[Alsa-devel] Re: [PATCH] snd_pcm_hw_params_set_rate_near val pointer

2004-03-02 Thread Jack O';Quin
Samuel S Chessman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In building and running jack 0.94 from current tar, segfault traced to > alsa_driver at snd_pcm_hw_params_set_rate_near (line 388). > > This occurs when switching to 16 bit or starting with 16 bit (-S option) > > This is caused by snd_pcm_hw_params

Re: [Alsa-devel] 2.6.0-test11

2003-12-01 Thread Jack O';Quin
eleased in 2.6.[12345]. No one should get hung up by that. Right now, 2.6.0 needs stability. Regards, -- Jack O'Quin Austin, Texas --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more p

Re: [Alsa-devel] help for a levelmeter

2002-10-17 Thread Jack O';Quin
l meter is already available and > working. > > It's very simple to add other *-meters, scopes, etc. That's great! Is there any user-level documentation for all this cool stuff? -- Jack O'Quin Austin, Texas, USA --- Thi

Re: [Alsa-devel] removal of snd_ prefix from module options

2002-10-14 Thread Jack O';Quin
Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I would like to confirm the consensus about $SUBJECT. > Does anybody still have objections against this action? I have withdrawn my objections. Compatibility with de facto kernel standards is a good reason to make this change. --

Re: [Alsa-devel] snd_ prefix for module options

2002-10-12 Thread Jack O';Quin
> On 11 Oct 2002, Jack O'Quin wrote: > > Are you saying that the "snd_" prefix violates standard Linux > > kernel rules for device driver options? Did the kernel developers > > request this change? Jaroslav Kysela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: &g

Re: [Alsa-devel] snd_ prefix for module options

2002-10-11 Thread Jack O';Quin
> Jack O'Quin wrote: > > Can someone please explain what terrible problem we're trying to solve > > that justifies introducing *any* breakage at all? > > > ALSA is part of the 2.5 kernel now. It is mainstream Linux software, > > good technology, neede

Re: [Alsa-devel] snd_ prefix for module options

2002-10-10 Thread Jack O';Quin
se days. Since 0.5, which *is* a release, is "no longer supported", what are ordinary users expected to run? OSS? ALSA is part of the 2.5 kernel now. It is mainstream Linux software, good technology, needed by many users. Isn't

Re: [Alsa-devel] Why do I get broken pipe on write to a pcm in statePREPARED?

2002-10-09 Thread Jack O';Quin
g, so even this may be an improvement. The proposal permits appropriately programmed applications to do something useful. This behavior conforms to both the letter and spirit of the X/Open standard, as far as I can see. So, I think the change *should* be made, even at this late stage of the rele

Re: [Alsa-devel] snd_ prefix for module options

2002-10-09 Thread Jack O';Quin
people to hassle with fixing something that's not broken in the first place. Regards, -- Jack O'Quin Austin, Texas, USA --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf

Re: [Alsa-devel] Forward: Re: questions for alsa-devel

2002-10-02 Thread Jack O';Quin
Matthias Saou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > All this will get so much easier once stable kernels used by Linux > distributions come with ALSA by default ;-) Sure will. Providing we stay focused on maintaining binary compatibility... :-) -- Jack O'Quin Austin,

Re: [Alsa-devel] new "in-compatible" alsa-lib PCM API

2002-09-19 Thread Jack O';Quin
don't do this"), and not in the broader meanings of "obstructive" or "pessimistic". You're doing an important job, and we all appreciate it. Regards, -- Jack O'Quin Austin, Texas, USA http://www.stellajazz.com ---

Re: [Alsa-devel] new "in-compatible" alsa-lib PCM API

2002-09-18 Thread Jack O';Quin
or rc3 compatible library and add an > autoconfiguration code to alsa.m4. My suggestion is to use /opt/alsa/rc3 > directory for this job. Comments? -- Jack O'Quin Austin, Texas, USA http://www.stellajazz.com --- This SF.NET email is

Re: [Alsa-devel] new "in-compatible" alsa-lib PCM API

2002-09-17 Thread Jack O';Quin
tions in future. The compatible library >will be built when '--with-compat-rc3' argument is passed to the >configure script in alsa-lib. This solution allows keeping binary >compatibility and allows to update alsa-lib with recent one (built > without --with-