WARNING: Unsanitized content follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 14. November 2003 16:31 schrieb Takashi Iwai:
> At Fri, 14 Nov 2003 15:11:22 +,
>
> Mark Hubbard wrote:
> > On Friday 14 Nov 2003 13:20, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > as a future plan, we'll define dmix
Hello,
I'm having troubles with recent alsa releases (newer than 0.9.6). I
first suffered the bugs explained later on 2.6 test kernels, so i
thought it was smply a 2.6 bug. Tonight the 0.9.8 alsa packages made
their paths into debian SID so i compiled the kernel part for my usual
2.4.22 kernel and
Hello. What is the latest status of Creative/emu10k1 support?
I have Alsa driver where the LiveDrive Line-In2 ("Line LiveDrive 1")
on capture bus does not work. We checked the case with Alsa developers
but the problem remained. A quick look at the Alsa-Devel archives
reveals that others have had t
At Fri, 14 Nov 2003 15:11:22 +,
Mark Hubbard wrote:
>
> On Friday 14 Nov 2003 13:20, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > as a future plan, we'll define dmix as default for el-cheapo
> > soundcards, but e.g. not for sb live, which supports such a function
> > on hardware.
>
> And what is your definition o
On Friday 14 Nov 2003 13:20, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> as a future plan, we'll define dmix as default for el-cheapo
> soundcards, but e.g. not for sb live, which supports such a function
> on hardware.
And what is your definition of an "el-cheapo" soundcard? :)
I object to this future plan as even us
At Fri, 14 Nov 2003 14:01:09 +0100,
Peter Kirk wrote:
>
> WARNING: Unsanitized content follows.
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am Freitag, 14. November 2003 13:21 schrieb Paul Davis:
> > >So, these are two numbers - and basicly all is fine as long as you dont
> > > wan= t=2
WARNING: Unsanitized content follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 14. November 2003 13:21 schrieb Paul Davis:
> >So, these are two numbers - and basicly all is fine as long as you dont
> > wan= t=20
> >to excede them, but if you do, you need to use dmix or dsnoop. Why
>So, these are two numbers - and basicly all is fine as long as you dont wan=
>t=20
>to excede them, but if you do, you need to use dmix or dsnoop. Why not use=
>=20
>dmix and dsnoop automaticly when necessary ? Wouldnt it be possible to have=
because it would be catastrophic, or, well, at least v
