dev300m58 (or corresponding cws
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
User mav changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 17 09:17:13 +
2009 ---
mhu-mav: Indeed, the setSize() implementation is insufficient, stupid me :-(
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
User mhu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
User mav changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 16 07:11:47 +
2009 ---
The only suspicious change is the fix for issue 103266 ( that is quite similar
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 16 07:23:43 +
2009 ---
Yes, I think so, too. I explicitly checked CWS dba32f, where issue 103266 was
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 16 08:06:39 +
2009 ---
According to svn, the package and storage source code integrated in DEV300_m58
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 16 08:15:16 +
2009 ---
Interestingly, the same does *not* hold for module dbaccess - it differs
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 16 08:21:24 +
2009 ---
hmm, found no suspicious code change at all in dbaccess
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 16 08:29:29 +
2009 ---
the only other CWS which touched dbaccess in m58 is dbaperf3 - there, the bug
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 16 08:52:24 +
2009 ---
At the moment the document has been created, but not yet closed, the underlying
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 16 09:15:42 +
2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=64783)
high-level log fil
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 16 09:25:48 +
2009 ---
The problem is that the stream is not truncated on rewriting for any reason. So
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 16 09:27:22 +
2009 ---
fs-mav: See the attached log file for what happens on the DBDoc-level,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 16 09:31:06 +
2009 ---
One more interesting observation: If I completely omit step 2.1, then the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 16 09:52:01 +
2009 ---
note: omitting 2.1.1.2 and 4.1.2, i.e. the superfluous commits of the root
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 16 10:48:35 +
2009 ---
I will commit a patch to CWS dba33a which prevents the superfluous commits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
User mav changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 16 20:19:37 +
2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=64805)
mav-mhu: The patch seems to fix the problem,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
Issue #|105082
Summary|Newly created empty database not opens
Component|Database access
Version|DEV300m58
33 matches
Mail list logo
